castigating the allies. and fdr in particular for having sold:, use lamia, hungary, romania, take your pick, having sold one of those countries down the river at yalta. that was the phrase used. -- for having sold czechoslovakia, etc.. the return of the crown of saint saintn to hungry -- stephen, the founder of the hungarian nation traditionally. it was being held in the united gary andomehow patriots smuggled it out ahead of the communists and president carter wanted to give it back to improve relations with hungary. politics in cleveland for years. leading thean was charge not to give the crown of saint stephen back to the communists. that was yalta talk for five years growing up about the captive nations of eastern europe. to argue today there is another lens through which we can and should look at yalta. it is less used. it was referred to and i will go into more detail. we could judge it a remarkable yalta'sto gauge impact on the end of the war itself. on the strategy of the allies and the war's last mo

western allied forces under allied commander eisenhower were stuck on the rhine, 300 miles away from berlin. this is where we are and here's where the western allies were at the time. and here's where the soviets were. there is a real discrepancy in who is closer to berlin. the soviet offenses had smashed their way deep in, overrunning exposed provinces of eight east prussia and the coastal province of pomerania. seizing the german capital first was thus extremely unlikely for the western allies, short of a miracle. but it was also a highly risky operation that i would argue is foreign to eisenhower's sober sense of strategy. eisenhower does take his share of risks in the war, but by and large the operations on the map is not what you would consider pulley on it -- napoleonic and the chances they take and the risk they are willing to court. there's a 1967 book by stephen ambrose, one of the fathers of this museum along with nick miller. eisenhower in berlin, 1945, the decision to halt at the elba. not driving for berlin but halting here, where the americans would eventually stop. he

better native allies for other allies but i cannot find a better set of american allies. that leaves you with the choice of did the united states organize everybody, line everybody up, challenge everybody to do better than they do and shame everybody into doing more than they do or do we step back in the hopes that others will step forward. i think dave is rightly outlined the problem with people who step forward are not going to do it on the terms that we are going to want them to do it on and it is so much less extensive to sustain largely beneficial environment that to allow it to corrode and have to reestablish it. >> [inaudible] one reason why people are stepping up more effectively in response to president in two previous presidents is because previous presidents have given mixed messages. they said you need to do more but will always be there for you and always do whatever it takes. president trump has said you need to do more and by the way, if you don't i might not be there but now suddenly everyone was like oh so there's a may be a incentive but a nuance and a s

at the time, western allied forces under allied commander eisenhower were still stuck on the rein, 300 miles away from berlin. this is where we are at the time and here is where the soviet -- sorry, i don't mean to -- sounds like the home team. here is where the western allies were at the time and here is where the soviets were. a real discrepancy in who is closer to berlin. but soviet defenses had smashed its way into the reich itself, overrunning east prussia here and the coastal province of pomerania and came to rest here on the rivers. seizing the german capital first was unlikely for the western allies but also a highly risky operation that was foreign to eisenhower's sober sense of strategy. eisenhower does take his share of risks in the war but by and large the operations on the map are not what you could consider napoleanic in the chances they take, in the risks they're willing to court. that's a little 1967 book by steven ambrose of sainted memory. steven ambrose, of course, is one of the fathers of this museum, along with our own nick mueller. he wrote a book called "eisenhow

the nato allies on - - trade them but i cannot find a better set of american allies and that leaves you with a choice does the united states challenge everybody better than they do or do we step back that others will step forward? and those who step forward will not do it on the terms we will want them to do it on. and to sustain the large the beneficial environment. >> and one reason why they are stepping out more effectively in response to president trump and you guys need to do more. and by the way if you don't do more now everybody says oh yeah. so now there is a new one sense and with that russian invasion of the european allies. and then to codified of the treaty. and i understand the desire to pay more and then with that effort to article five with that responsibilities that is designed to prevent you are encouraging russia to be far more costly to you are incredibly shortsighted. they have all said you need to pay more but to imply on article five to be shortsighted and contrary to be crash on - - congressionally mandated. >> i agree with that i understand why president trum

