this convention met to express the will and reaffirmed the bliss of the democratic party, there have been differences of opinion and that is the democratic way. those differences have been settled, by a majority of voters, as it should be. now it's time for us to get together and beat the common enemy, that's up to you. we will be working together for victory in the great cause. the victory has become a habit of our party, it's been elected four times in succession, and i convinced it will be elected a fifth time, this november. the reason is, the people now the democratic party is the people's party, in the republican party is their party of -- and it always has been, and i will always be. for the record of the democratic party, is written in the accomplishments of the last 16 years. i don't need your -- to repeat them, they have been very able in place before this convention, by the keynote speaker, the candidate for vice president, and by the chairman. confidence and security have been brought to the american people like the democratic party. farm income has increased from less tha

it is the democrat party that is become the party of tyranny.not only rejects these principles, it is seeking to replace itself. it's leaders are seeking to grab power. that they do not have the right to cease. it is become as i said a tyrannical party that seeks to devour the civil society. and our constitutional system. and it's not just those areas of the constitution that i've mentioned earlier here i have evidence there are attacks on the first attempt in addition to court packing. they have proposed limiting your right to free speech particularly in a political campaign. they wanted to end the ability for you to support organizations that run advocate city ads on television and radio and in the newspaper. they wanted to end it because they're so in love with a democratic party media so repealing part of the first amendment they have 54 democratted who voted for that and kamala harris potentially president of the united states -- what did she said? she wanted to use executive orders to eviscerate second amendment to destroy it in bill of ri

cheers and applause ] this convention met to express the will and reaffirm the beliefs of the democratic partythere have been differences of opinion, and that is the democratic way. those differences have been settled by a majority vote, as they should be. now it's time for us to get together and beat the common enemy. and that's up to you. we have been working together for victory in a great cause. victory has become a habit of our party. it's been elected four times in succession, and i am convinced it will be elected the fifth time next november. [ cheers and applause ] the reason is that the people know that the democratic party is the people's party and the republican party is the party of special interest and it always has been and always will be. [ cheers and applause ] >> the record of the democratic party is written in the accomplishments of the last 16 years. i don't need to repeat them. they've been very ably placed before this convention by the keynote speaker, the candidate for vice president and by the permanent chairman. confidence and security have been brought to the american

and the democratic party is the people's party, not the labor party, not the farmer's party, not the employer's party, it is the party of no one because it is the party of everyone. that, i think, is our ancient mission. where we have deserted it, we have failed. with your help, there will be no desertion now. better we lose the election than mislead the people and better we lose than misgovern the people. help me to do the job in this autumn of conflict and of campaign. help me to do the job in the year of darkness and doubt and crisis which stretch beyond the horizon of tonight's happy vision. and we will justify our glorious past and the loyalty of silent mignons who look to us for compassion, for understanding, and for honest purpose. thus we will serve our great tradition greatly. i ask of you, all you have, i will give you all i have. even as he who came here tonight and honored me as he has honored you, the democratic party, by a lifetime of service and bravery that will find him an imperishable page in the history of the republic and of the democratic party president harry s.

and the democratic party is the people's party -- not the labour party, not the farmers party, not the employers party, it is the party of no one because it is the party of everyone. that, that, i -- i think is our ancient mission. where we have deserted it, we have failed. with your help, there will be no desertion now. better we lose the election then mislead the people, and better we lose then miss govern the people. help me to do the job in this autumn of conflict and of campaign. how me to do the job in these years of darkness, of doubt and a crisis which stretch beyond the horizon of tonight's happy vision, and we will justify our glorious past and the loyalty of silent millions who look to us for compassion, for understanding, and for honest purpose. thus, we will serve our great tradition greatly. i ask of you all you have. i will give you all i have, even as he who came here tonight and honored me, as he has honored you, the democratic party, by a lifetime of service and bravery that will find him and imperishable page in the history of the republic and of the democratic party

