planning commission t planning commission voted to destroy an illegal a.d.u. because it would not be able to meet the building code requirements. so even with this law, it won't stop all demolitions that destr destroy existing or legal a.d.u.s and we can work to do more. >> thank you. probably why less people burn to death in that you are houses in our society. new other members of the public who would like to speak to this item? >> caller: good evening, supervisors. this is gordon in support of the legislation and it need to be continued. that is and removing density controls is a good step in that direction. i would like to expand this legislation with the density controls across the board that were created for racist reasons and if it was rawsist when it was kree yachted, and just beyond the opportunities we could have and somebody in a mansion and like the one that supervisor peskin luvs in and wants to split up the home to three or four more units to rent out some below argument rate and remove the density controls throughout the city. this is a good first step and no reason not to take more steps as well. legalizing and no reason they should be kicked out. if there are serious concerns about an a.d.u. that is built illegally, le sfie and natural affordable housing in the city. one last point and i hear that generally referring to people who advocate for market housing as libber theian. ien am i am a democrat and have been knocking on doors six i was 16 and to engage with the name calling like a child. thank you. please pass this legislation. >> mr. gordon, your personal attacks are noted and unwarranted. and unfortunate and do not help your position which if you watched this committee relative to proposition e and the housing balance report, you will realize are quite unfortunate and unproductive statements. next speaker please. >> caller: good evening, supervisors. robert from district five. i want -- i know this item is going to be continued, but i would like to say that density controls were originally enacted as part of red lining throughout the west side in neighborhoods like mount davidson manor and saint frances wood and others near balboa park in particular. i found a planning document from 1970 that shows the distribution of existing and planned public housing and virtually all of it was planned for would be currently districts five, 8, 9, 10, 111 and 12 with virtually no public housingen and density controls are not an original idea from the fact that it's been san francisco policy to put all density in the east side explicitly in normally industrial areas for the last 50, 60 years. thank you. >> next speaker. >> mr. chair, that completes the queue. >> okay. public comment is closed. at the request of supervisor mandelman, i will continue this item to the call of the chair. and hopefully schedule it to august. on that motion, roll call please. >> supervisor preston. >> aye. >> supervisor safai. >> aye. >> supervisor peskin? >> aye. >> you have three aye's. >> could you please read item seven and eight together? >> item 7 is an ordinance amending the general plan to revise the balboa park station area plan and the recreation and open stays element and amen