well yes that's a major question that we are definitely following up in our special investigation committee so there are 2 levels to it one is we will interrogate ernst and young very seriously in order to find out what went wrong and why they ought to cost of lee for so many years for wire cut even though basic evidence such as banking account statements of the bank have been missing for years level $2.00 which is what consequences what political consequences that have those that have in terms of regulation of auditing companies my i think that for example we should exchange auditors between companies more of let's say every 6 to 8 years or all it will arrest the probability in order to detect criminal fraud activity such as fraud got into wire can't let's talk more about corporate governance what needs to change in germany to make sure this can never happen again. well i don't know if we can say this will never ever happen again but you mentioned a good point because besides reforms of the financial supervisor already in companies we need to take corporate governance very seriously i'm co

well yes that's a major question that we are definitely following up in our special investigation committee so there are 2 levels to it one is we will interrogate ernst and young very seriously in order to find out what went wrong and why they ought to cost of lee for so many years for wire cut even though basic evidence such as banking account statements of the bank have been missing for years level $2.00 which is what consequences what political consequences that have does that have in terms of regulation of auditing companies my i think that for example we should exchange auditors between companies more of let's say every 6 to 8 years or all of that we're in a race to probability in order to detect criminal fraud activity such as france we got into why or can't let's talk more about corporate governance what needs to change in germany to make sure this can never happen again. well i don't know if we can say this will never ever happen again. because the science reforms of the financial supervisor all of the incumbent is we need to take corporate governance very seriously i'm convinced th

that statement angers women's rights activist money should talk lee who is part of the investigative committee last year the public health department revealed that $84000.00 hysterectomies were performed in one district alone but the report was simply filed away. but that got it when get passes out in news it local authorities have the information they were taken aback by the shocked response and now they want to cover it up. if suddenly the number fell 213000 cases and now supposedly it's just 1300 that has. bit as a woody. khurana doesn't expect the state to do anything about her plight she hopes that when your son marries he'll tell his wife not to have a hysterectomy and she says that if she knew then what she knows now she'd never of had the operation. they break gender barriers in sports give unsung heroines a voice. and help others become more independent and learn how in our impact series we meet entrepreneurs human rights activists and bloggers fighting injustice and to being loose in their societies. people making an impact people making a difference. but no parents will be no humans

that statement angers women's rights activist money should talk lee who is part of the investigative committee last year the public health department revealed that $84000.00 hysterectomies were performed in one district alone but the report was simply filed away. but that got it when get by says that in use it at all local authorities have the information they were taken aback by the shocked response and now they want to cover it up. if suddenly the number fell 213000 cases and now supposedly it's just 1300 that has that it will be outputted as award. khurana doesn't expect the state to do anything about her plight she hopes that when her son marries he'll tell his wife not to have a hysterectomy and she says that if she knew then what she knows now she'd never of had the operation. they break the gender barrier in sports give unsung hero ends a voice. and help others become more independent and out in our impact series we meet entrepreneurs human rights activists and bloggers fighting injustice and to be loose in their societies. people making an impact people making a difference. but no pare

that statement angers women's rights activist money should talk lee who is part of the investigative committee last year the public health department revealed that $84000.00 hysterectomy s. were performed in one district alone but the report was simply filed away. but the got it when get by says that in use it local authorities have the information they were taken aback by the shocked response and now they want to cover it up. if suddenly the number fell 213000 cases and now supposedly it's just 1300 there that has a lot of would i be outputted as a woody. khurana doesn't expect the state to do anything about her plight she hopes that when her son marries he'll tell his wife not to have a hysterectomy and she says that if she knew then what she knows now she'd never of had the operation. they break the gender barrier in sports give unsung hero ends a voice. and help others become more independent. in our impact series we meet entrepreneurs human rights activists and bloggers fighting injustice and to believe in their societies. people making an impact people making a difference. will be no hum

well i think some of the people who were detained have already been released but the investigative committee has already opened various criminal cases against some of the protestors and also the activists for breaking the rules of you know organizing mass events during the pandemic for apparently blocking traffic for allegedly iowans against the police and in previous protests with previous big protests we've often seen similar behavior from the investigative committee perhaps it could scare further protestors off of the streets going forward. and we'll have to see whether that's the case. that this really has the potential these rest really have the potential to dent the support for the. well at least in our news team have already announced that they are they are planning protests for this coming week and they seem to want to keep the pressure on the kremlin up and keep that momentum going i think that needs hardcore supporters will most likely come out to any of the it to these protests in the in the coming weeks or on this coming weekend but many of the people that i spoke to at the prote