and the democratic party is deep peoples party, not the labour party, not the farmer's party, not the employer's party, it is the party of no one, because it is the party of everyone. that, i think it's our ancient mission. where we have deserted, we have failed. with your help there will be no desertion now, better we lose the election, then mislead the people, and better we lose then miss covering the people on. help me to do the job in this order, with conflict in the campaign, help me do the jobs for the years of crisis, which come be on the horizon of tonight's division. and we will justify our glory, and the silent millions who look to us, for a campaign, for unexpected. plus, we will serve our great today shuns greatly. i ask of you, all you have, i will give you are right now, even as he who came here tonight and honored me, as he has honored you, the democratic party, by a lifetime of service and bravery, that imperishable page in the history of the republic, and of the democratic party, president truman. and finally, my friends in the staggering task that you have assigned m

a message to the democratic party? we don't like you shoving candidates down our throat. led by at going to be party machine. host: that was one of the questions i wanted to talk about. who is causing voters supported president trump, 2016 are democratic candidate hillary clinton, to support the libertarian party in this cycle? what is bringing voters to your side? guest: with trump voters, it is his record. i completely understand why you voted for trump. he came in as an outsider. i will fix the system. i'm a businessman. i know how to balance a budget. i will cut spending, cut the deficit, bring the troops home. sounds like a great message. have someone who did not 50 years of political favors who did to pay back. yet, he has increased deficit at a faster rate than obama. yes, that was before coronavirus. we have the biggest debt ever. he did not bring the troops home. if you like the fact, if the reason you voted for trump was to get bigger government under obama, is you don't think obama increased the deficit fast

he slowly built up the democratic party. he went out and recruited party workers. e recruited candidates. he raised money. he wrote platforms and speeches. the democrats got 24 seats in 1954. then in 1956, mcgovern took the party helped build up and ran for congress in the first time in defeated the two term republican harold loafer. you want to get in 1958 when he defeated a former south dakota governor. then in 1960 he made his first bid for the united states senate, lost, and so jon kennedy felt that his candidacy had brought mcgovern down in south dakota. so he offered mcgovern the position to run the food for peace program in the kennedy administration. >> and so we are talking about george mcgovern's legacy, his candidacy, we will delve into the primary run that he made in 1971. but before we do that, let's get in kurt in akron, ohio as part of the conversation. go ahead, kurt. >> thank you and good evening, c-span. thank you for this wonderful series of the contenders. i only hope that sunday you will do one about the cabinet as well. anyway, my comment and q

he built up the democratic party. ecruited candidates, raised money, wrote platforms and speeches. the democrats got 24 seats in 1954, then in 1956, mcgovern took this party he had helped build up and ran for congress and defeated a two-term republican. he won again in 1958 when he defeated a former south dakota governor and then in 1960 he made his first bid for the united states senate. lost to a longtime senator in california. john kennedy felt that perhaps his candidacy had brought mcgovern down in south dakota and he had offered mcgovern the position to run the food for peace program in the kennedy administration. >> and so we're talking about george mcgovern's legacy, his candidacy. we're going to delve into the primary run that he made in 1971. before we do that, let's get in curt in akron, ohio, as part of the conversation. go ahead, curt. >> caller: thank you and good evening, c-span. thank you for this wonderful series of "the contenders." i hope someday you'll do one about the cabinet too. anyway, my comment

truly becoming a democratic party. because of his efforts and the efforts of many of you, the convention of 1972 has an interesting, shall we say, as it was, helped save the democratic party and helped open the doors for young people, for women, minorities, for people who had up to that time been shut out. it is fashionable, i know, for people to say there is not much different betwe difference between the two parties, but there really is. there is a necessity for a democratic party and the kind of democratic party that he ensituationed and help create. >> what is your reaction to seeing gary hart talk about the reforms? >> he is certainly correct that his role was a critical role. i go back to well above 1968, and i can remember in 1960 john kennedy was running. he and his aide and speech writer ted sorenson recently passed away. they would get on an airplane and they would fly around and visit governors and mayors who were so empowered that you could pick up the nomination that way. retail, what retail, not with the

i think that's really important, too, when you think about the democratic party at this time is thatyenson, for the democratic national committee at this particular time.y why? where's the strengthno of the democratic party at this time? why do they win elections? ryan? >> it would be like remnants of roosevelt's coalition. re >> absolutely. and something 0smn else, the first advertisement especially pointed out is like, look back to 1931, look 20 years ago, like when republicans did bad things.lo i mean, i feel like in the modern era, 20 years ago is a completely different environment than now.that t so it's really trying to harken back to arguments they've been making for the last two decadesa >> excellent, kayla? >> yeah, i was goingng to say ye can sees. the contrast between democratic party and they're trying to -- they're continually asking people to look back at what we've done, not even what stevenson has done, necessaril, but what other democrats have done and just linking that -- the party together and that's the only thing that they share but because he's a democrat he d wi

