the transfer of power is a norm. norms are not always self-executing. that means people who care about their country in both parties, in congress, people in the courts, people with voices in this country need to go the extra mile to reinforce the american democracy that we all believe in and that we could lose. if you break a norm like this once, it's hard to put that genie back in the bottle. it will be hard for someone to govern if it's joe biden and you have the republican party backing up trump and saying if result is illegitimate. it's the time for grown-ups to stand up, more so than they have, and say this is beyond a third rail. we cannot go there as a country. it will be hard to put things back together if we go through a two and a half month period under chaos after the election. >> speaking of grown-ups, elise jordan, here's joe biden. it's fair to say joe biden is everyone reacting to that comment from trump. let's watch. >> he would not submit to a peaceful transfer of power if he loses the election. >> what country are we in? look, he says

what happened, the norms caught up. here is a case where maybe people did not had opportunities to blow their nose that often where they were mostly outside and in all the send they have these opportunities to gratify themselves and satisfy the strong urges so they did. but people don't do that anymore and the reason they don't do those things anymore is because the norms have caught up. what brandon and i hope is that eventually the norms will catch up for grandstanding also and people will come to see. when something gets on facebook or twitter along caption on instagram about whatever it social justice social justice issue they wanted to impress people with their issues about. it's not the sort of thing that people do in polite company. i'm interested in the practical applications for this book. and the ideas that are set out in it. particularly because i can see attention and how they are applied. the first way is going back to our discussion about there is a self-assessment having this in front of you you understan

there are a whole series of norms involved, there is a whole series of considerations involved.but when you boil it all down, this comes down to a political question. which is, given the opportunity, does the senate move ahead in considering a nomination for the supreme court, that has the potential to further entrench a conservative majority on that court. and, republicans in congress republicans in the senate have made that decision which is fundamentally a political one. i don't know the democrats would decide differently if they were in control. this is how our politics have become. unfortunately, a lot of the norms that we have come to expect that two sides would observe in a consideration like this one, have been tossed out the window. starting in 2013 for example when harry reid made the decision to move away from the institutional norm of having a super majority vote for lower court nominees. so this has been going on for some time now. both sides are guilty of eroding those norms. >> dean brown, a conservative judge is no doubt going to tip the scales on a host of cases

social norms change. example would be the most recent lgbtq cases where the federal government now cannot discriminate against people on the basis of whether they are transgender or gay. originalists would say discrimination on the basis of sex is just discrimination on the basis of gender. clearly those words have different meanings at different times. this is not to say that the court should be reaching out into the future, but the idea that the constitution is frozen is antithetical to growing democracy, a democracy that lives and breathes. >> danielle, thank you for joining us. danielle mclaughlin author of "the federalist society" and she'll be on with us through the course of the weekend. >>> president trump is set to officially announce his supreme court nominee from the white house at 5:00 p.m. eastern. nicolle wallace will anchor our network coverage of that event starting at 5:00 p.m. eastern. >>> we're just three days away from the first presidential debate of this election. make sure to join o

people who lots of people who say gender is a construct meaning gender is stereotypes and societal norms it's all made up and it's something we imposeon people to oppress them . and then we have people who feel that the word gender is really about gender identity and how masculine or feminine you are his biological and it's not a construct. and some of this misunderstanding about the word gender is what is fueling certain culture wars. and i think it's pretty clear , the main thing that's clear is that nothing is clear. i saw scientific research the same research interpreted in completely different ways by people who had different definitions of the word gender . and i saw people making certain arguments and compiling all the evidence to further their arguments and ignoring anything that interrupted it. and i didn't want to do that. i wanted to mix it all together and say look how messy this is. look how hard it is to determine what's biological and what's constructed because we raise children so differently that we don't have really a way to know what is just from biology. and what we,

