the iea complaint -- claims the explanations are not feasible.response is that these issues relate to an issue that is two decades old and we should move forward. for verification implementation, these issues need to be clarified one way or another. >> you heard hillary mentioned the fact it is going to be difficult for the bite in the administration to lift -- to lift -- the biden administration to lift all the sanctions. when it comes to iran's perspective, we have heard from officials in tehran they want to see all sanctions lifted before they can start negotiating with the u.s. is there any room for negotiation or are they really going to stick to this -- is this going to be a sticking point going forward? >> i think iran is going to stick to that plan because that plan was specified by the supreme leader of iran. if you look at this from iran's perspective, there is a lot of mistrust regarding the americans. from iran's perspective, iran gave a lot of concessions. even though the deal was enshrined in a u.n. security council resolution, dona

the iea also saying the oil supply is clearing.orecast for demand for this year is now seeing stronger consumption in the u.s. and china following a more positive forecast. joining me now is the ceo of pioneer, the double point energy deal will add 97,000 acres in the midland basin. thanks for joining me. scott: good morning, good to see you. let's talk about the broad picture for a second. that has to do with global inventory, are you positive, negative, when does the draw happen? scott: i've been very optimistic about what is going on with opec and opec-plus. vaccinations, especially in the u.s. i still expect another 5 million barrel pickup in demand. that's why i'm very optimistic about oil prices moving up another five dollars or $10 in the next few weeks. alix: that will incentivize opec and opec-plus to move forward with releasing more oil, do we take it? scott: yes. most of the market share was picked up by opec in the next several months. over the next several years, especially with what has happened with the decline in u.

we also have a history where iea -- iaea have passed on intelligence to the israeli regime.hether biden himself knew it or not, there is the possibility the pentagon and the cia went behind his back, as with all repeatedly during the trump administration. whether biden knew or not, it does not make a difference. the fact americans have spoken of their satisfaction shows that when they want to talk, they are still willing to be violent and to support acts of war against iranian people. that does not help any talks. i think it creates an incentive -- let me put it this way. it destroys incentive for iranians to negotiate in order to implement a nuclear deal. >> what do you think about the u.s. position in particular when it comes to this attack? what have been notified by israel? the accusation is israel was behind it by iran, or would israel have done this alone and gone against biden's wishes? >> the fact the attack took place a day before the arrival of the u.s. secretary of defense makes it probable israel informed the united states and had the united states' tacit approva

d then iea hrd an ofcefir ask r to hanupg the pho anegain. sn my son. haven't ense him sin.ce >> unfornatutely, asn a riafcan-ameranic male livingn i at jurisctdiion, he s wa problyab also awe arof the arming dreege of foogeta of afrin-caamericanen m being senselslesy killedy bpolice office, rsincludinthg e killing of georgfle oyd. d anthis creesat a certa in deeegr of trau amand fear whenev aern africaamn-erican male ithn at jurisctdiion is stopped. beuscae the qutieson they' re askinghe tmselves,m ai next? this is e threason why hwae s callg inhis moth. er repteorr: the family apgrplintog understd anhow a poceli officerou cld mista ake n for a setar. officer potteras w actually training the officer on duty thwi her. >> teras, taser,as ter! i cannoact cept thai t lost smyon. he n'sever comg inback. i can't ceacpt that, m aistake? that dsnoe't even unsod right. this oicffer has bn eeon the force fo26r years. i n'cat acceptha tt. for a picole officer to stake a setar for a n guis acaltuly very rera. the tar seis not en vecarried on e same se i

hurricanes iea and aida, which according to the world food programme destroyed the homes and a livelihoods of about 7.8 million people in honduras and guatemala. she also referenced food insecurity, which we know from the world food programme and from the inter american governmental bank has gotten much worse over the last ten years. it's been the worst drought in about 40 years in central america, particularly in the northern triangle where people are migrating from. so, you know, the stresses on peoples livelihoods, the number of people who are still engaged in agriculture who can no longer make hay living because of extreme weather cycles, i think is a really important driver and it's one that we have been focused on all that much. traditionally, we've talked about poverty and violence and corruption as root causes or us push factors and now i think the climate issue has really come up front and center and i think that it's an extremely important factor, as something that needs to be really front and center in policy response. cynthia arnson when you look at the three countries we're ta