wa nted campaign and the florida democratic party wanted to make that a priority as they shouldnt of the united states has not made that a priority. our party was to make sure that we were trying to make safe and we have been making a programme to make sure we are reaching out to people and we have been seeing a very positive response in broward and so we are going to continue to work to get people out to vote. the chair of the democratic party in browa rd to vote. the chair of the democratic party in broward county florida, thank you very much. do you ever consider moving to florida every four years so you do not have to ask them about the orderfor 2000, 2004, all the close votes ? the orderfor 2000, 2004, all the close votes? i consider moving down there anyway because the weather is so good. it sounds good going to florida. i think it is super interesting, i think these polls that are showing biden ahead by four points when i speak to strategists which i am kind of doing every day at the moment, they don't seem to think that is reflective. they do feel that florida is going t

woodrow wilson after world what happens to the democratic party. what happens to winston churchill, a pretty good war leader in 1945. he's out the door. so this is a normal thing. the readjustment means a lot of things get thrown out including parties in power. republicans take the house, and the senate in 1946. they are on a roll. harry truman keeps going up and down in the popularity. by the spring of 1947, 1948, he is down in the low thirties, in terms of popularity. and it's not only a republican democrat thing going on here, the democratic party is splitting three ways. not just two ways, not just you've got some sort of carter, teddy kennedy thing going on, not a george bush buchanan going on, but it's being split. the left, the center, and the right. on the right, you have the southern segregationist democrats. franklin roosevelt had talked to good game with black civil rights. but he really hadn't done anything. remember that the army and the navy in world war ii are still segregated. there is no move to desegregate anything in the country.

not even what stevenson has done, necessarily, but what other democrats have done and linking the partyis a democrat he will be as successful as past democrats. whereas, with ike's campaign, it was looking to the future. they didn't really have a great past in recent years to look back to that they would want to advertise, so they had to push past that and you can see that contrast here. also a lack of prioritizing media. there is no creativity here, which would make sense, because they didn't prioritize it and that definitely hurt them in this. >> i think that is really important to think about. that the democratic party has been in office for 20 years. that is a long time to control the white house and they had done so in a way that built the coalition with very specific new deal programs that give benefits to voters. that brought workers and farmers into that democratic coalition with all the programs we have looked at. so they were relying on the structures of economic incentives to bring voters to the polls. they weren't worried about getting new voters. they just wanted to capital

democrat in the white house. so, given this, we see one party playing up the democratic not playing up his party label. >> you knowr a great deal about the personal factor in american politics cou coup de grace about a personal sexual appeal or the boo-boo when somebody makes a mistake. how much does this -- obviously it affects the party label orientation of the voter. how much does it really change this, other than for an obvious person like general eisenhower to whom the personality thing and the fact of people feeling comfortable with him must have been the major aspect of his triumph. do you think in 1976 with this united democratic party, there is going to be an appeal that president ford can make personally, which would override the democratic majority of plurality in the same sense that president nixon in 1972 could attack the etiological position of senator mcgovern to override that plurality. >> it's kind of a centric campaign in which both, more or less, or in the center of the political spectrum. and at the same time there are no special issues that are sharply dividing the country like the vietnam war

the democratic party of 1964. [cheers and applause] we have written a proud record of accomplishments for all americans. if any ask what we have done, just let them look at what we promised to do. for those promises have become our deeds. and the promises of tonight, i can assure you will become the deeds of tomorrow. [cheers and applause] we are in the midst of the largest and the longest period of peacetime prosperity in our history. [cheers and applause] and almost every american listening to us tonight has seen the results in his own life. but prosperity for most has not brought prosperity to all. and those who have received the bounty of this land. who sit tonight secure in affluence and safe in power. must not now turn from the needs of their neighbors. [cheers and applause] our party and our nation will continue to extend the hand of compassion and the hand of affection and love to the old and the sick and the hungry. [cheers and applause] for who among us dares to betray the command. thou shall opened nine

