side facebook twitter and on the chinese side to talk on the technology giant while we also the targets of a u.s. pressure campaign cartoons lampooning the u.s. have been spreading in chinese media this one depicting uncle sam suggesting the u.s. is threatened by competition but the official tone has been angry. dollar. while we ban is part of what he calls nations becoming clean countries which is in fact a synonym for double standards. that means. the battle may be over to talk but the war is about vying for tech supremacy at stake not just profit but power. let's bring in our business correspondent and squatted in new york now yen why are u.s. officials so concerned about tech talk. well i mean talk has been an incredible success story and that's a new very short time in april actually to talk a surplus $2000000000.00 global event they have been some suspicion and some charges that talk actually might collect of privacy data from its users that there has been some an ease about that not just from the u.s. side but we also hear similar concerns from regulators for instance in the u.k.

side facebook twitter and on the chinese site to talk on the technology giant while we also the targets of a u.s. pressure campaign cartoons lampooning the u.s. have been spreading in chinese media this one depicting uncle sam suggesting the u.s. is threatened by competition but the official tone has been angry. at you all are. while we ban is part of what he calls nations becoming clean countries which is in fact the senate them for double standards. that means. the battle may be over to talk but the war is about vying for tech supremacy at stake not just profit but power. let's bring in our business correspondent and squatted in new york now yen why are u.s. officials so concerned about tech talk. well i mean talk has been an incredible success story and that's a new very short time in april actually to talk a surplus $2000000000.00 global event they have been some suspicion and some charges that talk actually might collect of privacy data from its users and there has been some an ease about that not just from the u.s. side but we also hear similar concerns from regulators for instanc

side facebook twitter and apple on the chinese side to talk and the technology giant while we also the targets of a u.s. pressure campaign cartoons lampooning the u.s. have been spreading in chinese media one depicting uncle sam suggesting the u.s. is threatened by competition but the official tone has been angry. dollar. while we ban is part of what he calls nations becoming clean can. trees which is in fact a synonym for double standards from the order that means. the battle may be over to talk but the war is about vying for tech supremacy at stake not just profit but power. sticking with 2nd australia is to become the 1st country to require facebook and google to pay for news content provided by media companies under a royalty style system that will become law this year us tech giants facebook inc and alphabetic google will be forced to pay australian media outlets for their content. was truly a is the 1st country to introduce laws to make the tech giants pay for independently generated media content the australian treasurer said it was time media laws caught up to reality. but as t

side, facebook, twitter, apple.the chinese side, tiktok and chinese giant huawei also the target of a u.s. campaign. cartoons have been spreading in chinese media, this one depicting uncle sam, sis -- asserting the u.s. is threatened by competition. the huawei band is part of what pompeo -- the battle may be over tiktok, but the war is about vying for supremacy. at stake -- not just profit but power. >> our business correspondent following the story in new york. there has been talk of the u.s. banning tiktok. why would microsoft want to buy it? >> basically because tiktok has been quite a success story, surpassing 2 billion downloads already in april. it's very popular, especially with youngerer crowds.s. older people tend to go on instagram and such. one question ultimately would be the price. tiktok belongs to chinese company bytedance, and might be worth alone about $50 billion. >> we've heard the president is preparing an executive order against tiktok. what can you tell us about that? >> all that we know so far

side facebook twitter and on the chinese site to talk on the technology giant while we also the targets of a u.s. pressure campaign cartoons lampooning the u.s. have been spreading in chinese media this one depicting uncle sam suggesting the u.s. is threatened by competition but the official tone has been angry. dollar. while we ban is part of what he calls nations becoming clean countries which is in fact the senate him for double standards that means. the bottle may be over to talk but the war is about vying for tech supremacy at stake not just profit but power. our business correspondent yes cortez following the story for us in new york there's been talk here of the u.s. banning talks so why would microsoft want to buy it. well basically because tick talk has been quite a success story is served processing 2000000000 downloads i'm already in april it's very popular especially with the younger crowd so i older people might tend to go on instagram or as such so but one question clearly also would be the prize to talk belongs to the chinese internet company by dan's and to talk alone mi

