jail sentences are to run can concurrently and the maximum of those sentences is 12 years in prison but he still has an appeals process to the court of appeal and even that after that has been exhausted the verdict is not in his favor he can still appeal to the highest court in the land that's the federal court so this is a process that could take years and obviously not jeb and his lawyers want to ensure that if the he can still take take advantage of the appeals process then he doesn't want to be spending those years where he's appealing his verdict behind bars there is a political ramification to this isn't there because there's party is also a key part or has formed a key part of the coalition government in malaysia and therefore one wonders how much responsibility all rather how much power and control. is going to be able to carry on. until such times as this sentencing does come in because as you say there was an expectation of a hope at least by his defense that he would be allowed to carry on his parliamentary duties and so that decision was finally made. absolutely you know not trip is no longer the leader of the united m

joe lochner's story. >> welcome to the new york court of appeals courtroom right here in this way. this is the very courtroom in which people against lochner would have been heard. the case was decided in 1904, and the case was on appeal to this court from a ruling of the appellate division. we have the very setup in which the attorneys would have appeared. this side would have been the appellant, which was joseph lochner's people sitting here. the respondent being in this case, the attorney general, would be sitting here. the lawyer for joseph lochner would have begun right here. facing the bench and would have begun with words something like may it please the court, i'm the attorney for joseph lochner, asking the court to reverse his conviction, because he was denied the right to enter into a contract to purchase labor and to accept whatever working hours he, my client, had with the employee. so he would have made that argument right here. the judges would have engaged him in questions, following which the attorney general would have presented the state's viewpoint. and the argume

of it once she. once once that that happens there is also there are peals to the high court to the to the court of appeal to the european court of human rights. if she actually if the judge grants extradition and says ok julian assange can be sent to the united states for trial on this indictment then there are several levels of appeal within the british system and then in the european system. before any extra actual extradition would take place and meanwhile and i think we need to mention this chris julian assange his health is severely deteriorating and i think you did mention neal's meltzer and talked about that he mentioned psychological torture when julian was in the ecuadorian embassy in london for 7 years and had some serious health problems and the u.k. government would not allow him to leave and go to a hospital which aggravated these medical conditions his health has severely deteriorated there's going to be there are going to be medical report submitted in the next month or 2 about his condition but there is another reason that julian assange should not be extradited aside from the political o

however the court of appeals will reverse it. as far as appointing someone it happens all the time including at the supreme court. the whatever two years of litigating says we won't do it anymore. for a judge to give someone the other side is routine. >> not a partisan who is writing up ed's. >> there was evidence withheld from flynn and his legal team became forward the changed the controversy, a lot more than we got to see. we will see what the court does. thanks for weighing in. don't want to wear a mask? and when usb that could cost you $2,000. next. we're always here to help with fast response and great service and it doesn't stop there we're also here to help look ahead that's why we're helping members catch up by spreading any missed usaa insurance payments over the next twelve months so you can keep more cash in your pockets for when it matters most and that's just one of the many ways we're here to help the military community find out more at usaa.com they have businesses to grow customers to care for lives to get home to

however, the court of appeals, if they take the case will reverse it. ar as appointing someone, happens all the time, including at the supreme court. when the department after two years of litigating says, you know, we are not going to do it anymore, for a judge to appoint someone to give him or her the other side, that's routine. >> someone was not a part of it was writing offense. >> shannon: there was evidence that had been withheld from flynn and his legal team that came forward. that seemed to change the contours of this case and there was a lot more that we got to seattle involving peter strzok and others. now we will see with the court does. thank you both for weighing in. >> thank you. >> thank you, shannon. >> shannon: don't want to wear a mask? and one u.s. city that could soon cost you 2,000 bucks. details, next. throws at you, we're always here to help with fast response and great service and it doesn't stop there we're also here to help look ahead that's why we're helping members catch up by spreading any missed usaa insurance payments over