that statement angers women's rights activist money should talk lee who is part of the investigative committee last year the public health department revealed that $84000.00 hysterectomy s. were performed in one district alone but the report was simply filed away. but they got it when get by says that in use it local authorities have the information they were taken aback by the shocked response and now they want to cover it up. if suddenly the number fell 213000 cases and now supposedly it's just 1300 there that has added would be outputted as a woody. khurana doesn't expect the state to do anything about her plight she hopes that when her son marries he'll tell his wife not to have a hysterectomy and she says that if she knew then what she knows now she'd never of had the operation. they break gender barriers in sports give unsung hero ends a voice. and help others become more independent minded in our impact series we meet entrepreneurs human rights activists and bloggers fighting injustice and to be loose and nasa scientists. people making an impact people making a difference. with no fear

well yes that's a major question that we are definitely following up in our special investigation committee so there are 2 levels to it one is we will interrogate ernst and young very seriously in order to find out what went wrong and why they ought to cost of lee for so many years for wire cut even though basically evidence such as banking account statements of the bank have been missing for years level $2.00 which is what consequences what political consequences that have those that have in terms of regulation of auditing companies my i think that for example we should exchange auditors between companies more of let's say every 6 to 8 years or all it will erase the probability in order to detect criminal fraudulent activity such as fraud regarding to why you can't let's talk more about corporate governance what needs to change in germany to make sure this can never happen again. well i don't know if we can say this will never ever happen again. because besides reforms of the financial supervisor all of them companies need to take corporate governance very seriously i'm convinced that we n

that statement angers women's rights activist money should talk lee who is part of the investigative committee last year the public health department revealed that $84000.00 hysterectomies were performed in one district alone but the report was simply filed away. but they got it when get by says that a new local authorities have the information they were taken aback by the shocked response and now they want to cover it up. if suddenly the number fell 213000 cases and now supposedly it's just 1300 yards out of. there that's a woody. doesn't expect the state to do anything about her plight she hopes that when her son marries he'll tell his wife not to have a hysterectomy and she says that if she knew then what she knows now she'd never of had the operation. they break the gender barrier in sports give heroine a voice. and help others become more independent. in our impact series we meet entrepreneurs human rights activists and bloggers fighting injustice and to be in their society.

that statement angers women's rights activist money should talk lee who is part of the investigative committee last year the public health department revealed that $84000.00 hysterectomies were performed in one district alone but the report was simply filed away. when get by. local authorities have the information they were taken aback by the shocked response and now they want to cover it up. suddenly the number fell 213000 cases and now supposedly it's just 1300. doesn't expect the state to do anything about her plight she hopes that when her son marries he'll tell his wife not to have a hysterectomy and she says that if she knew then what she knows now she'd never of had the operation. they break the gender barrier in sports give unsung heroine a voice. and help others become more independent. in our impact series we meet entrepreneurs human rights activists and bloggers fighting injustice and to abuse in their societies. people making an impact people making a difference.

that statement angers women's rights activist money should talk lee who is part of the investigative committee last year the public health department revealed that $84000.00 hysterectomy swer performed in one district alone but the report was simply filed away. but that got it when get by says at a news it local authorities have the information they were taken aback by the shocked response and now they want to cover it up. if suddenly the number fell 213000 cases and now supposedly it's just 1300 that has. bit as a woody. khurana doesn't expect the state to do anything about her plight she hopes that when her son marries he'll tell his wife not to have a hysterectomy and she says that if she knew then what she knows now she'd never of had the operation. they break gender barriers in sports give unsung heroine a voice. and help others become more independent and in our impact series we meet entrepreneurs human rights activists and bloggers fighting injustice and to boost in nasa scientists. people making an impact people making a difference. but no fear and there will be no humans on the planet