we are treaty ally. there is a difference between allies by treaty who are committed to certain requirements and people you aggregate on the ground and one of the points i make in the book is us dominance poses an adaptation challenge not just for our adversaries but for allies. they have chosen to focus on certain capabilities to keep up with the united states but they have let other capabilities slide by the wayside. the british have tried to cover a wider band of things to keep up but they have less resources for each category so that is why the west learns to fight the west. we have to stop thinking of a collection of western powers as a joint set of capabilities rather than competing. >> one more point i want you to talk about is you are not talking only about military allies but also when we have a battlefield success this is very much in the book. we need a way to translate that to a political success afterwords. we have not been very successful at that. who does that? if it is left to the militar

good at the time, western allied forces, under allied commander eisenhower, was still stuck on the ryan, could 300 miles away from berlin, kisses where we are at the time, and here is where the soviets are sorry sounds like the home team, here's where the western allies were at the time, and here's where the soviets were, there is a discrepancy in moves closer to berlin. but soviet offensive said that smashed their way deep into the right itself, over running the provinces of east pressure, and the coastal province of palm arena. coming to rest on the line at -- . seizing the german capital first was extremely unlikely for the western allies, short of some miracle. it was also a highly risky operation that i would argue is kind of foreign to eisenhower's strategy. eisenhower does take his share of risk in the war but by and large, the operations on the map are not what you would consider napoleon it in the chances they take and the risks they are willing to court. there is a little 1967 book by steven ambrose of memory. steven ambrose of course is one of the fathers with this museum alo

and moved steadily to a meeting with the russian ally in the east.n, the citadel of nazi-ism, fell. ♪ early in january, franklin delano roosevelt was inaugurated as president of the united states. his fourth successive term. the simple ceremony took place on the white house porch. ♪ almost immediately, the president went to yalta and met with joseph stalin and winston churchill on final steps to crush the axis and establish peace. it was the last meeting of the original big three. franklin roosevelt looked tired and old. in april, a great man was dead. the loss of franklin delano roosevelt was deeply felt by people all around the world. ♪ in the cabinet room of the white house, harry s truman was sworn in as president. on the very eve of victory and its deserving aftermath, his was the heavy duty of carrying on with the leaders of america's allies. 25 days later, on may 7, and a little schoolhouse in france, came the unconditional surrender of germany. general alfred jodl, nazi chief of staff, signs a document formally ending all german resistance. g

particularly allies from their super po super power ally. they also need to know what the institutional landing spot of where all of this is going. so one of the weaknesses i think of the current administration is that they don't really tell us allies and like-minded countries where the or what the intended institutional outcome of any kind of negotiation or tension will be or even whether there is an institutional outcome, and australia, despite how robust we are behind the americans, we do kind of need to know what an enduring landing spot on various issues look like, and this is particularly the case with the economic tensions between the united states and china. so patrick, i'll end there, and help you to talk about -- >> thank you very much, john. richard has just flown in from manila, john from sydney, the rest of us have walked down the hall. that's why we have gone in this order, and our colleague, visiting senior fellow at the hudson institute from denmark has written extensively about europe's role in general in the indo pacific no

tell which going to allies do you think are real allies? which one do you think are fickl e? you trust people with the secret of your own intelligence gathering? problem notwhich one do you spo 1939. it is specific to all eras. i don't think it is suppressing at all that the poles said nothing at this meeting in january of 1939. you might think that the conference was a complete failure. i don't think it was. two things come out of it. this is the memorandum of agreement. it is in french. it is by bertrand. it is the intelligence of 1939.on agreement it says for greater convenience and discretion from now on, we are going to call ourselves by the following abbreviations of . it says for greater convenience and. learn more sunday on american history tv. to follow the federal response to the coronavirus outbreak, go /coronavirus. you can review the latest events avirus.sunday/coron night on q&a , peggy wallace kennedy, daughter of former four term alabama governor and presidential candidate george wallace talks about his controversial career. >> back in 1996, we took our younge

you know being online and soon you know but you know what should allies really like how can allies truly help how can they truly make a difference when they're fighting for a cause you know beyond just kind of giving you a verbal hey you're doing great you're all believing you i think you know this is something that i've always had conversations around because you know there's a lot of people who are really fervent supporters of like any kind of marginalized community you know when you think about. a community you think about how some people think that the last a ally or that you know in the black lives matter movement that it wouldn't be successful without you know the allies and i think you know in even as like a marvelous person within myself obviously i don't get taken all the identities in the world so obviously i'm an ally to other people i think if you're in a situation where you're trying to support a movement or a marginalized community and you constantly hear your words your voice more than others you're probably you shouldn't that shouldn't be happening i think sometimes you h

