kids: house finch, mourning dove, european starling, brewer's blackbird, red-tailed hawk, american crowboy: hooded oole, gray egret, great blue heron, and a mockingbird. rumble: the students love this. they love charging in here and really getting to know at a very deep, profound level what's showing up in our habitat. we observe, we record, we analyze, we share. all of these are important skills for our students. so, at the very bottom, do you see the live spidern there? kids: yeah. rumble: i'm surrounded by deerweed, native sages, encilia, but if you go back to 2014, i would have been standing on asphalt. peel back that asphalt, allow the dirt to be there, to plant native plants and create a living laboratory for students to really explore. girl: my name is ramona ramino. i like the garden because we come here and explore nature in the garden. what see in the gden is hummingbirds, mockingbirds, and flowers. second girl: my name is jimena lopez. we're trying to illustrate poppies and deer grass. boy: the california poppy is a flower native to california.

americans. in one sense, this is sort of a jim crow caucus that is now formed inside the republican party trying to deny african americans the right to vote. >> is it voter suppression, or racism? or both? >> i think it's both. it's attempted voter suppression. the whole idea of jim crow was to stop people who should be legitimately able to vote from voting. they weren't successful on election day with that. these african americans voted. so now they're trying after the fact to disqualify their votes. it's how many jelly beans are in the jar before you can vote, only now it's after the fact. it's just straight-up racism, and it's a failure of the republican party to expand and be able to give legitimate reasons for the ma rt. >> of african americans to support them. all these republicans and their jim crow caucus, they're overwhelmingly opposed by african-americans in their own state. and now they're trying to take the votes away from others in other states. it's really just straight-up shameful racism. >> jim, let's talk about tomorrow, because more than three million -- three million people ha

americans. so it's a jim crow caucus trying to deny african-americans the vote. >> is it voter suppression? >> it's attempted voter suppression. the whole idea of jim crow was to stop people who should be legitimately able to vote from voting. they weren't successful on election day, so after the fact, they're trying to disqualify their vote. it's just straight-up racism, and it's a failure of the republican party to expand and to give legitimate reasons for the majority of african-americans to support them. all these republicans and their jim crow caucus, they're overwhelmingly opposed by african-americans in their own state. and now they're trying to take the vote away from others in other states. it's straight-up shameful racism. >> and tomorrow, more than 3 million people have cast their ballots in georgia. on the one hand, president trump is sowing chaos and division. but on the other hand, his campaigning in the general election drove more voters out than people expected. how do you see this playing out tomorrow? >> well, back to stuart's point. the reason we're here in georgia is syst

discrimination against jews, but they lived in the u.s., where discrimination against jews and african-americans in jim crow theyca existed as well, so make a courageous decision to stand up and boycott the games. edna: despite the intensity of that personal sacrifice and the wrenching disappointment, they did not talk publicly about the decision. it was a personal thing. dr. greene: that's right. they don't speak out once they decide not to participate. edna: i want to wish a good afternoon to visitors come to viewers watching. i use museum speak all the time. someday we will have visitors again. thank you for joining us from greensboro, north carolina. good morning to new jersey, florida, harrisburg, san francisco, and internationally, watching from some paulo, brazil, cairo, egypt. good morning to el salvador, peru, and stockholm. will ask you to post your questions in the comments section. we have a sense of how it played out for a couple of college students who could relate on a personal level as jews. how do american athletes grapple with the question about whether to compete or not? dr. thomas: a dif

crow will be done. we will bury that son of a gun." that is a bit more threatening. langston hughes has dori miller's machine gun pointed not at the japanese, but at an american institution we personify as jim crow. >> this is where you go back to the war years and think about the navy's attempt to soft and -- soften and ameliorate potential anger against the nation with the war effort. there is that threat that miller embodies. gwendolyn brooks, the african-american poet, wrote a called "negro soldier" -- "negro hero" to suggest a doris miller. in that poem, doris is seduced by this angelic white woman who is the image of the nation. but she has a knife concealed in her sleeve, so she is ready to strike back against miller, even though he is giving his love and affection to her. so there is that threat, and menace, and there were many acts of violence directed against black americans in uniform, particularly in the america south. not exclusively. they embodied this menace, these supposedly lesser second-class citizens showing themselves to be what is perhaps the greatest embodiment of patriotism. the man willing to give his life in service of his nation. so miller inspi

