supremacist and you are probably domestic terrorists too on the president you love, he's actually usama bin laden. eric swalwell said the same thing. his chinese problems seems to have gone away. he made the same comparison. now trump supporters are saying our president is usama bin laden and i'm a domestic terrorist? this social media arms of our country suppressing, investigating, and indicting? whether i was there or not. they are broadening it on purpose and that's the scary part. they want trump-ism gone, not just the president. >> jesse: juan, do you see that type of rhetorical framing is dangerous and reckless and irresponsible? >> juan: if you extended to everyone, i think it would be irresponsible. i don't think that you can somehow moderate the actions that took place at the capital last week. i don't know how you can do it. i made the point yesterday. our pentagon correspondent jennifer griffin tweeted about it today. we have 15,000 u.s. troops at the u.s. capitol today right now. we have a picture of some of them last night sleeping on the floor of the u.s. capitol. i mean, it's enoug

he got no real pushback from pbs when compared president trump's actions to usama bin laden. >> usamawas widely acknowledged that he was responsible for inspiring the attack on the country. the president, with his words using the words fight with the speakers that he assembled that day who called for trial by combat and said we have to take names and sleep. i'm comparing the words of an individual who would incite and radicalized somebody as usama bin laden did to what president trump did. >> also not a single question about his past ties to a suspected chinese spy. i feel like michael, this is attention seeking behavior. an equivalent of a tile they're eating toilet in front of parents cast. >> well i think that's an apt comparison, dagen. the whole thing about the references and the terrorist references that we are hearing. even joe biden referred to ted cruz and josh ali participating like joseph gables and the big lie. now we have the usama bin laden comparison. the democrats are really stretching to make it sound like what happened last week was the worst thing in the history of

our country. >> i'm comparing two words of an individual who would incite and radicalize what usama bin laden did to president trump. >> he swore up and bit down that that was the case without anything to back that up and now he's comparing him to usama bin laden for something that happened on january the 6th. that's what investigation has barely begun on. that's how that horrible behavior actually came about. >> this is horrible and reckless, totally immature and bin laden is responsible for roasting many of my neighbors here in new york city. i watched as the towers burned with my own eyes. nothing anything like that happened last wednesday when president trump said to his supporters, i know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make their voices heard. that doesn't sound like the words of usama bin laden, that sounds like him calling on them to be peaceful and patriotic. i think swalwell should apologize for that. and versus swalwell who had sexual intercourse with the chinese spy and nancy pelosi let him be on the intelligenc

he means enemy in the way usama bin laden is an enemy. remember what we did to usama bin laden.tter seen his tweet? do they care? does anybody? you know the answer. not a single one denounced what he said or even told him to cool it a little bit. and what about the news media? reporters search for what they call extremism. have they noticed davis on twitter? probably they have but of course they agree with him. just income of "the daily beast," the home page of our -- he ran a piece with this title. other countries, the story pointed out, have domestic spy agencies to fight extremists at home. what the piece does not mention is also other countries would include china, north korea north korea, kazakhstan. domestic spy agency is a not very solid euphemism for secret police. that's what they are calling for. now you'd think talk like that would constitute a big red wine for the many professional freedom defenders in washington, the ones you send money to, think takes. they are everywhere but not tonight. where are they tonight? a former u.s. military officer declares war on an ame

. >> usama bin laden didn't enter u.s.l in 9/11, but it's widely acknowledged that he was responsible for inspiring the attack on the country. the president, with his words, using the words, fight with the speakers that he assembled that they who called for trial by combat, he said we have to take names and -- i'm comparing the words of an individual who would incite and radicalize somebody as usama bin laden didn't add to what president trump did. >> tucker: in the midst of darkness, there is light. that means mark steyn, best selling author, professional assessor eric swalwell, great to see you. what is this? >> i think nancy pelosi is just sticking it to us because she can. we -- there is any number of packet mediocrities who could have taken the place of swallwell, but she's deciding to twist the knife. at this guy, as he said, is being penetrated thoroughly by chinese intelligence, about the only intelligence he has been penetrated by. he's actually an asset in a certain sense for the chinese communist party. his para