rights groups warn it will give the government even more control over the media landscape sides like facebook and twitter will be required to have local representatives in turkey the companies could face fines only century be blocked under the new law let's speak to synonym correspondent in istanbul so tell us more cinema about the content of this law. well fully the aim of this government's bill that passed this morning is actually to define real or legal entities who allow users to create more niche or or share online content and. since this bill has passed the government has the right to ask the social media platform provider to remove the content if it if the government sees it is not appropriate actually this new bill define this new bill defines the crimes that are defined in the lower on social media as well so if something is a crime in the in the constitution or in the turkish law let's say a child abuse or is this information in for damia this is also a crime on social media as well the reason why the government took the smoke was actually it goes back to 2013 stumble gives the protests and the

rights groups warn it will give the government even more control over the media landscape sides like facebook and twitter will have will be required to have local representatives in turkey that also need to store uses data inside the country making it easier for prosecutors and authorities to access the companies could face fines only century be blocked under the new law. has more from the sample. basically the turkish government says if something is a crime according to turkish though that it is a crime on social media as well the bill has some positive sides but especially on the possibilities of restricting personal freedom of speech and restricting journalism suppressing journalism many international organizations hooman rights groups and also even the united nations have reacted against the social media bill saying that it would harm. this freedom of speech in turkey in turkey even the mainstream media is currently under government control so the media it's not wrong to say that media is. not dick and that's why many fear that this could cause more marginal marginalization in media but on the other

and just like facebook and twitter before it, a dark side is emerging. a platform where you have fun and be creative. it's whole philosophy is based around music, lip syncing and, of course, dancing. it's not supposed to be a political platform. it was not supposed to be any platform other than music. and that's how it started. tiktok banned political ads last year, but its content is increasingly political, blurring the lines between comedy, entertainment, and politics. tiktok uses laid claim to sabotaging donald trump's tulsa rally, reserving seeds in droves they would never use. now people have started sitting up and taking notice of the platform's political power. the big question now isjust how influential can these videos be? and are they the future of political advertising? tiktok is easy to use and fun, giving uses creative tools to make imaginative content. and exactly the same tools have been applied to political videos. there's a green screen option so you can be your own presenter, pointing different facts and figures on the screen. the other

facebook. the issue should be more about the responsibilities they should take in moderating or censoring content. it is a slippery slope with of this.on both sides there's a fundamental difference in facebook and twitter'spproach to political content. rightt sure one side is versus the other but there are fundamental differences. by.y: mark, stand we will continue this after a quick break. i want to get your thoughts on netflix as well as another company you cover as we stand by for the president to start that news briefing at the white house. we will be right back. this is bloomberg. ♪ emily: we are back with mark mahaney of rbc capital markets, who covers most of the big tech companies including facebook, amazon., and the ceos of those companies will be appearing on capitol hill monday to testify before the house antitrust subcommittee. we have talked about regulatory risks. do you think anyone of those three phases more regulatory risk than the others? amazonink google first, second, and facebook third, although i do think when we say regulatory risk, antitrust risk is really google and amazon. , speech content risk, it's facebook, so there are different risks. i stick with my guns on this. i don't t

and just like facebook and twitter before it, a dark side is emerging. a platform where you have fun and be creative. it's whole philosophy is based around music, lip syncing and, of course, dancing. it's not supposed to be a political platform. it was not supposed to be any platform other than music. and that's how it started. tiktok banned political ads last year, but its content is increasingly political, blurring the lines between comedy, entertainment, and politics. tiktok uses laid claim to sabotaging donald trump's tulsa rally, preserving seeds in droves they would never use. now people have started sitting up and taking notice of the platform's political power. the big question now isjust how influential can these videos be? and are they the future of political advertising? we will win our freedom... tiktok users are young. around two—thirds are under the age of 30. let me switch up for y'all real quick. topher is 29. by tiktok standards that is ancient. people are saying "0k, boomer" and, "like, i think you're using it wrong." topher is an unusu

