i want to know who she looks like. >>> for our next story, adam grant believes we should think again,enging our own opinions. he looks at the science behind why rethinking can leave us better positioned for success at work and happiness in life. true. grant's ted talks have been viewed more than 25 million times. he's also professor at the wharton school of the university of pennsylvania. and adam grant joins us from his home. it's so good to see you. i love this book. i've told my favorite son -- favorite daughter and now favorite son-in-law to get it. they have already ordered it. that's at least three sales for you, mr. grant. this is the thing -- you say we have no problem rethinking in our everyday life, but when it comes to our knowledge and opinions, that's tough. what do you mean rethinking our every day life but it's harder other places. explain. >> yeah. we're happy to renovate our kitchens or refresh our wardrobes. when it comes to the knowledge and the beliefs that we hold dear, we like to stick to our guns. >> why? >> i think a lot of us are afraid of being wrong. we don'

joining me now is adam grant, an organizational psychology at the wharton school where s his ted talks have been viewed over 25 million times. he is the author of the just released think again, the power of knowing what you don't know. professor, thanks so much for being here. i find that so much of what write about applies to our political climate. for example, you argue in favor of embracing the joy of being wrong but that seems to be the an tithesis of what our politicians act. >> you know who was a great flip-flopper? abraham lincoln. he came into office thinking if he alabolished slavery, that it would tear the union apart. >> and i can't think of a politician who upon reflection and says so faces the public and says i've thought about this more or there is new day it and i have changed my mind. 2346d, you get derided such as second kerry, well, he was against the war before he was for it. >> yeah, i think that this is a cultural problem. there is too much significant made stigma with admitting that you are wrong. if you are committed to being a life long learner, you better, with

we're going to talk about the monumental shift in the workplace with adam grant, behavioral psychologisthe major ceos of the country. we'll talk to adam right after the break. today we're going to fine tune the dynamic braking system whoo, what a ride! i invested in invesco qqq a fund that invests in the innovators of the nasdaq 100 like you you don't have to be a deep learning engineer to help make the world a smarter place does this come in blue? become an agent of innovation with invesco qqq does this come in blue? these days, we want sophisticated but simple. cutting edge made user friendly. in other words, we want a hybrid. and so do retailers. which is why they're going hybrid, with ibm. a hybrid cloud approach with watson ai helps manage supply chains while predicting demands with ease. from retail to healthcare, businesses are going with a smarter hybrid cloud, using the tools, platform and expertise of ibm. ♪ ♪ >>> welcome back to "squawk box" this morning salesforce recently declared the 9 to 5 workday, they say it is dead it's over. in a statement this week the company's chief

here and sooner or later we're going to be in boiling water >> so, joe, turns out according to adam grant has changed. it's no longer whether yields are going higher but when is a move too big that is what the masht's trying to figure out and that has three elements it's about the economy, it's about market conditions and about the fed. so far, so far people think that this move is while not welcome, is fine but keep an eye on it because the faster we move, the more you are going to destabilize all three of these elements that's why i've had it as a risk factor that i've talked to you in the last three months >> the reasons for it, it's a combination, i guess it's all related we could be reopening and earlier a guy like dr. scott gottleib said it's going to be like woodstock i remember, that was crazy if we reopen, or roaring '20s, whatever you want to talk about, but there is some pent-up urge to go let your -- everybody let their hair down. you can just feel it, mohamed. that might be coming we also have some hot inflation numbers and a resurgent economy and a resurgent consumer might b

granted. so, thank you for this opportunity. atjust 23, this is already naomi 0saka's fourth grand slam title. an uncertain year, an uncertain tournament, but you can be sure 0saka will win more. adamance are struggling with a covid outbreak in their camp. winger gabin villiere and prop mohamad haouas are the latest players to test positive. scrum half antoine dupont returned a positive result on friday. head coach fabien galthie, his assistant william servat were already isolating following the news that they both had the virus. france, top the table with two wins out of two, are due to face scotland next sunday. and that is all your sport for now. a 21—year—old british woman has become the youngest female to row solo across the atlantic ocean. jasmine harrison, from north yorkshire in the north of england, slept and rowed in two—hour rotations to complete the crossing in 70 days. sophia tran—thomson has this report. welcome to antigua! horn sounds. this was the moment jasmine harrison broke records. applause. the 21—year—old is the youngest female to row solo across the atlantic ocean. and for that matter, the youngest female to row solo across any ocean. welcome to antigua, jasm