and african-americans were only into the home ownership, afor people enslaved followed by 100 years of jim crow legislation. i would like to see how short the history is in terms of how african-americans have been mainstreamed. people who were designated, how recent this idea of mainstreaming and being included in the full body po potitic of our country and for many adult americans today. >> you have written remarkable books. tell us the story that got you to this point to inspect the building. >> i'm a daughter of people who were part of a great migration. a daughter of people who are survivors of jim crow and being raised by them. they migrated to washington d.c. and growing up in washington d.c. surrounded by people who were part of-- who were children or grandchildren of the great migration, everyone around me were-- everyone was somehow connected to the south. there was a deep personal family connection. people were going back to wherever they were from. in washington d.c., many people were from north carolina, and people were going back in the summer. so, i was surrounded by the experienc

american society. even if we're not jim crow-ing people quite so obviously as we used to do.that is what i'm trying to get at. that sometimes remembrance becomes redress in the minds of those remembering. it allows us to say we gave these guys medals of honor. yeah, it was 50 years too late, but this signifies our progress as a society. >> rob, is it possible you can have an audience and that people have their own views? there might be 15 people in the room with 15 views of exactly what's the doris miller story has to tell us. >> of course, i mean, that's the subjective nature of history isn't it? and a memory. we can read the same story and say, that means this, that means that. we show saving private ryan in france and you will get a different reaction from the one you might get with an american audience, because people are viewing it from their own particular context. we bring to it our political opinions, our ideologies, whether we've known about it or not. so yes, absolutely, there's no one true meaning of doris miller. that partly is what keeps narratives going, what ke

of jail free, so we can't address them ongoing systemic problems with race in american society, even if we are not jim crow and people quite so obviously, as we used to do. that's what i'm trying to get at. sometimes remembrance becomes redress in the minds of those remembering. and it allows us to say, we gave these guys medals of honor. yes it is 50 years too late. but this signifies our progress as a society. is it possible that you can have a audience -- tonight we are talking with the audience about doris miller. and people have their own views. there might be 15 people in the room, 15 views of exactly what the doris mueller story has to tell us. is that true? >> of course. that is the subjective nature isn't it, of history, and memory. we can read the same story and say that means acts, that means why. show saving private ride in france and you will get a very different reaction from the one that you will get with a american audience, because people are viewing it from their own particular context. we bring that to its our own political opinions, ideologies, whatnot, so absolutely, there is no one tr

race gender and original religion on the other side that that side of the american soil is the one that has produced slavery jim crow laws mass incarceration zip code and on the other have been on the international level and the good side of the american soul is the one that is the international just across the globe in order to have institutions and treaties like the un except or rather this is very important and medicare but it gives administration not only a need to undo it trumps policies but also he examine and we imagine his own policies when he was under the obama administration right and the answer is not out of generosity but out of necessity and out of a comfortable it's all right now one of those places i guess that the u.s. soul and values as you put a gun to be tested is going to be in policy towards yemen we know anthony blinken has talked about changing course on yemen what does that mean in terms of support for the coalition for coalition powers like saudi arabia and the emirates particularly comes to weapons supplies. by the administration to do all this when one of the most important thing of chang

legacy of division a legacy of burning down the house the republican house and the american house let me not remember jim crow came from the democratic party but you know you have been i said let's talk about america we don't a point fingers my exwife more hispanics in other minorities know carmen point when they expanded the ted ok for the party for the time being when he got his got i think one thing one of the huge legacy maybe in my mind maybe defining legacy you know it's not really a policy or a say it is that we realize that the country doesn't know much about the other and if they do they don't like what they see. whether there's no doubt that our country is fundamentally broken i mean look i i was only took an oath to uphold and defend the constitution of the united states of america against all enemies foreign and domestic and i agree with laura your take on the constitution you're need to go and i think what donald trump did on the when the 6. january was a frontal assault against the constitution united states trying to stop a process mandated by the 12th amendment from occurring whether you agree

crow. we're talking about american terrorism where every two and a half days it was some precious black manck woman, a black child hanging from some tree. it was ida b. wells that ledda serious struggle. then she organized black women and the black women's club. we need to know much more about her. we need to know more about how she was able to sustain her fire. she's a sunday school teacher in chicago. she still led the club movement from chicago but was also mistreated as was the case of every individual in this text. for many black people, themselves, why? because when you're on fire in that way, but when you've been niggerized in america, taught to hate yourself, believe you have the wrong hips and lips and noses and hair texture, believe you're less beautiful, less intelligent, and less moral. and black folk have been niggerized in america for 400 years. and she like others in this book have de-niggerized and have tried to do the same to other people and said don't be intimidated, don't be scared, straighten your back up, lift your voice, have a sense of dignity. organize and mobilize

