biopics he was a did a biopic as you guys mentioned earlier about thurgood marshall the 1st black us supreme court justice he did a biopic about jackie robinson the 1st black person to be allowed to play baseball in major league baseball and then he did a biopic about the great legends fingered james brown so he's done really great needy roles but they hadn't really crossed over to an international audience and he never had that kind of international success until he took on the role of black panther and that's what he'll be best remembered for so will be very interesting to see what they do in the sequel to to honor him. all this and was also not just respected as an actor and he was also a role model can you tell us a bit of found that what kind of a role model was he off screen you know he was that i think was a radio interview a couple of years ago around the time that black panther was released and he talked about receiving letters from kids with cancer one to meet him and talking about how it was so exciting to see a black superhero on the screen and he he wrote back and corresponded with hi

been rallying for the construction of a temple on the site after a lengthy legal battle in the us supreme court awarded the disputed a lot to hindus in november of last year the verdict caused disappointment among india's muslim community but many have since come to terms with their decision. to import the muslim community has accepted the verdict and we want to help with the construction of the temple. as muslims will be able to build a new mosque on a nearby plot but prominent muslim leaders fear the new temple could have bold new hindu nationalists to target other mosques in the region. and this is the 1st thanks so much for watching. combating the corona pandemic. where does research stand and. what are scientists learning. information and. our corona. with 19 special next on d w. r middle and i'm going to go compete the 2nd season only.

been rallying for the construction of a temple on the site after a lengthy legal battle in the us supreme court awarded the disputed a lot to hindus in november of last year the verdict caused disappointment among india's muslim community but many have since come to terms with their decision. to implore the muslim community has accepted the verdict and we want to help with the construction of the temple i mean there are. as muslims will be able to build a new mosque on a nearby plot but prominent muslim leaders feared the new temple could in bold and hindu nationalists to target other mosques in the region. where some of the other stories now that are making headlines around the world 12 people have died in a bus accident in milwaukee 030 others were seriously injured when the bus overturned close to the year on tuesday on the country's southwest coast local reports say the crash was due to dangerous driving on difficult road. in the united states at least 6 people with tropical storm. battered the country's east coast millions were left without power as driving winds and heavy rains caused hav

the lawsuit goes all the us supreme court and they win. a major ruling by the us supreme court. >> training. >> .. many of them were from one parent households, incredibly tough conditions and some talk how hungry they were half the time and they knew they wanted to play basketball and they wanted to play baseball really well and wanted -- did they know it was about something more important to connect to the relays at some point that what they were doing had significance beyond what was happening on the court or on the baseball diamond because it did. >> here is what was key to their lives at that point. jack gibbs was a black man -- >> black first black principal of that school. >> yes, and he was born in arlington, kentucky in a very tough neighborhood in he didn't want to work in the coal mines so he hitchhiked when he was 14 years old to columbus to be with another family relative because he figured that the school system there was much better and he had a sister who died in infancy in harlan, kentucky and jack gibbs every sunday had to

i'm going to have you with us supreme court has rejected an appeal by the country's exiled opposition leader to set aside the results of the country's disputed presidential election. challenge the results last week saying her country would never accept president lukashenko as leadership again the mass demonstrations against the government are still going on posing the biggest ever threat to look 20 sick. years in power. demonstrations in front of the ministry of education in minsk school teachers are on the streets they were election assistance they counted the votes now president alexander lukashenko has threatened to fire the ones who don't support his government. the bellary see an opposition wanted to negotiate directly with the authorities through the coordination council they set up but lucas shanker rejected that offer calling the council a legal 2 members have already been arrested both the detained members surrogate iliescu shown here and old kovach over was sentenced to 10 days in prison on tuesday a huge banner with luka shanker his election slogan for bella reese hangs ove

been rallying for the construction of a temple on the site after a lengthy legal battle in the us supreme court awarded the disputed a lot to hindus in november of last year the verdict caused disappointment among india's muslim community but many have since come to terms with the decision. that import the muslim community has accepted the verdict and we want to help with the construction of the temple. at u.t. as muslims will be able to build a new mosque on a nearby plot but prominent muslim leaders feared the new temple could have bold new hindu nationalists to target other mosques in the region. if so how significant is this project for prime minister narendra modi and his internationalist agenda. you know i mentioned. that one sentence wasn't better. but that this new variant. and i'll. love it we've got action. and this number. between muslims and hindus and i want you to. guess nothing. has ever. happened to this instruction is. not. unity and i want. to start on the construction today and i would also add another it's not citizenship that it's got. so far as you know what else cross the

