for the market the questions alternate the opposing questions for as long as both sides have questions. >> without objection so ordered. schumer: i have a question for the desk. >> the senator will submit it. >> question from senator schumer and feinstein, instructed to the house managers in the carpool read it. >> is not the case that the violent attack and siege on the capitol on january 6 would not have happened if not for the conduct of president trump. >> you have up to five minutes. >> to answer your question directly, he assembled the mob any of the flame, president trump did. everything that followed was because of his doing. and although he could've immediately and forcefully intervened to stop the violence, he never did. in other words, this violent bloodied insurrection that occurred on january 6, would not have occurred but for president trump. the evidence we presented at trial makes this absolutely clear. this attack as we have said, did not come from one random speech . did not happen by accident. the mob did not come out of thin air. before the election, donald trump sp

question. the question is from senator markey. duckworth the. house of representatives the kirk read the question exactly when did the president learn of the breach at the capitol and what steps did he take to address the violence please be as detailed as possible. to respond. to president senators this attack was on live t.v. on all major networks in real time the president as president has access to intelligence information including reports from inside the capitol he knew the violence that was under way he knew the severity of the threats and most importantly he knew the capitol police were overwhelmingly outnumbered and in a fight for their lives against thousands of insurgents with weapons we know he knew that we know that he did not send any individuals we did not hear any tweets we did not hear him tell those individuals stop this is wrong you must go back. we did not hear that so what else do the president do we are unclear but we believe it was a dereliction of his duty and that was because he was the one who had caused them to come to

i have a question for _ questions? mr president,. i have a question for the _ questions?. _ questions? mr president,. i have a question for the desk. senator- questions? mr president,. i have a| question for the desk. senator from geora ia. question for the desk. senator from georgia- send _ question for the desk. senator from georgia. send it _ question for the desk. senator from georgia. send it to _ question for the desk. senator from georgia. send it to the _ question for the desk. senator from georgia. send it to the desk. - the senator from georgia, senator warnock. — the senator from georgia, senator warnock. has— the senator from georgia, senator warnock. has a _ the senator from georgia, senator warnock, has a question _ the senator from georgia, senator warnock, has a question for - the senator from georgia, senator warnock, has a question for the i warnock, has a question for the house _ warnock, has a question for the house managers, _ warnock, has a question for the house managers, the _ warnock, has a question for the house managers, the clerk- warnock, has

done everything except answer athat question. the question they brought before you . a question that they want my client to be punished by. that is the question that should be getting past. and the answer is, he advocated for peace, patriotic protests. those are his words . the house manager showed zero, zero evidence that his words did anythingan else. remember, all of the evidence is that this was premeditated. the attack on the capital was preplanned. he didn't have anything to do with mr. trump. anyway. when he said on the day on january 6th. at that •-ellipsis. that's the issue before the senate. now in the issue of contesting elections in a result, the democrats how long long history of just doing that. i hope everybody is able to see the video earlier today. over and over again, it is been contested. when mr. trump was elected president, we were told - >> the counsel to half minutes have expired. >> the senate from wisconsin . >> sorry, cannot see. i send a question to the desk for both parties. >> senator from wisconsin sends a question for both counsel for th

my question follows up on kristen's first question. what is the cdc doing to communicate its guidance to governors and other officials, discouraging them from taking some of these steps, or ultimately is this largely a state and local matter where the administration's powers limited? >> i just wanted to confirm not that the question was asked that long ago -- i just wanted confirm -- not that that question was asked that long ago -- conversations with governors about those that are taking steps to relax mitigation standards? is that your question? >> right. if you could say more about what the administration is doing to provide counsel and instructions on issues like mast mandates, -- like mask mandates, dining restrictions, especially in light of the spread of these variants. >> across government, we talk to the states incredibly frequently, so maybe we will go around and see, dr. walensky, if there is anything you want to add. >> i think our stand on this is pretty well-established. we have a weekly governor's call and i have been in

who served or more than mr president i sent a question to the desk. question for the. question. if a president spins a big law anger americans and stoked the fury by repeating the lie at event after event. and invites violent groups to dca on the day and hour necessary to interrupt the electoral college cow and does nothing to stop those groups from advancing on the capital and fails to some in the national guard to protect the capital and then expresses pleasure and delight that the capitol was under attack is the president innocent of inciting an insurrection because in a speech he says be peaceful. you know it's very dangerous 5 that. you'll ask a very important question which is given everything that the president did leading up to the election after the election and leading up to january 6th all of the incitement of his supporters whom he convinced with a big lie over and over that the election had been stolen from them and from him and then once the mob had stormed the capitol the vice president was in danger the speaker was in danger the members of the house and the senat