either either side will want to take this to the appeals court now malaysia has a true tier appeals process so off to this point he can appeal to the court of appeal and then when that person is exhausted they can appeal to the highest court in the federal court so this is a process that can take years now and even if not it may not necessarily have to go to prison even if the judge imposes a custodial sentence in the guilty verdict he could delay the carrying out of the custodial sentence and not you will also be able to continue being a member of parliament until he is actually required to. serve out his prison sentence if there is any but this is a process that can take years because of the appeal system here thanks for the flood story there will be checking back in with you as the rest of those verdicts are read out thank you all the rays to find a vaccine to beat the coronavirus is heating up with u.s. president donald trump announcing an american made one has now ended phase 3 clinical trials that's the final hurdle before it can be approved it's being tested on 30000 volunteers drum believes it could be ready for widespread use by th

from transferring data of european citizens to america the court says the privacy shield deal is no longer valid because of u.s. surveillance rules. now the british court of appeal has ruled that a schoolgirl who travel to syria to join eisel should be allowed to return to the u.k. a bag of who is now 20 years old had her citizenship revoked and 29000 and she wants to return to challenge that decision tells me mckenzie is her lawyer he believes that the u.k. will have a hard time arguing that she poses a real threat. think it's for the government to convince the court that she's such a security threat that. she mustn't be allowed into the u.k. and laws without losing her citizenship and that's going to be somewhat difficult when the u.k. government accepted $400.00 her knees some of which were male fighters and who salvage a bed in itself in parliament accepted some of which were not in significant risks themselves so when you compare the people the type of people who are governments admitted have come back already 1st as a 15 year old girl who went out from school to isis and by all accounts spent her time as a housewife if 3 children. then one has to wonder wh

companies from transferring data of european citizens to america the court says the privacy shield deals no longer valid because of us the veil and still it's. a british court of appeal has ruled that a schoolgirl who travel to syria to join eisel should be allowed to return to the u.k. show me a bag of who is now 20 years old had her citizenship revoked in 2019 and she wants to return to challenge that decision or we can now speak to my fellow as she is the director of reprieve for human rights charity organization and she joins us now from london my thank you for being with us i know that you are in support of the court's decision today can you talk us through why. absolutely it's not really none of that you decision am entirely appropriate we have a situation here where the british government has failed categorically to deal with the hand although it's a discrete number of british families who are currently detained in terms of syria you cannot deprive someone of best citizenship i meant deny them any access to any court process to charmes that it's clearly armed and that's what it was that you know that you've said that a number of people are in similar situation

and other world news a british court of appeal. has ruled that a schoolgirl who traveled to syria to join eisold should be allowed to return to the u.k. shamima big old who is now 20 years old had her citizenship revoked in 2019 she wants to return to challenge that decision as bring in sunny a day ago in london for sonya this has been a very controversial case give us the background to this ruling and what have been the reactions. absolutely she was one of 3 schoolgirls who at the age of 15 left the u.k. to go to eisele when she arrived there she was married to a dutch convert and until she was found last year by a journalist in a refugee camp in northern syria. relatively little or nothing at all was really known of her at all now she said that what she was trying to do was get back. for her return to go back to the u.k. how ever it sprouted off a huge political controversy whereby the home secretary at the time was saying that because she broke the law and ran away to be with eisel that therefore in the interests of national sec

we do have the groups now able to operate again domestically as well a british court of appeal has ruled that a schoolgirl who travel to syria to join i salute should be allowed to return to the u.k. should be a big omaha of her citizenship revoked and 2019 she wants to return to challenge that decision taiwan's president has watched on a live fire military exercises to demonstrate the island's ability to fight invasion psion one said she wants the world to see the island is determined to protect itself if the o.p.'s says it's not to deliberately started filling africa's largest dam on the blue nile denying earlier reports it says an increase in the water levels is due to heavy rains. fighting continues in the azerbaijan armenia border despite both sides saying they're trying to find a peaceful solution at least 16 people have been killed since border clashes erupted on sunday tension between the former soviet republics has been escalating for several years as they battle over the disputed region of nagorno-karabakh. those are the headlines the news continues here on al-jazeera after wha

