blurry to humans that's because water has a higher density than ass so lightweight spam does make carlstrom at a water and the slow down that means an image isn't focused exactly on the retina as is the case out of water but behind it hence the blur diving goggles compensate for that. the all fish by contrast have almost spare eko hard lenses and can see everything up to a distance of one meter clearly. to look further away they are just focused by moving the lens closer to the retina. they still can't really see fog but usually they don't need to. they have a wide panoramic view because of their side facing eyes. ultra wide angle camera lenses called fisheye lenses mimic this effect. fish see more colors than we can they have receptus not only for red green and blue light but also for ultraviolet. in the dark depths that helps them locate prey that sport brilliant colors fisherman use colorful bait to exploit this ability in fish. some fish it turns out can distinguish different human faces. as a study of archer fish found. they'd shoot down prey by spitting a jet of water. in the experime

. >> prosecutors kristen richardson and carla carlstrom, promised the jury pieces of a puzzle.timately reveal a resentful, hateful husband, whose frustrations had boiled over. >> i think it was actually, i think the phrase it truly was a crime of passion. >> at the core of the prosecutors' case, david was a sexist philanderer who viewed his goody-two-shoes wife as a weight around his neck. so he put his hands around hers after an argument to free himself of the burden. david they said then turned to nici's problem with pills as his cover-up. >> why kill her? >> it wasn't a plan to murder. if it was something he planned to do, sure, he could divorce her. this was not a plan. this was something that erupted one night in a fit of rage. >> because they thought there was no premeditation, david pietz was charged with second, not first, degree murder. but proving he snapped and strangled nici in their condo wouldn't be easy. this was a highly circumstantial case with little direct evidence pointing david's way. >> in terms of the bedroom or the house, there is no physical evidence le