see only one ally is on the offensive.he reason is the conference is daking place after the -- an the u.s. and british are still recovering from a major surprise battle. they are not prepared to continue their advance. the soviet side is advancing. they start their major offensive on january 12, 1945. and by the time of the yalta conference, they are 40 miles away from berlin. they already have established -- on order. meet,n fdr and stalin they have this tihing, who will be first -- the americans or soviet? there is no question the soviets will be there first. whoever has more divisions on successes tod more show has the louder voice in the negotiations. that brings us back to something that we keep forgetting, whether we want to or not my yalta is not a peace conference, this is a wartime conference. what is happening on the front lines at that moment gives a lot of power or takes a lot of power from the negotiator. this is an illustration to what we had already started to discuss in terms of who contributed what to the

he was focusing on the west and so turning himself into stalin's best allies . it's part of what started. in this years many germans had fled to saudi leisure to escape from the western allies bombing. had been largely spared from aerial bombardment but now the soviet advance put them right in the middle of the wall. like in east prussia most people here only had one goal to escape from the read all. of it 1st early signs and then doesn't enjoy terrible because it's get beaten or die via because what we did during the eastern campaign especially against soviet civilians but also in poland into a list of often poor in the crimes we committed will return to was as vengeance yes vote. to one super kiran. those fears often proved to be justified many red army soldiers committed atrocities in revenge for the crimes of the vam of to and the s.s. . the home here. divide as that's what we see an escalation of violence against the german civilian population here the shooting of civilians the shooting of women and children. this issue some found fallen on can the abductio

australia is an ally, japan is a treaty ally. the indians are partners. we do not have to fourt forced e issue of people come in a formal alliance, cooperation ought to be enough and again, it comes to meeting these countries where they are. i should go back, you asked about trying to get into gdp, let's remember part of the problem is that no candidate in the 2016 election including the secretary of state who had negotiated. >> secretary clinton supported the ttp, that tells you something about where trade is in the american firmament, i personally was very pleased to see some of the tougher things that were said about nafta was the worst agreement in history by the president when he came in, we actually did get a us-mexico candidate agreement. we may have to do this in a way that does not go back and try to pick up where we were but actually take some of these things on. i think if you can look asia again you would want something like the ttp but i don't think it be the ttp. >> trade is such a difficult issue of both political parties but for those of u

for that to happen, all of our allies must be able to work together seamlessly. but right now some of our eastern european allies still rely on russian or soviet-era equipment. modernizing these military forces is a national security imperative. the eastern european security act puts in place direct loans to our security partners so they can update their military equipment to better address the shifting and complex security needs. as adversaries like russia continue to test our alliances, dose of and cohesion, these -- defenses and cohesion, these loans would be a meaningful step toward ensuring that we are ready and able to face evolving threats on the horizon. these loans would complement, not replace, our ongoing u.s. security assistant effort to europe and will be continued upon our allies upholding their own constitutions and the democratic value of the alliance. the united states must not only support the militaries of our nato allies but also safeguard the continued strength of the democratic values upon from which the alliance is built. i hope all members

poto de oakland las autoridades están listas para trasladar a los pasajeros a diferentes locaciones allíúdez con todos los detalles sandra cuéntanos >> qué tal muy buenos noches el crucero todavía no alcanza a llegar al área donde van desembarcar los pasajeros pero ya mi espalda se tenía pronosticado que llegara y en sido bastante puntuales estaban a unas 12 millas de aquí pero en alta mar hasta que las autoridades dieron luz verde y ya lo hicieran lleva a bordo a 21 personas se póster que no va a ser muy sencillo llevan miles de pasajeros el menor de california este fin de semana dijo que este proceso será un poco complicado y podía durar varios días escuché usted algunos de los pasajeros enfermos no ser llevados a hospitales son los primeros que se van a bajar del barco estuvieron contacto con sus pacientes van a ser puestos en cuarentena eso significa conocer llevados a ver bases militares allí en california y otros lados del país de 140 pasajeros son de aquí ahora los pasajeros que no tienen familiares aeropuertos de aquí en oakland y en 1 a especial lejos de la población en general