the court of appeals said, okay, we'll hear briefs. -reconsider and we could be back to a point where michael flynn's conviction remains in place. we'll see. >> okay, as always good to have you with us, thank you so much. >> thanks. >>> a quick programming note, join michael smerconish for an entertaining and poignant look at his one-of-a-kind career. cnn presents "things i wish i knew before i started talking" tonight at 10:00 eastern here on cnn. we're back after this. this selenite grey is so pretty isn't it? wow. jim could you pop the hood for us? there she is. -turbocharged, right? yes it is. jim, could you uh kick the tires? oh yes. can you change the color inside the car? oh sure. how about blue? that's more cyan but. jump in the back seat, jim. act like my kids. how much longer? -exactly how they sound. it's got massaging seats too, right? oh yeahhhhh. -oh yeahhhhh. visit the mercedes-benz summer event or shop online at participating dealers. get 0% apr financing up to 36 months on select new and certified pre-owned models. did

court was quite famous for protecting civil liberties and opening new areas of individual rights and so forth. the burger court, chief justice burger, who had been from minnesota and who had served on the court of appealsfor the district of columbia circuit, was very interested in the orderly processing of judicial decisions, the structure of the court, how decisions are made and how state courts work, that sort of thing. he was a much more businesslike jurist than his predecessor, oral warren. >> this would not be a pentagon papers case without daniel ellsberg, who was he? >> daniel ellsberg had been a marine in the war in vietnam, he was an intellectual, he had favored the war in its early days, and had come to believe that it was a war crime. he had come to believe that we were doing things in vietnam which violated international law and principles of morality. he was one of the authors of the pentagon papers. he was a scholar, as well as everything else i've said, and he was one of the authors commissioned to write chapters of the pentagon papers. he came to the view that if only the public could see the degree to which it had been lied to through the years, which perpetuated american presence in v

the court of appeal said she could not make her case from the camp. r apologises

for example, my colleague samuel and i argued against the chiefs proportional for an immediate court of appeals which would sit only below the supreme court. he thought this new court could alleviate what he saw as the excess workload of the supreme court by allowing justices to refer cases to it. in a 1200 page law review article, and an accompanying book, we argued that the chief had misdiagnosed the problem as a problem of capacity. what was really a problem of selectivity. so the general point is i am no shill for the chief justice. nonetheless, i'm here today to say that the consensus view at the very least, mrs. elements of the chief justice records that carry important lessons on the court and its role in society. the very first bench memo i produced for chief justice burger dealt with a california decision striking down as an equal protection violation of statutory rape law that applied only two males. two years before, the chief justice had publicly dissented from the denial in a similar case indicating in that case, that he would have granted and summarily reversed. in the first parag

court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit. a live look at chicago from fox 32, the big story there tonight, deerfield illinois based walgreens joins other major retailers promising to stop selling coconut milk products from some company d's in thailand. people for the ethical treatment of animals organizations has an investigation has revealed monkeys are abuse during the harvesting process. that is a live look outside the beltway from "special report." we will be right back. ♪ because heart and kidney disease shouldn't prevent you from pushing your limits. because every baby deserves the very best start in life. because a changing environment should mean caring for the land that takes care of us all. at bayer, everything we do, from advances in health to innovations in agriculture, is to help every life we touch. at bayer, this is why we science. and mine super soft? with the sleep number 360 smart bed, on sale now, you can both adjust your comfort with your sleep number setting. so, can it help us fall asleep faster? yes, by

him it is fine if he wants to put the justice department on trial because i don't think the court of appeals said that in the president was by the chief judge and i don't think they want to walk away from that case. shannon: the only step left is the supreme court. we will see of general finger tuesday there. thank you. we just lived through the worst economic decline in american history with second-quarter gross to missed product contracting 33% because of the coronavirus lockdown to our economy. looking ahead some wall street strategists believe we are at the leading edge of the v-shaped recovery. >> part of the wall of worry, you always have at the beginning of a new economic expansion, feels no different than it did in 2009. we are having a v-shaped recovery in the earnings regression. shannon: us stock futures point higher thanks to a blockbuster earnings report from apple. everybody -- americans who are out of work, looking to capitol hill to come to terms on a new coronavirus relief package, the white house and gop leaders say they are trying to get democrats to targeted relief measur