club wants to 7 7 7 slaying, 7 a saying, you7 77 7795 saying7, youhave77oif 7 7 7 slaying, yga'h;v;’iea is effectively what some ~ ~ , ~ ~ . is effectively what some fans ~ , ~ ~ . 7 7£héy77§éjid 7 7 7 7£héy77§étlid 7b} 7 7 7 7£héy735$tfid 7b} doing. 7 7 t7hey7wou7ld be doing. they7made said they would be doing. they made a big mistake and there is a long way to go to rebuild trust, and lots of things for fans to complain about stop the six clubs involved, do they go back to the premier league with their tails between their legs and their tails between their legs and the champions league with their tails between their legs? what the champions league with their tails between their legs? what about the future? there _ tails between their legs? what about the future? there are _ tails between their legs? what about the future? there are changes - tails between their legs? what about the future? there are changes to - tails between their legs? what about the future? there are changes to the chamions the future? there are changes to the champions league. _ the future? there are changes to the

data from the iea says the massive oil glut has almost dried up demand is up production has been down now the one fifth of the surplus ahead of the crash last year remains in tact. in other words, the market is tightening up. for more on this and the keys that crude may hold for the stock market is tom lee. funds global adviser and managing partner and head of research tom, good to have you on i know it is early you know i have been tagging your stuff on social media you are one of the few voices that looks past the scary headlines. we dive into the numbers and say, okay, bad stuff here. overall, the trend has been pretty good. that could increase the consumer that could tighten oil up. that could help stocks tie it all together for us >> yeah, brian, that's a great summary. oil demand is still a couple million barrels lower per day in the u.s. than it was before the pandemic a lot of that is jet fuel. what inn vefrt vident er invesy not appreciate is the prices relate to the cyclical trade gdp activity is linked to oil output if you think about it in rough terms for every 1% of gdp g

you could just say that that's pausing for thought as the iea moves lower in terms of their numbers onin the united states of america. yields are well below the 1.7% that is possible this year. no on anchoring a fix -- inflation excitations at the moment. lesser flecked on what the imf said. i mention the china number. they said it will drive the global economic growth in the coming years as the world recovers from the pandemic. as foreign capital piles into markets, regulators fear that it could all come crashing down. we've seen that before. why is the pace of the inflows into china a huge consensus trade with our guests in the past four months? wise it a concern? -- why is it a concern? >> too much of a good thing for china at the moment. we know the growth story and the recovery story with china. because of that, interest rates are relatively higher in the rest of the world. that's tough for foreign capital. 60% growth in terms of foreign investment into chinese stocks last year, heading towards 50% for the bond market. the currency had its best quarter in a decade last year. china

the likes of the iea and the eia as well. the dollar index was weaker against most g10 peers. haidi: i'll performers on the other side of that dollar weakness with the kiwi and the aussie dollar share. to look at the aussie, topping the g10 group, commodities also touching the highest in about four weeks. in terms of the equities, draining pretty muted. find the most since about smell third. it is within reach, from a record high. pretty flat at the moment but it doesn't look like equities overall getting set for retreats following the u.s. action. shery: strong earnings from goldman, wells fargo, traders, investment bankers. loans on the decline. bankers taking it as a sign of economic strength. let's get more from our wall street correspondence. jp morgan, stand out quarters for those company. what all the leverage be for growth in the future? >> they had knockout quarters in trading and investment banking. even though the ceo of goldman sachs had warned that it should be expectations having these for the second quarter. they did say that it was very active. we can expect ma

so there's some -- iea lot of criticism being hurled now. a senior u.s.y unwind an extensive intelligence and covert network that's been established over two decades. what are the consequences, potentially? >> fred, there are very few. that's a para military force which has been decidedly unsuccessful since we invaded in 2001. it's meant to fight the taliban. it's been losing in the field. a para military forces like that are very bad at collecting intelligence. if they're pulled out of there, we're not losing much. and that is not to mention the taliban is a cult, which is almost impossible to get into. they're going to do what they want to do and we're not going to know it until they do it. unfortunately that's been the truth going back to the '90s. it's not a big loss. >> sounds like you feel mission accomplished, the u.s. set out to afghanistan after 9/11 to seek out osama bin laden, to dismantle or disrupt al qaeda. that was done. and so now it's time for the u.s. to leave? >> i think absolutely. let's not forget the taliban did not attack us in 9/11