current by the end of the cologne was a major german city and by far the largest city that the allies have conquered by their humble homburg would like to see her learn munich were still far away. on current or well so it made sense to document to taking over the long march its iconic cathedral in the western part of iraq of the more broadly than say the conquest of the. now a new phase of the. cameraman from the u.s. army air force is accompanied the advancing troops as part of special film project $186.00 and captured the massive destruction on 16 millimeter color film. their footage paints an impressive picture of cologne nearly 3 quarters of which have been destroyed the us high command attach great importance to the film work the fields so i feel it played a major role in the 2nd world war not only from a documentary purposes but also for propaganda and a competition and they had horrible unpractical camera technology and they used color felt like an american film can color of course on show you could take your impressions home with you and talk a bit to the documentum for the ci

and it's cherished allies and friends.rty that is a trust we will never forsake. and ladies and gentlemen, israel and the united states will always stand together to because america and israel are more than friends. we are more than partners, we are allies. and friends, the united states and israel our family. [applause] we are. [speaking yiddish] true. we are a family the senate from a common tradition. we are family that upholds common values. and together, our family shares a common destiny . the american israeli alliance is stronger than ever before. our friendship is greater than ever before. and our future is brighter than ever before and so we say to all of those gathered here, to all who cherish israel, to the people of israel, the famous words of blessing, may the lord bless you and keep you. may his countenance shine upon you be gracious unto you. they all your ways be paths of these. with the unwavering support of all of you, and all who call these two great nations home, with the leadership of president donald

australia is an ally. japan is a treaty ally area the indians are partners. we don't have to force the issue of people coming to formal alliance with us. cooperation to be enough and again, it comes to kind of meeting these countries where they are. i should go back, you asked about trying to get back into the tpp. let's remember part of the problem is that no candidate in the 2016 election including the secretary of state who had negotiated it supported the tpp and that tells you something about where trade is in the american firmament. i personally was very pleased to see that some of the tougher things that were said about nafta, worst agreement in history by the president when he camein , we did get a us-mexico canada agreement. so we may have to do this in a way that doesn't go back and try to pick up where we were, but actually takes some of these things on a new and i think we can look at asia again, you would want something like the tpp but i don't think it's going to be the tpp. >> trade is such a difficult issue in both political parties yet forthos

in the years many germans had fled to say leisure to escape from the western allies bombing. had been largely spared from aerial bombardment but now the soviet advance put them right in the middle of the war. like in east prussia most people here only had one goal to escape from the red. of it 1st delish saw and then doesn't enjoy will be terrible as it could be in order vi because what we did during the eastern campaign especially against soviet civilians but also in poland in titian's have a list of often poor in the crimes we committed will return to washington as vengeance yes vote. so on so what kiran. those fear is often proved to be justified many red army soldiers committed atrocities in revenge for the crimes of the family and the s.s. . divide as cadets who will see an escalation of violence against the german civilian population here the shooting of civilians the shooting of women and children. this issue some found on one can the abduction of german civilians. in 2 vilest and the mass reap of women must forgive article from fall one dislikes a while ago by don got

he needs allies in europe.actually would be able on its own to keep germany down. stalin doesn't believe the soviet union on its own could do that as well. it is very interesting, we are all, when we think about the future, our vision is based on what happened in the past. we base it on experience. and these are people who just 20 years earlier thinking about the year 2,000, right? from their perspective world war i anticipate that's where they are now and it's very recent in their mind. they think the united states will not stay in europe but they also know that germany, no matter how much it has destroyed to date will be back in 20 years. that is their thinking and we know it will be a very powerful force. so stalin agrees to the froenen zone of occupation but says you can give them zoechbs occupation from your own zones of occupation from british and from america and that is eventual what happens. and now the big issue is dealing with germany is reparations. stalin wants $20 billion. the british and fdr are

because he needs allies.he needs allies in europe, he doesn't think that britain would be able on its own, to keep germany down. stalin doesn't believe that the soviet union on its own will be able to do that is well. again it is very interesting, we are all, when we think about the future, our vision is based on what happened in the past. based on experience. and this is the people who just 20 years earlier, when we think about the year 2000, from their perspective, the world war one ended, and that is where they are now, it's very recent in their mind. not only think that the united states would not stay in your but they also know, that germany, no matter how much it is destroyed today, it will be back in 20 years. or maybe earlier. that is their thinking, and they know that it will be a very powerful force. so at the end stolen agrees to the french zone of occupation, with says we can give france its own zones of occupation. from britain, glossary from american, and that is eventually what is what happens.