granted, this is a big family in illinois. these are family members he might see at events here or there, right, but they're family members. they wrote this. "adamy, what a disappointment you are to us and god. we were once so proud of your accomplishments. instead you go against your christian principles and join the devil's army, fake news and media. and i think this stands out because there are families across the country who have been divided like this. they've just been torn apart by what is true and what isn't true and having different opinions of that. >> there's so much there when it comes to that letter adam kinzinger and republicans and trump supporters as a whole, trump supporters have taken over the republican party. the republican party can no longer say they don't agree with the insurrectionists, bigots, racists, with the white supremacists and anti-semites because that's what they have clearly shown through their actions, especially over the last five years. with him showing that letter, first of all, they should probably figure out what christianity real plienz, and i think i would love to ask adam kinzinger that but he's so far

adams county. the suit alleges malicious prosecution and argues curtis's kids were falsely imprisoned during those police interviews. a federal court granteddants in regard to the emotional distress claim but allowed the case to move forward on all other accounts. the lovelace happily has moved out of quincy and curtis has opened a new law office in champaign, illinois. he and christine have started an exoneration mission. >> what happened to you guys in this whole thing, do you think? >> i don't know what happened to us, dennis. these kinds of things happen across our country everyday and now i think we have an obligation to share this story and to help other people. >> your goal was to leave that courthouse an innocent man? >> yes. i believe looking in the eyes of that jury, seeing, you know, tears from some of them how quickly that they came back that they were declaring to me and to the world that i'm innocent. >> curtis lovelace, a life interrupted. >>> i'm craig melvin. >> and i'm natalie morales. >> and this is "dateline." >> they said, we need you to get in the car with us.sa they zip tied my arms and zip tied my legs, duct tape my

secretary grant shapps yesterday saying people shouldn't be booking breaks and the prime minister saying it was too early to say if we could. let's talk to our chief political correspondent adamourse, into this mix comes the health secretary, matt hancock, who we have been talking about this morning saying he has booked a family holiday in cornwall this summer. he said he booked it months ago, so if we are looking to the government for a signal as to what we might be able to do, who do you go with? i what we might be able to do, who do you go with?— you go with? i think the common denominator— you go with? i think the common denominator the _ you go with? i think the common denominator the government - you go with? i think the common | denominator the government has arrived at today is that we shouldn't look to the government for advice about whether or not to go ahead with a booking for a holiday at home or abroad. and actually, we all need to accept its uncertain and the uncertainty has consequences depending on what we might want to do. the reason the government has had to reach a common position, common denominator, is because exactly asjust common denominator, is because

grant of mercy to those who have been clear victims of injustice. congress could reform the pardon power by creating statutory limits. there is a bill introduced by representative adam schiff that would present to important reforms. his bill would require the doj and president provide congressional materials related to the prosecution as well as the pardon and would strengthen the bribery statute by clarifying its application to the president and vice president that it is an official act to grant a pardon and that such a grant is a thing of value. the amendment would assure -- the bill would ensure any offer of a pardon or a pardon itself would be a criminal act if part of a corrupt exchange and declare presidential self pardons in valid. there's reason to believe this legislation would withstand constitutional challenges. it is widely accepted congress may impose penalties on a pardon intended to bribe a recipient. since the legislation does not attempt to circumscribe the grant of a pardon and does not tread near the article to powers and the doj has issued opinions consistent with this understanding, in october 1995, there was an opinion that stated if the applic

grant shapps. so much detail to get. let's get more on those new travel rules from our chief political correspondent, adam fleming, who joinsing said that, though, i think these measures will be introduced without a vote or a debate in parliament, so the critics of this policy, i think, are probably going to focus their attention on how it is unwound. when he start lifting these measures and what impact does it have on summer holidays with yellow something interesting to ask grant shapps about. last night on the newscast podcast we were interviewing the boss of iata, who say they have been negotiating with the british government and others about an app they are developing with the airlines where you would upload your vaccination status to allow you to get onto a flight, that could be as soon as april. the government says they don't want to introduce any kind of vaccine passport at home in the uk because that would be discriminatory against people who haven't had it or didn't want to get it, but they have kept the door open to it being something we might have to it being something we might have to use for travel once we can