and it shouldn't be a norm and we have to learn that i think in every society this will start with the family and the community and there are players in those communities fathers mothers traditional rulers religious leaders and they all have to be part of this conversation and we really have to go back to basics of doing no harm and that it is absolutely wrong to raise a hand against a woman you must find a better way of having to resolve whatever the issues are that you take up so i think the 1st thing is the conversation the conversation has to be that we have this dialogue together we speak together and that we don't become defensive about it and we don't fight about it but we bring a realisation to the community that this also builds a society that will never hold together if it is based on the foundation of women being beaten so i think the 1st step is is for all those key players in a family in a community in a society to begin to have these conversations to say this is not right it must stop and then and learn for those that have gone quite far and to know what it is that exacer

and i think to the closer you get to that norm. we're talking norms here in some regard, then the institution is bolstered. >> i want to turn a little to the future. and ask a few questions about what we might expect. and one is a little off beat, but i have to ask it because i am who i am, which is if biden is president, i'm curious what will happen at guantanamo or to guantanamo. the new york times reporter and central reporter carol rosenberg has been told by the biden campaign that mr. biden continues to support closing the detention center. josh, you were there when obama tried to close the detention center. the plan is still probably on paper. do you think that's possible, that biden could do this? or is this a non-starter? >> i hope it's possible, but it will take a change in political mr. in congress. you were kind enough to say, karen, i put a lot of hours alongside many, many, many other people in trying to first, you know, reduce the detainee population as much as possible consistent with security and humane treatment ob

been granted nearly 130 is the for them that they have explicitly elected so we stuck with the basic norms so by the way they did precisely what they had indicated they would do themselves in 1992. democrats control the senate opposite bush 41 and senator joe biden with the judiciary committee. unprompted publicly declared the committee might refused to cooperate t and the republican president tried to fill it. in 2007 democrats controlled opposite bush 43 and with more than a year and af half left president bush 43's term the current democratic leader to accept those extraordinary circumstances that they should boycott any further confirmations to the supremeur court so not only did they maintain the historical norm but in the playbook when voters have not chosen divided government american people elect the senate majority with the sitting president, the historical record is even more overwhelmingly in favor of confirmation. eight times in our nations history new vacancies have arisen and presidents have made nominations all during the election year. seven out of eight were confirmed and

away to the seasonal norm.r and temperatures certainly dropping away to the seasonal norm. over to you. a reminder of our top story... frustration across the country as many still cannot get coronavirus tests but the government says it is demand at record speed. you have had six months, mr speaker, to get this right and get the prime minister still can't deliver on his promises for the health secretary said yesterday it would take weeks to solve the situation but we do not have weeks. that is all from the bbc news at 0ne have weeks. that is all from the bbc news at one end on bbc one we joined the bbc news teams where you are. good afternoon. good afternoon, i'm gavin ramjaun — it'sjust after 1.30pm, and this is your latest sports news. let's go to old trafford first — where england are playing australia in the final one—day international of their three match series. it's1—1 going into this match. henry moeran‘s watching for us. england won the toss and decided to bat — they'll be regretting that decision? and

i think the closer you get to that norm, we are talking about norms here in some regard, the institution is bolstered. toen: i want to turn a bit the future and ask a few questions about what we might expect. offbeat, but i have to ask it because i am who i am. if hyden is president, i'm curious what will happen at guantanamo or to guantanamo. "the new york times" reporter carol rosenberg has been told by the biden campaign that mr. biden continues to support closing the detention center. josh, you were there when obama tried to close the detention center. that plan is still probably on paper. do you think that's possible? could biden do this? or is this a nonstarter? josh: i hope it's possible, but it will take a change of political will in congress. as you were kind enough to say, i put a lot of hours alongside many, many other people in theng to first produce detainee population as much as possible consistent with security and humane treatment obligations. and then to develop a plan that was developed -- presented in early 2016 to congress of what conference of closure would look like

was founded a more timely than ever we also must restate our commitment to the un charter and the norms of international law and the amount of ice covering the arctic sea has shrunk to its 2nd lowest levels and satellite records began more than 4 decades ago scientists say a week long heat wave in siberia earlier this month was a big contributor the last time arctic sea ice melted this much was back in 2012 so those are the headlines the news continues here on al-jazeera after inside story stay tuned that's watching. snapback show their only united states reinforces nuclear sanctions on iran but all other permanent members of the un security council including close allies are