>> catholics were very clearly associated with the democratic party from the 19th centuries through to the 1950s. and the data that we have tells us they started to shift a little bit more, more affluent catholics to the republican party in the 1950s. eisenhower was popular with many catholics. kennedy stopped that. kennedy was unbelievably popular with catholics of all income levels and ethnic backgrounds. we think he got 75%, something like that, 80% of the catholic vote which is a huge number. since then, broadly, euro american catholics drifting toward the democratic party. latino catholics, pretty significantly democratic. >> do you remember his assassination? >> no. i was two days old. >> as you look back and understand the research of what the country was going through, what was the church going through? what were catholic priests and non no nuns dealing with? >> we learned a lot about kennedy's personal life over the last 50 years and i think our culture is generally less empathetic to heroes and people who are perceived as leaders. kennedy was a hero for american catholics and

him an opportunity for a young man to improvise quickly within the democratic party of the state. >> let me go back to the way he was able to capture the in a nation of the country. three times getting the democratic nomination. has that ever happened where you've received a nomination and lost all three times? the first time -- the person you propelled the first time henry clay, received twice for the wig party. of course a little bit different from 100 years. ago this is a lot more voters. a lot more media. for a lot more media involved. i'm like, clay a pretty small country with population. america -- was published by the early 18 hundreds. this is a modern campaign all three of them in the sense that clay's campaign was. not >> -- you read in your book that -- voted in an election in 1886 and about 80% of -- >> testable. it's >> women in colorado. a couple other western states which he won actually. >> yes. 80%. that's the highest percentage of eligible voters in the election for men to the president. we've never had that high of a percentage of voters in the system. >> if you co

democrat in the white house. so, given this, we see one party playing up the democratic label, one candidate. her not playing up his party label. >> you know, we hear a great deal about the personal factor in american politics coup de grace about a personal sexual appeal or the boo-boo when somebody makes a mistake. how much does this -- obviouslyy it affects the party orientation, the label orientation. how much does it really change, other than for obvious person like general eisenhower, to whom the personality thing and the fact that people feel uncomfortable with him much of in the mazer aspect of his time? do you think in 1976, with this united democratic party, there's going to be real and appeal that president ford can make personal? which would override the democratic majority -- plurality, in the same sense that the president nixon, in 1972, could attack the ideological position of senator montgomery, to override that democratic? >> no, he makes a correct point. here is a basically a consensus campaign, in which both people, more or less near the center of the american political spect

the idea of the southern democratic party is changing. ll in southerners and southern politicians into the republican party. >> absolutely, at the same time that he is forced to finally take a stand on the little rock crisis and sends troops in. he feels it is his obligation as an executive to follow the law of the land. at the same time, the republican national committee is undergoing a variety of studies they call operation dixie. they are thinking about capitalizing on ways that are going on -- that are caused by the divides in the party. it is a calculated move. that you hit on. excellent. >> i find it ironic that he chose andrew jackson of all people to talk about when talking about the enforcement of a supreme court decision. given that one of jackson's most famous decisions was not to listen to the supreme court in the case of the indian removal act. also, one thing he makes it very clear -- to continue off the absolving government point. he makes it clear this is a last resort. it is very much the people are not listening to what h

these are the goals and will be the achievements of the democratic party. [applause] these are the goals of this great rich nation. these are the goals toward which i will lead if the american people choose to follow. [applause] for 30 years, year by year, step-by-step, vote by vote, men of both parties have built a solid foundation for our present prosperity. too many have worked too long and too hard to see this threatened now by policies which promise to undo all that we have done together over all these years. [applause] i believe most of the men and women in this hall tonight, and i believe most americans, understand that to reach our goals in our own land, we must work for peace among all lands. [applause] america's cause is still the cause of alleaykykidt. over the last four years, the world has begun to respond to a simple american belief: the belief that strength and courage and responsibility are the keys to peace. since 1961, under the leadership of that great president john f. kennedy, we have carried out the greatest peacetime buildup of nation

positive message that you don't want to be a part of that democratic party with truman and what's beenn the visual point, it really helps with the rewatch ability. i could probably recite, not the bob and ike bit. >> i can probably recite that from memory, but i like ike and it had the visuals and riding on the dofrng ney silhouette. i didn't even capture that the first three times i watched that video and i have watched it many times now, but also it's very personalizing and digging into the -- i don't know if this was explored in psychology yet, but it's the idea of peer pressure. i like ike. you like ike. why don't you like ike? everyone should like ike. >> absolutely. you know it's ike where in the democratic commercials they did not talk a lot about stevenson. you know about ike and ike, the personality, is at the forefront of the catchy songs and the imagery and the slogans that come together to promote ike the personality here. you know you don't actually see eisenhower himself appear in this commercial, but roster reeves, an advertising executive at this time talked with eisenh