he was focusing on the west and so turning himself into stalin's best allies . best part of a start. in this year's many germans had fled to saudi leisure to escape from the western allies bombing solutia had been largely spared from aerial bombardment but now the soviet advance put them right in the middle of the war. like in east prussia most people here only had one goal to escape from the read all. of it 1st delicious song and then doesn't enjoy will be terrible as it could be in order v.i. because what we did during the eastern campaign especially against soviet civilians but also in poland in titian's have a list of all poor in the crimes we committed will return to washington as vengeance yes vote. to once took on. those fears often proved to be justified many red army soldiers committed atrocities in revenge for the crimes of the family and the s. s. . the home here. divide as cuts you will see an escalation of violence against the german civilian population here the shooting of civilians the shooting of women and children. as she said falling falling on

allÍ les esperaba el personal sanitario debidamente equipado.el colapso que tiene el sistema de salud. con esta medida se pretende que los hospitales se concentren en pacientes graves y crÍticos, que representan el 30% de los infectados. la gente aunque encerrada en su casa bajo multas salen todos los dÍas a sus balcones para agradecer con estos aplausos el gran esfuerzo de mÉdicos, policÍas y cajeras de supermercados en esta crisis de coronavirus. felix: el cierre de escuelas y trabajos, y el aislamiento, estÁ afectando a dentro de nosotros late una fuerza que muestra nuestro vigor. un poder en nuestras manos que nos impulsa hacia adelante con un espíritu valiente que nos empodera. una vez mas, hemos redefinido lo que es una camioneta. ram. la camioneta del año 2020 motor trend por un segundo año consecutivo. fÉlix: la primera opciÓn para millones de personas que pasamos cuando nos toca la pandemia en casa con cierres de trabajos, y escuelas, es sin duda el internet. la conexiÓn simultÁnea tiene la red a punto de estallar. para evitarlo los usu

or its allies in the region?again, that is why i'm saying we are in a pattern that is constantly evolving. we but we should not expect the weaker party which is iran in this case to unilaterally, either capitulate or give away capabilities that it sees as critical to its national security. >> back to your question about the hard-liners taking over in iran. i think ali is basically right. as long as there is only pressure to pull down the regime, it will not amount to much. one of the things that i would like to see is a better articulated and more consensus u.s. foreign policy on iran itself. what i saw in the administration and still see is divided opinions. some people are hoping that economic pressure on iran will cause a collapse of the regime. the islamic republic will fall and something else will come in its place but it cannot be as bad. others are looking for specific changes to iranian policies which are amicable to u.s. interest. nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles and cruise missiles, support for proxi

don't give them to the allies. so what i'd like to do now is talk about some of the major issues, i wouldn't talk about all of them. this is far too many. this is on widespread and varying debateba there are certain key themes that are central to the debate between the two organizations. the anti-interventionists, the america first committee, basically make the argument that staying out of european wars is america's tradition. this goes back to george washington. the united states should not get itself entangled in european affairs and certainly get involved in european wars and this is a foreign policy that served america well. it did so for over 100 years. until the united states broke from that tradition in 1917 and went to war in europe. that was a mistake and it is a mistake that should not be repeated. we've learned the wisdom of the founders. they were right to stay out of european affairs and we should not make that mistake again. the interventionists of the white committee make a different argument. the po

next he looks at the february 1945 yalta conference between allied leaders winston churchill, franklin roosevelt and joseph stalin. mr. bishop focuses on churchill's role at the meeting and how yalta impacted the british prime minister personally and he talks about the legacy of yalta and the dawn of the cold war with churchill becoming one of the leading cold warriors of the era. the national world war ii museum hosted this event. >>> our final speaker of the day is mr. michael bishop. michael is a consultant in the office of the chairman of the national endowment of the humanitys. prior to that, he served as director of the national churchill library and center at george washington university in d.c. he also served as the executive director of the international churchill society. some of you, many of you know the museum has had a long-standing relationship with the local branch of the churchill society, the churchill society of new orleans and with him being half american, we feel we can keep covering winston as much as we want. but we certainly enjoyed watching michael and his affil