been rallying for the construction of a temple on the site after a lengthy legal battle in the us supreme court awarded the disputed a lot to hindus in november of last year the verdict caused disappointment among india's muslim community but many have since come to terms with their decision. in for the muslim community has accepted the verdict and we want to help with the construction of the temple and i mean i think that you know he has muslims will be able to build a new mosque on a nearby plot but prominent muslim leaders fear the new temple could have bold and hindu nationalists to target other mosques in the region. or here in germany a far right extremists has admitted that he was the one who killed a pro refugee politician last june stephon he is on trial for allegedly murdering conservative politician valter luka prosecutors say that he shot in the head close range outside the bluecoats home. i have been a powerful voice for refugees and had received death threats for backing german chancellor merkel's plans to take in margaret's back in 2015. stefan be talking to his lawyers as hearin

but last month a us supreme court ruling meant any outstanding fines would still need to be paid beforelebrities like lebron james, michaeljordan and john legend are stepping in to help pay the fines — but the decision is a huge setback for campaigners with the election only months away. well, joining me now from orlando is executive director of the florida rights restoration coalition desmond meade. it is difficult for people to find out exactly how much they owe and therefore hard to clear the debt. firstly, thank you for having me on the show. you are right, this has been a problem that has been raised over a year by the project where the state has yet to put together a centralised system that will allow people to at least have an accurate accounting of what they owe so they can satisfy their debt and bea they can satisfy their debt and be a part of democracy again. but we are still pressing forward and we are finding creative ways to work around the system in order to get people engaged. essentially all parties have always done this but this is part of a wider push and a concerted p

had already played thurgood marshall, a biopic about the first african—american male on the us supreme courtbout the life and death ofjackie robinson, jackie robinson as you probably already know was the first black man to join the major league baseball association so we were not surprised to see him take on such a challenging role and do it so well in black panther, it was leading up to that. he always, always chooses his roles very carefully. and i can remember the last time i saw him 2013, when i worked for cnn. i was on the red carpet covering 42 and he was serious then — one of few actors in his 30s that really gave a lot of thought into the roles that he would play, and i didn't see a lot of that in hollywood so i took notice. and a huge amount of reaction now from other stars in hollywood, reacting to his death. yeah, so many people. you know, josh gad went on instagram live and just wanted to send his condolences to his family. and, of course, so many people like spike lee, everybody pouring in that had worked with him. he worked with so many acclaimed people, even did saturday night

meanwhile the us supreme court today let rhode island retain a policy for now that lets residents their-mail without witnesses present william brangham explores how the vote-by-mail process works. judy five states already conduct their electionslmost entirely by mail right now. and for the most part they're experienced over the last two years has been a good one. but as you're saying given the pandemic it's likely that millions more americans will be trying to cast their vote this way come november to help dispel some of the myths and allegations about this technique. 'm joined again by jessica huesemann. she's a reporter of propublica and has made the election beat her beat for many years now jessica great. see you again. coulyou just help us for people who are not familiar with this basically speaking what is voting by mail voting? my nail is very similar to what we have always done except for instead of casting a ballot in the precinct to you are casting a ballot through the mail. so everything stays the same ones the ballot is received by the local administrator. they counted in the

clear constitutional rules, something that today we just expect, the constitution will save us, the supreme court will decide everything. i don't think that is what the founders intended. i argue trump is bringing us back to the original understanding because he is vigorous about using the powers of his office to fight and frustrate congress. >> host: for a lot of those powers, most of them are subject to reversal, the president has the power to reverse but that means for each president there is natural limitation on himself, the possibility of being reversed so sometimes these things sort themselves out over time. i want to remind people we go to audience questions in a few minutes, you can send questions on twitter, hashtag the fender in iv by email to nicole.pen@aei.org. you say in the closing part of the book with an eye towards the upcoming presidential election you say to make the case for another term donald trump will have to use the constitution more as a sword to advance his positive agenda looking at ways presidential power, executive administrative power and promote a policy agenda. w