>> i think he does bring the democratic party into nebraska's history. of course there were democrats here before william jennings bryan's campaigns but he elevates the democratic party in its stature in nebraska. here, obviously he's a major figure in nebraska history, and -- but the local legacy, of course, is this home and the hospital which bears his name. >> john is joining us from san francisco, as we look at the life and political career of william jennings bryan. go ahead, please. >> caller: bryan publicly defended the ku klux klan in 1924 democratic national convention. did he also privately embrace the practice of lynching in the south? >> he did not defend the klan in 1924. i'm not defending him retro speculatively. there was a debate in the convention in new york city was about whether to denounce the klan by name or not. he believed that democrats should win over the klan rather than denounce them. you know, he certainly had supporters who were in the klan. it's unfair to say he was a supporter of the klan. he was not. he was a racist against

this is not your grandparents's democrat party. it's a socialist and marxist party. they don't care if they shutdown your business. we will put you on a government program and you will be a democrat voter for life. this is about captitalism versus communism. they are know pretending it's not. they welcome that analogy which should scare all of us a lot. >> sean: you're absolutely right. 3,000, you are getting close to your dad. when you get to 35,000, he will look over his shoulder saying what is going on with don jr. 6 days to go. when we come back senator ted cruz laid into jack dorsey of twitter for their bias against conservatives. the big tech giants and media mob all in for the biden campaign. newt gingrich will break it down. don't believe the media. don't trust the polls. you will make the ultimate choice. are you ok? it's just a cold. if you have high blood pressure, a cold is not just a cold. most cold medicines may raise blood pressure. choose coricidin hbp. the brand with a heart. for powerful cold relief without raising your blood pressure. (fisherman vo)

in the relays the democratic party is at three under republican party is the party of freedom.on't believe the republican party stance on the platform. they say we just want help black people. i like my republican party and if you want to work hard in this country we want to help you if you want to contribute to this society we want to help you and if we want to make good decisions we will help you. we don't believe in handouts. we believe in may can sure that everybody understands the philosophy of america which is if you work hard and stay out of trouble this country will or ward you. >> host: with a go into this history a little bit because some people hear your words and they will say well i don't know if i agree with that. it's just part of the important thing to go back through our civil rights history for instance. do you give lyndon baines johnson as you said somebody who ran for office in the house and to the senate as a segregationist, do you give him some credit for duy shifting when the mantle of power came to him quickly decided he wanted to be the president of civ

is this going to be democratic party that speaks to those issues? we know that black voters are going to overwhelmingly vote democratic, but question is the margins and turnout. will folks turn out in same numbers from 2008 and 2012. listening to the barack obama video, 2016 would say would be personal insult for him if voters don't come out for hillary clinton like they did for him. there's a feeling that democratic party has taken them for granted, not rewarded that consistent vote with attention and policy deference. it's up to joe biden and kamala harris to in the last few days make that push to make clear to black voters, particularly black men and younger voters this is an election worth coming out for and they will be administration listening to their issues. >> we have to have this conversation. if we're having this conversation, nia, got to talk about suppression of especially black voters. black americans still face disproportionate barriers at the ballot box. how real is the disenfranchisement in this election? >> what's keeping the democr

tonight we of the democratic party constantly go before the people offering answers. not retreat. offering unity. not division. offering hope. not fear or smear. [ cheers and applause ] we do offer the people a choice. a choice of continuing on the courageous and the compassionate course that has made this nation the strongest and the freest and most prosperous and most peaceful nation in the history of mankind. [ applause ] to those who have sought to divide us, they have only helped to unite us. [ cheers and applause ] to these who would provoke us, we have turned the other cheek. so as we conclude our labors, let us tomorrow turn to our new path. let us be on our way! [ cheers and applause ]