crow era. all kinds of history moving forward with racially quality, and tracing american history, in terms of physical ability in the jim crow era and the similarities we are dealing with. >> i would like to ask whether it is personal connection that drew you to it, what -- i mispronounced your name and i will give you the first shot. in orlando. - >> i hear it all the time. my personal journey, the focus of the personal journey, listed in the green book since 2013, going into these communities in black neighborhoods and seeing where they are in government policy, we see a real departure of segregated communities and what they accomplished in the jim crow era, vibrancy and culture and you look at these areas. and gentrification. the fellowship at harvard, i had a fellowship at the schonberg in new york. the state of communities that are very difficult. during a time, with barack obama as president, to occur with that kind of thing, to transition the story and make it accessible, this historic travel guide that we don't need that anymore. it became a journey that is -- the book was published ea

crow is here and we'll discuss that with him as well. and republican senator now apologizing for on contesting joe biden's electoral win. later, vaccinating 100 million americans by his 100th day in office. how is joe biden going to do it? ? [ engine rumbling ] ♪♪ [ beeping ] [ engine revs ] ♪♪ uh, you know there's a 30-minute limit, right? tell that to the rain. [ beeping ] for those who were born to ride, there's progressive. sales are down from last quarter [ beeping ] but we are hoping things will pick up by q3. yeah...uh... doug? sorry about that. umm... what...its...um... you alright? [sigh] [ding]

extending the jim crow idea to women in this country, this is not to minimize the fact that women have been discriminated against. mexican americans, in texas, they faced discrimination but there's nothing, the analogy was false, black americans are uniquely and still living with the consequences of that. that is another thing in the plot to change america, also analogized. >> saint peters, missouri. robert and mike. >> you for taking my call. i'd like to hear your comments. first of all, i don't think america should be anymore as a method to look at is valid for all of the ingredients still retain i think that's a big problem immigration and invasion. my second part, the news media's role use things, they are trying to control you can comment on that, i would appreciate you home. i completely agree, this idea is valid, which is more the canadian model, a country with many different people to come united by common purpose is. imagine ourselves as a confederation of categories of the oppressed, we saw little bit in the election as a row in the "wall street journal", what you had in the rio grande valley in these counties have the m

even in the height of jim crow in the south when there was violence done against black americans, occasionallyators, white people, would be brought before a jury, and a trial would take place. more often than not, in most instances, that trial acquitted those white people regardless of the preponderance of their guilt. it didn't mean just because you knew in advance they would be acquitted that there shouldn't be a trial. because one day there was accountability, there was justice. it's not about winning. it's about justice. it's a trial. we all saw the president of the united states incite a mob of white supremacists, white nationalists, extremist militia, fascist proud boys, he incited them to violence. he attacked the capitol, the capitol fell, the american flag was torn down and the maga flag raised in its place. floor of the united states senate and house of representatives was desecrated. the mob was there to kill the vice president and speaker of the house. didn't succeed but killed five people, including bludgeoning a police officer to death. there must be accountability for an attack

. >> and if all this takes eliminating the filibuster, another jim crow relic in order to secure the god-given rights of every americanhat's what we should do. >> a jim crow relic. hayes, what did he mean by that? >> what he meant was the way this thing works, the reason why senators can talk and talk and talk like you just said is because the senate runs on the idea of a limited debate. if you want to talk about an issue more you can. if you come to an agreement you can vote. that's the way the senate ran for 100, 150 years of the senate. as the south realized, wait, the rules of the senate mean that we as a minority in the senate can slow things down when it comes to civil rights legislation. that's when the filibuster really start today come into use as we know it today. generally speaking, any senator can interrupt the flow of debate and say, you know what actually, we want to keep talking about this. the senate has used unanimous consent agreements getting all 100 senators on board to say, no, we're going to do this certain action and not even bother taking a vote. what the filibuster does today is actually, i di

and african-americans were only mainstream and the possibility of homeownership in a systematic way for those people that were enslaved followed by almost 100 years of jim crow segregation i would like to see us recognize how short the history is the how african-americans those that have been designated or how recent the idea and of those americans of today. >> you have written to remarkable books and started out as a journalist so tell us about your story what got you to this point where you are wisely seeing this? >> i was a daughter part of the great migration. my parents arrived jim crow and that they migrated to washington dc. those that were children or grandchildren of the great migration and there was a personal family connection people were going back to where they were from people from north carolina. so i was surrounded by the experiences and the culture they brought with them. and i was surrounded by the ways of worshiping call a seven or once removed. [laughter] >> you are never removed. [laughter] >> so i grew up with that and it just so happened to people in that space and that's what propelled me ultimately to write about the great migration.