kill the leaders of victory is illegal in iraq they are not welcomed in iraq god willing the investigative committee and the iraqi judiciary will continue to investigate this crime and will work hard to prosecute everyone who helped well here's a closer look at some of moneys legacy he joined the revolutionary guard of the 1980. and force on the front lines of the iran iraq war in the late 1990 s. he was appointed head of the could force running iran's foreign military and clandestine operations after 911 he delegated iranian and american diplomats to meet they briefly worked together against the taliban before the relationship deteriorated in iraq so the money helped iran backed faces during the fight against eisel though many iraqis are angered by iran the continuing influence and blame teheran for political instability and sectarian divisions during the iraq war the u.s. says that iran through the could force and shia militias killed more than 600 american soldiers in syria some of money lead faces backing president bashar assad and was instrumental to that government's survival throughout the ci

kill the leaders of victory is illegal in iraq they are not welcomed in iraq god willing the investigative committee and the iraqi judiciary will continue to investigate this crime and will work hard to prosecute everyone who helped out of there was child stratford tells us more about the events in iraq's capital. this was for want of a better description some sort of memorial we are expecting the launch protests in the capital to a call out has been given to people in various cities across the country to come and join those protests those protests very much focused all on demanding that the iraqi government put pressure on the americans to withdraw the remaining soldiers and military personnel from the country and meanwhile every day people on the streets are very concerned about any potential escalation because as we've been reporting for months the protests that have dominated the streets of baghdad and other cities protesters demanding jobs better economic conditions wholesale political change in an end to corruption all during a pandemic these people oversee very concerned about any kind of esc

and so a parliamentary investigative committee in the one taco has and has since state parliament it's also that question trying to find out more about that because here it is only marcus h. and stephanie who will get the word of today there are a lot of eyes on this trial this was the 1st right wing terrorists killing of a politician here in decades how great is the danger of right wing extremism in germany today. i think it is a great danger that the interior minister saying that is that it is the greatest danger for for security in germany and i think it is also a danger that has long been the collected by security authorities by the domestic intelligence agency and only recently after the killing of. the attack and ha now and take and. i think security forces domestic intelligence agencies are really trying to focus on that far right scene and they are saying that 13000 people in that scene. potentially violent so it is also a large scene that could pose a threat to. security in germany so there might be more stephany's out there. correspondent paid to head i'll set of that courtho

of the most so russian investigative committee has initiated a criminal case on enticement of minors into eagle activities that pose a danger to their lives carried out by internet and social media. mass protests have led to novell news release from custody before but some analysts believe the tactic won't work this time because he's become too much of a threat to president putin's grip on power. brian al jazeera. let's just take you to some of those live protests right now they're happening across russia these in the east of the country in your country peaceful protests of course we'll bring you more pictures as we get them from across russia through the day. still ahead here on al-jazeera why a community in argentina says it's being stigmatized in lockdown against its will also musgrave's in libya authorities trying to identify hundreds of civilians killed during the civil war to stay with us. mostly it's in the knees here in the philippines that are getting the bulk of this rainy season weather malays is a little bit drier in the forecast at least so that part of borneo in the abs

in moving ahead now, the majority is foregoing an investigation, committee hearing, fact witnesses and expert witnesses. an opportunity for members to ask questions to review the evidence, to hear new pieces of evidence and to consult with experts on impeachment and the constitution. there foregoing an opportunity for the president is accused to be heard. not because his reckless words are deserving of defense, but the president himself has due process and impeachment proceedings. failing to utilize historical and constitutional process we have used in the past and rushing to the floor makes this what professor jonathan turley calls "a dangerous snap impeachment." a snap impeachment, without due process and due consideration will not help bring the american people together, as our focus should be. it is a great disservice to the institution and to the country. to make matters worse, a snap impeachment like this does not give members the opportunity to openly consider this course of action and put it into context. i know the majority believes the case for impeachment is obvious but i am

contact has blocked all pages linked to the release system committee of the us so russian investigative committee has initiated a criminal case on enticement of minors into eagle activities that pose a danger to their lives carried out by internet and social media. mass protests have led to novell news release from custody before but some analysts believe the tactic won't work this time because he's become too much of a threat to president putin's grip on power. brian al-jazeera. a retired army general has become the 1st black american pick to be u.s. defense secretary the senate voted $93.00 to $2.00 to confirm joe biden's nominee lloyd alston to run the pentagon. the reports. ludo stan arrived at the pentagon shortly after his senate confirmation his 1st day shed you will include your cool with nato secretary general and a briefing on the coronavirus pandemic good to see you guys just. like you being here look forward to working with you earlier the retired army general had shattered a racial barrier in the united states by becoming the 1st african-american secretary of defense he was confirmed