and something like today we just expect the constitution is gonna save us, the supreme court will decide everything, i don't think that's what the founders intended it. that's why argue in a way, trump is bringing us back to that more original understanding is very vigorous about using the powers of his office to try to fight and frustrate congress >> for a lot of those powers most of them they are subject to reversal, the president has the power to reverse but that means for each president, there is a natural limitation on himself. it is the possibility of being reversed. sometimes these things sort themselves out over time. i want to remind people, we will go to audience questions in a few minutes. you can send questions on twitter or by email to nicole.penand@aei.org. you say in the closing i to make the case for another term president trump will have to use the constitution more as a sword to advance his positive agenda on looking ahead to the ways in which presidential power executive administrative power can help promote an affirmative policy agenda. what sorts of things could pres

supreme court. he left the supreme court. he ran for president. then he went back to the supreme court. when of the finest minds on the court's. >> why use? >> andrew jackson said that "he looks like god and talks like god." >> charles evans hughes -- the republican presidential nominee soon after the national convention. tonight, we looked at the life and legacy of charles evans hughes who was a two-term governor, secretary of state, and twice a supreme court justice. he was perhaps best known as one of the co-authors of the new deal. we're broadcasting live across from the capitol. he inaugurated this building when it first opened in 1935. let me introduce you to our guests this evening were joining us to talk about the life and legacy of charles evans hughes. my first guest is an historian, and bernadette higher -- bernadette tyler is a professor at cornell law school. i want you to set the stage for us. 1916, woodrow wilson wants to be reelected. frame what was going on in the country and the presidential campaign. >> president wilson said it would be a tragedy if his administration was defined by foriegn policy. it turned out to be j

and before we begin, i want to provide quick for the next couple august 4, please join us for the annual supreme court review would be anti-defamation league frederick lorenz and it will be a wonderful discussion of the important pieces of th cases ofm inferencing must tell you what a great pleasure on august 2 26th house circumstances permitting will open up our new exhibit how women won the vote about the 19th amendment as it is relevant to today's topic that examine exhibit about the history of the expansion of women's suffrage at workteam is hard glimmering behind me on the backdrop of. throughout the program please put your questions in a box and they will introduce them as sooe as possible. now it is my great pleasure to introduce our phenomenal taste. matthew sterling professor of history, social policy at the john f. kennedy school of government at harvard and the author of many books including the right to vote, the contested history of democracy which was a finalist for the "los angeles times" book prize and the book coming out in just ten days, why do we still have the electoral college. fo

we have brought back one of our first guest who is joining us on the plaza of the supreme court. david pietrusza, one aspect we have not spent much time on his his chair as secretary of state in his pivotal one post world war i years. would you tell us about what contributions he made in that role? >> he is regarded as not only one of the great chief justices, he is regarded as one of the great secretary of state. he is regarded as one of the top three. what he does is he inherits a great mess because of the failure of the league of nations, he was for the league of it -- he was for the league of nations, for the united states of america that entered the league, but he was not about to see sovereignty to the league of nations. article 10 said the united states would go to war if we were going to defend boundaries of the mass in europe. he thought that the league could be fixed. he planned to submit a clean-air bill treaty which could get through the senate when he became secretary of state. that was impossible. warren harding saw this a little quicker than he did. hughes recognize

and the idea of us standing there, residing california state supreme court ruling, the law, to the copver the community, that bobby seale and his friend huey newton seale and his friend huey n ewto n we re seale and his friend huey newton were out patrolling police. we not —— we did not patrol every day, at this time i was working for the city government of oakland, california. i went on patrol police seven times in a six—month period. that led us to california state legislature, we lead a delegation into the legislature because they were trying to make a law to stop us patrolling cops. so we were very legal in patrolling the police. forgive me i am going tojump in once more because as isaid, tojump in once more because as i said, there is so much we wa nt to i said, there is so much we want to talk about and your experience of this. back then it was called the civil rights movement, now we talk about black lives matter, and we have seen black lives matter, and we have seen today and over the last few months, protests over the deaths of so many african—americans at deaths of so many af

