something mckibben writes are all we've heard about that are out. mckibben writes in rolling stone on that issue and says that yes you are right he did endorse it but then he changed his position and you did note that how would you respond because the double messaging of the environmental movement is noted in the file that they say one thing and they do another if you really. they offer very biomass plant your door to be closed if you're a guest pole you're going to copper topass to be coal close you're not just going to write an op ed so that there's kind of agreement there were $100.00 something models about how that was going to be affected $100.00 of them contained biomass and biofuels you know just this last few months the democratic bills before congress for clean energy contained bio mass abuse so biomass this at all this you know there's no visible opposition to this so to me it was just a cia thing to write these op eds in the syrup of the same thing so that's it was noted that there is a mixed. message about biomass and i thought that was

bill mckibben published the endl warming by reaching a national popular audience. just months earlier, nasa climas hansen had given his first urgent testimony before congress as the pauaul revere of global warming. he implored the nation's politis to start winding down our fossil fuel accounts to avoid runaway climate change. in 1989, instead of its usual ph its planet of the year.