majority has chosen to race to the floor with a new article of impeachment for going any investigation any committee process or any chance for members to fully contemplate this course of action before proceeding professor jonathan turley is correct when he called this. a quote dangerous snap impeachment and impeachment that effectively would go to a vote without the deliberation or inquiries of the traditional hearing professor turley also noted that quote the damage caused by the rioters this week was enormous however it will pale in comparison to the damage from a new precedent of a snap and pietschmann unquote if the majority seeking consensus this is hardly the way to create a majority failing to provide the house with an opportunity to review all the facts which are still coming to light to discuss all the evidence to listen to scholars to examine the witnesses and to consider precedents this is not the type of robust process we have followed for every modern impeachment and the failure to do so does a great disservice to this institution and to this country mr speaker i can think of nothing th

tlaib of michigan and the newest member of the squad, oversight committee is responsible for investigating committeesud, and abuse of power. >> representative gwen moore denies breaking quarantine to cast a ballot for nancy pelosi, she tested positive for covid-19 five days before making it public. more traveled to be in washington dc to vote to keep pelosi speaker of the house. republican congresswoman kathy mc morris rogers is floating the idea of dropping a motion to remove pelosi from her leadership role. malingering joins us to react to the georgia senate runoff. todd: and we will check in with will cain in atlanta after the break. eir blood sugar. a majority of adults who took ozempic® reached an a1c under 7 and maintained it. here's your a1c. oh! my a1c is under 7! (announcer) and you may lose weight. adults who took ozempic® lost on average up to 12 pounds. i lost almost 12 pounds! oh! (announcer) for those also with known heart disease, ozempic® lowers the risk of major cardiovascular events such as heart attack, stroke, or death. it lowers the risk. oh! and i only have to take it once a wee

well yes that's a major question that we are definitely following up in our special investigation committee so there are 2 levels to it one is we will interrogate ernst and young very seriously in order to find out what went wrong and why they ahd to cost of lee for so many years for wire cut even though basic evidence such as banking account statements of the bank have been missing for years level $2.00 which is what consequences what political consequences that have those that have in terms of regulation of auditing companies my i think that for example we should exchange auditors between companies more of let's say every 6 to 8 years in order that we're in a race to probability in order to detect criminal activity such as france got into wire can't let's talk more about corporate governance what needs to change in germany to make sure this can never happen again well i don't know if we can say this will never ever happen again but you mentioned a good point because besides reforms of the financial supervisor already in companies we need to take corporate governance very seriously i'm con

top republicans on three house investigative committees now demanding documents and records involving again potentially trying to buy influence with the biden family in a new way not seen before. with us tonight, matthew whitaker, michael lee, gary kaltbaum, harmeet dhillon. janice dean, vince collagnese and tom homan. conflicts of interest that could rope in a big name power player in the biden administration. more on wall street warfare. the little buy sticking it to the bid guys, wall street establishment. the little guys bull mania a raid that the big gun hedge funds love to hate. the little guys taking out the big guys. we have what you need to know to stay out of the crossfire. also tonight the administration's green new boondoggle. the president's top team members have a long and storied embarrassing history of blowing your tax dollars, wasting your tax dollars on green energy projects that eventually belly-flopped. it is giving cash for flunkers a whole new meaning. more on john kerry lecturing oil and gas workers that they need to suck it up and lose their jobs during a pande

top republicans on three house investigative committees now demanding documents and records involvingith the biden family in a new way not seen before. with us tonight, matthew whitaker, michael lee, gary kaltbaum, harmeet dhillon. janice dean, vince collagnese and tom homan. conflicts of interest that could rope in a big name power player in the biden adminio

top republicans on three house investigative committees now demanding documents and records involvingseen before. with us tonight, matthew whitaker, michael lee, gary kaltbaum, harmeet dhillon. janice dean, vince collagnese and tom homan. conflicts of interest that could rope in a big name power player in the biden administration. more on wall street warfare. the little

>> four house committees are launching investigation news the attack. happen and what went so wrong. democratic congresswoman carolyn maloney is chair of one of the committees investigating and she joins me now. thank you for being here. that is just a minute plus of 12 minutes of video from this one reporter's perspective. terrifying seeing it all. when do you think -- what do you think this video shows? >> well i think it is shocking beyond belief. it is an attack on our democracy, our institutions, it is an attack on all of us. it is never happened in history before. this will go down as one of the darkest days if the history of our great country. and we have to get an understanding of what happened and make sure that this doesn't happen again. >> and part of that is that your committee has opened an investigation into what happened on january 6th. other committees are doing the same thing as well. what specifically do you want to find out? >> well we're looking at the intelligence part of it. we're looking at the fbi and the homeland security and th