supreme court has kept us free to do it.toms and border protection and the army corps of engineers are pressing ahead hard to make it happen and today's win was a big one to make sure we stay on track for that goal. >> jason: it will and it will be most helpful, having been on the border is much as i have, it will be a huge help to the border patrol, no doubt about it. i also want to get your reaction to the story that you can read about on foxnews.com, this idea that have a police department's are getting budget cuts in this time and age right now. i've got to tell you, it's going to be devastating to the country and its residents. they are supposed to be protecting the citizenry. you can't just go and cut their budget and not expect to have a consequence. >> you know, that's why police become police officers. they want to do good and protect their communities. of course you have the every so often bad apple but there's no professionaprofession on earth t have that. for purely political reasons, you have left-wing governmen

america now for 5060 years what other checks will be used and the usual tricks are some new tricks krag there's brand new tricks in 2018 the supreme court handed a new weapon to the vote the purge in general in june of 2800 they said they can use a new trick to remove voters our wonderful new supreme court which is to say that if if you miss a couple of elections. that means you're in active voter by the way an active doesn't mean you're sitting around on the couch eating potato chips it means you skip the cow collections they say skip a couple actions and then you don't answer postcard guess what they say they say well obviously you will move so it's missing an election not returning a piece of junk mail that means you've moved they target these these these letters at african-american voters asian american voters let latin x. voters and young people and so went once when the supreme court said you can now begin wiping out voters using this new gimmick they took it for a test drive in georgia in november of 2018 i was there when stacy was the 1st black woman to run for governor of any american state lost but stay seems since something u

and under the constitutional theory, that the supreme court has adopted, and most of us believe, and i except for the purposes of this argument. even though may not be a good constitutional theory. you can only have one sided time. so i accept this decision, and under our current constitutional theory, if something happens through private action, there is no constitutional remedy. and if it happens, by state action federal state and local action, not only is their constitutional remedy, but a constitutional obligation for remedy. so and so this wealth gap that you are talking about, as many of the problems i've alluded to already, a it rose because of state sponsored segregation. and that is this you know my book says it's the forgotten history. it's not a hidden history, it's a forgotten history. so there are two main aspects of it, and like i say i have to describe both of them and how they interact with each other to answer your question. the first is public housing, most of us think of public housing, as a place where lowing come, and mostly minority families live, and sometimes

used. the supreme court has already ruled on that. >> hansi, i'm so grateful to you that you're underliningt point there is no citizenship question on the 2020 census. in as much as it might have been about an attempt to not have that been so, it's also about a chilling effect and people being afraid to submit their results. hansi, thank you so much. >>> they're unseen on the front lines of the pandemic. essential farm, who workers who are handling our food supply. in a special nbc news telemundo report, why many of these workers are willing to risk their own health for their jobs. >>> first, new york sues to dissolve the national rifle association. what the lawsuit says the higher ups are accused of doing, next. thousands of women with metastatic breast cancer, which is breast cancer that has spread to other parts of the body, are living in the moment and taking ibrance. ibrance with an aromatase inhibitor is for postmenopausal women or for men with hr+/her2- metastatic breast cancer, as the first hormonal based therapy. ibrance plus letrozole significantly delayed disease progression vers

again, it shows you how the 14th amendment have been used for all sorts of -- again, our supreme court has punted on that. just a few months ago there was an attempt to get the court to overturn the gerrymandering of congressional districts where states, state legislators, you know, they redraw the districts and that do it so one party will get far, far higher percentage of the members of congress and their vote and the supreme court said we are not interested in this. it's up to the states to do it and we are just going home. that question is still up in the air, but as to what the constitution defines as a person, well, first of all, the first sentence of the 14th amendment, any person born in the united states, this relates to the decisions relating to abortion rights, you have to be born to be a person, you know, even though many states, sort of unborn, et cetera, but to be a person with rights you have to been born somewhere but it's an interesting thing. as i said, the 14th amendment uses the word citizens, privileges or immunity of citizens, that's not everybody but later it tal