here is final question. if i were a democrat, what does the poll tell me about how i might take some of the voters who supported trump in 2020 and add them to the democratic tally in 2022 or 2024? who wants to take a crack at that first? kristen: i think the economic issues are the most fertile ground. most of the cultural issues, there is no way for the democratic on this and making overtures considering where the center of gravity is the democratic party is. but you can see it around debate around covid relief. mitt romney saying i want to give $3000 for every child in america and facing backlash in his own party. that is the kind of thing where you can see democrats -- again, i am not sure democrats embracing mitt romney means anything for a variety of reasons. but this economic, stimulus quality-of-life type issues where there is the greatest opportunity for democrats to peel some folks away. karlyn: anyone else, very quickly? sean: i have long said joe biden was the only one who would beat trump of the

my question is, what reassurance can. question is, what reassurance can you give _ question is, whatthat the vaccine is safe in the long term? thank you.- patients that the vaccine is safe in the long term? thank you. thank you for the question. _ the long term? thank you. thank you for the question. i _ the long term? thank you. thank you for the question. i don't _ the long term? thank you. thank you for the question. i don't think - the long term? thank you. thank you for the question. i don't think bame i for the question. i don't think bame cancer— for the question. i don't think bame cancer patients are any different to any other— cancer patients are any different to any other cancer patients. sadly, cancer— any other cancer patients. sadly, cancer doesn't discriminate in that way either~ — cancer doesn't discriminate in that way either. i am sorry to hear you have _ way either. i am sorry to hear you have had — way either. i am sorry to hear you have had such an experience. what i can say— have had such an experience. what i can say is— have had such an experience. what i can

this is a protection question. typically judges apply some even scrutiny to this question examining the purpose of the legislation and how tightly the regulation fits its stated purpose. if the regulation burdens too much core second amendment activity than it's unconstitutional but if it's burdens or minor than the regulation can stand. so a prohibition for example on possessing a firearm with obliterated serial numbers has been held to be constitutional it covers the second amendment, the second amendment is implicated but the regulation that it can survive the challenge. some judges among them, justice brett kavanaugh, as indicated that the southern part of the two protest, the balancing of the right -- would advocate on approach that would rely solely on text history and tradition, -- when he wrote as a d.c. circuit court judge, -- doesn't mean that governments lack flexibility or power to enact government regulations. indeed according to the justice, he says quote, governments appear to have more flexibility w

what we live for every day is to question more we question our children we question oh wise one christian relatives and we question what's going on in the news how else to learn without question and. the world is driven by dreamers shaped by one person of those. who dares thinks. we dare to ask. welcome back to watching the hawks in our special look back and remembrance of the life work and legacy of the legendary radio and television broadcaster larry king who passed away last saturday in los angeles at the age of 87 where once again joined by the host of the world according to jesse former minnesota governor jesse ventura the host of news with rick sanchez the one and only rick sanchez and the host a big question. jesse you work with larry king at or after he left c.n.n. when he was focused at building up streaming content on the internet as news media began to change in a focus was placed heavily on digital and social media larry king remained a staple what would you say was the key to his longevity in the changing media environment and what did you enjoy most about working with. well

sherman: that isn't my question sir. you are evading my question by making up other questions. let me repeat. two identical orders come in. same quantity. one is for robinhood, one is for fidelity. what happens? mr. griffin: the quality of the execution varies by the channel of the order. this is a commonly understood phenomenon. channels matter. when you get a mortgage, a mortgage for jp morgan has a different rate of interest. rep. sherman: reclaiming my time, sir. who gets the better deal? one that comes from a broker who is being paid for order flow and one not? can you testify that, on balance, there is no difference, assuming the same size of the order? mr. griffin: as i said earlier, size of the order is only one factor. rep. sherman: you are doing a great job of wasting my time. if you are going to filibuster, you should run for the senate. everyone else i have talked to in this industry says when you pay for order flow, you get -- when your broker is being paid for order flow, you get a worse execution. otherwise you are in the peculiar circumstance where you are makin