so we stuck with the basic norms. by the way, his undoing, the majority did precisely with the democrats indicated they would do themselves. in 1992. the democrats control the sena senate, opposite president bush 41. then senator joe biden was with the judiciary committee. unprompted. .. .. a year end a half left. and president bush, 43's term, the democratic leader declared that quote except in extraordinary circumstances,", the opposite party senate should boycott any further confirmation to the supreme court. that is the current democratic leader a year end a half before the end of the bush administration. soli in 2016, senate republicans did not only maintain the historical norm, we also ran the playbook. when voters have not chosen divided government, when the american people have voted to send majority to work closely with the sitting president. the references more overwhelmingly in favor history has arisen and presidents have made nominations awe during the election year. seven of the eight were confirmed. and

destruction of norm he put on tonight. it didn't help him move the ball forward, it reframed the race a bit. this is a question almost regardless of ideology. do you believe in democratic norm? do you believe in respecting the rules that elections count. i'm a conservative republican. i can disagree with joe biden all day long. i watched tonight and never been more embarrassed and certain trump is unfit to be president. what does he have to do set himself on fire? it was embarrassing. the question becomes -- i do think the biden people could start a nice fight for ten days over the idea of the next moderator having a mike cut off switch or fire hose. to regain some control. trump will never agree to it. biden does have to debate again. they can make a thing out of this. the as near as of the democracy a fair and civil debate was trashed and vandalized. there ought to be a price paid. >> let's talk about another center piece of the democracy. the presidency itself. we only have one at a time. they live in a house that belon

so we stuck with the basic norms. oh, and by the way, in so doing, our majority did precisely what democrats have indicated they would do themselves. in 1992, democrats control the senate opposite president bush 41. then-senator joe biden chaired the judiciary committee. unprompted, unprompted, he publicly declared that his committee might refuse to cooperate if a vacancy arose and the republican president tried to fill it. in 2007, democrats control the senate opposite president bush 43. and with more than a year and a half left, a year and a half left, in president bush 43's term, the current democratic leader declared that, quote, except in extraordinary circumstances, end quote, the opposite party senate should boycott any further confirmations to the supreme court. that's the current democratic leader a year and a half before the end of the bush administration. so in 2016, senate republicans did not only maintain the historical norm, we also ran the biden-schumer playbook. when voters have not chosen divided gove

but i think it's starting to become the norm here. so many kids. diagnosis things are gotten predicates are brought to term because it's the wrong. mary when we're feeling it and we all have the same question what. michael's diagnosis was a shock well what the occupied alice of small and mom have to stories of our protagonist because we wanted to distract ourselves from our own situation. and michael vanished behind a hospital darfur another x. i mean nation the only thing i saw was the sign sans chants biggest online which sponsored the hospital. thought mcmurry how to us not to see ourselves anymore. i mean doubtless the people who say that there is not only the environmental destruction but also a health impact like cancer and very red diseases coming from the only sense where do you think that this. has been disproven a 100 times over a 1000 times over. and we you know i mean we can always improve but i don't we have our water is clean we have great care and there are quality years better than anywhere else in the for old i mean we're doing a g

so on 2016, senate republicans did not only maintain the historical norm, we also ran the biden- schumer playbook. when voters have not chosen divided government, when the american people have elected a senate majority to work closelyw with the sitting president, the historical record is even more overwhelmingly in favor of confirmation. eight times in our nation's history, new vacancies have arisen and presidents have made nominations all during the election year. seven of the eight were confirmed and the sole exception, justice abe fortas was a bizarre situation, including obvious personal corruption that extended into financial dealings. apart from that one strange exception, no senate has failed to confirm a nominee in the circumstances that face us right now. aside from that one strange exception, no senate has failed to confirm a nominee in the circumstances that face us right now. the historical precedent is overwhelmingly and it runs in one direction. if our democratic colleagues want to claim they are outraged, they can only be outraged at the plain facts of american history. th