and just like facebook and twitter before it, a dark side is emerging.ve fun and be creative. its whole philosophy is based around music, lip syncing and, of course, dancing. it's not supposed to be a political platform. it was not supposed to be any platform other than music. i mean, that's how it started. tiktok banned political ads last year, but its content is increasingly political, blurring the lines between comedy, entertainment, and politics. tiktok uses laid claim to sabotaging donald trump's tulsa rally, reserving seeds in droves they would never use. now people have started sitting up and taking notice of the platform's political power. the big question now isjust how influential can these videos be? and are they the future of political advertising? tiktok is easy to use and fun, giving users creative tools to make imaginative content. and exactly the same tools have been applied to political videos. there's a green screen option so you can be your own presenter, pointing different facts and figures on the screen. the other thing you can do on

and just like facebook and twitter before it, a dark side is emerging.is a platform where you have fun and be creative. it's all philosophy is based around music, lip syncing and of course dancing. it is not supposed to be a political platform. it was not supposed to be any platform other than music. that is how it started. tiktok banned political ads last year, but its content is increasingly political, blurring the lines between comedy and entertainment, and politics. tiktok uses entertainment, and politics. tiktok uses laid claim to sabotaging donald trump's rally in tulsa, preserving seeds in droves they would never use. seeds in droves they would never use. now people have started sitting up use. now people have started sitting up and taking notice of the platform's political power. the big question now isjust platform's political power. the big question now is just how influential can these videos be? and are they the future of clinical advertising? we will win our freedom... the future of clinical advertising? we will win our freedom. .. tiktok us

sides to sheila. she could mourn skylar but on twitter and facebook, she and rachel also seemed carefree.police continued their rachel tweeted, i need a mimosa or ten. they were going about their lives even while the police believed the girls were stone-cold killers. >> locals would whisper in each other's ears and say, how are they still free? >> coalbart aroma runs a blog calls newsball.com. early on he started following this case and was struck by sheila's tweets. things like ain't no rest for the wicked. and incredibly this apparent reference to the countdown to skylar's murder. we really did go on three. >> it's unbelievable that she feels she's so invincible to tweet this publicly. >> and then finally by mid-april 2013 ronny gaskins got the one critical piece of evidence he needed. confirmation that skylar's blood had been found in sheila's trunk. >> on top of the video surveillance, the phone records, rachel's statements at that point we felt we had confidence to have probable cause to make the arrest. >> now authorities told skylar's parents the whole story. their daughter's two b

side that speech is being limited. is that a fair statement? no. i don't think that is true >>at all. if you look at facebook or twitter, they have taken down things on the left as well if they found that that speech was harassing or it was inciting violence, or if it was unlawful. i do think that there is a balance when you have somebody like donald trump to totally disagree with. i don't think it makes sense to say, we are going to and donald trump from the social media platforms. he is still president of the united states and to me, that would be further inciting his supporters and his base. but do i think donald trump, if he sends a tweet promoting violence, do i think that tweet should be amplified? no. so there are ways that we can promote speech without trafficking in ways that amplify violence and hate and make others uncomfortable in participating in it these are very complex issues, and we have been grappling with them for generations. the bigger issue is, we can't trust zuckerberg or dorsey to come up with the right formulation of what is truth in what is proper deliberation in a democracy. i hope they reall

twitter or facebook pages to weigh in. >>> and elizabeth cook, san francisco won't consider any additional reopenings until at least the other side of the holiday weekend. the city's hospitalization rate has jumped by nearly 50% in the past week and it is recording about 50 new cases a day. an average of 5.8 for every 100, 000 residents. city, county health director says that is very near the threshold that could land san francisco on the state's watch list. >> we don't know whether this is going to be a one-time blip or whether this is the tip of the iceberg and we're going to have rapid increase in cases and hospitalizations. it is too soon to tell. >> here is some good news. san francisco hospitals are still doing okay in terms of available beds, but the doctor says that won't last if we don't stay vick lant. veronica? >>> big news from the governor. he plans to pull back on the state's reopening plan and will make abannouncement on enforcement tomorrow ahead of the holiday weekend. >> we have 4th of july weekend coming up. one of the areas of biggest concern as it relates to the spread of covid-19 in the state remains family