and one of the things that was really difficult for smith were divisions within the national democratic party so that the whole south at this point is a democratic south with smith as their national candidate. and so you had real tensions within the democratic party between this kind of urban core that smith was coming to represent and the more southern wing as well as other wings of the democratic party as well. those interparty tensions were as important as these tensions with democrats and republicans. >> hoover, 444 electoral votes, al smith, 87 electoral votes. hoover won 40 states. al smith one eight. those eight states, arkansas, louisiana, mississippi, alabama, georgia, south carolina, massachusetts and rhode island. we have another question here from our audience. >> jay. if you were to grade his governorship, what letter would you assign to it. and the second question is, as the first catholic presidential candidate, did he help how the country viewed religion as a factor? >> let's take the governor question here and the religion question is there. >> i would give governor smith an

it was bill clinton and al gore and others that formed a right wing to the democratic party called the democratic leadership conference democratic leadership council which i talk about in the book and they were trying to bring the party away from what they felt was the left for the progressives and by lead with jesse jackson's campaign who was a mental mind i ran to try to bring it back from this triangulation is moving the party to the right and i think that it has been followed as i talk about in the book by elizabeth warren and bernie sanders and others and i think that is of been an intra party struggle that has now moved the party more toward which should be but is still not all the way we ought to be but it is still in my judgment much better than the rip. publications that don't move at all in any area toward the trying to have an equal and fair society you see we talk to young activists who want people to vote by them this time around they appear to say things haven't changed that much there's all sorts of propaganda against bernie sanders supporters people on the left what is

now, the democratic party embraces blm. mocrats incorporated blm talking points directly into their party platform the summer pier for you didn't hear much about that in news coverage of the convention, just like you probably didn't hear anything about, the harrises speech at the nw cp this. the media didn't have time to tell you about it, there were too many of those rioting white supremacist to hunt down, and that is a shame, because you should know a lot more about kamala harris, a lot more. kamala harris is 22 years younger than joe biden's. so if joe biden wins next month, at some point, possibly sooner than we expect, kamala harris will control the white house, the federal government. and that is a concern, because very few people in the democratic party -- certainly at her level -- i pushed blm's message more aggressively than kamala harris has. here she was on friday. >> black lives matter has been the most significant agent for change within the criminal justice system because it has been a counterforce to the force

where from trumka coming out in 2016 you seen the regional side of the republican party and now you see a new side a democrat a republican party who are all ok well i mean i mean look at that that's an interesting argument but even when he is in the 2 parties a lot of people feel disaffected ok i'll give you i'm a perfect example ok i can see myself as a conservative but i am a noninterventionist so there's no place for me in the republican party if there's a john mccain. lindsey graham or marco rubio i think no i have no ability with those people whatsoever so you know i mean that's why you know there will be chants of the to the in the to the g.o.p. i mean you see what i'm getting here ok i mean the parties are very monolithic they can what they claim to stand for which i don't think they do but that's that and that does a back seat will go ahead john. well look i agree with you wholeheartedly and then will to an extent as well there is faction in within the party but i agree more with your point that the parties are monolithic because at the end of the day no matter how radical a o.c. or issue too late is

it is orchestrated among the national left-wing media, the democratic party that has become an outrage this country. and the intelligence community working hand in glove with the democratic presidential nominee of 2016, hillary clinton, and her campaign and the democratic national committee. there is no guesswork here. it is obvious. why in the world would the justice department not react? >> well, i believe that they are, and i will say this: it's quite with possible that the i.g., horowitz that you're referring to, didn't see these documents. i am quite sure the documents i've been able to review recently are documents we didn't have during our investigation that were clearly relevant that, quite frankly, every american needs to see the documents that i have seen. and that is it's just wrong. because as everyone knows, we had a full-blown investigation that i was leading back in early 2017. we had subpoenas out for this information, and there was clearly an orchestrated effort to keep certain documents away from the legislative branch of government, both house and senate. and that's

parties, separate from the selection. movements farther to the left in the democratic old ocean and base and movements as trump has shown further to the right and republican base. so it is going to be critical both parties moving forward in the futures understand where younger coalitions of voters are and how their generations are behaving in terms of politics and behavior when it comes to voting. we are going to see an enormous shift in terms of record breaking turnout among young voters this november. and that will ultimately also shipped electorate. the younger you are when you first vote or register to vote, or engage in an election, the more likely are to vote for the rest of your life, in presidential or other elections. so that will also have an impact. thei certainly think generational data from this report is really important. you know, our generation-i am a millennial, and the generations beneath us are getting married later in life they are getting married at all. there starting the relationship to the job force and the economy it is very different. we have been through sessions. we are going to go through another on