we are in the new norm, as is no norm. it's sort of law of the jungle.ts what they could do after an election. they're all very extreme and the sort of things that you wouldn't normally consider if it weren't so quirky as nate as kind of spelled out the situation we now find ourselves in. but back to this prospect of their deciding the november election. probably would be the worst moment for the supreme court since the dred scott case. what you need above all in that situation is legitimacy, almost more than the right determination on the law. and it seems impossible that a court that had just been put up there by the president, if it decides for the president, could ever seem legitimate in the eyes of the american people. and that is a true crisis. >> guy, it was interesting to me listening to the ceremony in the rose garden the emphasis on this being apolitical. i think there is always the question of whether or not there is a supreme court nominee can be apolitical, whether that is baked into the realities of the process. but in this moment in partic

that's really connected to creativity and gender norms, abiding by gender norms are really connected to the things we've been talking about in the culture about toxic masculinity or about eating disorders with girls. so queuing to gender norms tends to be bad for children and rejecting them tends to be good for children so if your child is doing that without you pushing them to, you should be psyched. >> that's so inspiring lisa. i think everyone smiling. >> i turned them off, i don't know who's who. >> what was it like for you. you had done all the research and you interviewed all these people. was there anything you experienced while you are writing thebook ? what was the writing experience like for you. i know i was super forward. amazingly everyone lisa came to me with a manuscript and there was a 50 page, it wasn't 50 pages about how it felt to me. i felt weighed down by this dictionary that she was going to put in the back of the book. of all these terms and everything and i was like these , no business but i think you learned a lot and experienced a lot so what was the writing

we cannot keep rewriting history, scribbling norms, .crambling -- scrambling norms after ruth bader ginsburg passed away, they say biden should release the list. trumpno wonder president and his administration asked that i release the list after she passed away. it is a game to the. -- it is a game to them. first, putting a judges name -- judge's name on a list like that could influence the action of a judge, and that would be wrong. listd, anyone put on the under this circumstance would be subject to unrelenting political attacks, because any nominee i would select would not get a hearing until 2021 at the earliest. she would endure those attacks for months on and without being defend herself. thirdly and finally, and most important lead, if i win, i will make my choice for the supreme court not based on a partisan election campaign, but on what prior presidents have done. and i have served with many of them. only after consulting democrats and republicans in the united states senate and taking their advice and asking for consent. is a person who gets to name someone, propose. i medicallykn

>> illegal, it may be not out of the constitution, out of the norms and traditions and unwritten rules of the senate, it is illegitimate, one of the unwritten rules is that people keep their word, the republicans promised there would be in fact no such nomination or confirmation during an election year, they're breaking their word, they're potentially breaking the senate, and they are violating the trust that the american people, the majority of the american people want this decision to be made after the inaugural. the majority of american people want health care to be preserved, and this nominee has expressed a willingness to disregard well settled, established precedent when it doesn't align with her views. this nominee has said that chief justice roberts was wrong to uphold the affordable care act. plainly, this nominee is out of step, out of the mainstream, not only with the majority of american people but with legal thinking generally. >> so what i hear you saying, senator blumenthal, it may be inappropriate, may be wrong, especially so close to an election, but you agree that the

, where norms were how we sort of kept guardrails up. are we going to have to codify some norms or put some of this in law now to avoid a repeat of this in the future? >> well, i think that we've learned a lot in this election cycle about how we need to protect the right to vote. we knew that before this election cycle. but on these questions of a peaceful transfer of power, look, ultimately it does depend on the good will of leaders to concede that they have lost an election. that's true in our system and in many other systems. and we don't have some kind of independent election authority in the united states that declares who the winner is. we have a very complicated constitutional machinery largely based on federalism, on states making these decisions. ultimately, unless we're radically going to change our system, we rely on the goodwill of the leaders to leave office when they've lost an election. >> nate, before i let you go, is that a palm beach ballot box behind you? >> it is. this is, you know, i wouldn't say it's for good luck,