"the boston globe" is reporting with the investigative committee why the panic button in your offices were removed. you can elaborate about that? >> well, it was certainly unnerving later in the day that the panic buttons from my office had been removed. there is an investigation under way, so far as that matter. and my panic buttons have been reinstalled. but it does beg the larger point in question, which is why i called for within hours of this violent attack an investigation. so we can better understand what individuals and agencies enabled this insurrection. this white supremacist mob's efforts to interrupt the peaceful transfer of power. and certainly, we know donald trump has culpability. which is why he'll be forever the twice impeached president of this president by the house i hope the senate will do their job, too, and hold him accountable for the role he played but he is not the only one culpable. we should be expelling those members who perpetuated this lie and inciting this riot. we have sought to impeach and remove. now we must move to expel which is why i'm supporting

that if he does not send the aides who are still on his side to testify before the senate investigating committee, then the country is only going to hear from the aides who are going to testify against him. so he is meeting with his former chief of staff, white house chief of staff. he talks about pardoning everybody in his inner circle. >> there's some blue language in this as well. >> what i mean to say is this talking in the confidence of this room. there is nothing more important you >> this was an invitation to all of the aides to perjure themselves when they testified in public. they all did. and they, all the ones he mentioned, his former attorney general and campaign chairman, they were all charged with obstruction of justice and perjury in 1974. the grand jury that indicted them wanted to indict nixon as well. but the special prosecutor at the time said, we're not really sure we can indict a president. so they simply named him as an unindicted co-conspirator. they up until richard nixon got on that helicopter in 1974 to leave the white house for good, pressed him to fulfill his promise t

the contact has blocked all pages linked to the release system coming to them or so russian investigative committee has initiated a criminal case on enticement of minors into eagle activities that pose a danger to their lives carried out by internet and social media. mass protests have led to novell news release from custody before but some analysts believe the tactic worked this time because he's become too much of a threat to president putin's grip on power. brian al jazeera. let's bring in ben noble who's a lecturer in russian politics at university college in london joins us live via skype from the british capital and the tensions clearly running high in russian city is how the kremlin play this you think they're in a difficult position are they do they keep novell in prison or risk sparking further outrage or let him loose where he could easily act as a kind of lightning rod for more protests. i think it's clearly not a crime really wants to get in about any behind bars and we shouldn't forget that today is an incredibly important moment that both sides of the kremlin that wants to show that n

in every modern impeachment inquiry, an investigation and committee action has proceeded bringing an impeachment resolution to the floor. in part this is to ensure members have the full facts, the opportunity to engage expert witnesses, and have a chance to be heard. it also provides due process to the president of the united states, and again, every modern impeachment inquiry, the president has been given an opportunity to be heard in some form or another. this is necessary in order to ensure the american people have confidence in the procedures the house is following. it's also necessary not because of the president's inappropriate and reckless words are deserving of defense, but because the presidency itself demands due process and the impeachment proceedings. unfortunately, the majority has chosen to race atto the floor with a new article of impeachment foregoing any investigation, any committee process or any chance for members to fully contemplate this course of action before proceeding. professor jonathan turley is correct when he called this, a dangerous snap impeachment, a i

that if he does not send the aides who are still on his side to testify before the senate investigating committee, then the country is only going to hear from the aides who are going to testify against him. so he is meeting with his former chief of staff, white house chief of staff, h.r. hauhaldemad he talks about pardoning everybody in his inner circle. >> and there is some blue language in this as well. >> what i mean to say is this, talking in confidence in this room. there's nothing more important you and john have than to keep me in this -- office because i don't give a shit what comes out of you or john, even that poor damn dumb john mitchell. there is going to be a total pardon. >> well, don't even say that. >> you know it. you know it and i know it. >> it's wrong. wrong. of you guys. you and john. you and john cannot be condemned for something you didn't do. >> well -- >> god damn it, it was -- john dean. >> i don't think we will be. we didn't do. >> why not? >> because we didn't do it. >> this was an invitation to all the aides to perjure themselves when they testified in public. they al

