mr. sanchez. we issued a motes of violation for the illegalization and we didn't -- we always give the opportunity to provide a chance and we haven't had any and it didn't look like it was part of the original construction. this is an unfortunate project in the fact that they have had the revoked permits previously for other issues regarding the retaining wall and the other stuff in the back and now is the time to get it in on one good permit and whether we could have in support of the permit and the next time they move forward we are not dealing with those issues and every time we go out there, something else comes up and it is tough for the people and holding on to the property and no work can take place. the place is vacant and is a hard situation but i think there is a clear path and i couldn't support it from the d.b.i. point of view, but there is a path forward that mr. sanchez led out there. >> we will now hear from the permit holder. we have mr. art chan, the agent for the permit holder. >

mr. sanchez. we issued a motes of violation for the illegalization and we didn't -- we always give the opportunity to provide a chance and we haven't had any and it didn't look like it was part of the original construction. this is an unfortunate project in the fact that they have had the revoked permits previously for other issues regarding the retaining wall and the other stuff in the back and now is the time to get it in on one good permit and whether we could have in support of the permit and the next time they move forward we are not dealing with those issues and every time we go out there, something else comes up and it is tough for the people and holding on to the property and no work can take place. the place is vacant and is a hard situation but i think there is a clear path and i couldn't support it from the d.b.i. point of view, but there is a path forward that mr. sanchez led out there. >> we will now hear from the permit holder. we have mr. art chan, the agent for the permit holder. >

mr. sanchez? >> no, sir. >> supervisor peskin: seeing no questions, and this does not happen very often anymore because the legislative and the executive branches are actually working much closer in collaboration than has historically happened. many, many years ago, my colleagues, supervisor jake introduced proposition d and amendment to the charter that split the appointment on the planning commission to the board of the exercises supervisors ano mayor. as mr. sanchez just said, this was a 4-3 vote at the planning commission. three from the appointees of the people's house, the board of supervisors, who actually agreed with the legislation without amendment for to the executive branch that actually wanted to go with the two choices. one of the two choices. the choice of everything is principally permitted but, i think we've done a pretty good job of parsing this and we've done that by making sure that those kinds of uses, adult entertainment, tobacco use, a number of other uses that are tradition

mr. sanchez? >> no, sir. >> supervisor peskin: seeing no questions, and this does not happen very often anymore because the legislative and the executive branches are actually working much closer in collaboration than has historically happened. many, many years ago, my colleagues, supervisor jake introduced proposition d and amendment to the charter that split the appointment on the planning commission to the board of the exercises supervisors ano mayor. as mr. sanchez just said, this was a 4-3 vote at the planning commission. three from the appointees of the people's house, the board of supervisors, who actually agreed with the legislation without amendment for to the executive branch that actually wanted to go with the two choices. one of the two choices. the choice of everything is principally permitted but, i think we've done a pretty good job of parsing this and we've done that by making sure that those kinds of uses, adult entertainment, tobacco use, a number of other uses that are tradition

mr. sanchez? >> no, sir. >> supervisor peskin: seeing no questions, and this does not happen very often anymore because the legislative and the executive branches are actually working much closer in collaboration than has historically happened. many, many years ago, my colleagues, supervisor jake introduced proposition d and amendment to the charter that split the appointment on the planning commission to the board of the exercises supervisors ano mayor. as mr. sanchez just said, this was a 4-3 vote at the planning commission. three from the appointees of the people's house, the board of supervisors, who actually agreed with the legislation without amendment for to the executive branch that actually wanted to go with the two choices. one of the two choices. the choice of everything is principally permitted but, i think we've done a pretty good job of parsing this and we've done that by making sure that those kinds of uses, adult entertainment, tobacco use, a number of other uses that are tradition

mr. sanchez. ms. collins? mr. cook? >> yes. >> ms. lam? >> ms. lam: yes. >> vice president lopez: yes. >> ms. norton: yes. >> president sanchez: yes. thank you. heinz foster yes. yes. thank you, that's five ayes. >> president sanchez: all right. thank you. and congratulations, all, on getting this. >> congratulations. >> next item is 208 -- 11s0 adoption evisions to the fiscal year 20-21 adopted budgets for the san francisco unified school district and san francisco county office of education in accordance with the california education code section. we need a motion and a second. >> so moved. >> second. >> president sanchez: thank you, superintendent matthews. >> superintendent matthews: this evening we have our chief financial officer meagan wallace presenting. >> good evening, commissioners and superintendent matthews. we have revisions for the 20-21 adopted budgets for sfusd and the county office of education. as a reminder on july 1, 2020, the board of education approved our budget. however, the education code, 42127-h, schools are permitted t

mr. sanchez, this permit did not have planning permit review. but did you want to weigh in. >> we'll pass. >> we'll move on to the department of building inspection, joe duffy. >> tonight we have an appeal on a plumbing permit which is a little bit unusual. we usually get it on the building permits. the plumbing permit was a permit to renew older work that was done, which is pretty common when you have expired permits. it's got a description on it, i think read out earlier and it looks like the permit got issued correctly exit looks like it will be cleaned off as you heard from the appellant. thanking the appellant letting them know there was expired permits. i would like to thank the property owners for renewing the permits and hopefully they can work to getting the work completed now. and we had a series of complaints over the last year, just, like, actually since jun june 3 until july 8th, there's been 11 complaints to electrical plumbing and we had six closed and five are still open. and so, obviously, the appellant is fighting the complaina

mr. sanchez has this week off.