this question.e line, about what potential is opened up by these vaccinations but i think what everybody wants to see is a world in which we can relax the guidelines and the non—pharmaceutical interventions for everybody, relax all the restrictions for everybody and do that by vaccinating, as chris explained with the chart of the most vulnerable groups, as many of the most vulnerable as we can as fast as possible and then taking a view about the interaction between that and the prevalence of the disease. at the moment, as we have discussed several times, the level of infection is still for willingly high for us to imagine the relaxation of the current guidelines but we will obviously review that in the days ahead. anything to say more about the idea that people increasingly talk of of vaccine passport as it were?- increasingly talk of of vaccine passport as it were? thank you, and for the question _ passport as it were? thank you, and for the question because _ passport as it were? thank you, and fo

what we live for every day is to question more we question our children we question oh wise one christian relatives and we question what's going on in the news how else to learn without questioning. to get the ball really to sneer those who really can show you. show it thank you just because suitably. well with that i suppose you noticed that i stay so back. no no no risk of being a bull episodes didn't go to see you if you. go to sleep during your force where you could be near must of missed with another thoughts about spirit i pity you a bus more than 6 pm don't you know. if de gea crew will. show. for you to. sort of move to. the story keep lists to they will but what is. ringback l. look forward to talking to you all that technology should work for people. i robot must obey the orders given by human beings except where such orders to conflict with the 1st law show your identification for should be very careful about artificial intelligence and the point of view c. is to trace evidence here. conflict on various chozen with artificial intelligence where some of the. most protect its own

>> thank you for the question. there are several discussions, meetings that take place between the police department as well as federal partners we often times have coordination calls, they authorize the permit for the federal land so this ordination between the best possible police department in u.s. capitol police, with respect to intelligence, fbi, they are often part of those discussions. i think the thing going forward that certainly needs to be looked at with respect to specific intelligence, outlined through out some of the testimony today, when those specific information that wants us to perhaps posture currently, notification system needs to be different. the j ctf distribution is not something that's a monitored list, seven days a week that would generate a response to that. when those communications are sent out, they are staff members who will get to that information at sometime but again, that's been laid out, we are talking about something of this magnitude that could potentially happen and ultimately

appreciate your question. are there any other questions in the chat? seeing none. >> i wanted to thank them for their deem analysis and the recommendation that they gave. those are the kind of recommendations we need to guide us as we continue the reform efforts of the department. it's that critical thinking and mindset that has been really helpful to us. i'm hoping those suggestions you raised are included in the recommendation the next go around, that we have you here and can share with us. thank you again. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> president cohen: sergeant youngblood, how are you? >> i'm well. >> president cohen: let's call the next item >> next item is public comment on line item 2. the pub is welcome to make public comment regarding the police equity report. we have couple of comments. you have two minutes. >> this is yalonda williams, president of the officers for justice. i want to say it low participation that they obtained is due to the fact that there was no reach out to the police employee group such as o.s.j. this report establishes w

the clerk will read the question. at 6:01 eastern time on january 6 president trump tweeted these are the things that happens when the sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously and viciously stripped away from great patriots who have been badly unfairly treated for so long. adding for rioters to go home with love, what is the relevance of this tweet to president trump gilkes? at the house >> the house managers are recognized for up to five minutes. >> senators, this was a key quote and the key statement by the president that day, that horrific day. remember the capital had been storms, it had been attacked, people had yelled hanging mike pence, people had gone after speaker pelosi, people brought baseball bats and other weapons. many members of congress, the senate and house were fearful for their own lives. the president didn't call the national guard. his own administration didn't list him as somebody they had spoken with to activate the guard. he said remember this day forever. if he was not guilty of

the question is on ordering the previous question on the resolution. so many as are in favor say aye. those opposed, no. in the opinion of the chair, the ayes have it. the gentleman from pennsylvania. mr. reschenthaler: on that i request the yeas and nays. the speaker pro tempore: pursuant to section 3-s of resolution 8, the yeas and nays are ordered. members will record their votes by electronic device. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr. jeffries: as the member designated by chairwoman zoe lofgren, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that chairwoman lofgren will vote yea on ordering the previous question. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from massachusetts seek re

the speaker pro tempore: the question is on the prefts question. members will record their votes by electronic device. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does gentleman seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. fleischmann of tennessee, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. fleischmann will vote nay on ordering the previous question. as the member designated by the gentleman from tennessee, i inform the house that mr. day joel a will vote in a on ordering the previous question. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from drk seek recognition? mr. butterfield: as the member designated by mr. price. i inform the house mr. price will vote yes, vote yes on ordering the previous question. as the member desi

