i don't mean to repeat the same questions ad nauseam, but i think we've reached a point of nauseam some time yesterday. i do have questions based on some things you said previously and i want to add for clarification, there's a question about these e-mails that i think they claim describing withholding the aid comes from someone on capitol hill. is that true? >> sir, are you preferring to my statement today? >> i believe this is previou, a question we've had previous. >> i'm sorry. i don't think i have enough information to make an assessment. is it from a particular page in deposition? >> there was communications with you by someone by the foreign affairs -- >> that there may have been communications with me? >> e-mails with you. >> sir, i am not aware. >> okay. thank you. for clarification, as well, someone may have asked you or from the ukrainian embassy about the withholding of aid. is that true? did you hear from them? >> sir, i testified earlier that the communication from the ukrainian embassy was to my staff and my staff mentioned this to me after my deposition. the only specifi

of the big announcements are already known, we know the brexit one that will be hammered home ad nauseam,000 more police officers and six new hospitals. the other bits and pieces are undercharged far, cash to fill in potholes for example and money to ensure that nurses working overnight don‘t have to pay for car parking charges. decent policies but not really game changes. what we have this morning instead is a defensive announcement from the tories that they will not put up the key tax rates. vat, national insurance and income tax. the policy was hammered home by the chancellor sajid javid. we are clear that we want to help people with the cost of living wherever we can. well, we are very clear. we want to help people with the cost of living where ever we can. earlier this week, we set out our plans to cut taxes, cut national insurance for 31 million people, helping the lowest pay is. it‘s not going to add up. well, if i answer the question about the tax lock, i will show you exactly how it adds up. we are also announcing today this, as you say, the triple tax lock which is our commitme

if she was breaking the law of course, we heard ad nauseam, ad infinitum about the stupid emails, but i'm just saying as someone who has seen this before, let me tell you, trouble is coming. they will not lose three democrats on impeachment vote. if you look at the way these senators are acting sean, you have a big role to play here. you've got to bring some strategy to this. you cannot put mick mulvaney on tv. god's sake, nobody likes him. that's not good. could you imagine in the middle of all this, david kendall is gallivanting around with two goons? y'all got to get a team in place. see all these pro-trump people here? they want you to fight back. they want you to get organized. they want you to take it to them, not fooling around with broad guarantee and all that stuff. these guys are ready to fight. you got to give them some leadership. >> do you agree with that premise? do you think the house will impeach trump? >> i think there's a strong likelihood they impeach, the senate will not convict, and donald trump will be reelected. >> i will tell you the other thing i actually had

we make a lot of policy recommendations throughout the year and rather than list them all ad nauseam, we try and highlight those that related most relevant to the work of the things that we've been discussing over the past year and i want to make a note, this is a new thing and we're putting them online either from the commission or from the community people can go onto the website to track and see what those recommendations have been in the past and what they are currently. that's on page 14 and 15 and there's a link to those policy recommendations. there's a summary on page 17 of the audit and i think you guys are going to be getting a presentation about where we are with the audit again over the next few months and on page 20, we'll talk about the overview of the pacific bridge partner and the work tonight so they are here following this presentation. on page 20 and 21, page 22, talks about the training. i just want to articulate the training stuff. it's really important. when i came to d.p.a. the training budget was $4,000. that's -- there is an opportunity for improvements there.

. >> neil: two ad nauseam. >> you could have show trials if you want.ld do a lot of damage. >> neil: thank you guys very much. i might point out that that all of these rich guys -- when it comes to their giving pledge, including bill gates and warren buffett, they have decided that they would give to the gates foundation or these other private efforts that they feel can be more constructive than the government to a man and woman, what they seem to be saying as, when we leave this earth, we certainly are not going to leave it to washington paid we are going to leave it to better hands. a little more after this. this, and even this. but i don't have to clean this, because the self-cleaning brush roll removes hair while i clean. - [announcer] shark, the vacuum that deep cleans now cleans itself. we're portuguese? i thought we were hungarian. can you tell me that story again? behind every question is a story waiting to be discovered. this holiday, start the journey with a dna kit from ancestry. >> neil: twitter employees are being accused of helping saudi a

we talked about ad nauseam he had a political bias against trump.e was working for hillary clinton's opposition research firm. he had a deadline. he had on cooperated information that could've been russiania misinformation. but here's another thing that the fbi struggled with, and that is that he had the private intelligence clients. sometimes when he is talking to the fbi and the statefb state department officials, he is getting information from w tm that he sells to his clients. i have the anecdote right in the "times" when he is talking with bruce ohr, remember his buddy at the department? christopher steele since the dossier to the lawyer for ukraine oligarch, the guy is under indictment. his lawyers trying to help him themawyers trying to help him information about the u.s. government and sources are telling him about the case in the u.s. priority is in ukraine. these are the sort of things at the fbi has not been held to account. and we will learn a lot more about christopher steele. he will be the star witness or the star figure when the fisa