side that speech is been limited. is that a fair statement? >> guest: no, i don't think that's true at all. i think if you look at facebook or twitter, that they've taken down things on the left as well if they found that speech was harassing or if it was inciting violence or if it was unlawful. i do think there is a balance. when you some like donald trump, like totally disagree with, i don't think it makes sense to set okay, we're going to ban donald trump from the social media platforms. he is still the president of the united states and to me that would just be further inciting his supporters and his base. but do i think that donald trump, if he has an inflammatory tweet that is inciting violence, that tweet should be amplified? no. so i think there are ways when we can allow for speech but not cathing in ways that amplified violence or hate in making others uncomfortable or participating. look, these are complex issues. the supreme court has been grappling with them for generations. the bigger issue is, we can't trust zuckerberg or dorsey to come up with the right formulation of what is truth and what is the proper deliberation

twitter facebook you tube found out on instagram. we go to work so you straight home. oh my youngins in miami. the food on the side of. the main thing was of a time that. was it was a bit beyond that were innocent as yvonne was more about. one with no more than the side of the ultimate. scene that i'm going to fit in but i'm before put a cop on him but i'll. give up and now i'm body i'm not move on. the world is driven by a dream shaped by some person. no day or. week day or to ask. president revokes home calling his preferential trade status on feel sanctions over children is new security lol prompting beijing to retaliate in. the horrific murder of a young female soldier in texas all their personnel come forward commanders are accused of failing to. prime culture one alleged victim claims she and others are being something that. is happening a lot. in just the amount of control that the military has to keep it kind of quiet is what is surprising. lives modern campaigners demanding.

side there. a request here by r. yet.s who wanted to hear malo this morning. thanks for your request. send us your requests, facebook, twitterks, sal. moving into a very different sound in music recommends of the rock band linkin park are the latest musicians to tell the president to stop using their music. the band issued a formal cease and desist order after the president's reelection team used the muse nick campaign video released over the weekend. the order states lincoln park tonight support president trump or endorse his policies. the band now joins the list of other musicians issuing similar orders against the president, including the rolling tones, neil young and rihanna. >>> today republican congressional leaders are going to the white house to meet with president trumpp to work out the details of the next coronavirus relief package. senate majority leader mcconnell is prepared to roll out a $1 trillion package in a matter of days. house speaker pelosi passed a 3 trillion dollar measure from the democrats. some republicans say they don't support continuing the expanded unemployment benefits. >> we made a mistake whe

when it comes to the reaction from big tech, talking about facebook or twitter or google or apple, in terms of how they deal on the privacy sideh the hong kong government. is there a real concern about heading towards, i guess, one country, one tech system when it comes to hong kong now? bill: sure. wheres administration, there is this range of views, secretary of state pompeo said that from his point of view, hong kong has just become another chinese city. there is a whole range of thought about what china is doing and how seriously it's making a move on hong kong. there is certainly that group who argues that, you know, essentially, it is becoming very country, one system situation. you should not distinguish between hong kong and shanghai or beijing or any other chinese city because essentially, china is treating it all as one, you know, geographical unit. shery: we also had heard that chinese firms received some of was u.s. relief fund that dispersed through the ppp program. quickly, how much are we seeing in terms of the u.s. being able to push back against chinese firms? bill: it is an interesting debate. it does look li