bin laden. you can't make it up, but predictable. >> holding him accountable is different from the people who directly were involved in tearing down the doors and rampaging. dominic the capitol building. >> usama bin laden did not enter u.s. soil on september 11th, but it was widely acknowledged he was responsible for inspiring the attack on our country. >> sean: all right. according to the democrats old standards comparing the president of the world's most hated terrorist must be incitement, right? okay. it what about joe biden question mckee once told his subordinates he wanted to assault him. that has to be incitement right? this is insurrection they're talking about, right? >> i wish i could take him behind a gym. >> i didn't make a mistake. they asked me if i would like to debate this gentleman. i said no, i said if we were in high school i would beat the [bleep] out of him. >> sean: using democrats own standards, how is that not an impeachable statement? let's not forget joe's vp, kamala harris. 2020, two weeks after farr left rioters, they burnt down a minneapolis police station, they burned it to the ground. just two weeks after violence rioters attempted to storm the white house groun

ainsley: congressman eric swallwell compared the current president to usama bin laden. was responsible for inspiring the attack on our country and the president with his words, using the words fight with the speakers assembled that day who called for trial by combat, we have to take names, i am comparing the words of an individual who would incite and radicalize somebody is usama bin laden to do what donald trump did. ainsley: what are your thoughts? >> somebody on the intelligence committee would take the time to know the history of our enemies and usama bin laden didn't speak just to inspire individuals, he was an individual that literally planned the attacks in kenya and tanzania, 9/11 and others. he was a planner of attacks, that is what he's likening the president to which is totally inaccurate, without any questioning to continue on the last train of thought, it is wrong for him to do this and he is working to try to incite more division in this country. ainsley: where was eric swallwell when you were surrounded by attackers and rioters who were in your face threa

anyone who disagrees with susan rice is worse than usama bin laden and more dangerous.se people, meaning you, have the weapons. these terrorists. by terrorists, they mean tens of millions of american citizens who might have a firearm at home and didn't vote for joe biden. they are the threat, and we need to hunt them like we hunted al qaeda. you just saw the clip. that's what he said. it is hard to imagine a leader saying something more destructive and more reckless than that on television in a moment as far as the one we are in. it's terrifying in its stupidity. this isn't crying fire in a crowded theater, this is using a flamethrower in a crowded theater. what are the implications of a former cia director talking like this? it's not going to make anyone a more moderate, that's for certain. just the opposite. john brennan is creating more extremists. it's not just him, all of the news channels other than this one right now are repeating this official line that the american government is now at war with its own population. here's cnn's version. >> my colleague jim judo

and -- i'm comparing thele words of an individual who would incite and radicalize somebody as usama bin laden add to what president trump did. >> tucker: in the midst ofof darkness, there is light. that means mark steyn, best selling author, professional assessor eric swalwell, great to see you. what is this? >> i think nancy pelosi is just sticking it to us because she can. we -- there is any number of packet mediocrities who could have taken the place of swalwell, but she's deciding tor twist the knife. this guy, as he said, is being penetrated thoroughly by chinese intelligence, about the only intelligence he has been penetrated by. he's actually an asset in a certain sense for the chinese communist party. his paramore of the california democrat party has planted an intern in his office. i love that 007 picture of him in his tuxedo and fang saying the name -- i love that. the fact is he embodies the complete fraudulence and the dysfunction of the american system. as you know, you played that clip a couple of weeks back. he's on one of these hearings. that's one thing i'm giving up for the

hottie and we're going to treat you like we treated those radicals after 9/11 the way we treated usama bin ladenget in line. this is a war on terror. keep your mind as you listen to people talk like this and adam schiff is far from the only one, they are talking about american citizens here. they are talking about you but nobody seems to notice or care. one who does notice and cares quite a bit, one of the only democrats to stand up and impose this transparently fascist purge is tulsi gabbard, the former member of congress of hawaii, she published a video message explaining exactly what's at stake. >> john brennan, adam schiff, and oligarchs in big tech who are trying to undermined our constitutionally protected rights and turn our country into a police state with kgb style surveillance are also domestic enemies and much more powerful and therefore dangerous than the mob that stormed the capital. >> tucker: what you just heard her say is true, no matter what they tell you, no matter how much they attack the person who said it, it's absolutely true, that is true and god bless tulsi gabbard for sa