i don't mean to repeat the same ad nauseam, but i think we reached a point of nauseam sometime yesterday or sometime ago. it is repetitive here and forgive me for doing that. miss cooper i do have some questions based on some things you said previously. clarification, there is a question about these emails where i think they claimed withholding the aid that had come from the capital or someone on the foreign affairs committee. true? >> sir, are you referring to my statement today or something? >> i think this was previous questioning. are you aware of such an email? >> i'm sorry i don't have enough information to make an assessment. is it from a particular page from my deposition? >> no. it's reporting that we've heard that there was communications with someone on the foreign affairs committee on the hill. is that not true? >> that there may have been communications with me? >> emails. >> sir, i'm not aware. >> ok, thank you. >> ok, thank you. four carefully occasioned -- for clarification as well, somebody may have asked you from the crane in embassy about withholding aid. is that true?

if you read through the transcripts and we've been reading them, that statement was discussed ad nauseamough the regular channel with regards to ukraine. the efforts from some in the administration to push president zelensky and top advisers to release a public statement read by zelensky that would talk about opening investigations into burisma, into hunter biden and also 2016 allegations, unsubstantiated meddling and that is mentioned in the pentagon and seen it repeatedly over the democrats and here is another element as democrats continue to try to paint the broad picture that we'll see spill out into a broad public matter on thursday and friday. >> and i know you want to keep look through the transcript. what you said is important. we get transcripts and they are bombarded by details what it means big picture correct me if i'm wrong is another official corroborating the events going on that made -- that made the democrats say that this is impeachable, meaning a quid pro quo. >> reporter: look, the most -- and i'll make this quick. the most important thing to pick out of the transcrip

long time and there's very little end in sight to the spirit >> neil: china cannot let this go on ad nauseame they approving and upping the ante to get in the protesters face? >> that is occurring. i think the one thing beijing cannot do. we think they can come up with the one thing they can't do is to openly deploy the people's armed police or people nations armed troops to hong kong. >> neil: what if they are discussed? >> in the hong kong police, there are mainland people from china. i don't speak cantonese in a cantonese speaking city. they are speaking mandarin. they are addressed by other policemen as comrades. there are mixed in with the hong kong police. on a side point, the very destructive and violent tactics of the hong kong police of discipline occurred when i think the chinese started to put their people into the hong kong police force in hong kong uniforms. the people knew it pretty quickly. they were not speaking cantonese. so then you start to see these videos. and it is conclusive now that beijing is operating on the streets of hong kong with its own people. >> neil: does th

i don't mean to repeat the same questions at nauseam, but we reached it yesterday or some time ago. it's some repepative hearing. i do have some questions and i want to add for clarification there's a question about these e-mails that i think they described withholding the aid and they had come from capitol hill or from someone on the foreign affairs committee. is that true? >> sir, are you referring to my statement today or something previous? >> i believe this is previous, a question we had previous. e had s >> is that not true? >> that there may have been communications with me? >> yes. >> sir, i'm not aware. >> thank you. and for clarification as well, someone may have asked you or queried you from the ukrainian embassy about the withholding of aid. is that true? did you hear from them in. >> sir, i testified earlier the communication from the crukrainn embassy was to my staff. and the staff mentioned this to me after the deposition. i believe it was on september 5th at a reception at the ukrainian embassy. >> was that just a query generally about the forthcoming aid or was it s

released a statement on the upcoming treat says the meeting is set and it has been covered at ad nauseamvents because they have fantastic service and secure spaces that fit our needs. according to the "washington post," doral provides trump $75 million in revenue per year. but has fallen in profits by 69% since trump entered politics in 2015. >> let's get to that story about the wall. sources telling nbc news, the white house is preparing court filings to begin taking over private land to build trump's long-promised border wall. the administration has been touting 78 miles of quote new wall along the southern border but it turns out that number is just replacement wall. watch this. >> how many miles of wall has been constructed, not wall that is replacing old wall, but new wall has been built to this point? >> so 78 miles of new wall has been built. >> so much of that obviously is replacing wall that formally existed, the president said was insufficient. how many miles of wall now exist where there was no wall whatsoever. >> so again, my response to that is every mile of wall that's bein

