the left still had no interest in hearing cavanagh story the constitution gives the senate an importantole. in the confirmation process but you have replaced advice and consent with search and destroy the hash tag i believe her even trending on twitter but when terrorist came forward with claims that democratic presidential nominee joe biden sexually assaulted her she says the same celebrities who supported ford did not do the same for her when coming out with her story but there is a measure of hypocrisy with the campaign saying it's a it's not to say you know my social media has been hacked all my personal information has been dragged through every person that maybe has a you know a great against me an ex boyfriend or an ex landlord or whatever it is has been able to have a platform rather than me. talking about things that have nothing to do with 993 like you have been the whole thing with being called a russian agent that in particular. that incites people people actually i'm going to doctrine from that because they thought i was being a traitor to america. actress alyssa milano had

. >> of votes footprint cavanagh on the supreme court may be paying out for her but it has put women's control over their own health care decisions and extreme jeopardy. >> is democrats face is sex assault accusation of their own calls to believe all women have changed, some democrats are echoing a defense of biden similar to collins's calls for due process and praise of brett kavanaugh's character last year. >> we've heard a lot of charges and counter charges about brett kavanaugh, but as those who have known him best have attested he has been an exemplary public servant. >> gideon who said collins's speech defending due process felt like a betrayal of sexual assault survivors also tweeted the hashtag believe women on the 1-year anniversary of the brett kavanaugh hearing and get on the sex assault allegations against biden, getting the still silent. it may make room in the spotlight for further left candidates like kidman who railed against the state of party on twitter writing somehow we went for the most diverse field of presidential candidates in history to pick the lesser of two o

he's already payrolls if you contrast that thing that comes out of his mouth anyway that when the cavanagh case came along they probably thought they had it in the bag women do not sit around making these things up these women have come forward knowing they have everything to lose they thought that will do it these women who hounded cavanagh comments like double standards to that oath presumptive presidential nominee who should not be running on character for the president the united states you want him to withdraw i wish he would well have a home because what a woman says nice things about russia and goes off to my candidate the only one that. not to shake the on his 7 year old life as much prissy as i could think to into my hash time's up. so what you think. you were. too subtle it's going to. go on a lift and for the most the police of the into sex scandal around joe budden house proved the hypocritical true of the bt but the truth is now that we're seen this with joe biden with cher reid is that it's not me too for all women it's me too only to protect the women that accuse donald trum

rob: it hasn't been that long, this is not how they treated brett cavanagh when this happened to him.oining me with his take on this, thank you for coming on. your reaction to this? >> it was joy behar, the trump campaign, that is not the story. so many people want to confuse the story. the story is here is this woman who in 1993 pressed against the wall and joe biden sexually assaulted her. he told her roommate and the relative, called into larry king's former show on cnn, she's more credible at this stage than christine ford ever was in the only way to get to an answer is through some level of investigation, that is going through facts and data. you mentioned tara reade wants access to these forms that are held by the senator. he will not allow those forms released, has his own people looking through his own records. maybe sandy berger, not really sure. it is very clear the rational mind is not saying i believe tara reade because you don't know what happened. the biden team and nancy pelosi and stacy abrams are not in favor of an investigation that is proof the me too movement which

he clerked for then brett cavanagh on the dc circuit, the very court to which judge walker is nominated went on to clerk for justice kennedy on the supreme court, he has been a law professor for several years thinking about the legal issues deeply and for senator leahy and senator durbin and senator schumer to say he's not qualified is funny because even liberal american bar association came out and said he was well qualified to serve in those senators said that is the gold standard. shannon: something he is taking a lot of heat for, the decision a few weeks ago where he authored a decision in kentucky where number of churches were trying to have drive in services for easter and the mayor said no, not going to happen. he in part in the opinion he wrote set on holy thursday and american mayor criminalize the communal celebration of easter, went on to talk about characters in the bible and scripture in theology and a lot of people thought that was unnecessary. one professor at university of iowa writing on gazette.com judges must never allow their personal feelings or attachments, politic

. >> sean: are the left now going to treat fight in the way they treated cavanagh?ill they say i believe her the way they did with the cavanaugh accusers? even though they didn't have half the corroboration, they didn't have any actually. nor do they have a haunting call from the mother of any of the accusers. are they going to comb through biden's yearbooks from high school like they didn't cavanaugh? will they call for him to stand down for the party's nominees? will they say i believe, in this case, tara reade appeared that's what they demanded in the cavanaugh case without any corroborating evidence whatsoever. she has witnesses, she has her mother's phone call. she filed the report. at the very least, joe has nothing to hide it, and he wants to be transparent like he says he does, he can just release all the personnel files on tara reade appeared and now there reportedly stored up with his records. now we know staff was in there already. biden, doesn't seem interested in that level of transparency. speaks volumes, take a look. >> why not approve a search of her

