that was howard jones talking to paul carter.address the concerns of those who may still be undecided, we have come to this rooftop in london to take some measurements from a 56 transmitter. and we have drafted in some independent experts to help. dr richard findlay is an electromagnetic field safety specialist, and he's going to be measuring the strength and frequency of the radio waves at different distances from the mast. so, first we're going to put the probe right up on the middle of the transmitter. yes. the middle, coming down... and your maximum reading was...? 550. 551.6%. so basically, if you were to strap yourself to that transmitter, three metres up there, you would be getting five times the guidelines. yes, you would be overexposed. ok, but nobody‘s going to do that. no. ok, so should we go over there? what would you say, two or three metres in that direction and see how the signal drops off? yep. there we go. wow. 14.5. so even over the last distance, we have gone down by a factor of, what is that? that's more than

that was howard jones talking to paul carter.address the concerns of those who may still be undecided, we have come to this rooftop in london to ta ke have come to this rooftop in london to take some measurements from a 56 transmitter. and we have drafted in some independent experts to help. doctor richard findlay is an electromagnetic field safety specialists, and he is going to be measuring the strength and frequency of the radio waves at different distances from the mast. so, first we are going to put the probe write—up on the middle of the transmitter. yes. 0k. the middle, coming down... the maximum reading was...? 550. 551.696. so basically, if you were to strap yourself to that transmitter, three metres up there, you would be getting five times the guidelines. yes, you would be overexposed. 0k, times the guidelines. yes, you would be overexposed. ok, but nobody's going to do that. no. so should we going to do that. no. so should we go over there? what would you say, two or three metres in that direction and see how the sign

that was howard jones talking to paul carter.concerns of those who may still be undecided, we have come to this rooftop in london to take some measurements from a 56 transmitter. and we have drafted in some independent experts to help. dr richard findlay is an electromagnetic field safety specialist, and he's going to be measuring the strength and frequency of the radio waves at different distances from the mast. so, first we're going to put the probe right up on the middle of the transmitter. yes. 0k. the middle, coming down... the maximum reading was...? 550. 551.6%. so basically, if you were to strap yourself to that transmitter, three metres up there, you would be getting five times the guidelines. yes, you would be overexposed. ok, but nobody‘s going to do that. no. so should we go over there? what would you say, two or three metres in that direction and see how the signal drops off? yep. there we go. wow. 14.5. so even over the last distance, we have gone down by a factor of, what is that? that's more than 50 times? 550 dow

that was howard jones talking to paul carter.an electromagnetic field safety specialist, and he‘s going to be measuring the strength and frequency of the radio waves at different distances from the mast. so, first, we‘re going to put the probe right up on the middle of the transmitter. yes. 0k. let‘s go. the middle, coming down... and your maximum reading was...? 550. 551.6%. so basically, if you were to strap yourself to that transmitter, three metres up there, you‘d be getting five times the guidelines. yes, you‘d be overexposed. ok, but nobody‘s going to do that. no. ok, so shall we go over there? what would you say, two or three metres in that direction, and see how the signal drops off? yep. there we go. oh, wow! 14.5. so even over that distance, we‘ve gone from — we‘ve gone down by a factor of, what is that? that‘s more than 50 times? yeah, 550 down to 14.5, so... 0k, down to less than a fifth of the government safety guidelines. yes. right, time to try and make sense of those readings with physicist and cancer researcher d

that was howard jones talking to paul carter.try and address the concerns of those who may still be undecided, we have come to this rooftop in london to take some measurements from a 56 transmitter. and we have drafted in some independent experts to help. dr richard findlay is an electromagnetic field safety specialist, and he's going to be measuring the strength and frequency of the radio waves at different distances from the mast. so, first we're going to put the probe right up on the middle of the transmitter. so even over the last distance, we have gone down by a factor of, what is that? that's more than 50 times? 550 down to 14.5, so... down to less than a fifth of the government safety guidelines. yes. right. time to try and make sense of those readings with physicist and cancer researcher david grimes. so, we have seen there that the power drops off really, really quickly, as you move away from the transmitter. absolutely, and that is what you would expect. as you get further and further away from a source of light, which

this is paul carter. hello. hello. you have been looking at some of the latest prosthetics for us.na prosthetics for us. and you started in a place that seems pretty nonobvious to me. that's right. they went to reykjavik in iceland and i went to reykjavik in iceland and i went to reykjavik in iceland and i went to see the manufacturing process and the story behind the iconic running late, the prostatic running blade which is now synonymous with paralympic sport. what people may not realise that there is a huge amount of research and design which goes into making the blades, but also developing them and testing them to make them but in the future. you have got a pair of blades yourself. i do. the future. you have got a pair of blades yourself. ido. i'm the future. you have got a pair of blades yourself. i do. i'm very much a non— paralympian. i'm not really built for running. so we decided to leave this one up to the professionals. here at the headquarters of the prosthetics company in iceland. they have gathered a team of serious paralympic athletes for some even more serious testi