thanks for the question- i'm — second question, jvt? thanks for the question.gether to _ clinical answer. when you put people together to eat and socialise over a meal. _ together to eat and socialise over a meat, over— together to eat and socialise over a meat, over a — together to eat and socialise over a meal, over a table, together to eat and socialise over a meal, overa table, as together to eat and socialise over a meal, over a table, as we all like to do. _ meal, over a table, as we all like to do. and — meal, over a table, as we all like to do, and may be a little drink is also _ to do, and may be a little drink is also consumed at the same time, and the volume _ also consumed at the same time, and the volume goes up in the place, of course, _ the volume goes up in the place, of course, it— the volume goes up in the place, of course, it is— the volume goes up in the place, of course, it is likely that there will be some — course, it is likely that there will be some transmission. but really, who pays — be some transmission. but really, who pays the bill

many of the questions revolve around this question of inter marriage. would you like your granddaughter married marry a person of other race? or would you like one of your granddaughters go to a racially mixed school? why are we talking about the south, when the schools in new york are full of puerto ricans? so there is definitely that bias that eleanor is speaking into. if you are asking me is she making any conference to her cause, i would say not necessarily, because those at that time those things were not really done. you didn't extend yourself. even now, i think it's hard for some people to move out of their comfort zone. she was certainly always talking about it, and she was talking about it for the entire time she was in the white house, but i can't say she had good success with that. >> a couple of questions about the media. why did she go from the journal to mccaul's? what kind of magazine was my calls, what kind of demographic did it appeal to? who was reading that particular magazine? third question was was there any competition to have her

i have two questions if i may. with the new brazilian covid variant, many latin-american regions not having severe travel restrictions in place, do you think the u.s. should take further action in this region, including travel restrictions? and have any travel requirements been defined for those coming into united states from mexico at the southern border? >> yes, the president has put in strict travel restrictions. if you're traveling from an international country, it requires a test, a negative test three days in advance and then quarantining once you land in the u.s. the travel restrictions on certain countries, including brazil, are even stricter in terms of who's allowed to travel to the u.s. so, travel restrictions internationally have been tightened quite a bit during this period of pandemic. i don't know if you had a second question too. >> i do have a second question, and actually a quick follow-up. you mentioned quarantining after landing in the u.s. is that quarantine going to be enforced? and my second

our first question comes from just outside new york city. michael, your question please. hello, julia and minouche. it's an honour. how resilient are young children? can three— and four—year—olds who have spent so much - |of their lives in covid be expected| to recover as quickly as older kids, and how can we help parentsi and teachers to prepare now? lots of questions there. how resilient are children, julia gillard? i think children are inherently pretty resilient, but the onus is on us as the adults to make sure we are giving them the best enabling conditions even in these very difficult times. in many countries, we're doing a good job with educational continuity, with play—baseed lessons online for children at that very young age. what we have to do is make sure that is available that is available right around the well, that there isn't a differential system, where children in richer countries are getting so much more than children in poorer countries. but you're right that we have to be thoughtful, that when children are able to get back together again that there is

with a question regarding facebook's trump ban. this is coming at a heightened political moment. it's having -- happening as the second impeachment is occurring, coming at a very early stage in the establishment. i was hoping you could enlighten us and provide something that needs consideration and they have taken on such a controversial case for the oversight board. >> first of all, fantastic to be here. really welcome this kind of discussion. i look forward to a lively debate. i think i'm going to back up because there's somebody people who are not completely clear about how we're going to work with these cases. and the idea is if a user is not happy with a decision that facebook has taken on their content on facebook or instagram , if they are not happy with that, they can appeal to the oversight board. we are not able to look at all the cases that go out. we will take the cases for the last number of people, and also the most difficult cases. a couple weeks ago, the first five cases -- and it's a good example of what we'll do.