. >>> the justice department has the option of asking the entire first circuit court of appeals now forearing or could can ask the supreme court to review the case. well, an unprecedented rehearing set for august 11th for general michael flynn. the d.c. court of appeals sided with the corrupt judge, emmet sullivan, to re-examine the justice department's decision to drop the case against the general. this politically corrupt judiciary refuses to right the wrongs of what was a corrupt fbi against, working against flynn and president trump from four years ago. and it goes on and on. joining us now to take this up is tom fitton, the president of judicial watch, a man whose organization involved every day in trying to right wrongs. his new book is "a republic under assault: the left's ongoing attack on american freedom." it's available for preorder now. we recommend it to you mightily. tom, let's start with this, first, this reversal in boston. if what's going on here? the federal government has now the right to reinstate executions. what are we, what are we watching here if it's not an acti

she asked the second circuit court of appeals to halt what they say would put her in jeopardy.een promised confidentiality before being forced to answer many personal, sensitive, and allegedly criminaltory things. she is charged with perjury in lying about her involvement in sex trafficking. she awaits trial in a brooklyn jail. >>> the legal battle against michael flynn will continue. the appeals court has thrown out the split decision by its three-person pam that directed the district court to close the case. the court will hear new arguments over whether judge emmett sullivan is required to grant the motion to drop the charges against flynn or if his decision to hear friend of the court arguments opposing the dismissal and decide on his own is indeed within his power. flynn pled guilty on three occasions before two different judges to lying the fbi in its investigation of the russian interference. appellate court arguments are set for august 11th. joining me now msnbc legal analyst danny kve cevallos. if they end up not dismissing the charges, what happens next? >> technicall

turning now to a hearing set for august 11th before the full court of appeals in d.c. michael flynn, the court will rehear the arguments over the department of justice decision to drop the government's case against flip. the -- against flynn. the judge in this case emmet sullivan. he wants the hearing to find out the reasons behind the government's decision. husband attorney, sidney powell, told fox news what he is doing is up constitutional. >> it's a sad day for the rule of law. judge sullivan' petition for rehearing should not have even been considered by the court because he had no standing to file it. he's not a party in the case. he's supposed to be a neutral umpire. gregg: he's far from a neutral umpire. let's talk about it with former trump deputy national security adviser kt mcfarland, author of "revolution: trump, washington and we, the people," which i e have read and i thought was excellent, kt, thanks very much. you know, as you know, i have long argued that flynn was falsely accused and wrongfully prosecuted. and now newly discovered evidence shows it. th

court of appeals doesn't have to take up the judge's request. major day at the supreme court a day of important victories again for president trump. the justices closed out their term by delivering split conditions on two cases concerning the release of president trump's tax returns and financial records. in separate rulings, justices deliver ad victory for president trump in block the radical dems in congress from having access to the president's financial records. at the same time, the high court also ruled president trump, nor does any president in their ruling have absolute immunity from prosecution, as if that was the issue. and the ruling, by the court is that manhattan's activist left-wing democrat cy vance, the manhattan district attorney can have access to those documents and can subpoena his tax returns from his accounting firm. in this instance a contradictory and extraordinary ruling from a court that is obviously simply left its moorings. during a news briefing white house press secretary kayleigh mcenany focused on the radical left'

the judge already lost at this panel court of appeals and now goes the full district circuit court ofl make a very safe position and is he going to challenge that to the supreme court? again, trying to preserve what he thinks is article three power. so this thing could go on for years. >> sandra: i want to transition now because a lot of folks want to know what happens with the durham investigation, looking into the origins of the mueller probe. went on the story with martha last night and had this to say. >> it'll die. you'll never see it again. it'll die a natural death. here is why they are doing this because they think joe biden might win. joe biden wins, you are never going to see this report see the light of day. this is what the bureaucracy does. >> sandra: so he is a under a lot of pressure but if you can't wrap it by summer, some sources are telling fox news that it could be until after election day. >> what he's dealing with is with that unofficial timeline the department of justice have where they don't want to announce anything that would have. on the other hand, they spen

