this is talking about who jeremy corbyn is, spent time with before jeremy adams from sinn fein backede had and all that stuff is part of the narrative which is which is would you risk your country in safety with this man. there is a question ofjudgement safety with this man. there is a question of judgement and safety with this man. there is a question ofjudgement and when it comes back to this sort of atrocity and attack, actually we need our prime minister to be a statesman, we don‘t need him to be the sizing it and off the back of a weekend where insta ntly, and off the back of a weekend where instantly, he went on the attack and started blaming it on labour, tab this sort of intervention that again plays into politicising, it‘s kind of crass and they were always going to go on the attack with this but it‘s about timing and a time we expect them to be acting like a prime minister, a statesman, to be laying crass, dirty, gutter politics feels unbecoming. but on the front page we have so little on the context in which this is said. there is no reference being made which is why i'm sa

we have heard from borisjohnson, adam pryce of the plaid cymru and nicola sturgeon of the snp and nigel farage from the brexit party and we hope jeremyn willjoin us tomorrow. welcomejo swinson. jeremy corbyn willjoin us tomorrow. welcome jo swinson. good to be here. do you enjoy the opportunity to take questions directly from people? absolutely. i think it is really important. let's start with jan in deptford. what would you like to ask? i would like to know what do you think is the price of the national sovereignty, what do you think it means? jan, i think that it is important our sovereignty, what do you think it means? i think that we have a united kingdom that we can be proud of and i also think that we managed to do better for the thing we wa nt managed to do better for the thing we want in this country if we work closely with other countries. and i think that is true for scotland, england, wales and northern ireland coming together as a united kingdom andi coming together as a united kingdom and i also think it is true of the united kingdom working with 27 other countries in the european union and iimagine countries in the euro

adam marshall. thank you for joining us. stocks are soaring. because ofw if it is the victory of boris johnson or if it is because the specter of jeremy corbyn isof significantly higher taxes is not what we are going to be seeing from the next government. businesses also want to see more detail from the conservatives now that they have won this landslide victory. there were not a lot of details. francine: what do they want to know specifically? the relationship between the u.k. and the eu? think it is a mixture of domestic and international priorities. businesses need more information. they are leaving on the 31st of january -- it is about future trading conditions we will face. will it be a loose relationship or a tighter relationship? those are the kinds of questions we get day in and day out from companies around the u.k. we need to raise skill levels in this country domestically. we also have to cut the cost of doing business. we have to make it attractive for investors to pile back into the u.k. relief ismuch of a the loss of jeremy corbyn and john make donald --john mcdonald? we heard jeremy corbyn and mcdonald talking about radical manif

adam schiff is at the base of that. >> you mentioned the fisa report that came out yesterday. us attorney john jeremy should a stunning statement disagreeing with key tenets of the report on that, what new questions did the ig report raise to you? >> the most shocking thing was the first thing, i took pages and pages of notes about the report but the very beginning was the most shocking to me and that was the inspector general has found that this fisa investigation was predicated properly when there were three suppositions inside the initial allegations that someone thought papadopoulos had said maybe the russians were going to provide some kind of contrary information against the hillary clinton campaign. that's not proper predication to open a counterintelligence investigation against an american citizen running for president of the united states and i want to make a quick point, people are saying the inspector general concluded there was no political bias at the beginning of the investigation but in fact what he said was nobody admitted to any political bias. if you use normal common sense and inf

adam, referring to itvi. it's just itv these days. is it? yeah. 0k. i suppose you've been living abroad for some time! it's interesting, emily, the interview there from jeremy, since the question has been "why didn't when you were on with andrew neil?" that he had said sorry some months ago. and then he goes on to this morning. that was only the tail end of a longer exchange about the whole question of anti—semitism. and he got there in the end, but got there in kind of quite an aggressive way. he clearly feels angered that this question is forever chasing him around. i have to say, i find that whole exchange really bizarre. because, as you say, labour have stated repeatedly that corbyn has already apologised. so either you go into the interview thinking fresh start, and i'm going to do it again, and this is a different audience and it's a week away from the election and i will do it straight up, or else you don't do it and you say, stop banging on about this. i've already explained my position. we've done it before, i don't feel the need to pander to you. it was quite an aggressive line of questioning. "i want you to say sorry". i wonder what that achieves

adam schiff talk about, and another connected to obstruction of justice. that really relates to value volume two of the report. >> jeff, stand by i want to bring in jeremy peters. the republicans put out a memo last night basically, a minority report, they write that there is no evidence that the president had a negative apparatus. but they talked about an irregular channel. . there is really nothing this thing that acknowledges any form of wrong doing. you might say he is trying to get to some wrong doing, but there will be no acknowledgment that donald trump did anything wrong let alone impeachable. >> that is right, and that has been their posture all along. for them to concede that this president did anything wrong would be to put themselves on the wrong tide -- side. it doesn't really matter what the facts are in this case. the transcript shows president trump is saying yeah, i need you to do me a favor, though. and they said there is no quid pro quo. the facts will say one thing and the spin will say the other. and i think what is the most remarkable about this process is how if i recollefirmly that spi in the consciousness of the average trump supporter

group of people, chairman nadler, adam schiff and speaker nancy pelosi so this is what we're watching out for, to see if we get any clues today on tomorrow, fred. >> jeremy much. >>> meanwhile, the white house is refusing to take part in monday's hearing, issuing a letter in fact to the house judiciary committee attacking the inquiry as baseless and a reckless abuse of power. the chairman of the committee, jerrold nadler, responded with this statement, saying, quote, if the president has no good response to the allegations, then he would not want to appear before the committee. having declined this opportunity, he cannot claim that the process is unfair, end quote. kristen holmes is at the white house for us. kristen, explain what is the strategy here? because the white house has been saying this process is not fair. their people haven't been a part of it. and now an invitation to do so but then turning down that invite. >> reporter: yeah, that's right, fred. taking a look at this as a whole here, it appears that their strategy is not to engage, at least while these impeachment proceedings are still in the house of representatives. and this really isn't

jeremy corbyn. she says it is all to play for, 36 hours or so to go. with me now in at the studio, adamo come up to 16 seats. if those posts are not to be accurate, it would be an extraordinary result, there is the assumption have to be thatis there is the assumption have to be that is all because a brexit? at the stage, so near to the election, i think predicting an outcome in an election which is so volatile, where i think the level of doubt nows has been higher than anything i have ever experienced was that people are also very engaged, one of the surprising thing is, despite the age of a nte surprising thing is, despite the age of ante politics, people are very interested in having conversations at the doorstep. i think it will be at the doorstep. i think it will be a very long and unpredictable night. i asked about the brexit factor is because your party says that you would campaign for wales to remain in at the eu as an independent wales. you're swimming against the tide, aren't you? are wales voted to leave. well, opinion is shifting. the only way to test that is to have a full c