that was howard jones talking to paul carter.st, we're going to put the probe right up on the middle of the transmitter. yes. 0k. let's go. the middle, coming down... and your maximum reading was...? 550. 551.6%. so basically, if you were to strap yourself to that transmitter, three metres up there, you'd be getting five times the guidelines. yes, you'd be overexposed. ok, but nobody‘s going to do that. no. ok, so shall we go over there? what would you say, two or three metres in that direction, and see how the signal drops off? yep. there we go. oh, wow! 14.5. so even over the last distance, we've gone from — we've gone down by a factor of, what is that? that's more than 50 times? yeah, 550 down to 14.5, so... ok, down to less than a fifth of the government safety guidelines. yes. right, time to try and make sense of those readings with physicist and cancer researcher david grimes. so, we have seen there that the power drops off really, really quickly as you move away from the transmitter. absolutely, and that is what you would

paul: justice department. >> office legal counsel opinions, bipartisan, both administrations, jimmy carter, bill clint clintonsh, court opinion in dc during the george w. bush's administration that was eventually settled, so there really wasn't any dc circuit to underlay this decision. paul: bill, i think it goes to the supreme court. >> makes them kind of extraordinary claims and absolutist claim and you would think the supreme court will not defer on this. paul: basically says any time congress subpoenas a close adviser to the president chief of staff or somebody intimately they have to go up there. >> they have to go up there. enormous change in this, i think the people court will. the interesting thing, democrats want this but we don't really want this, we will move full steam ahead no matter what, democrats are saying, we will leave it to the senate trial and we will hope that roberts compels mcgahn, the majority of senators can overrule roberts, all the wild cards tucked in because of artificial deadline to get this done before christmas. paul: we already know from robert mueller report what mcgahn prob

and here was carter in one of his most courageous decisions -- he appointed paul volcker to head the fed, knowing he was going to choke the economy, raise interest rates, raise unemployment to deal with this embedded in inflation and carter said to us, i don't want my legacy to be perpetual high inflation, even if it means my reelection. the hostage crisis the main reason carter lost reelection? would you say yes, no, or is compensated. guest: i would say yes, but the risen economic impact. absolutely it was humiliating the superpower could not get john and his colleagues released after 444 days. in by the way, we had several agreements with his prime minister and each time khomeini would veto it. in my opinion, yes, it was the prime reason and the hostage rescue became a matter for for the failure to get the hostages out. that was the thread, in my opinion, that led to his overwhelming defeat, but the ,oint i was also making, steve iranian -- there was a to mystic economic impact oil.ing down iranian host: we will talk about the rescue section in a moment. let's go to phil. of the ci

and here was carter in one of his most courageous decisions -- he appointed paul volcker to head the fed, knowing he was going to choke the economy, raise interest rates, raise unemployment to deal with this embedded in inflation and carter said to us, i don't want my legacy to be perpetual high inflation, even if it means my reelection. the hostage crisis the main reason carter lost reelection? would you say yes, no, or is compensated. guest: i would say yes, but the risen economic impact. absolutely it was humiliating the superpower could not get john and his colleagues released after 444 days. in by the way, we had several agreements with his prime minister and each time khomeini would veto it. in my opinion, yes, it was the prime reason and the hostage rescue became a matter for for the failure to get the hostages out. that was the thread, in my opinion, that led to his overwhelming defeat, but the ,oint i was also making, steve iranian -- there was a to mystic economic impact oil.ing down iranian host: we will talk about the rescue section in a moment. let's go to phil. of the ci

and here was carter in one of his most courageous decisions -- he appointed paul volcker to head the knowing he was going to choke the economy, raise interest rates, raise unemployment to deal with this embedded in inflation and carter said to us, i don't want my legacy to be perpetual high inflation, even if it means my reelection. the hostage crisis the main reason carter lost reelection? would you say yes, no, or is compensated. guest: i would say yes, but the risen economic impact. absolutely it was humiliating the superpower could not get john and his colleagues released after 444 days. in by the way, we had several agreements with his prime minister and each time khomeini would veto it. in my opinion, yes, it was the prime reason and the hostage rescue became a matter for for the failure to get the hostages out. that was the thread, in my opinion, that led to his overwhelming defeat, but the ,oint i was also making, steve iranian -- there was a to mystic economic impact oil.ing down iranian host: we will talk about the rescue section in a moment. let's go to phil. of the cia wa

paul: kim, if you look back in history democrats have a tendency to fall in love with these outsiders and it often works well for them with jimmy carterne knew where he was nationally and build clinton came out of arkansas, barack obama first-term senator and they all one. maybe democrats - they tend to fall in love with this new, young charismatic person. is that what is going on here? >> i was just going to say pete buttigieg reminds me of barack obama. look at all the negatives, little name recognition, to some extent, a lack of experience but also at the same time this uniting message. i would wager most people cannot tell you what pete buttigieg policy proposals are but he is roderick and he speaks very well and talks about bring people together and democrats do love that. right now kyle's analysis of some of his weaknesses are very true but it's also the case that if he were to win iowa and then new hampshire he will get a big second look in those fall along states and it could be enough to propel him. there is a real shot for the s sky. paul: one thing that struck me at the debate as he got a free pass until kelsey gabbard took