thank you for the question. the short answer is we are on track to meet the deadline, we have, as i noted in my oral remarks, two weeks ago we delivered 35 million doses in the last week, we were pleased we finally got to deliver 9 billion doses which puts us on the track record if you look at the number of weeks ahead we should be able to continue deliver approximately 40 -- 50 million doses a month. if we are able -- >> does that get you to 300 by the end of july? >> yes, ma'am, it does. >> johnson & johnson said 100 million doses by end of june. last month, j and j board member said the goal was to have 100 million doses even earlier, maybe by april. we are hoping the ua by johnson & johnson covid vaccine could come any day and if it does, would you be able to deliver the hundred million doses by end of june, if not sooner? >> we are on track to deliver 100 million doses by end of june. >> super. thank you so much. astrazeneca set 300 million doses, last year you testified, we are scaling up to manufacture up

thanks so much for taking my question. i have two questions. the first is, a lack of pharmacies and hospitals, providers and transportation has emerged in communities hardest hit by the virus. what's the plan and timeline for getting more vaccinations to areas with inadequate health infrastructure? has the government found that's a problem, an increasing problem when looking at vaccine distribution? and the second question i have is on life expectancy. i'm wondering how lasting this change in life expectancy is. do we expected to bounce back, and when will it go back up? andy: well, let me take the first question, and dr. walensky can get the second question on life expectancy. there are a number of issues that you point out that are access barriers including transportation, including the clinical infrastructure, and it's important to point out, that even when there is a local availability of vaccines, people from outside of these communities, outside of the hard-hit communities come in and make appointments and often come in and take some of t

question. that is not a question i have directly looked in to. i was short in my response, as requested. >> supervisor haney: are there any other military base cleanups that you are familiar where there were thousands of c ivilians moved into base housing, built on a contaminated part of the site that are still there while the site is being remediated. is that something you are aware of from any other sites? >> i will answer that, as well. perhaps, dtsc, if they can anything to add, they can fill in. the area i cover for dtsc is san mateo county north to the oregon border. i would say for those military sites. speaking for that portion of or state alone, i am not aware that there are any residents immediately adjacent. cdp, if there is anything more. >> supervisor melgar: is mr. chu still on here? >> i'm calling from calling fr. addressing that question, we don't know of another site that has residents living that is undergoing cleanup currently. >> supervisor haney: thank you. i wanted to esta

the questions. >> mr. president. >> for it the former president's counsel, sorry about that. >> thank you mr. president. the house manager said yesterday that due process is discretionary, meaning the house is not required to provide and indeed did not provide in the impeachment and a constitutional protections to a defendant in a house impeachment proceeding. what are the applications for a constitutional order as new house precedent combined with senate power to disqualify from public office at private citizen in an impeachment trial? the counsel has five minutes. >> that is a complicated question. may i have that read again please? >> the house managers said yesterday that due process is discretionary, meaning the house is not required to provide and indeed did not provide in the impeachment and a constitutional protections to a defendant in house impeachment proceedings. what are the implications for our constitutional order of this new house precedent combined with the senate's power to disqualify fro

questions. covid—19 slammed the brakes on global tourism. but with vaccines now being rolled out around the world, there is optimism that international travel may soon take—off again. hello and welcome to global questions with me, zeinab badawi. covid—19 lockdowns have wreaked havoc on our economies and one area that's been knocked sideways is the travel and tourism industry. one in ten people around the world work in the sector and it accounts for $9 trillion of global gdp. has the travel industry been transformed for ever? and could some of the changes actually be good for us? and the planet? that's global questions, travel in a post—global world. travel in a post—covid world. well, to bring you this edition of global questions, our two panellists and our questioners join us live via video link. let me tell you who is in the hot seat this week giving the answers. paul theroux is an internationally acclaimed american author and explorer who has been described as the world's most perceptive trav

good question. and the answer is yes. _ good question. and the answer is yes, of— good question.ery smart men. and they went over draught after draught after draught on that document. and they reviewed all the other draughts of all the _ they reviewed all the other draughts of all the state constitutions, all of all the state constitutions, all of them — of all the state constitutions, all of them. and they picked and choose to what— of them. and they picked and choose to what they wanted and they discarded what they did not. and what _ discarded what they did not. and what they— discarded what they did not. and what they discarded was the option for ali— what they discarded was the option for all of— what they discarded was the option for all of you to impeach a former elected _ for all of you to impeach a former elected official. i hope that's answering your question, thank you. -- draft _ answering your question, thank you. -- draft after— answering your question, thank you. —— draft after draught. mr -- draft after draught. mr president. _ -- draft after draught. mr president