. >> ad nauseam and these were things they tried to do to get the president to refocus the job at hanthe refuses to do that. yesterday at the hearings, stephanie grisham insisted the president didn't watch any of it and he's busy doing his job and the president sent about 30 tweets in a single day and proceeded to talk at the press conference for quite a bit of the time about the impeachment inquiry. so it's kind of a lost cause at this point. >> thank you all very much. next, police interviewing the relatives of the latest deadly school shooting suspect. what was the motive and the 11th hour, the democratic field of presidential candidates. guess, what everybody? it just got bigger today. >> replacing that with our own better version of division is not the ultimate solution. >> deval patrick, former governor of massachusetts have a chance? (alarm beeping) welcome to our busy world. where we all want more energy. but with less carbon footprint. can we have both? at bp, we're working every day to make energy that's cleaner and better. and we see possibilities everywhere. to make energy

so on wednesday, we can expect to hear republicans introduce hunter biden's name ad nauseam to give the effect of basically launching the kind of investigation in that hearing room that democrats allege president trump wanted ukrainian officials to launch into the bidens. but republicans will have their work cut out for them on wednesday and friday and here's why. a democratic source familiar told me that these hearings are intentionally choreographed so even if the american people tune in for just the first hour, they will have heard plenty. that's what i was told by a democratic source familiar. that the -- that the first hour is designed to be a bombshell. and these hearings will look different than from any other congressional hearing the people have seen to this point because the first 45 minutes, adam schiff, the democratic leader of the house intelligence committee, will be able to make the case. he will be able to pursue lines of inquiry with both witnesses that would be different and longer than a traditional congressional hearing where you might have a lawmaker have five minut

ad nauseam. great to see you at the bloomberg news economy form. stephen king, senior economic advisor at hsbc. nejra: onto another key interview from the new economy forum, the deputy finance minister of germany tells us there should be progress on the banking union by december. >> we are still very fragmented within the single baking markets -- banking markets. the goal of the european union is to have single markets for all goods and services. we still need to move a lot to get that done for banking services. >> does that mean it is almost impossible to have something substantial by december? >> i think we will make progress by december. our position that has just been published, so we are still debating a lot of the impulses that we gave. i think it is a less -- less of a question of whether we will have something definitively agreed in the next two or three weeks. i think the key thing is that there will be progress soon. we aim to see first results in december. >> what are some of the concessions that have led to where we are now? >> i mean,

we've heard our democratic colleagues say ad nauseam that impeachment will not interfere with their ability to legislate, that the evidence -- but the evidence suggests otherwise. what americans want is action. what americans want is for us to do our job. and we can give them what they want by allowing legislation we know has a chance of becoming law, like my drug pricing bill, like the debbie smith act, like the violence against women act come to the floor, get passed, and sent to the president. that would be doing our job, and i believe that is what our constituents want from each of us, not this singleminded obsession with impeachment that started the day the president was sworn into office here less than a year before the next election. madam president, i yield the floor and i -- well, i would yield the floor. ms. ernst: madam president? the presiding officer: the senator from 00 with a. ms. ernst: before i start talking about this topic today, i do want to thank the senior senator from texas for your remarks on the violence against women act and the debbie smith act. i think it is vita

we talked about it ad nauseam over last 18 months particularly. the fact of the matter it helped dim sentiment among the business communities unlike levels outside recessions would see. levels of pessimism in the business community. if we talk ourselves into recession if things don't break postively, coming out of this phase one negotiation effort that would hopefully culminate here in the next month or so obviously the other is some kind of a retaliatory response on either party allegedly iran or saudi arabia or some proxies around oil prices that could you know, spike to you know, triple digits which would be obviously unwelcome event which would trip up consumer spending which has been principal support of economic activity not only in the u.s. but oil consuming nations as well at a time when global growth needs to be steadying but still is very fragile. neil: mark, always good catching up with you. mark luschini janney investment strategist out of pittsburgh. >>> "medicare for all" with no middle class tax hike at all. elizabeth warren's plan

we have debated ad nauseam the constitution's place in civil and legal discourse asking does it provide a workable standard or is it just an outdated piece of paper now rendered illegitimate by the male whiteness of its drafters. mr. president, i think you know my response. we defend the constitution and the system of government it created because we know from studying history and from observing current events that freedom does not suddenly expire. freedom begins to witter the -- wither the moment those in power convince themselves that a reprieve from uncomfortable policy debates over speech, self-defense, or the size of government will be worth the risk of shelving the standards that protect individual liberty. the current blase tolerance and in some cases incomprehensible enthusiasm for socialism and other authoritarian philosophies is sending a strong message to the rest of the world that the standard for global freedom is up for debate. if we acquiesce to the argument that america's founding principles have passed their expiration date, we will have failed as a people and as a worl