in 2014 they began a project to ask residents to reflect what the bucan ma mall means to them. this collaboration with the studio for public spaces and partner trust for public land, there was a collaboration that resulted in some temporary gardens and gateways. the community activated these temporary installations with events and celebrations and at those gatherings over the course of a couple years, people were informed about envisioning and invited to participate in a series of meetings and events. it was a robust process that went to the vision plan. then in 2019, having clear goal the vision plan, rec and park began the formal concept design process looks at the buchanan street mall as a whole. with community events and presentations and over 1,000 surveys conducted. the goals were to connect the blocks, have social exchange and engagement and interaction and gardens and play and recreation. the communities invested a lot of time and resources to get to this point and are really looking forward to capital investment in their neighborhood. i have been talking about backgrou

concerned around how the walls at the edge of the street are not conducive to what they see at the bucanan mall where there is a lot of engagement. it fits under the code with an active use requirement under 145 and the special area with the 8.1 to how that active use and engagement should be done. i am curious to hear if you have more specific detail around the qualities how that could be accomplished. >> sometimes with guidelines you need to have more specific to it. i just thought that might be just a little hint to the owners of that facility. last question would be -- somewhere in there it talks about from the community point of view that having these guidelines would reduce their need to attend hearings and object to projects. wasn't that somewhere in here? i don't see how that is going to happen. these guidelines are not that specific. >> from is some question, particularly with the unintended burdens of the design guidelines, whether it encourages more interaction with the community and more hearing with the community. some might see it as a public benefit. the burden to certain