next question. served from west virginia to suppress our senate question to the desk directed to the house managers. question for the house managers a clerk or a report would the president be made aware of the f.b.i. and intelligence information of a possible attack and would the president be responsible for not preparing to protect the capitol and all elected officials of government with national guard and law enforcement as he did when he appeared when he appeared in front of the st john's episcopal church. it's the risp responsibility of the president to now president of the united states our commander in chief daily briefings on what is happening in the country that he has a duty to protect additionally. the president would have known just like the rest of us know all of the reports that were out there and publicly available how many of you received call saying to be careful on january 6th to be careful that day i'm not who i'm seeing reports it doesn't seem safe how much more the president of t

last question for dr. buttenheim, i was fascinated by your testimony on vaccine hesitancy and distrust of government and i completely agree this is less discussion about urology and more a discussion about psychology when were talking about overcoming vaccine hesitancy but i think that something doctor guam said about distrust of government resonated also which is that people don't want to feel like their government is forcing them to get the vaccine and we have to be cautious when you say are not going to make it mandatory but in other ways where telling them they are. where telling them their children have to be vaccinated to return to school and they have to get vaccine to get on a commercial aircraft, how do we trace this path towards steering people in the right direction to get vaccines but not requiring them to get it and enhancing their distrust of government. >> that's the question we get a lot, where do mandates fit in with this vaccine and most of my research three covid was on the childhood sch

good question. there's no natural strong american ally amongst these ten countries, and i argue in the book, including vietnam. vietnam may be at one end of my spectrum but the vietnamese are slow walking the relationship with the united states, particularly in the defense realm. if you talk to the u.s. -- the pentagon and to the u.s. defense at at that time shays in -- at tat at-shay in hanoi they'll say the vietnamese are putting the brakes on the relation shot they a allow one ship a year. all kind odd things the americans do with thailand, philippines, malaysia, snowsarch that the vietnamese will not permit in the defense sphere. and vietnam has -- the other thing that is not known very well is the depth of the vietnamese-china relationship. party to party level. obviously commercial level. even military to military exchanges. yes, they really have enormous difficulties over their spite disputed islands, they have millenia of animosity towards each. other a lot of problems in that relationship b

so question, mr. sund, can you tell us exactly how the capitol police preparations for january 6th differed from preparations for the protests from last summer? and if you can specifically address if they were the same or different use of force guidelines in place on january 6th compared to the protests of last summer, or any criteria for making arrests on january 6th versus the protests from last summer. >> okay, and if you could do that in about a minute -- >> yes, ma'am. >> thank you, senator. >> i will do that concisely. planning and preparations, we plan for every demonstration the exact same way. doesn't matter the message of the person, doesn't matter the demographics of the grievance involved in the demonstration, we do it the exact same way, we develop our information, we develop our intel and base a response plan on that. so let's transition to preparations. i will tell you we handled the 15 major demonstrations involving black lives matters groups, following the death of george floyd over t

it's a great question. i don't have specifics yet, but maybe in a few years. >> jonathan jones, one of our future speakers this semester. it is great to see you here or see evidence that you are here in your typed question, i should say. he is asking and i expect this may be a difficult thing to pin down, but he says do you have a sense of roughly the proportion of black soldiers taken prisoner versus those captured? >> i'm still struggling with that. they are talking about how they're being spoken of, how they're being captured. it is hinted at, and the numbers are not very clear. and something that i have to revisit when guy through the compiled military service records and hoers. really trying to figure out but the finer points about who is a prisoner and who dies in action versus who dies in activity. there are around but there is 700 men that died in captivity that i know of, i suspect several were in the immediate aftermath. he notes that at least six men were killed in the aftermath. another man talk

consider this question. what do you think is the greatest single cause of misunderstanding between the nations of the world, both great and small? eleanor had a one-word answer. fear. the next era begins early in the 1950s after dwight eisenhower is elected president and eleanor roosevelt has returned to private life. the increasing prosperity of the 1950s eased american's financial worries while at the same time heightening their social woes. marriage rates had risen before and after world war ii as young people hurried to exchange vows before shipping off to combat or married as soon as they returned. these young couples also had more children. the nation's birth rate rose from fewer than 20 births per thousand in the 1930s to more than 25 births per thousand in 1947. the increased birthrates and the rise of a youth culture characterized by discontent and rebelliousness and concerns about juvenile delinquency made childrearing questions more urgent. at the same time divorce rates spiked, leading to uncerta