place in the heart but to preen caught in lebanon which was which is one of the which is the supreme court in the us they call it the council of justice. and let's look ahead for a 2nd what are the most pressing issues the caretaker government coming in now will have to address. as taken to take a government. minder of 42 years. future time now do you secure wishing that among the political parties the m.p.'s the blocs many people that you could party they should among each other to to have another you to have to form another government it's. not going to from our sources that it should be a national government which means that includes all political parties we tried that before several times in government that's why some political parties in the opposition saw it they said it didn't work so how come it will work again so it seems the coming days we will witness some i gained some although the political. and there is somebody who can step up in this situation another political figure maybe who can't who can step in now and give a promising message to the lebanese people. it's so hard especially if t

please join us for the 2020 annual supreme court review in partnership with the antidefamation league, and it will feature the distinguished .egal scholars it will be a wonderful discussion of the most important cases of the term. i must tell you with great 26th,re that on august circumstances permitting, the national constitution center will open our new exhibit, how vote, about the 19th amendment. it is very relevant to today's topic. it is an exhibit about the history of the expansion of women's suffrage. our team is hard at work to reopen the national constitution center building, which is glimmering behind me on the backdrop. they opened the doors and welcomed people. and remember, throughout the program, please put your questions in the chat box, and i will introduce them to our panelists as soon as possible. and now, it is my great pleasure to introduce our phenomenal guests. he is a professor of history and social policy for the john f. kennedy school of government at harvard. he is the author of many books including the right to vote. the contested history of democracy in the

they argued against us at the u.s. supreme court. abeled us spawns of satan and slandered us in mainstream media. no matter their abuse, we'll keep fighting for the country and children we love just like president trump. he's breaking the unions grip on our schools. that's why unions have tried to destroy him since the day he was elected. but president trump isn't afraid to fight for what's right. he won't back down. his courage gives great teachers renewed hope. he's even proposed education freedom scholarships to return control to parents, protect religious liberties and empower kids to escape dangerous low-performing schools. the republican platform supports educational freedom. the democrat party does not. democrats stand with deceptive teachers unions who pick on loving teachers and little kids. president trump stands with america's families, great teachers and most importantly our children. so america's great teachers, let's stand with president trump in protection of the kids and country we love. ♪ >>> i am so grateful to speak

i think what the president is going to do is he's going to use the powers the supreme court granted himaking him a king and using executive action doing a lot of things with legislative action. >> shannon: pointing the fingers at each other for the couple weeks. it comes to this and the president has said all along if they can't get a deal hammered out i will take executive action. is that what you expect to hear? >> i think it's where this is heading. the reality is that the president can't do as much by executive action as congress could've done that they were able to reach a deal but it was very clear coming out of the negotiations today that the two sides remained incredibly far apart, it's almost hard to find areas where they actually were in agreement. so it appears that everybody has made the decision that it's not worth going back and talking again only to keep banging their heads against the wall. the white house side, the republican side. the only way forward is through executive actions that could at least address some of what might've been in a final package. >> shannon: he

us freedom . for them the supreme court decision to detain libby on witness tampering and fraud charges this week is an outrage and thousands of former good fighters have gone free tanks 282016 peace deal no i don't it's not fair that they keep him like a vile criminal when those guerrilla fighters are sitting in the senate it's not fair not fair. 7 but to others here who is the criminal a man with alleged ties to drug traffickers and paramilitary groups with no regard to human rights whose war against marxist insurgents left thousands of innocent civilians there. the opposition against a hard fought peace deal with fired rebels that its predecessor a one man way to santa is achieved leaving the country split in 2. and even then certain promises to defend these divisions there threatening the possibility of requests. would have this party in this political protests share current president have attacked the courts the situation even calling for an overhaul of the justice system and a change to the constitution. for many political commentators the current crisis is testing the country's institution

property, the organization in which the burden of regulation has been imposed on us by the state, and the supreme court what it did, and now states are doing what they are doing legalizing sports betting, they are now imposing a set of requirements on us in terms of how they expect us to protect the integrity of the product, so my view is we should get a fee, not off the profits, because i don't want anyone thinking we are incentivized for a particular team to win or a game to go or a particular score or seven games instead of six games or whatever else, but i feel as a business matter, we should show the proceeds. david: he was a spectacular commissioner, he retired when he what 72. when he was 65, 66, 68, 69, 70, did you ever give him a little push? adam: never, never, never. ♪ david: how do you get to be nba commissioner? did you grow up saying i want to be nba commissioner? adam: i didn't grow up wanting to be the commissioner. i don't think i had any sense of what it was. david: you did not go to duke on a basketball scholarship? adam: i definitely didn't. i'm pretty sure that when -- even when i