institutions and norms apparently.hat is a very odd to fret for them to make, considering that impeachment was probably one of their worst moments during the term presidency. along with the senate democrats treatment of justice kavanaugh, now they seem to be doubling down on the same bad behavior. i would say not seriously because it doesn't even make sense for the president to be exercising his constitutional authority, it obviously cannot be an impeachable offense. >> harris: when the speaker of the house says she has a quiver full of arrows and they potentially have other things, she wouldn't mention any of these other things. how do you gear up for this? we are 43 days out from election. this becomes part of at least some of the nomenclature that goes along with 2020 and what led up to november. how do you prepare for what's coming down the pipe? i have to guess the president is not going to back off wanting to name a nominee. >> right, exactly. harris, we will prepare the same way as we have four successful nomina

it's crucial that we reinforce that norm. there are some legal rights and law that come into play. for example the court has said that once the government provides the right to vote in this context, it's a fundamental right. law does matter here as well. i hope and expect that our legal rules are going to stand up against the attempt to delegitimize the electoral process. >> that's what a lot of americans are hoping for as well. dr. patel, president trump appeared to throw cold water on new fda guidelines requiring outside experts to weigh in before the agency actually approves a coronavirus vaccine. i ha i want you to listen to this. >> we're looking at that. that has to be approved by the white house. we may or may not approve it. >> does that sound like political interference for you? what have you found out about people demanding a review process of the fda process? >> it's ironic. he says it's a political move. that's exactly what the president is making and it's clear that this is coming kind of from -- this isn't just the president by himself, ayman, which is the disturbing

you this was the norm this feast posted if they don't this is a feature against muslim next month and nothing we give them is to keep them here when out of love as he thought he was if you want to who won the vote of any no nothing but a good enough. on. the other to impute all you will find with the lord knows him again oh thank goodness i'm still here it might be does it and i would have nothing to follow your advice given that i think you're looking very much because you want to believe she will make the best crude oil on land without a good deal yeah i just figured that a particular you know the metrodome or the sharpest ok big guy i can go out of up to be a good idea that i'm getting late no jacket and yeah you get there get your. jesus . and your blood in the trailer being seen this for the city. you have guided us since this morning. long destructo just like you do for the better future ask. your prayers here today sitting in for a visit all of. the solution to the problem of the people want to. be subjected to you can be a she. only if you will play with the interest of your.

. >> well certainly for people who talk a lot about norm breaking this would be a massive norm-breakingway that filling a vacant seat of the supreme court is absolutely not breaking a norm. there is no comparison actually between the garland case and this one because of course in that case the senate and the white house were opposite parties. in this case we have a duly-elected president. we have a duly-elected senate to advice and consent. there is no reason in terms of our norms why the president should not appoint and senate should not confirm a new justice to the supreme court. charles: yeah. i mean of course all presidents are obligated you know, to make a nomination. in this case mitch mcconnell says he will have a vote on it. you know, i want to bring up your reaction to a tweet from earlier this week that says i don't think anyone understands the depth of female rage right now. you're response to this tweet was, do you mean lingering rage over the way sexual assault was used as a political football to smear brett kavanaugh, yeah, i still have some female rage over that. it will

i'm not sure i go ahead is norm in politics and. 19 times same party appointments. all went through but under johnson who is a corruption problem. so the norm when you have the senate and the report and they present on the one side is to go through and get it on the norm when they're on opposite sides is to not to get it done any even the white house obama's white house counsel ruemmler she was on the other foot they would block the republican. so the issue as my concern is is this is going to go forward the hearings are actually going to be probably shorter than that then the hearings were for kavanaugh and historians it would be really. and you know where to use if we have constitutional crisis number only 4. there are 8 justices and there was gridlock. >>gee wonder if the republicans remember that in in 2016. when there are only 8 justices on the supreme court because of the vacancy caused by the death of antonin scalia and the fact that the republicans won't let merrick merrick garland go forward and the fact is that as you said tom this normal is usually does h

near you now unless you're the whitest lady here ok norm then only one of these. yeah they read i hope with some of us. placed in this room to your was no make it any better than book a place that astound me that you stop us i am from the left i don't care for movement look at do it casey came in the back i say you are now part 2 here i want to see. them dances was this even the adamant but he may tell ya it's business you hoes. you look at the more days mr skilling then don't you know pull us out you know what i get for when liam arabia song begin knowing general we are a bit of a. timid little is let me. see. definitions for the words inflation and deflation that this is the fact that he can say both are happening at the same time or could happen the same time you have to ask a stop what's the what's the use of even using work like inflation or deflation because a stock doesn't describe the what's going on with the economy we've outgrown those with words the economy has moved beyond those definitions we're in a different type of economy and market completely. ne