tech giants grew-- facebook, twitter, spotify, instagram, ogle's youtube-- soid alex jones. have been very hard to getuld before and suddenly became easy. >> we're on the right sideory. >> he wasn't really my cup of tea; it was young men who liked him because he was wild and he was funny. >> nellies, going, "ah, kill everybody." >> narrator: his audience washi mostly men-- it became known as "dude radio."on every week milwatched his programs...st >> i mean, it's ike scum, nazi filth... >> narrator: ...and his conspiracy movies.: ("carmina buranao fortuna" by carl orff playing) it was the te of controversialer content that ged clicks. the more outrageous the better;t the bigg lie, the more and youtube's algorith of times.ed s videos billions >> in the near future, earth is dominated by a powerful world government. >> his films got out to millions and millions and millions of people. >> the dawn of a new dark age is upon mankind. >> hen we put out a film, i remember "endgame," within like something like six or seven daye ing like 30 million views. it was ridiculous. i just remember nstantly thousands every time i'dup by refreshed. >> but charlie's tired of being he

and just like facebook and twitter before it, a dark side is emerging.hole philosophy is based around music, lip syncing and, of course, dancing. it's not supposed to be a political platform. it was not supposed to be any platform other than music. i mean, that's how it started. tiktok banned political ads last year, but its content is increasingly political, blurring the lines between comedy, entertainment, and politics. tiktok uses laid claim to sabotaging donald trump's tulsa rally, reserving seats in droves they would never use. now people have started sitting up and taking notice of the platform's political power. the big question now isjust how influential can these videos be? and are they the future of political advertising? tiktok is easy to use and fun, giving users creative tools to make imaginative content. and exactly the same tools have been applied to political videos. there's a green screen option so you can be your own presenter, pointing different facts and figures on the screen. the other thing you can do on tiktok is sing along with yo

facebook, twitter, spotify, instagram, google's youtube-- soid alex nes. >> information that you wouldve een very hard to get before and suddenly became easy. >> we're on the right sideory. tea; it was young men who liked him because he was wild and he was funny. >> nellies, going, "ah, kill everybody." >> nrator: his audience was memostly white men-- it be known as "dude radio." every week millions watched his programs... >> i mean, it's just like scum, nazi filth...d >> narrator: ...s conspiracy movies. ("carma burana: o fortuna" by carl orff playing) it was the type of controversial contenthat generated clicks. the more outrageous the better; e bigger the lie, the mo clicks he got. and youtube's gorithms recommended his videos billions of times. >> in the near future, earth is dominated by a powerful worldme gove. >> his films got out to millionn millions and millions of ople. >> the dawn of a new dark age is upon mankind. >> when we put out a film, i remember "endgame,within like something like six or seven dayl receiving like 30 n views. it was ridiculous. i just remember constantlyhi thousands every time i'd refreshed. >> but charlie's tired of being held up li

facebook and twitter have been "broadly supportive". captainjoe root is back training with the england team after missing the first test against west indies for the birth of his daughter. the two sidesond test at old trafford. and competitive women‘s tennis returned in britain yesterday for the first time since the start of lockdown. the british number six, katie boulter, amongst the winners at the progress tour women‘s championships at the national tennis centre in roehampton. it‘s being played under coronavirus restictions, which means that players call their own lines and collect the balls at the end of a point. it continues on the bbc sport website and app from 11 o‘clock today. that‘s all from us at the bbc sport centre for now, more on the bbc news channel at 1:30pm. thank you very much. we are going to speak about postnatal depression, thank you for your messages. 0ne viewer says, i had a baby five weeks before lockdown and as a result of a complicated but i did not leave the house much before locked in. my boy has only seen health visitors once andi has only seen health visitors once and i am worried about how he will integrate into society. to add to the stress, my company

facebook and twitter allow. they're private organizations. if they want to, if they want to aggravate half of the world by you know, banning speech on one side of the aisle or the other, that is their business decision, you know. every company has a right to do their social justice warrioring on one side of the other or the aisle and alienating the other half but we need that political discourse. the final point i would make on antitrust, whatever we do in terms of breaking up corporations we should not harm the shareholders. and you don't want to criminalize unless they're actually breaking the law, but just because you win the race, we didn't shoot secretariat because he won a lot of races and was the best horse out there. if we're going to break things up, we got to do it intelligently and do it in a way that does note harm shareholders. that is my view. neil: no. very good view here, because so far wall street reacts with stocks that nothing will come of this. we'll see. scott mcnealy, thank you very much. we have a lot of breaking news. some sad news to share with you if you haven't heard already, herman kaine, a conservative voice, a f