and i think a lot of working class union folks who had some allegiance to the democratic party going back to fdr, i think they peeled off. and, you know, went with wallace. and i don't know that they would have gone to the republican party and to nixon. >> we have seen that in the north. the south is where i think if wallace wasn't in the race in the south, nixon would have gone the votes. >> he started to do it and backed out. he decided not to do it. he began to get -- began to be ill at that point. >> but he did go back to the senate? >> 1970 he took mccarthy's seat in the senate. jim mccarthy's popularity in the state had dropped and he left politics. and humphrey took it. one of the largest landslides of senatorial career until 19 78 when he died. >> what was his second stint like? >> second stint. >> when he returned. >> he was at the bottom. he was a freshman. he was treated that way. no committees. walter mondale was senior senator. and treated like someone was just starting. he found his own way. and within a short time he was working on bills again and passed a couple differ

and a second specific challenge after the election which will exercise many in the democratic party. ourt? thanks to the confirmation of amy coney barrett, there is now a clear six — three conservative majority built into the supreme court. there are democrats, i am thinking of the senator ed markey who say, quote, we must now expand the supreme court. there are going to be cause for job biden to lead on that. do you think that would be wise for the healing in america?m could very well be. court wasn't always nine. how did we get to nine and when did we get to nine and when did we get tonight and why did we get there? the question is, do we need to go to 11, 12, 13?! need to go to 11, 12, 13? i think a baker's dozen might be a good number, i don't know. let's have some studies. you are ready to pack the supreme court to overcome what is the current political tone of that court? you are prepared to pack it and then tell america that you still want to enter the division and the polarisation? to the contrary, sir. i am prepared to unpack the court. it has already been packed for the last

they will be two sets of rules, one for the elites for the democratic party and a deep state and hillary clinton, another set of rules for we the people. we saw a nauseating example of this today in the great state of pennsylvania when a democratic lawmaker caught on a hot mic telling a colleague that she was only wearing a mask or political theater. apparently, she wants we, the people, to follow her selfless example, and she is full of it. take a look. >> i'm going to take my mask o off. >> i am only wearing mine for political theater reader. so that it's on camera. >> she was talking to the governor of pennsylvania, just like the governor in new york and new jersey who put covid patients to an executive order into nursing homes. another brilliant governor. anyway, the state deterred, we reached out to her, the governor of pennsylvania, no comment, no response. meanwhile, joe biden had some political theater of his own during the debate. he called the president, pretty much every nasty name in the book, said the president is a racist -- by the way, wasn't it joe that was friendly to hi

i have endorsements across the democratic party in san francisco. check out my comprehensive plans at victorforsf.com. >> my name is jeremy peter, and i'm running to represent you on the ccsf board. many people ask why i'm running in this year's election. i have a great job at an efficiency project manager. i love spending time with my partner, eric, and i love living here in the bayview. education has afforded me opportunities, and i believe that education is a human right. advancing tuition free education allows our most vulnerable students a chance to make a difference in their lives. the climate crisis was my call to action. in march, san francisco voters approved $845 million bond for ccsf infrastructure improvements. using this deal, my greparty w put the green plan into action. environmental, financial, and educational sustainability are intertwined. with students as our guide is principle, we will appoint a community oriented chancellor who is committed to implementing a strategic plan that is interested in sustained eligibility and the sust

here's the bigotry between liberal media and the democratic party. he support a republican president for his reelection, but he even spoke at the republican national convention. but there is not a word from white democrats or the white liberal media. so that's the white liberal media. so that's the bigotry right there. why am i treated differently? because of african—americanjust treated differently? because of african—american just like many treated differently? because of african—americanjust like many in the media... i did not raise that issue. message rate democratic representative. i did not race or colour or background to all, i said it's interesting to see a democrat representative from georgia crowd surfing at a trump rally. welcome a note, before you said that you talked about me being a democrat in georgia supporting a republican. that's interesting. why didn't you say that when a democrat from georgia... isjust as interesting with a republican supportsjoe biden, it covered that. if it does not mean anything don't mention it. it does mean s