mr. sanchez. around other issues that we didn't necessarily always agree on but what i felt was important is the dedication they clearly had to 9 district and to the children and families there and i want to thank dr. matthews. the work that we have done with dr. matthews has been invaluable. his patients his directness, his capped candidness is -- they are exemplary and qualities that he brings to the district in addition to the work that he does on behalf of the children and families in the district in addition to the teachers and administrators. i think there couldn't have been a better choice for superintendent of the year. thank you very much for taking my comment. >> thank you. >> hello, heather. >> i'd like to register my opposition to charging sfusd families and the infant, toddler and preschool programs while schools are closed for in-person education. thank you. >> thank you. caller, are you there? 627? >> caller: i am. hello. everyone, representing alliance 6 blacks who are educators. w

mr. sanchez has this week off. regarding this case before you now, the property at 1215, 29th avenue is developed a single family home. it's quite long and dense and it only provide an overview and be available for any questions. the first enforcement action regarding units on this property was a d.b.i. complaint from the ground floor in 1999. that enforcement process moved slowly. there were other compliments filed over several years. the property owner filed a new building permit in 2014, nine years later to remove the unit. that permit was issued but never completed. there's no evidence or documentation that the two illegal units were actually removed. planning department engagement began in 2018 when the complaint was filed. the department obtained documents from 2011 and 2014 that clearly described two illegal units out ground floor, which at that time that the property owner did not dispute they were working with d.b.i. to remove those illegal units. in 30-day notice for owner move-in in 2018, the landlord st

mr. sanchez has this week off. regarding this case before you now, the property at 1215, 29th avenue is developed a single family home. it's quite long and dense and it only provide an overview and be available for any questions. the first enforcement action regarding units on this property was a d.b.i. complaint from the ground floor in 1999. that enforcement process moved slowly. there were other compliments filed over several years. the property owner filed a new building permit in 2014, nine years later to remove the unit. that permit was issued but never completed. there's no evidence or documentation that the two illegal units were actually removed. planning department engagement began in 2018 when the complaint was filed. the department obtained documents from 2011 and 2014 that clearly described two illegal units out ground floor, which at that time that the property owner did not dispute they were working with d.b.i. to remove those illegal units. in 30-day notice for owner move-in in 2018, the landlord st

mr. sanchez has this week off. regarding this case before you now, the property at 1215, 29th avenue is developed a single family home. it's quite long and dense and it only provide an overview and be available for any questions. the first enforcement action regarding units on this property was a d.b.i. complaint from the ground floor in 1999. that enforcement process moved slowly. there were other compliments filed over several years. the property owner filed a new building permit in 2014, nine years later to remove the unit. that permit was issued but never completed. there's no evidence or documentation that the two illegal units were actually removed. planning department engagement began in 2018 when the complaint was filed. the department obtained documents from 2011 and 2014 that clearly described two illegal units out ground floor, which at that time that the property owner did not dispute they were working with d.b.i. to remove those illegal units. in 30-day notice for owner move-in in 2018, the landlord st

mr. ruiz will vote on h.res. 1092. as the member designated by ms. sanchez, pursuant to house resolution 965, i inform the house that ms. anchez will vote yea on ordering the previous question on h.res. 1092. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman ?rom arizona rise as the member designated by representative kirkpatrick, pursuant to house resolution 965, i inform the representative kirkpatrick will vote aye on the previous question. for peaker pro tempore: what purpose does the gentleman from florida rise? designated by r mr. kennedy of massachusetts, pursuant to house resolution 965, i inform the house that mr. kennedy will vote aye on the previous question. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia rise? >> madam speaker, as the member titus of by ms. nevada, pursuant to house resolution 965, i inform the titus will vote yea on the previous question. for peaker pro tempore: what purpose does the gentleman from michigan rise? mr. kildee: as the member designated by mr. horsford of nevada, pursuant to hou

mr. walker. or what you might expect someone to pay you for your uterus, miss sanchez.ything less than that is a waste of our time. by the way, we had that water y folks. me from the well in hinkley. >> and the lawsuit was settled for hundreds of millions of dollars. that was a record at the time. promvich's fight for -- brockovich's fight for clean water continues in a book called "superman's not coming: our national water crisis and what people can do about it." she joins us first on "cbs this morning." erin, thank you for being here. it's an issue all of us should care about. the one thing that we all absolutely need for life itself is clean water. we were just talking in a prior session bmtabout a woman swimmi in the hudson river in new york. i understand you had a reaction to what we were saying. i'm curious, what was goi contemplate taking a dip in the hudson? >> a couple of things came to mind, and good morning. it's a pleasure to be here. i don't know -- didn't think you saw that. i was kind of squirming around because we have so many issues with sewage coming i

sanchez will vote the motion to recommit to h.r. 8015. -- as the member designated by ruiz, pursuant to house resolution 965, i inform the vote noat mr. ruiz will on the motion to recommit to h.r. 8015. as the member designated by ms. sanchez, pursuant to house i inform the , house that ms. sanchez will vote no on the motion to recommit to 8015. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. sherman: as the member designated by mr. garamendi, ursuant to house resolution 965, i inform the house that mr. aramendi will vote no on the motion to recommit. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia seek recognition? mr. connolly: mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. nevada, pursuant to house resolution 965, i inform titus will at ms. vote nay on the motion to recommit. fo the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from massachusetts seek recognition? > as the member designated by ms. omar, pursuant to house resolution 965, i inform the house that ms. omar will vote nay on the motion to recommit. the speaker pro tempore: for what pu