allÍ les esperaba el personal sanitario debidamente equipado.s el colapso que tiene el sistema de salud. con esta medida se pretende que los hospitales se concentren en pacientes graves y crÍticos, que representan el 30% de los infectados. la gente aunque encerrada en su casa bajo multas salen todos los dÍas a sus balcones para agradecer con estos aplausos el gran esfuerzo de mÉdicos, policÍas y cajeras de supermercados en esta crisis de coronavirus. felix: el cierre de escuelas y trabajos, y el aislamiento, estÁ afectando a nuestra historia empezó hace más de 60 años en un gallinero abandonado donde nuestra fundadora descubrió a una maestra de español jubilada. sin casa, ni seguro médico. y le dijo no a la injusticia y sÍ a una vida mejor. con este impulso - esta empatía nació aarp. hoy trabajamos por la gente para que vivan a su manera, sin importar su edad - cuidando de su salud y seguridad financiera - y fortaleciendo nuestras comunidades. juntos somos aarp. juntos es posible. fÉlix: la primera opciÓn para millones de personas que pasamos cu

of course it should be part of our discussions with our allies and partners. and in fact in any trade agreement. i think this is a great step forward. thank you. >> thank you. mr. bosswell, murphy, 5 g networks have potential to define functionalities. can you talk about some of the security benefits as well as >> challenges that exist with new network elements? mr. murphy or mr. was well, either one? >> i'll go. thank you, senator. so of course 5g will become more virtualized and software defined. what we mean by that it's intelligence in the network will be located more in the cloud or closer to the edge. so distinctions between different parts of the network may become blurred. it also gives us some distinct advantages as we bring in new security technologies 5g will be built on a secure 4g infrastructure. but it does bring new tools to the toolbox. the new arcitectures that we will role out and types of technologies we will use allows us to use additional microphone across the network, enhanced authentication and regulator access control front enhanced pri

los que todavÍa no lo necesiten tanto.k estÁn abarrotados de pacientes, los que no pueden atender allÍchos pacientes mejoren, y que los otros lamentablemente no estÉn con nosotros mÁs. continuamos desde acÁ, les mando un abrazo. marÍa: muchas gracias, jorge. jorge: no puedo imaginarme cÓmo ha cambiado nuestra vida tan rÁpidamente, que en central park haya un hospital provisional, es realmente impresionante. marÍa: si nos hubieran dicho que eso era parte de una pelÍcula, ni la vemos, quizÁs. jorge: hay dos o tres pelÍculas que se han hecho virales durante los Últimos dÍas, y ninguna presenta el panorama como el que estamos viviendo. marÍa: la vida nos estÁ escribiendo un guiÓn peor de lo que hemos imaginado, para ver quÉ somos capaces, y rÁpidamente te iba a decir, el fin de semana hay una queja que tiene mucha gente: estÁn tirando los guantes y las mascarillas a la salida de los supermercados, los tiran a las calles, no lo hagan, tÍrenlos en los botes de basura, piense en los demÁs. jorge: que cada quien sea responsable de su propia basura. marÍa: del uso de su propia basura, que esto

the allies, 82%. in other words, we do not have to fight this war. the allies will take care of it. they will win it. we can be on their side, we can sell them goods, we can root for them, but they will win on their own. they do not need us. this is important to remember. they are over confident, in fact in an ally victory when the war begins. they are underestimating the germany's ability to fight in this war. another interesting shift takes place. when you raised the possibility that germany might win the war. if it looks like england and france might be defeated then should the united states declare war. 44% suddenly said yes. it is still not a majority even if nazi germany is going to win, but that is a huge number for the amount of people that would be willing to go to war. flushing out this view of american public opinion, they do not want to fight, but they think it might be necessary, at least some think it might be necessary, but only if it is the only way to keep the nazi germany's away. yuck so to sum up all of this. the fundamental tension i would argue in american opini

netanyahu claims victory in the country's general election but exit polls signal his likud party and its allies will fall short of a parliamentary majority as the 3rd electoral battle in a year between netanyahu and his main rival benny gantz also coming up a new border crisis for europe with the backing of the turkish president turkey has allowed thousands of migrants to cross its territory headed for greece instead of an open door all day finding riot police armed with tear gas and europe's leaders say it will stay that way. plus mind your manners and mind the virus gemini's interior minister refuses to shake hands with chancellor angela merkel as the corona virus spreads. i'm told me a lot of ball welcome to the program exit polls in israel suggest that prime minister benjamin netanyahu holds a solid ad over his main rival in the country's 3rd election in less than a year but israeli media say that netanyahu is likud party and its religious and nationalist allies are likely to be short of a parliamentary majority official results are expected to come in throughout the night and the final tal