flaps analogy drawn through the experience of african-americans and that is how it was done with every group that there was even a paper jane crow law extending the jim crow idea to white women in this country, this is not to minimize the power women have been disseminated against, mexican americans especially on the border areas of texas face real discrimination, the analogy was false, when drawn to black americans. black americans suffered uniquely and that is something we're still living with the consequences of that and the plot to change america is point out this false analogy i think. >> host: in st. peter's missouri, republican line. >> caller: thank you for taking my call was i have a couple points to make and would like to hear your comments on them. i don't think america should be looked at as a melting pot. i like to look at it as a salad where all the ingredients are mixed together but retain their individual properties and that is a big problem because representative bobby jindal said it best when he said immigration without exhalation is an invasion and that is what i think is happening in our country. my second po

even before that, senator lindsey graham who is not joined in the jim crow effort to negate the votes of african-american voters in cities where they don't like the out come. lindsey graham of south carolina had himself trying to pressure georgia officials to change the election. he had been here before. in november he accused trump south carolina senator of improperly exhorting him to meddle in the election. graham denied it. he asked us to throw out legally cast ballots. so after that call, we decided to do this. on the 19th or 18th attempt that the president made to get in touch with him. we have to tape this to protect ourselves. what do you make of the efforts of people like graham and others whether they are part of the dozen or not to essentially wipe out the votes? particular people of color. >> this is i think this is the point that stacey abrams made when she first lost the governor's race in georgia. and the thing that she's been trying to remedy since that loss which is to say that donald trurp is the tip of the spear and the most gross about it and careless about it. and explicit about it. i

entrepreneurs, saying the members of my category that's an experience of african americans there is even a paper written called jane crow the law. extending the jim crow idea to women. two white women in this country. this is not to minimize the fact that women have been discriminated against. they faced real discrimination black americans suffered uniquely or still living with the consequences of that. that is another thing i wanted to do, as pointed out. in st. peter's missouri the republican line. thanks for taking my culprit got a couple points to make and like to hear your comments on them. first of all, i don't think that america really should be looked at anymore as a melting pot. like to look at more as a salad were all of the ingredients still retain their individual properties think representative bobby general said it best is basically an invasion. that is what i think is happening with our country. land, my second point i would like you to comment on, like you to comment on the news media's role in just how the country views things. think they are trying to control the narrative of what the american people t

obama: and of all of this takes limiting the filibuster, another jim crow relic, in order to secure the god-given rights of every americant is what we should do. amy: another jim crow relic, says obama. you take this back to slavery. adam: that's right, and obama is 100% right. he has been consistent on the filibuster. he has always want to get rid of it. he says he wishes he had stted his first administration by rallying democrats to get rid of it, so he could have passed more and bigger things. he is right about the history. it is important to understand that the framers, for all of their own racism and slaveholding status, even they did not want the filibuster to exist. when they created the senate , it was an institution that had no filibuster power. it was designed to be a majoty ruled body. it was designed to be discouraged of a -- of obstructionism. this wasn't just a coincidence or some gray area. the reason they were clear about it was they created the constitution in the shadows of the article of confederation, and the widespread view at the time was that the reason the articles of confederation failed was that

it ended slavery, it ended jim crow and brought freedom to all americans, laws that protected all of a freedoms. they are trying to undo all of that and distracting us with talks of race and anybody who is a believer and believes in our founding supposed, america was pretty good in the christian society. they are trying to silence us, calling white people racists and black people who believes in those things silent and make all of us who believe in our founding principles, we are thee bad guys, don't listen to them, they are racist sellouts, they don't believe in this new america we are breathing in. b this global society we are bringing in is going to make everything better. it's not going to make everything better. we are already in the evidence, it makes us worse. it has us at the brink of destabilization. tucker: i think that's right. different invasion is very simple most religious people are universalist, every person is equal before god because we were all created by god so we are all of equal value. they are selling something very different in my view and much darker than t t