this is a man by the name of norm eisen.eisen is a key legal hatchet man, democrat operative, former obama ethics czar, believe it or not. and he is also a key architect of nearly every effort to censor, soup, impeach and overthrow the president. he is the author of, in fact, a color revolution playbook literally called the playbook. and one of the items he calls fofor in his playbook to overthw regimes overseas he doesn't like it is fraud scenarios using election fraud to engineer mass protests to question the legitimacy of the target leader. norm eisen has a long and checkered history going way back to his days at crewe which is a l'affaire harmon and he's been behind over 180 lawsuits against trump. he authored ten articles of impeachment before the president's phone call was even made. the special counsel to democrats for the impeachment process. he was literally involved in every aspect of this color revolution against trump. his latest act and perhaps his greatest act coming up is to use a l'affaire order to overturn t

two, it's not about norms. a word we hear a lot. the law and constitution mandate respecting the vote. and the peaceful transfer of power. donald trump took an oath to protect the constitution. and he's not the only one. top federal employees do as well. all federal officials have a legal obligation to the constitution. to reit trait obvious, because it's 2020, and that is increasingly necessary, federal officials must resist unlawful orders. including potentially from the president. officials who break election law, let alone go anywhere near using voice or violence in a conspiracy also face major consequences including prison. now, some republicans are drawing a line today. senator romney saying any tike this peaceful transfer of power is unacceptable. leader mcconnell saying there will be an orderly transition. and we should note in a fairly unusual rebuke the trump, the senate passed a resolution to reaffirm the commitment to the orderly and peaceful transfer of power. again, where are we in america in 2020 that the senate has t

forces, allies and partners, and civilian populations until iran complies with international norms. we encourage them to cease these malign activities and act like a normal country. but we are also prepared to respond to iranian aggression. the commanders have the authorities and resources they need to protect troops and prepare for any contingencies and we continue to stand shoulder to shoulder with allies and partners to counter the destabilizing behavior. in doing so, we will protect our people, our interests, and maintain the security of like-minded nations. thank you. >> good morning. i'm grateful for the president's commitment to ending the iranian nuclear ballistic missile and conventional weapons undertakings that threaten and terrorize the rest of the world. today the u.s. department of commerce is adding five iranian scientists to the entity list for enabling or assisting their nuclear development programs. the individuals added to the list are [indiscernible] are associated with j hl laboratory, the atomic energy organization of iran, involved in nuclear activities and de

this should not be the norm in europe.s can't be the norm in the civilized world. >> whether sanctions are brought in or not, their ability to influence the situation appears limited. mr. lukashenko has been in power since the 1990's. the only things that would change that are police turning against him or vladimir putin despite pressure, those things have not happened. >> absolutely. we need to be engaged, the international community, more actively in diplomacy and trying to engineer a transition. we know ultimately the ukrainian transition did not work because the leader who had been discredited and forced by his people from his position lost his nerve and fled to russia. before that happened, the u.s. and russia brokered a transition for the ukrainian so they could go to elections. in the case of belarus, they did just hold elections. the question is whether the elections are going to be recognized by the opposition. they were largely discredited by eyewitnesses who saw the ballots and understood that the victor was not

that's the norm people have been talking about.the suggestions here are true, this is a lot worse than that. what is much worse than the thing i described is if you have someone in the justice department and worse, the attorney general at the heist of the president, bring something to the election for the purpose of affecting the election and whether or not that's true, the president of the united states made it clear that's his desire and wish and on many other occasions, the attorney general made clear he likes to do the president's bidding. the combination of those things makes for i think a very, very bad look for the justice department, for the president and for the rule of law. >> andrew, with all these kind of norms broken, does this -- regardless of what happens in this particular election, i mean, do we -- are we able to go back to a system where, you know, where there is faith in institutions? >> well, i think for the reasons mentioned, it's incredibly corrosive. the makes the jobs of the fbi agents and u.s. attorneys aro