in every modern impeachment inquiry, an investigation and committee action has proceeded bringing an impeachment resolution to the floor. in part, this is to ensure that members have the full facts, the opportunity to engage expert witnesses, and have a chance to be heard. it also provides due process to the president of the united states, and, again, in every modern impeachment inquiry the president has been given an opportunity to be heard in some form or another. this is necessary in order to ensure that the american people have confidence in the procedures the house is following. it is also necessary not because of the president's inappropriate and reckless words or deserving of defense, but because the presidency itself demands due process and the impeachment proceedings. unfortunately the majority has chosen to race to the floor with a new article of impeachment, forgoing any investigation, any committee process, or any chance for members to fully contemplate this course of action before proceeding. professor jonathan turley is correct when he called this a, quote, dangerous sn

investigate. now they're going to be four independent congressional committee investigations on this.ioned lauren boebert. why is she walking around the metal detectors that are installed there and arguing with capitol police when they say, look, we need to check your bag. we know that she's a gun rights activist and she talks about, you know, packing heat and carrying a gun. i don't ef know, a, if that is legal to do into the capitol building itself, but certainly, not recommended to do. i think we can pretty much all agree on that. so what's that about? you've got these republicans that are saying, i'm not going to go through the metal detectors, it's got to raise red flags to you. >> yeah. so, i mean, lawmakers have an exception on capitol grounds, they're allowed to carry weapons under some 1967 obscure exception to the law, but they're not allowed to have weapons on the floor of the house chamber, and you have madison, a new republican lawmaker, one of the most extreme new republican lawmakers, telling interviewers that he was armed in the chamber on the day of the attack, which

dick durbin has already promised a senate judiciary committee investigation of everything that was revealed in your reporting friday night. and over the weekend. the house judiciary committee is busy with impeachment duties at this point. but that's probably the first public venue we will have for any kind of investigation of this. do you expect that jeffrey clark will testify to that or will be taking the fifth amendment of that? hiring a lawyer to try to avoid any kind of subpoena to that? >> you know, i'm not really sure what mr. clark will do. i do feel, though, that the actions that he took, he took because he truly believed that they were the correct thing to do. and that his actions will be guided by the fact that he does believe that what he did was correct. he's one of, i will say, not a small number of people both in the republican party and who worked in the federal government who had their own serious issues about the election but what made mr. clark interesting or unusual, he worked at the justice department. top officials in the fbi had conducted dozens of fraud investigation,

investigation is essential. it has to come first. we have homeland security committee, and we have issues that relate to intelligence from judiciary and intelligence committee. we have the armed services many. there will be -- the committees will be doing their oversight in many different ways the appropriations committee and the oversight committee have overarching responsibility. again, the investigation will tell us what we need to know to have truth that we can trust the system that we have here. it is so sad. imagine 10 days ago, as i said, we lost our innocence in this, because we always prepared to detect and defend from all enemies foreign but it also says and domestic and now we have to protect ourselves from enemies domestic. how close within, the investigation will let us know. >> are you considering the article indefinitely? >> we have just learned from cbs that he just tweeted that louisiana's lieutenant has been asked by speaker pelosi to investigate capitol hill security. history said he is a tell it like it is southerner who came famous during katrina.

investigations. they are trying to sort out at the moment which committees will hold jurisdiction. there are some calls for a 9/11 style look back at how we got here. that will be a more comprehensive in-depth investigation. there's cultural democrats including mikey cheryl from new jersey about whether any of these rioters had been corresponding with republican lawmakers themselves in the days leading up to january 6. there seems to be some suggestion that there were towards being given by members of congress or staff for these rioters -- would be rioters the day in advance of the attack. that is something mikey cheryl has sent a letter to the top security officials were -- requesting some kind of investigation. there will be tons of video surveillance in the capital itself of the people not only who are there on january 6 but also of any visitors that might have been coming through the capital in the days in advance. towards have been completely closed during the pandemic. it would be pretty easy to see who had access to the building. host: scott is a group -- congressional report

investigation is essential. it has to come first. but in addition to chairman ryan's committeee have , homeland security committee, we have issues that relate to intelligence from judiciary and intelligence committee. we have the armed services committee. so there will be a full -- the committees will be doing their oversight in many different ways . and of course the appropriations , committee and the oversight committee have overarching responsibility. but again, the investigation will tell us what we need to know to have truth, so that we can trust the system that we have here. and it is so sad. imagine 10 days ago, as i said, we really lost our innocence in this, because we always prepared to detect and defend from all enemies foreign. but the constitution also says, and domestic, and now we have to protect ourselves from enemies domestic. how close within, the investigation will let us know. >> are you considering withholding the article indefinitely? [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2021] >> on january 6, breaching security and caused extensive damage to

