here in the heart of moscow respond to russia analyst martin mccauley and a security expert charles shoebridge for their thoughts on the attack. nobody in his right mind would take an a k $47.00. 10 to get into the lubyanka and start firing at the gods he's bound to be killed he knew that he could have gone into any restroom and floated as many people as he liked but that was not his objective he just wanted to kill those associated with the secret service is now the f.s.b. and if he killed one blue he would then say they have achieved my objective because i would be killed as well given the target appears to have been dispiriting obviously so publicly links with the security services in the states and given the timing on the almost the anniversary of. the security forces day. be quite strong indications as to the motivation assuming that the gunman is a rational act this attack i think taken place against a more soft target which is usually the case with more explicit overt terrorist acts then you would have expected i think far more casualties to have resulted. in the e.u. and moscow have sl

is being kept in the loop of this attack right here in the heart of moscow security analyst charles shoebridge outlined where he thinks things could go from here. they've said that from according to reports that nobody else was involved in this attack they will want to be sure that nobody else was actually involved in any planning aspects or in terms of assisting the government and that may take some time for example the examination of mobile phone records of any c.c.t.v. records and of course any. e-mails communications and so on that might be held on the suspect's computers and elsewhere and of course that would require house searches and so on but the fact is i think. even if you were going to have the most benign government the most benign state in any country or what you will get some people. seem to have a sense of that just one of them because of policy because of instance or background or the circumstances of their own personal lives. 3 and a half years after the british people voted for the u.k. to leave the european union 3 prime ministers later and for briggs it deals with checked b

here in the heart of moscow we spoke to russia analyst martin mccauley and a security expert charles shoebridge for their thoughts on the attack. he had he was obviously extremely antigun nosed by something that happened probably to his family. his friends or somebody else because nobody in his right mind. i tend to get into the lubyanka and start firing at the guards he's bound to be killed lou that could have done to any restaurant in florida as many people as you like but that was not his objective he just wanted to kill those associated with the secret service is now the official tree and if you killed one blue he would then say that i have achieved my objective because i would be killed as well given that the target appears to have been dispiriting obviously so publicly linked with the security services in the state and given the timing on the almost up to the anniversary of. the security forces day those would be quite strong indications as to the motivation assuming that the government is a rational actor had this attack i think taken place against a more soft target which is usually the

kept in the loop of this attack right here in the heart of moscow think you're the analyst charles shoebridge outline for us where he thinks things can go from here well other place in the security services will be looking really to establish 2 aspects of this is an absolute priority the 1st of course is the identity of this person and they may well already know that and of course will give a very good and a very strong indication i think of what they were to vacation in this case was what it was political or person or indeed some other aspect that was driving the motivation here and 2nd of course even though they've said it's from according to reports that nobody else was involved in this attack they will want to be sure that nobody else was actually involved in any planning aspects or in terms of assisting the government and that may take some time for example the examination of mobile phone records of any c.c.t.v. records and of course any. the mouse communications and so on that might be held on the suspects computers and elsewhere and of course that would require how such and so on but t