us, thank you for that in lightning, educational, and entertaining lecture. we are looking forward to publishing a version of that in the journal of supreme court history. those of us i have heard it will enjoy it all the more for the presentation we heard today. thank you very much for today. [applause] this is american history tv on c-span3. feature 40d we's hours of programs exploring our natures -- nation's past. >> dozens of films documenting the aftermath of the atomic arms that were dropped on hiroshima and nakasaki, japan in august of 1945, are available at the u.s. national archives in maryland. the film shop by japanese and american crews, were hidden and off-limits to the public for decades after world war ii ended. up next on 'reel america" antorian greg mitchell, author joins us to tell the story of these films. we begin with a portion of a film describing the morning of august 6, 1945 and hiroshima. this program includes scenes of atomic tom victims that some viewers may find -- atomic bomb victims that some viewers may find disturbing. >> it was the sixth of august. an unusually calm and clear morning. two ininutes after 8:00, formation ap

currently, we have the portfolio on loan to us from the supreme court, and henry clay would have used these items when he went to washington, d.c. we also have a pair of stirrups that say "h. clay," and as a farmer, henry clay believed in breeding the best to the best and because of this philosophy, 11 kentucky derby winners can draw their bloodlines back here to ashland. next, we have the library. henry clay began his legal career in 1797. we have his law license up here on the wall, and this was issued in 1797 in virginia. henry clay would turn to his legal career throughout his life as a source of revenue or income and his legal career and his great oratory really helped define who he was. >> well, we will be back with you throughout the program. you will be available to answer some of our viewer questions and take us on a tour of the other places in the house, avery malone, so thank you very much for this view of ashland in henry clay's period. who were some of the famous people he may have hosted here? >> several presidents came here. william henry harrison met with clay here, ma

supreme court already waiting their. case i put it a make us break and on last march trump versus last in the supreme court made it very clear those documents are going to be turned over to the grand jury in new york so yes there is an ongoing criminal investigation at the state level and there may be another one of the federal level in the southern district of new york at least $21.00 states are suing the u.s. postal service and the postman as a general who is the joy accusing them of intentionally effort to thwart motors from mailing their ballots this fall these lawsuits carry any weight. yes they do we've got a very difficult situation right now if we are going to rely on both but male many americans do not want to vote in person without with 19 they want to vote by mail and that's our right and many states have put in place an effect the vote by mail system although the trump operatives have been suing to try to block vote by mail in the number of states the problem is both my mail doesn't work at the postal system doesn't deliver we just

i think several cases of the supreme court are a reminder just how important this election is for the future of the supreme court. joining usjeffress a member of the white house faith initiative, and a fox news contributor and author of the new book praying for america. available everywhere right now. pastor it is great to see you. avoiding if you share the best prince's disappointment with justice roberts? so i do. the vice president has been a lot nicer than i would've been in that interview. look, roberts has done many disappointing things in the abortion ruling especially in this church situation. a shutdown of this church in which the supreme court in john roberts actually said it is permissible to gather together at caesar's palace in order to gamble but you cannot gather together in a church in order to worship god.oo that is an abomination. and look, we know there is no such thing as a sure thing when it comes to picking supreme court justices. but the odds are tremendously better at getting a conservative justice with president trump and with president biden. david: let me move over to what's happening on the cityy

remarkable the supreme court said you have to follow the administrative procedure act that could take between one and four years to undo president obama's decision even if he didn't use that. so one thing i have been asking and i started asking this in 2012 when obama issued that if it's not in power of enforcement of the supreme court believes what it says then think of what president trump can do it will take his successor two or three years he could radically change immigration law to say i will not force it against computer science or mathematics or for those who bring billions of dollars to american businesses. just create his own daca program replace children or parents of children with stemmed agree or skills. i think the supreme court is wrong but i don't know why there has to be a constitutional law presidential power to limits trump although the supreme court should have a completely different will that only benefits other presidents. >> your argument comes back to the take care clause at one point he wrote the book before the court decided that case. but you wrote it with an eye to the case knowing it was on its way. it's not be the case they can force the