suffered to the experience of african african-americans and that is how it was done with every group. there was even a paper written. there was even jane crow and the law. this is not to minimize the fact women have been discriminated against. for example, mexican americans especially along the south faced real discrimination but there was nothing of the same. the analogy was false when it was drawn to black americans. black americans suffered uniquely and that is something we are still living with the consequences of that. that's another thing that i wanted to do is point out this false and analogizing. a. >> we will hear from mark in st. peter's missouri on therepu. a. >> thank you for taking my call. i don't think that america should be looked at anymore as a melting pot. i like to look at it as a salad where all of the ingredients are mixed together but they still retain their individual properties and i think that that is a big problem because representative bobby jindal said it best immigration without assimilation is basically an invasion and i think that is what is happening with our country. the second point i would like you to com

crow bureaucracy trying to impede her in the route. as well as its good fortune to have the remarkable moxie after disposable. since most white americans unless alerted to the contrary received her as a white woman. curtis' fair skin no doubt helped her as she navigated the jim crow south. in a family history provided by her daughter curtis was described as, quote, a blonde blue eyed matron of medium height. and apparent she was a blonde caucasian, end quote. given the overlapping rash of jim crow laws segregating public spaces and conveyances in the south eastern states she traveled, her complexion likely granted her privilege that many of the black women she recruited did not possess. curtis' physical appearance was frequently commented upon during her lifetime. her quarters described her as a woman of culture and beauty and alternatively as a woman of mystery. and yet history suggests that the white skin privilege she did enjoy she used strategically as a tool of racial advancement. thus to view her solely at face value, to read her efforts to recruit african-american nurses as merely the actions of a fair skin lackey of the mckinle

. >> and if all this takes eliminating the filibuster, another jim crow relic, in order to secure the god-given rights of every americant's what we should do. >> indeed the filibuster is a relic from the darkest days of jim crow. in the half century following the premature end of reconstruction, dozens of anti-lynching bills were filibustered out of existence and not a single substantial civil right bill became law. all because of an arcane rule wielded by a racist southern minority in the senate. indeed the longest ever filibuster was completed by perhaps the country's most famous segregationist. in 1957 senator strom thurmond filibustered a civil rights bill for tofr 24 hours effectively delaying progress toward equality for black americans for years. the filibuster has always represented a tyranny of the minority over the majority. a democratic change in the senate has made it more unconscionable than ever. the senators represent 40 more american than their 50 republican counterparts. and because gop senators are from overwhelmingly smaller and whiter states, their threat to filibustering president biden's entire ag

. >> almost three decades, where there are no african-americans served in either the house or the senate. that had to do with the jim crow laws that go on the books in the south. the way that changes over time -- there is a critical thing going on in the south, where african-americans begin to leave the south and move northward, as part of a multi-decade movement that would later recall the great migration. that begins -- depending on which historian you talk to, 1890's and it runs through world war ii. it picks up momentum around world war i as there is a need to fill industrial jobs, and jobs that have been occupied by many who have gone off to fight in the war. out of the rural south come into industrial jobs, st. louis, cleveland, pittsburgh, new york. over time, the african-american population increases. the african-americans in the cities are gradually created by the political parties. it is a perfect example of the process. he is born in the south. he and his family are part of a group who moved to the midwest, to kansas. he goes to grade school, high school -- he finds his way to chicago in the 1890's and moved u

and american officers were aware as early as october 1917 that its men were contracting high rates of venereal disease. the logics of jim crow rule were part and parcel of the efforts used to reduce vd among african-americans working as stevedores on the docks of st. nazair. in evaluating the racial and sexual logics at play in crafting this proposal it should be noted that young was unabashed in his opposition to sexual relations occurring between black men and white women. in his autobiography, he recalled a visit to the 92nd quote, unquote, american negro division headquarters where he met with its medical officers to discuss the venereal problem. to his surprise, he discovered that all the doctors, lieutenants, and captains were black or were black that day. young used this opportunity to make his thoughts about interracial sexuality known, quote, i talked very frankly about the insurmountable barrier between the two races, the necessity of leaving white women alone, and their duty as officers to impress these facts upon their men. i heard afterwards that my remarks did little good and most of these negro doctors became