administration cannot withhold funding from california or san francisco go because of sanctuary laws. the appeals courtaid sanctuary laws restrict police cooperation with federal immigration agents. state and local governments are required to share information with federal authorities about the immigration status of someone in their custody. however, the court of appeals ruled the law does not require them to notify immigration agents about a person's upcoming release. more than 100,000 mail-in ballots were rejected by california election officials in the march presidential primary. the information shows most of the mail-in ballots were disqualified because they arrived too late at about 13,000 voters forgot to sign the ballot. the large number of rejected ballots highlights the challenges ahead and the effort to make sure every vote is counted as the national debate goes on about the integrity of vote by mail elections. >>> happening today, some covid- 19 testing sites will open up in the south bay. the walk-up testing is free and you don't need an appointment, insurance or a doctors note. you also do

judge sullivan want as full court of appeal hearing on this? s is all politically motivated. general flynn is an american hero. he has been exonerated in the court of public opinion. he should be exonerated in the courts as well. i hope at some point the president will get involved here and allow general flynn to go back to living his life and reward him for his tremendous record of service to our country. elizabeth: congressman, great to see you. thank you for your service to our country. come back soon. >> okay. elizabeth: coming up black voices for trump advisory board member deneen borelli, getting major blowback on the new legislation that would radically undermine and undercut the nation's criminal justice system and the border patrol. that story next what do you think? i don't see it. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ ♪. elizabeth: welcome back. progressive democrats rashida tlaib of michigan and ayanna pressley of massachusetts getting major blowback on their new legislation that would radically undercut

circuit court of appeals where i had to file a last-minute emergency appeal of judge jackson's room sendingoi jail. she ignored all the legal precedents in that. she ignored my health conditions. she ignored the conditions at the prison at that time, and she ignored the current policies of doj and the bop. you would've thought it wouldn't been reversed in the appeals court the they ruled for herd 3-0. i'm afraid this is a fixed system. above all, though, i guess i would have to say the most important thing here is the courageous and as of the president's act. i know there were many, many people who told him in an election year, don't do this. let roger stone wait for a pardon after the election. sean, i don't think i would have live that long, not with my asthmatic condition. not with now 60 covid-19 cases in that prison.li so i have deep affection for donald trump because i've known him 40 years. he's a man of great justice and fairness. he's a man of enormous courage. i knew he would take some shots for this, but i think most people, most fair-minded people, understand he saved my life an

court to step in and toss the case. and in a surprising 2-1 decision last month, a three-judge panel of the d.c. circuit court of appealsd to do just that, ordering an immediate end to michael flynn's case, except now today, in the latest legal turn, the full u.s. court of appeals for the d.c. circuit has agreed to reconsider that decision, essentially wiping out last month's ruling and setting oral arguments for august 11th. joining us now is the former u.s. attorney for the eastern district of michigan and legal analyst for msnbc barbara mcquade. barbara, thank you for being with us. my go-to when anything gets a little complicated here. this one is complicated. let's start with the idea that bill barr at any opportunity paints a picture of a guy who was tricked into lying to the fbi and that what he was actually talking to the russian ambassador about was positive for the country and in keeping with u.s. administration policy, none of which is true. >> you're absolutely right, ali. and even if william barr or donald trump thought that what michael flynn was saying was laudable, it wasn't their call. at the time that

him it's perfectly fine if he wants to put the justice departn trial, because i don't think the court of appeal thinks that, and the main precedent in this case was written by the chief judge of this court, and i don't think they want to walk away from that case. >> shannon: yeah. the only step left as the supreme court, so we will see of general flynn ends up getting his day there. in the meantime, andy mccarthy, thank you. >> thanks, shannon. >> shannon: all right, as expected, we just lived through the worst economic decline in american history, with the seconsecond quarter growth domec product contracting nearly 33% because of the coronavirus lockdown to our economy. some top strategist believe we are at the leading edge of a v-shaped recovery. >> this is part of the worry, you always have at the beginning of a new economic expansion. it feels no different to me than it did in '09. we think we're having a v-shaped recovery economy, and the earnings revision is starting to turn up sharply. >> shannon: reporting a sharply higher open thanks to a blockbuster earnings report from apple tonight.