carol: i wanted to ask norm. has the coronavirus, the pandemic, how has it shifted public opinion on america's role in the world, the changes in terms of the view of multilateralism versus unilateralism and those sorts of things? what is your take on that? norman: remember, this came up with a discussion of the wuhan virus as the china virus, but it who, spilled over to the world health organization, and internationally trying to combat this. it has played out in another way, as well, it is the contrast of how the united states has handled the coronavirus and how other countries, especially our allies, like australia, for example, have handled it and european countries, whom the president has harshly criticized, the european countries, but we know where countries moved very quickly to shut things down and to use masks and testing and contact tracing, this had a different implication. this is going to come up, i think, in another way. one of those areas where we see contention in congress has not yet played out be

even fact checking, ari, is going by norms that were blown up tonight because none of the norms of political behavior and presidential debates can be applied to what we witnessed, but i digress. what do you have? >> well, i appreciate it, brian. i don't think you digress because you're hitting it on the head and a lot of people will witness that, make up their own minds how much blatant violation of the rules there was. we'll walk through just a couple because fact checking as you said is an important part of this. one brief moment came in an exchange over violent crime. take a look. >> violent crime went down 17%, 15% in our administration. it's gone up on his watch. >> went down much more in ours. >> fact check, joe biden is correct, the violent crime went down quite a bit during the obama biden administration. we'll put this up on the screen. went down about 16%. true in the ballpark of what he said. it did not surge under donald trump, though, in fact, it's been stagnant about 0.4%. that makes biden's other claim an exaggeration and trump's denial completely false because he said it was

allstate [norm] and we live in columbia, missouri. we do consulting, but we also write.take care of ourselves constantly; it's important. we walk three to five times a week, a couple miles at a time. - we've both been taking prevagen for a little more than 11 years now. after about 30 days of taking it, we noticed clarity that we didn't notice before. - it's still helping me. i still notice a difference. prevagen. healthier brain. better life. it's time for theraflu hot liquid medicine. powerful relief so you can restore and recover. theraflu hot beats cold. powerful relief so you can restore and recover. over time, you go noseblind to the odors in your home. (background music) but others smell this... (upbeat music) that's why febreze plug has two alternating scents and eliminate odors for 1200 hours. ♪breathe happy febreze... ♪la la la la la. more dangerous and corrupt president than trump. he's harming our basic values, giving rise to hate, and he's selling out america to big corporations. i'm working to protect immigrants, women, communities of color, and lgbtq peopl

above the norm or -- northern hemimihere. the northern hemisphere is about to enter thehe colder months. people are going to crowd into small spaces to keep warm. thatat's the e worst thining yon do. you need to avavoid conontact ad avoid being i in enclosed, crowd spaces with poor ventilation.. also, hospitals tend to geget overcrowded with other illnesses in the colder months. we are saying that now is the time to suppress the transmission. >> what should those governments in the northern hemisphere be focusing on? >> really getting the message to the people that it is in thehe hands of every one of us. every person needs to be a coronavirus stopper. how do you do that?? you are seriouous about sosocial distancing. that means i if you're goioing o socialalize, youou socialize distantly. you don't hang out together in crowds. you really wash so you make sure it's possible for people to wash their hands and they go into the office, get out of public transport, go into a shop. should be the meansns to clean your hands everywhe

so trump now has broken all the norms. so here's the thing.derator going forward is going to be able to control trump if he acts that way. i also think joe biden can't not debate. i think you cannot, you know, cower to the bully because i don't think that debate helped trump. at the end of the day, trump's losing. he's got to pull vote off biden. he's got to win all the undecided voters. i don't think with those cohorts he did anything to help. he probably hurt himself quite a bit actually. so there's going to be a second debate. i don't think mike pence will act that way by the way. but i think in the second debate, you know, if trump acts that way, we're going to have the same debate. so it was a terrible night for trump's chances for re-election, a terrible night for american democracy. i think it did nothing to hurt joe biden's chances. now, maybe trump will come out and be somebody completely different. but, you know, if that's -- let's look back at 2000, brian, and mike knows this well. if al gore had sighed throughout all three of those

