in the coast so there is still ample space that will cost and it comes to a cost the reason why ted olsoncontinue with this is the question of cost it's trying to cut costs and with that risk in diesel livelihoods over for instance the fishery community there but also how the people who are trying to make their livelihoods in the fukushima prefecture but yet have a cap we do have to be realistic head that is an economics consideration to take into consideration there is you know you have to make this cost effective and what i guessed in tokyo is saying is that this is the most cost effective way of doing it. well the most cost effective way would have been to take the heat to take the morning or from last to the tsunami seriously and invest in that time we have now seen a contester fee for which there is trying to bush's responsibility time and again and this is one of the very many instances where temp was trying to do that and i am very sympathetic to to mine to my japanese friends in the region who say we've seen this once twice tens dozens of times happen in tepco tries to get away fo