. >> sean: iea thought they were banned from using tear gas but they're using it tonight? >> i've picked up some whiffs of something with some kind of a chemical irritant in it, but i'm certainly hearing the bangs and seeing the smoke but not a big concentration again, nothing like we got last night. >> sean: we will keep these images up, go back to mike tobin in mere minutes as this now is getting very tense at this hour like we've been telling you, the only way democrats can pass their extreme radical socialist agenda and lie to you about it it wasn't about emergency covert relief, infrastructure bill wasn't about what they said everything is now being defined as infrastructure, false claims aboutei the georgia election law with nothing moreur than an attempt to smear republicans, corporate cowards to go along with their lies senator ted cruz is standing strong moving ahead with the bill with senator josh hawley to hold major league baseball accountable by moving it to increase its antitrust scrutiny after the league pulled the all-star game from georgia and moved to col

iea don't know, i feel like that has happened a lot. that hotspot of creativity has also dimmed i think in the last five years or so. event there is the dimension of prestige tv being increasingly repetitive. but also i wonder about its narcotic effects the phenomenon of the binge watching and how you see that relating to decadence? there is an article a tentative one a working paper published a little while ago that was looking at technological advances in recent years. argued there increasingly focus on the attention economy for their increasingly focusing on entertainment and basically making entertainment more addictive to use more pointed language. i wonder what you think about that. the volume of that itself has an effect on the second people out of the real worldld and into this world of consuming guilty pleasures things that are not necessarily going to change your life. it's more the sheer volume take you out of life that's relevant. >> yes. i think that is almost unquestionably happening. we are conducting massive entertainmen

ross who came out with "hale county morning and evening" a few years back and i talked to him at the iea awards. the thing that he talks about and that more and more documentary filmmakers talk about is we are coming into an era of radically personal stories, right? that we are trying to share us as people so that it's not just about education but it is, and an educated voter thing, right? but it's not just about that. it's who am i, who are you, how are we the same, how are our communities the same, how can we, i am you, you are me, we are all together. >> i taught at usc for a while, and every time i would ask people to come up with an idea for a film, and they would say, well, i'm interested in, you know, pet chihuahuas and i want to do a documentary about pet chihuahuas or my grandmother is a very interesting woman and i want to do a documentary about my grandmother. and i was probably not popular with the students. i said, i want you to do a documentary about something you don't know, it's not you, it's somebody else you don't know, not your grandma, somebody else's grandma, because

iea fullyrlie agree with the po senator kyle and president reagan made earlier, a nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought. so what? so western strategies and capabilities, nuclear and tructu non-nuclear, must now be f structured to credibly deter ory this so-called red theory of victory. this is aent newfor deterrenceu requirement for western policies and capabilities and our understanding of deterrence must catch up to this geopolitical reality. what's the implication of the situation for the calculation of how much is enough for credible deterrence? the u.s. requirementr now is to deter a range of plausible nuclear threats, particularly including unprecedented regional nuclear first use threats.pabili correspondingly, u.s. policies and capabilities now must be resilient, flexible, and tailored to support credible deterrence. that requirement puts a premium on the deterrence value of the e nuclearar triad and on nato y te nuclear forces for the resilience and flexibility they provide. that's the goal underlying the o obama and trump administration's programs to rebuild th

even under iea sustainable development scenario which major transformation of global energy systems and it's fully aligned with the paris agreement, oil and natural gas is still projected to provide 46 percent of the world's energy in 2040. it's a critical question for congress is whether more of this energy will come from right here at home from overseas . the answer to this question has profound implications for our nations future. we know why energy leadership for america is important to our economic strength and national security. but american energy leadership is also important to protecting the environment and addressing climate change . our commitment to environmental protection is clear . the united states is now the global leader in both energy production and co2 emissions reduction. over the past several years the primary driver of emissions reduction has been increased natural gas for power generation. with smart policies can build on this progress. our industry is also working to reduce methane. in 1990 to 2019 methane emissions from natural gas systems declined 16 percent w