so ideally to coordinate with allies against china. >> number one i see this as much as a a shift and by members of congress and matters of the public god knows how many msn debates on china to know how that has shifted and what the constituency was it is a sure sign of how big the golf was in there is always a lot of hesitation and then elected to lead and now as confusion has deepened nobody understands what this is about and what those people want. and that's why they are paying more attention. >> i really believe that. and what we never ever talk about his age. i'm sorry. i'm not as bright as i was and in the wake of world war ii the united nations or wto with that intellectual property competition to have not even all. >> and the agreements with the discomfort ofal globalization. with containerized shipping and the integrated financial markets. theredi are two remedies to this. t and from that was at issue here. and to retrain the people of those in nor could they be automated away. and those effects of that phenomenon so to say what is the solution that effectively takes the man

this case overlooks the fact that the allies destroyed the u-boat force, not the russians and the allies had the major role of destroying the luftwaffe. the russians forget that the air campaign, the results drew the best of the fighter force back into the defense of germany where it was destroyed, so there was an indirect influence on the eastern front which in fact favored the russians. gerhart has done great footnotes. you have to check those out. >> again, nobody would want to dispute him. i would add that indeed, sometimes it is interpreted as the second front that had not opened earlier on the ground and i think a good argument in the made that so much, not only manpower, but american wealth and british wealth went into the campaign that kept the germans offkilter. for example, if you think about the building of the fee weapons, the german rockets and so forth, initially they were tested on the north sea and when the british bomb that side, they had to relocate the effort underground. they put it in the mountains and engines were put in tested in the sub camp agency, so if you look

the otheside of it is, we have to have the backs of our allies.hey need to know that when we're in the foxhole, we've got their back. and that's why that syria decision was so important, because when the kurds have lost of fighting terrorism,ame we have to stand with them. we havto let them know that that bloodshed mattered. and i'm glad the president deded to leave troops ther whether it's to guard the oil or for other reasons, becausell for inence purposes, but also for the fact that that partnership, we have to let them know it meant something. >> i agree with you that that's the message the world needs hear, but i'm not sure they're hearing it, which is, i think, what's reflected in this pew tistudy, that our standing has slipped. it sometimes when you lead, people don't lik but we should make sure that they know we're gonna stand in allegiance with our allies, but we're gonna have tough love with ourrothers and sisters to know we're in this together and we all have to sacrifice and pull weight. >> another one of your a predecessothe u.n., amb

the keyboard here is a western ally they kept saying that kurds are western allies so you cannot dodge them you cannot enter the a.v.s. even the. even the syrian government should not enter it even though legally it's all syrian territory right if. not on the border with turkey but look at that map it's pretty deep inside syria it's 5 percent of the syrian territory and it's controlled by jihadi groups even the b.b.c. acknowledges that it's you know so the question is how can you clean up this area you know the syrian government the russian aviation how can they do it without using media means you know that the west is he put critical they keep saying that the issue is a terrorist organization now it's called. sham and the 3rd if soldiers who were killed during the recent operations of the syrian army there they were killed or berated next door at the create a sham so oh how can the syrian government be blamed for using media to force against terrorism only it's only taken lightly since the it is acknowledged that this is going to have to be resolved. that it's not going to be resolved

allies and trade. those new and that is very trump and i don't think any other candidate would've done that. japan and south korea, looking for renegotiations. and when it does, use of the letter of this collision and ways it can be quite sudden and unexpected and he will raise the temperature and he will lower it. you'll make threats and then he will talk almost anybody. this tends to enter people and there's allies and adversaries, probably even some of his own staff. but what i do find striking, if you turned on the volume which tends to be very high, it is not obvious that he himself knows the endpoint. i'm not sure he knows it. he keeps his options open. that is different from saying that is hell-bent on dismantling what we felt rules based on international order. i'm not convinced that he actually has that as a reference .1 way or another. in fact click doubt the he could describe to you is interested in renegotiating existing arrangements. is a kind of portfolio assessment of the u.s. overseas,