"the argument presented here and in the court of appeals were limited to absolute immunity peer to court of appeals has directed at the case be returned to the district court where the president may raise further arguments as appropriate. his quote where that leaves us tonight is the president's legal team says we are going to fight on both of these fronts. almost nobody expects that those documents will be released before election day just months away. >> neil: but someone could leak them, right? >> yeah, that is a concern that came up during the argument, especially the case dealing with a new york prosecutor. justice was pushing back with one of the -- we all know that prosecutors have leaked things. he specifically mentioned, sometimes things get leaked to "the new york times." it was very aware that that was a potential consideration in the case. any time you give documents to congressional committees, to anyone who spans the circle of who has access, you have to know there's a potential for leaks. it has been a real problem for this administration. >> neil: the president's own niec

i want to begin with this, this decision by the circuit court of appeals in d.c.espond to an idiotic, i mean, outrah -- outrageous decision by a district court judge, emmet sullivan, to continue the preposterous, absurd theater that he has created in his courtroom. >> well, that d.c. circuit is a majority leftist, haas time i checked, so it's no surprise they're going to continue the torture of general flynn. this is about general flynn, obviously, directly. but indirectly, it's about president trump. so president trump, in my view, should pardon flynn because they are attacking him and his presidency through this abuse of flynn. and it's got to end. it's just got to end. and we have new documents out this showing they knew from the get go he was innocent, yet they continued to pursue him. in fact, they knew he didn't lie, and yet they went to the white house according to the new documents that this justice department was hiding. they knew he didn't lie, and yet they went to the white house, and they lied to pence in saying that flynn lied to him. really terrible

tiered appeal process so this is something that could go on for years and he can appeal to the court of appeal if he gets a decision that's not in his favor he can then appeal to the highest court in the land the federal court that so this is really something that could go on for years lawrence thanks very much less speak live to bridget welsh in kuala lumpur as well she is an honorary research associate at the asia research institute at the university of nottingham malays you have bridget welcome back to al-jazeera so we've already had this word kleptocracy but the scale of this the systemic aspects of this this is the biggest case of its kind that we've ever reported on. yes i mean in the u.s. in that department justice found that there were about $4500000000.00 but this is only part of what. this goes up to at least $10000000000.00 and it is a huge staggering amount do we also have to engage with the idea that someplace off in the shadows there were so many backdoor deals going on and the people who were on the receiving end of those backdoor deals they kind of implicates it anyway no. well

to the court of appeals. that will have to be briefed, and here we are in the middle of july, the election is in november. it seems to be very up likely that the actual documents will be turned over to the grand jury before november, and as we're pointing out all morning there is no requirement or even permission for public disclosure of these documents at any point. >> okay. we'll get back to you on justices that joined in the majority. that's fascinating, too. let me go back to the white house. the any reaction from the president? >> reporter: we're still waiting to hear from him, from the white house press secretary but the treasury secretary steve mnuchin had an ill-timed interview and he was asked about this decision that just came down. he said it didn't involve the treasury which it doesn't, but he goes i would say the only thing i do agree on is that when things go to congress, they tend to get leaked and when things go to grand juries they don't. that has played such an important factor in what jessi

living in a refugee and stripped of her british citizenshi dominic has this analysis on the court of appealsecision. >> this is comparing with the onk. is doing to other na you look at therench, and they have been bringing home some of their citizens out there the americans have put huge pressure on the brits, saying that have got to responsibility for these people and you cannot leave them in the region. bring them home, send them to jail if need be in the u.k., that is what the country is doing. do not dump this problem on someone else. said that there has to be ao reconsideration of the human rights issues, a threat her life, it is qte significant in this case because you could have other people in similar situations saying we want to come hom ♪ >> this is "outside source" live from the bbc. rug ia try steal coronavirus research from britain and around the world. egypt, out of ethiopia, which is starting to fill a resvoir beyond a controversial -- on t blue nile. satellite images released this week show water battle -- backing up. now reporting reduced water flow in its section of the nil

it to the 4th circuit court of appeals and won again but even there the government want to get but even though the government won on appeal the important thing is that the court said that the cia had 60 days to clear the book or to explain why the book couldn't be cleared that's become policy so what they do is they almost never make the 60 days they'll send you a letter saying oh if this is so full of classified information we can't possibly do it in 60 days we need another 6 months we need another 12 months and then you have to hire an attorney and say no that's not the law the law is 60 days well if you're controversial they'll threaten to take you to court like they did with john bolton if you're not controversial or if your book is pro cia they'll get it done within the 60 days what john bolton did and i want to preface this by saying i am no fan of john bolton's i think he's a dangerous as you said type chickenhawk and that's being nice about it but john boehner actually did what he was supposed to do he worked very closely with a publication's review officer at th