questions and many other ones, in 1978, congress established a house select committee on assassinations to open the investigation. the committee issued this report with a major conclusions. harvey oswald did indeed fire hotshots from the window. one of them killed kennedy. scientific acoustical evidence established a quote high probability, not certainty, high probability that the second gun was filed from the front but missed. nobody was found, as i said. and on the basis of available evidence, they concluded that kennedy again was probably assassinated. as a result of it conspiracy, the extent of which the committee would not determine. despite such indeterminate findings, the american public apparently has not had no wish to pursue the matter. incredibly, even though the vast majority seems to believe that oswald didn't behave alone and that there was a conspiracy, it -- has been opposed to reopening the case well it might be deference to the family, fear of what might be found, certainly out of the futility of it all that gets greater as time goes by. well ladies and gentlemen, i wish i knew the answer. but

are you hearing about such an investigation? which committees might run such an investigation?ake? >> well, yesterday, most of the senate, about 80 of us, were together for four or five hours after we had been evacuated from the senate chamber and while we were waiting for law enforcement to retake control of the capitol. we had quite a few conversations about how yesterday's events revealed spl eed some of the se flaws in our system here. i think it's urgent that we take this as a matter, right at the very beginning of this congress to look at. there is both an appropriations subcommittee that's responsible for the legislative branch and homeland security and judiciary, which are committees of the senate. all of those groups can and should immediately look into what happened, what were the failures of planning, how do we make sure this doesn't happen again. >> all that money that went into making the building so secure, it wasn't like yesterday was a super sophisticated operation. they basically just stormed the building and were walking around like they were tourists. so wher

>> it is something that with all of the investigations by the committees and the special investigatorsand so forth has been completely missed, overlooked, and distorted. we have been trying for a lifetime behind the scenes to bring about peace between iran and iraq. we knew that we were not that favorite people, mainly because of our previous relationships with the shot. now we also knew, let me put it this way, it started with this. by way of a third country in the middle east, we were informed that there were some representatives of iran, not of the government. they want to make contact with the united states to see if they could not establish a better relationship, and they put it on the basis. if you will remember that time. not to longer go, we were hearing every day that their days were numbered, and he might not live out the week. these people are representative of one of the factions that are still there within the country as to who is going to be in charge when he is gone. his third country recommended them. said their credentials were honest. so we accepted, and we set some p

investigation. and so there's a process. the senator -- we have a responsibility to question the behavior of senators. and the way to do that is through an ethics committee investigation and review. and that's what we're pursuing. >> what do you think about senator mcconnell's proposed timeline for trial for donald trump, what we know, what he's suggesting, january 28th, they would issue a summons to trump. february 4th, he gets to answer the articles of impeachment. february 11th, he can submit his pretrial brief. february 13th, the house can submit their rebuttal. what do you think of that? >> he's submitting a time frame for the democrats to review, and what's that's happening. we're not interested in delaying the trial of this president and his inciting to insurrection, but at the same time if we're going to take that kind of time, i want to make sure that president biden's nominees have hearings and that we can get on with putting them in place so that they can conduct the business of doing things that will actually help people. and that's what president biden is doing with his proposals right now. >> i want to ask you about what happened to these t

january 6th capitol riots as the chair woman of the house oversight and reform committee is requesting an fbi investigation into the now disabled website parler and its role in the insurrection. congresswoman carolyn maloney said the request is a, quote, step toward opening a formal committee investigation into sites that may encourage violence including parler. joining me is carolyn maloney. congresswoman, thank you for joining us. what are your main concerns here with parler and other sites that led to this letter? >> well, lindsay, inciting violence and calling for violence is a crime. it's a very serious crime. in the amazon-filed papers they called the post on parler aimed clearly at planning violence, clearly aimed at overturning a free and fair election, which is a corner stone of our democracy. these actions clearly threaten our national security and our way of life. these are very clear issues. they were inciting violence. violence is not free speech. it's a crime. it needs to be investigated and the fbi has the tools to do it. we want to know who's behind it, who planned it, who financed it and g