grant of mercy for those who have been clear victims of injustice. congress could also reform the pardon power by creating statutory limits. there is a bill introduced by representative adam schiff which would propose two important reforms. in cases of covered offices, his bill would require the doj and the president provide committees with materials related to the prosecution, as well as the pardon and strengthen the bribery statute by clarifying the application to the president and vice-president, that it's an official act to grant the pardon or commutation and that such a grant is a thing of value. thus the amendment or the bill would ensure that any offer of a pardon, or a pardon itself would be a criminal act if part of a corrupt exchange. and it would also declare presidential self-pardons invalid. the strong reason to believe this legislation would withstand constitutional challenges. it's widely accepted that congress may impose criminal penalties on intending to prescribe. since they do not circum describe-- and doj has issued two opinions that are consistent with this understanding. in october, 1995, there was an opinion that stated the application of the briber

grant program at the federal level under historic preservation. so there's ways to take a look at exploring where we might be able to possibly generate additional funding. >> commissioner adamsre's foundation money out there. i have seen it in other cities and not to give too much away, but i know there are other cities in california that do have similar programs and i know that a lot of this stuff is funded out of big foundations. maybe you, rick and i can talk off line about talking to some of the foundations. that's specifically in their giving program, especially with historic reference and what we have started here with the legacy businesses. you are seeing it in other cities now, without a doubt. >> i think if there are efforts where we can minimize, the requirement of the general fund to fund the program, then that is potentially more sustainable and puts less pressure on the general fund. >> commissioner adams: thank you. >> president laguana: commissioner adams, i'll just note, i know from my work on the venue recovery fund, when the city creates an account, there's an actual account where the money sits and presumably can be deposited to. i think your question is a

grant program at the federal level under historic preservation. so there's ways to take a look at exploring where we might be able to possibly generate additional funding. >> commissioner adams: i know there's foundation money out there. i have seen it in other cities and not to give too much away, but i know there are other cities in california that do have similar programs and i know that a lot of this stuff is funded out of big foundations. maybe you, rick and i can talk off line about talking to some of the foundations. that's specifically in their giving program, especially with historic reference and what we have started here with the legacy businesses. you are seeing it in other cities now, without a doubt. >> i think if there are efforts where we can minimize, the requirement of the general fund to fund the program, then that is potentially more sustainable and puts less pressure on the general fund. >> commissioner adams: thank you. >> president laguana: commissioner adams, i'll just note, i know from my work on the venue recovery fund, when the city creates an account, there's an actual account where the money sits and presumably can be deposited to. i think your q

grant program at the federal level under historic preservation. so there's ways to take a look at exploring where we might be able to possibly generate additional funding. >> commissioner adams: i know there's foundation money out there. i have seen it in other cities and not to give too much away, but i know there are other cities in california that do have similar programs and i know that a lot of this stuff is funded out of big foundations. maybe you, rick and i can talk off line about talking to some of the foundations. that's specifically in their giving program, especially with historic reference and what we have started here with the legacy businesses. you are seeing it in other cities now, without a doubt. >> i think if there are efforts where we can minimize, the requirement of the general fund to fund the program, then that is potentially more sustainable and puts less pressure on the general fund. >> commissioner adams: thank you. >> president laguana: commissioner adams, i'll just note, i know from my work on the venue recovery fund, when the city creates an account, there's an actual account where the money sits and presumably can be deposited to. i think your q

secretary grant shapps said that people would expect pretty strong action and he stood by the maximum penalty of a ten—year prison sentence for lying about travelling back from a high risk covid country. adamre there human rights implications about these charges? yeah, definitely. we have not seen the regulations yet, and a tendency with the government is to do this at the very last moment, so it is very difficult to understand exactly what is going to be said, but obviously, for the first time, the government are going to be detaining people, locking people up in hotels, guarded, for at least ten days, and thatis guarded, for at least ten days, and that is a big step change and gives rise to significant issues. you know, are they going to provide for people with disabilities that will prevent them being able to be detained in a small hotel room? will they allow for people who can't afford the fees, you know, not everybody is popping off for a jolly in dubai or whatever, some people have to go abroad for funerals, to see sick relatives, are they going to be literally prevented from coming back because they can't afford it? ithink coming back because they can't afford it? i think also there