the american battle for monuments commission, the court of appeals for veterans claims , arlington national cemetery and the armed forces retirement home. nobody will be surprised that this bill does not fund a border wall, nor allow the president to and and divert military -- bypass and divert military construction funding from previously approved national security projects. as i have said, military construction dollars should be used for the purpose of they are provided, which is to support the department of defense's mission for service members and their families. with that i want to say thank you to our subcommittee members . it is a joy to work with each of you. colleaguesot of our complement one another on their subcommittees and how well they get along. with thisspecial case subcommittee and it makes me really proud to have you as colleagues. i want to thank my partner, judge carter, who not only worked tirelessly and is a passionate advocate for his constituents and people who serve in the armed forces, but he is an absolute gentleman and has become a dear friend. it has been wonder

course the ultimate court of appeal in the federal system is the united states supreme court. and his freedom suit comes to the united states supreme court by dred scott versus sanford. nina spelled it any official dock hitting of the case. so, sanford. john sanford acquires de that he did not really had in his name. never mind. dred scott versus stanford. what is the supreme court going to do with this? you have to think. what body, what governmental body past the northwest ordinance? ian? >> was it the british? no. >> the confederation? >> the confederation congress. right? so the assumption is that congress has the authority to make rules for the northwest territories. fast forward to the kansas nebraska act. the kansas nebraska act lays down rules governing slavery, or the possibility of slavery in kansas and nebraska. congress does that. congress adopts the kansas nebraska act. so the assumption from the northwest ordinance all the way up to the kansas nebraska act is that the united states congress is vested with the authority to make determinations about the status of sl

now the british court of appeal has ruled that a schoolgirl who travel to syria to join eisel should be allowed to attend to the u.k. so name a baguette who is now 20 years old had her citizenship revoked in 2019 she wants to return to challenge that decision as name a country is heading away and he believes the u.k. will have a hard time giving the cheapos as a real threat or i think is for the government to convince the court she's such a security threat that. she mustn't be allowed into the u.k. and most without losing her citizenship and that's going to be somewhat difficult when the u.k. government accepted $400.00 return days some of which were male fighters and who salvage a bed in itself in poem and accepted some of which were not in significant risks themselves so when you compare the people the type of people who are governments admitted have come back already versus a 15 year old girl who went out from school to isis and by all accounts spent her time as a housewife if 3 children. then one has to wonder what is the security risk that that person poses and some of the leade

british court of appeal has ruled that a schoolgirl who travel to syria to join isis should be allowed to return to the u.k. jemimah big room had her citizenship revoked and 2019 she wants to return to challenge that decision. iran is reported of halted the execution of 3 protesters after a massive social media campaign demanding a reprieve the men were given death sentences following their arrests during anti-government protests last november more than 7000000 tweets using the hash tag do not execute or sent following the decision with some political analysts or gulf state analytics he's joining us on skype from lund in sweden thank you very much indeed for being with us why do you think this case produced such a response. so there are 3 important points about the human case 1st of all. there drove the decision to execute these 3 young people was basically why the government was basically a after. dating terrorizing get. dissatisfied and rest of the population in the face of increasing economic security environmental and social challenges that are rooted in systemic corruption and mis

also here in the uk, the court of appeal has ruled that one of three london schoolgirls who ran away state group at the age of 15 should be allowed to come back to the uk to challenge a decision to strip her of her british nationality. shamima begum, who's now 20, is unable to leave syria after her citizenship was revoked last year. the case has provoked a lot of discussion here in the uk about how to deal with britons who chose to support is. anthony glees is professor of security and intelligence studies at the university of buckingham. he discussed the decision with dal babu, a former chief superintendent of the metropolitan police, who acted as an intermediary between the begum family and counter terror police. i was brought in as an intermediary to try to build a relationship between the families and the police. because the families discovered that the authorities were aware that these girls were being groomed. in fact, girls from the school — one girl had gone, another girl was taken off the plane — attempted to go. even at that point, the authorities had decided not to inform