it's a two-part question. so please bear with me in the senate the question. if the briefing say that regarding the benefit of the individual with prior infections with sar-cov-2, limited cases of. covid-19 there are regarding the infection status of a line. it without benefit of individuals with prior sar-cov-2 infections. so part of the question that i have is are there enough data to look at whether those who are covid-19 positive baseline has more robust immune response. so that is my first half of the question. and i want to bring up the concern or point again, people are possibly testing the subject for evidence of infection at the time of inviting her on blinding before administering the vaccine. so that second part of the question. raise part of that question so that second part of the question is, in the single-dose ad 26, immunity booster for covid-19. this would be relevant for 19 million or so adults who have tested positive and might be candidates for a windows vaccine. >> can you hear me. [inaudible]. >> in the blood sample would be taken. so tha

we are question. -- have a question. can more be done to help the people of the dnr and lnr in terms of reducing poverty? hanna: that is the question of who is responsible? it can always be done more, but at the same time that is the question of the legal issues as well. it is the obligation of the occupied power for the state executing effective control of the territory to fulfill obligations of human rights, social protections of people, and all others. we already have quite a number of legal decisions by the international bodies that confirmed russia has effective control over those territories. if we think about those, those people -- they have the right protections. the question is, can they receive them only in the territory of ukraine or the government who controls the territory? just for security. in the very beginning, there was a chance to deliver some of the money for sanctions or for all the subsidies. should they deliver something to the occupied territory while securingultimately now no one cn guarantee suc

[inaudible] i have no questions.e angotti: with respect to what are the testing procedures for av's? they have to get a permit in order to operate on public roads, in order to test on public roads and have a cpc permit if they want to take passengers. so with respect to testing procedures, that's notsomething that companies share with us . because they are not required to. they do need ... we see them driving so we know they're drivingaround the city, their collecting data . there mapping the streets . we are not privy to the details of their testing programs but they do they have a collision, they have to report the collision to the dmv. very quickly after they have to fill out a report that gets published on the dmv website and we look at those. they also have to providewhat are called disengagement reports . and disengagement are when the car, so there's usually a safety driver behind thewheel. right now , for most companies. so disengagement is when the car goes from autonomous mode to manual load. and it's usual

so here's my question. beyond the overall impacts that the bill were before us or other fiscal response will make in terms of increasing overall economic growth, based on your experience, would you agree that it's important to very intentionally develop policies to help the long-term unemployed, of individuals who even during good nick times were unable to get into the work force? >> i do. and this really isn't a longer-run thing i would say but it's particularly relevant now. industries are always you know growing and shrinking and workers are moving from one industry to another. that's just a market-based economy working. in this situation, you have that accelerated in a big way and so many of the people, we may find that many of the people who are not going back to work or not back at work now may really struggle to find jobs. because businesses are being automated. we hear that all the time computers and automated answers are becoming more and more common so i think those people are really going to need

she wrote this question to us.for our vaccination slot, will we have had to delay our health care for a year and a half? where can we go for the vaccine now? and this question i think really has two important parts to it. first it's about vaccine access, but also what to do if you have been delaying care, but you're not eligible for the vaccine yet, or maybe you won't be able to get it until march. so i want to pose this question to our panel. and let's start with you, dr. brown. what would you say to rose? >> i think that's a great yes, rose, and it's something my patients ask me all the time. i tell them do not delay care. if you need care, you should get it. it's really important to recognize that we now have many, many ways to access care in addition to in-person care. so there are times when you need to come into the office, but our offices are now so much safer than they ever were. and we're taking incredile precautions, hand-washing, social distancing, wearing masks, and in some cases -- i think it's importa

i look forward to your questions questions. civic thank you very much. we willl now now begin around te five-minute questions and i asked my colleagues to keep track of your clock and stay within five minutes. the united states is in the midst of the worst pandemic we have ever seen in over a century in the previous administration was -- dissemination of misinformation and erosion of trust in our scientific agencies and as we mark over half a million people dead in this country that goes without saying the toll is profound. under president biden's leadership in anaheim science-based coordinate response. we have seen significant increases in testing and tracing and vaccinations and we have seen downward trends in the numbers of the casesci hospitalizations and deaths. there is a lot of work ahead of us to get everybody vaccinated and fight misinformation with reliable public health guidance and we need to address people choosing not to get vaccinated by having trusted public health experts in terms of partners and communicating with the american public ab