so that norm broke.n of the court as america's football is, whether that means the court is broken or america is broken, i guess it's either/or. but we need the court, right? we've got daca this year. title 7 ensure this year that you can't be fired for being gay or transgender in the workplace. this is a big freaking deal. the court could save the affordable care act. we need the court. so the fact that the court is simultaneously broken and it's also sort of the last backstop, that's the really terrifying part. we need it to function. >> trevor: before i let you go, i wanted to pitch a solution to you. what if they reformed the way you choose the justices in america in that republicans and democrats both pick their, like, top five, they put them into, like, balls like the lottery, and then you have to approve who gets put in, and everyone puts them in, like, a giant tumbler, you don't know which ball it's going to be, and that way you know whichever one gets pulled out has to be the supreme court pick.

the president wants to do something, it's usually out of bounds and ethically norms were legally and the people around him have to respond. i'm sure deborah brooks' calculations about how she deals with the president around the pandemic is very similar to the ones jim comey made decisions on, john kelly had to make decisions on. interesting part, the differences that trump means a human mri machine shines a light on to these people and it reveals them in different ways. comey would never have, he is never going to bend, he was never going to work. began had never again opportunity to remake the courts. he's going to put up with different things but always until a certain time and then you have some people around the president, which you have to wonder what they have done to continue to be the. >> speaking of mcgann, the two men/at the book, they're not quite antiheroes, they are not exactly heroes they are kind of human experience characters up against forces much greater than then, they sometimes don't even understand themselves but they are two men exerting tremendous influence in

national norms it's a use chemical of. chemical agent which is violating. probation over and over chemical weapons. for when we see that. attacked. destroyed. there's not as a nation attack against me and of course it matters for. democracy individual liberty. so that's the view of stoltenberg and nato terry you know for for its part the kremlin has countered denying any culpability in this case given all of this what are the next steps that we could see the military alliance taking. less time that it was proven by the united kingdom that russian nationals used nova chuck to attack a former russian spy sergei scruple and his daughter there in salisbury nato expelled 7 russian diplomats nato russia has a mission at nato which surprises a lot of people and it has been downsized partly in response to this last nobody shark attack so what nato wants to do is again hope that russia will participate will come clean on its no big chunk stocks but i would say that that's probably. for lauren hope so they will be discussing the all

. - i'm norm. - i'm szasz. [norm] and we live in columbia, missouri. we do consulting, but we also write. [szasz] we take care of ourselves constantly; it's important. we walk three to five times a week, a couple miles at a time. - we've both been taking prevagen for a little more than 11 years now. after about 30 days of taking it, we noticed clarity that we didn't notice before. - it's still helping me. i still notice a difference. we didn't notice before. that's great! that's 15% on top of what geico could already save you. so what are you waiting for? john stamos to knit you a scarf? all finished, jean. enjoy! thank you. i give. the stitch work is impeccable. it's just a double fleck pattern with a reverse garter stitch. no big deal. is your hair this soft? softer. geico. save an extra 15% when you switch by october 7th. [upb♪ i fell asleep ♪ tobut when i woke up. ♪i put everything in perspective. ♪ (boy) hi, do you want to share my sandwich? (vo) good feeds our connections. good feeds us all. hormel natural choice lunch meats. >>> so you know you

expenditure what we've done corruption is one of the biggest killers in the society today that is norm mega corruption scandal in pakistan because at the top level we've controlled it problem and still we have corruption low down the levels which is again going to be a struggle we need to take a lot of steps eventually to do a control corruption at all levels but it's a struggle it's not going to happen quickly and so reason why. we have not been able to clamp down on corruption is because those who come into power and. make money using the power to make money have never been held accountable and so this is the 1st time in our history that the powerful are being held accountable let's move on to. the whole world not only pakistan grappling with the fallout from this pandemic from june where people were thinking that this could be a nightmare scenario for pakistan to know where the number of infections seems to be falling down what happens in between mr prime minister in pakistan we made of probably the best decision very difficult decision we decided not to have the sort of lot down th