anchor: rebecca cavanagh, criminal defense attorney for new york state, thank you.thank you for having me. anchor: in the past few minutes president trump announced the u.s. is terminating its relationship with the world health organization. in a short press conference at the white house, dominated by the relationship with china, he said he was beginning the process of eliminating special treatment for hong kong, in response to china's plans to impose new rules in the territory. pres. trump: the chinese governments move against hong kong is the latest in a series of measures diminishing the city's long-standing and proud status. this is a tragedy for the people of hong kong, the people of china and indeed the people of the world. china claims it is protecting national security, but the truth is that hong kong was secure and prosperous as a free society. beijing's decision reverses all of that. it extends the rea of china's invasive apparatus into what was formerly a bastion of liberty. china's latest incursion, along with other recent developments that degradethe te

forward knowing they have everything to lose they thought that will do it these women who hounded cavanagh comment like double standards to that oath presumptive presidential nominee who should not be running on character for the president the united states you want him to withdraw i wish he would all have home because one woman says nice things about russia and goes off to my candidate the only one that's not. shake the on his 7 year old life and apply as much chrissy as i can fit into my hash tag time's up. so what you think. you will find too subtle. legal analyst and for the most to believe that the time sex scandal around joe biden has proved the hypocritical nature of the me to be meant the truth is now that we're seen this with joe biden with cher read is that it's not me too for all women it's me too only to protect the women that accuse donald trump or his associates it's only me to if you accuse somebody who we don't like if you accuse one of our guys we can't really believe what you say that's absolutely duplicitous and it's exactly what this movement similar movements have been

let's be clear here, joe biden said it, during the cavanagh hearing, believe all women, presume she's the truth. that is burden shifting, classic democratic strategy to shift the burden onto cavanaugh or other republicans who are under any sort of accusation, and that is simply a power grab. and he shifts the burden back to due process, to the constitutional standard, when it works for him. regardless of the truth of the matter, joe biden can already be convicted and looped the court of public opinion because he is proving that he is not only fully transparent, but he is hypocritical, he doesn't want to believe all women when he works for him, and then when it doesn't work for him, he's willing to completely at the critical period of this is something that shows absolutely, he's unfit for office. >> shannon: let me bring kevin in here. "the new york times," not a conservative publication, tonight the editorial board has that piece out talking about the fact that he has asked for the senate secretaries to release these things. but also says, that's not enough. it doesn't go far enough,

as i talk to women about this they are saying wait a minute, where is fairness in this, brett cavanagh was treated one way, the media was all over brett kavanaugh, they turned it into a kangaroo court with the help of the democrats on the judiciary committee and now there is nothing being said about tara reade. the interesting thing to a lot of women about this is that tara reade can say this is who i talked to, there is a recording of her mother calling into larry king, there are others that say yes, she told us about this, so she has that corroborating evidence that is necessary that christine ford never had. she couldn't tell you dates, times, place, year, tara reade can give you the specific and the details. so it would be important for the vice president to come out and tell the truth and secondly say fairness is important here, showing respect for women is important here and there is no place for hypocrisy and no place. the democrats have a tendency to say we are going to abide by rules when it helps us to achieve our goals but we are going to get rid of all those rules if they s

>> shannon: a part of the election is with susan collins, who he literally wrote the book on the cavanaghonfirmation, and we remember the incredible threats that were made against her, and to literally physical harm threatened, but in addition to that we have been told since she gave kavanaugh the due process benefit of the doubt and wait all the evidence, she had to go, and now the person running against her, you right at "the federalist" after launching the candidacy because of her support for due process, main house speaker sarah gideon is now going out of her way to ignore the detailed accusation of and proprietary and harassment by joe biden. i mean, we have been told the whole time by them that that is the reason susan collins has to has to go. >> it is the entire base of the campaign. she is a moderate republican, but because she gave a speech explaining due process and presumption of innocence, she was roundly decried by people who believe that brett kavanaugh should not be confirmed. they called her gender trader specifically setting that speech in defense of due process. now you

the third-party so what's to stop them to have them appear before a grand jury and then justice cavanagh said explain the rationale for one rule for one so what do you make of all of that and how did you hear the justices trying to distinguish clinton v jones? >> i think i got much more play in this argument and in the prior one. one of the interesting things is at the court then was sensitive to the possibility of the president being targeted but also require the president to do an initial showing of burden what is going on is to bears the burden and when. so the president and solicitor general the president once the absolutee immunity i didn't get much sense of interest of that but i thought that they agreed with that that there was concerned and then the question of the solicitor general would say given that potential there should be a high and showing. of course clinton versus jones said first had to show the burden on the presidency and then specifically so already to move us beyond clinton versus jones so among the justices of the court my sense is they are trying to figure out wha

. >> brett cavanagh and justice kennedy are outstanding judges. ... >> i am not attacking them i'm just asking you what you meant. >> and what i meant is that justice kavanaugh as well as justice kennedy are outstanding judges for that and of the approach to judging that considers text rather than inserting the judges political opinions into what the law is. >> all right. because as i read it, you referred to our work, our cause, our hope and our dream as being different from what is usually taken, but identified it with justice kavanaugh was views. and i'm just interested in knowing what that meant. >> certainly. i think justice kavanaugh approach to the law respects separation of powers. respects the judges limited role in our constitution structure and demonstrates fidelity to text, those were the kinds of legal principles that i was praising when i was praising justice kavanaugh in my speech. >> thank you. appreciate that. >> senator grassley. >> judge walker, i'm going to ask you about chevron, because most other circuit judges, don't do as much with administrative rulings which th