crow bars, seattle windows smashed. and property destroyed. in denver rioters burned american flags.e they didn't get the unity memo. biden has not condemned the violence yet. still waiting. here to react, seattle talk show host, jason rantz. they told us it would be a pro trump mob sweeping 50 capitols across the country. it turns out it was an antifa mob and places in the northwest. what are people saying? >> they are saying nothing. the council of seattle. the mayor in portland and washington state really aren't saying anything. there is a tendency to completely ignore antifa violence. after all it is a myth created by the right wing. and the people who do acknowledge it simply call it an idea. but that idea ends up destroying lots of businesses and hurting lots of people. there is a movement on the ground with not just the activists in the community. and progressives who live in portland and seattle pushing back saying there wasn't a riot. what are you talking about? they are saying people are trying to take attention away from the real issues which of course is white nationalist

crow bars, seattle windows smashed. and property destroyed. in denver rioters burned american flags.e they didn't get the unity memo. biden has not condemned the violence yet. still waiting. here to react, seattle talk show host, jason rantz. they told us it would be a pro trump mob sweeping 50 capitols across the country. it turns out it was an antifa mob and places in the northwest. what are people saying? >> they are saying nothing. the council of seattle. the mayor in portland and washington state really aren't saying anything. there is a tendency to completely ignore antifa violence. after all it is a myth created by the right wing. and the people who do acknowledge it simply call it an idea. but that idea ends up destroying lots of businesses and hurting lots of people. there is a movement on the ground with not just the activists in the community. and progressives who live in portland and seattle pushing back saying there wasn't a riot. what are you talking about? they are saying people are trying to take attention away from the real issues which of course is white nationalist

crow. now they didn't call it segregation, we're talking about american terrorism, maybe two and a half days there was some precious black women or black woman or a child, strange fruit that southern trees bear that the great billy holiday sang about, and the great american porn writing the lyrics. and she organized black women in the black women's club. so we need to know much more about ida b walsh, we know two more know more about how she was able to sustain of course, she's a sunday school teacher in chicago. she was also missed traded as was the case of every individual in this text. many black people themselves. why? because when you are on fire in that way, when you've by been nick arise in america believe you are the wrong hips and lips and nose isn't hair texture. you believe your last beautiful, less intelligent and less moral. black folks have been nicaraguan america for hundred years and she and other folks in this book and have de negress black people. she says don't be intimidated, don't be scared, straighten your backup. ever have a sense of dignity, organize mobile laws with

talk about illegitimate votes, all legal votes, this is just the language of the jim crow south that african-americanbunch of white republicans who overwhelmingly are not supported by african-americans in their own state who are attempting to disqualify african-americans in other states. and i think it is shameful. and i think the corporate donors should ask themselves is this really what you want to support. do you really want to disqualify your african-american customers and employees. because that is what this is about. it is just about race. >> jamie. >> it is treacherous. to see what is going on right now, stewart is right, i mean, a lot of it is about race, a lot of it is just about political power. and people trying to hold on to that political power. and dr. king said in a letter we will repin this generation for the appalling silence of the good people. there are good people in the republican party. and those people need to stand up and they need to stop emboldening these folks who are flouting their constitutional oath to protect and defend the constitution of the united states. so i hope f

the compromise of 1877 is what allowed american states to push african-americans away from the voting booths and into a jim crowition, which was going to last for nearly a century and we are still dealing with today. number three, look at the people who actually invade the capital. this is not been covered enough. has not been hit hard enough was of these are basically white supremacist. the white supremacists are leading the way in making the argument this is our house. in other words, what we think is american government should be in the hands of white full who are willing to be violent about black people. juan: professor snyder, i would ask in terms of you characterize it more as aattempte coup then perhaps maybe insurrection -- a coup assumes there was -- it seems to me, an actual plot afoot by the coup makers. in this situation, it appears that trump -- he egg on th mob. it seems to me there has always been a right-wing fascist movement in the united states in search of a leader. if you go back to father coughlin inhe 1930's, huey long, george wallace, always a significant person of the american popation t

and the fact that the top 1% and america have seen their wealth crowed during the pandemic and clearly not the case for so many other americanso pay for this investment? he would focus on people and making sure people pay their fair share making sure people pay their fairshare and making sure people pay their fair share and that is through closing tax loopholes and pinpointed top companies in the top band of us companies not paying much tax at all. he also wanted to get schools open and next wednesday, when he takes over, we begin a new chapter in together, we can get this done. an optimistic note struck by president—electjoe biden there. that is get some reaction and joining us and was listening. what did you make of it? ~ ., ., it? we were finding out all the details of that _ it? we were finding out all the details of that stimulus - details of that stimulus package, worth $1.9 trillion and that is a very expensive price tag and joe biden has said as well. he said that economists have advised him that it economists have advised him thatitis economists have advised him that it is better to invest now, otherwise the us econo