side effects. the national institutes of health also ended trials of the drug last month saying it was unlikely to benefit hospitalized coronavirus patients. >> the president defended this video he tweeted. facebook, youtube, and twitter violates policies regarding false coronavirus information. meanwhile, a new poll this week finds 64% of americans believe u.s. efforts to handle the coronavirus outbreak are going badly. 57% believe president trump specifically is doing a bad job of handling it. >> white house press secretary joins us now. good morning. thanks for being with us. why is the president pushing hydroxychloroquine again when his own health experts say it's not effective in fighting the virus? >> the president has a positive outlook for this drug in the early stages. he looks at the henry ford study that came out which was poz ten i've the henry ford ceo saying this could save lives. a yale epidemiologist said that this week as well. but the president has been clear this should only be used in the context of a prescription from your doctor. he wants to save lives. that's his goal. that's why he's promoting this drug as a proef lax us but only in consultation with your doctor. >> dr. fauci said the overwhelm

side of the ledger we're just not seeing equivalent numbers at all going to the trump campaign we see azinga foupder, the facebook he could founder, $620,000, $620,000, meg whitman, $500,000 to the biden team and a twitterfounder $250,000 to team biden that is an all star list of tech names. and it speaks to a problem that president has had in tracting ceos to his side and keeping them to his side the you remember after charlottesville we saw so many of the ceos that joined the president's advisory council all leave in protest to the economies's comments he's not able to get a lot of the big public company ceo names in his column that he would like still, the president has an advantage over joe biden going into the fall in terms of cash on hand. so this will be a big spending election and then the other question going into all this is will these cash on hand numbers in the end of the day really matter last time around, donald trump was the underfunded surprise candidate and he won money might not matter as much as we grew up thinking did it. >> having the big corporate ceos though, is that a help or hindrance? could that be used as something to bash vice president biden >> well, look, the president has

facebook is in an awkward position i parlayed about this last nice. twitter's being asked to sen sentencsens sentences censor more and they're trying to make both sides happy. they're really making everybody angry. they're taking it out on them in these hearings you could see that yesterday when both -- it was pretty bipartisan, actually, going after them >> the reason i asked about the size antitrust question beyond an antitrust hearing is even when you get into the issues of free speech, censorship and whatnot, the real issue is if facebook is such a juggernaut and it's effectively a monopoly, therefore, then you don't get lots of different voices but if you decide it's not a monopoly and there are lots of different platforms and ways to get access to information, then it becomes a different conversation. >> well, facebook is in a difficult position they have to get all of their new mergers and acquisitions approved by the government at this point to facebook's defense, everything they've done up to this point has been approved since acquiring instagram, whatsapp, acquiring these companies. however, it is kind of an insurmountable task competing wi

twitter and facebook as well. one of the guys who often steals the show in these hearings is jim jordan. had you big tech reps taking it from all sidesple and amazon giving the anticompetitive argument. when it came to facebook, they say well, we are better than everybody else. a lot of things went back at google and whether or not they are censoring conservatives. jim jordan went right at that here is support of what he had to say. >> the yes or no question, can you assure americans today you won't taylor your features to help joe biden in the upcoming election? >> we support work that campaigns do. >> i understand that we all do all kinds of online social media. can you today assure americans you will not table your features in any way to help specifically help one candidate over the other and what i'm concerned about you helping joe biden over president trump. >> we won't do any work, you know, to politically tilt anything one way or the other. it's against our core values. >> can you assure us today config your features as she said she did in 2016. can you say you won't do the same thing for joe biden in 2020. >> you have my comm