they were close allies in everything that i told you about, except the newberg thing. i'm pretty sure madison was not in on that part. madison was committed to all of the things we just talked about. and they were the two kind of young hot shot lawyers in the continental congress pouring over the articles of confederation to find ways to expand the federal power. you know, madison was committed to federal power and to nationhood. everyone knows that. only later the did the differences between hamilton and madison become so overwhelming. the enemies that hamilton had in the 1780s, are a group of people whose names are not well known, but they represent a movement, a populist movement that had its own ideas about finance, if i may use that word about money, about american wealth, about accountability to the people they met themselves, the ordinary people. these are people frequently without the vote, because of course, you had to have property to have the vote and to run for office. you had to have more property. they wanted the vote. they wanted to vote for white men, i

so coming out of newberg. we have this sort of picture of the hamilton scheme the concentration and growth of american wealth. in a federal and a bonded government debt to the rich and obligation to the rich all in federal rather than state hands, which is what they were trying to do. it was hard and they were getting they felt they weren't getting anywhere sometimes an interstate mutual obligation to aligned with the interests of the rich the interest in the sense of interest payments on those bonds, but also the financial interests in general and the social interests. and now you've got the like if it's a puzzle you're trying to put together like in this system and make it perfect or complete is what perfect would have meant in the 18th century. you have the sort of the final click piece is like the concentration of military power in the same bonded debt. so this combines wealth with government with force actual literal force, and this leads sort of to the idea of tax collection kind of pulling the country t

so you can see the newberg conspiracy is a failure. but in terms of bringing forth the hamilton scheme, you can see it as a success. coming out of the newberg conspiracy, he sets the table in a way for what he's going to do in the 1790s. he has a new relationship with george washington and you might think because washington counseled hamilton, you would think that washington had thought, well, this hamilton is crazy. i got to stay away from him. actually, their correspondence is just a fascinating study in the dynamics of their always-fascinating tense, but also all-important relationship. they actually get closer after the newberg conspiracy and washington makes it clear to hamilton that he is 100% in favor of being sure that the country is put in a position -- this is, again, leading toward nationhood, nationalism, they're in a position to pay the public creditors by which he means those same bondholders that we're talking about. this was a vision that washington shared. so coming out of newberg we have this sort of picture of the ha

there is a an unsigned letter circulated in washington's newberg camp. calling for a mutiny calling for rising up against george washington was alarmed to say the least it appears that this mutiny this insurrection is coming from inside his own headquarters and then on march 11 the mutineers met. they met a large building called the temple. you can go to the next slide for this so called newburgh. conspiracy now washington decided to respond, but did so brilliantly by letting the mutineers the insurrectionists show their hand then on march 15th. he called for a meeting in the temple. they all gathered instead of washington being there early and he was always punctual he comes a minute late and comes in from the back door. he walks up in general horatio gates and others as shown themselves, and we're on the stage mut. washington demands that they surrender the stage he then as a two-part speech one he explodes you can see the wording here. patience to fortitude, you know, the long sufferings of this army are unexampled in history. washington is saying tha

so we newberg new york general george washington confronts his fellow officers and convinces them the the importance of having civilian control of the military in terms of upholding democratic principles and upholding order with in within the newly, you know, sort of american society. so the theater has about a 12-minute film, you know with historians talking about the the newberg conspiracy and the built up to it and and what it means not only then but what it means today in terms of having the military remain within civilian control meaning that the army when the military works for the american public for large part of my professional career i've involved with an army museums as a veteran myself folks had an interest in how the army story is told so i started early on as working in army museums in new york city. that's where i'm from. so i started at the harbor defense museum a very small museum at fort hamilton. i moved on to the case meet museum, which was at fort monroe, which had a fantastic story from civil war time period and then i moved on to the quartermaster museum, which

and so, you know, i obviously applaud newberger because this sort of environmental activism, you know, from people like jeff unbin who exxonmobil is putting up on their board, fidelity and calpers, it's just going to accelerate what's already happening which is that the corporate sector9 and the financial sector are both 'em gracing this in the future -- embracing this in the future because this is a societal change that's not going to be changed no matter, you know, what changes occur politically in washington or anywhere else. and just one last point on china, andrew's exactly right. the chinese could do better on the coal-fired power plant front, but they see the opportunity here. they're leading in electrification of transportation. and so the faster we can get ahead of this in the united states, the more we have an opportunity to win that the battle economically. liz: david crane, andrew wheeler, thank you for weighing in. this is a two-day event, and we look at it through the prism of business. we're not red, we're not blue, we're green. that's the neil cavuto line. thank you ve

one of these is a nurse and manager at north carolina medical center in newberg. she had the double challenge of caring from her parents and her staff from ppe shortages, caring for dying patients, supporting her staff members who were working long hours amid their own sacrifices, she kept things running and kept people safe. nikisha, felicia, david, custom furnishing, parkdale mills, and so many other people and companies in our state stepped up and i am so grateful to all of them. and now, it's time for us to step up. the elected leaders. north carolinians want us to work together like they've had to do. now, members of the legislature, we know we can find common ground because we've done it before. our differences often get the attention, but our cooperation got billions of dollars in relief funds to people who needed it. you've passed and i signed legislation to provide funding to rebuild after natural disasters. together we pass the build and c-bonds for better roads. we've landed tens of thousands of good paying job with strategic and economic incentives. we

the second thing is someone has to do it, whether it is an newberger -- ann neuberger or someone else but someone has to be running some sort of god's eye view over cybersecurity operations. whether it is military, law enforcement, defense, i think that is probably better suited for the national security council. nonetheless, that has to be a clear mission set for someone. suzanne: kemba, please. kemba: from the private sector, no that i am here, one of the things i have observed is the private sector has a hard time finding the right bellybutton. they have a lot of signals, a lot of information. the private sector wants to tell the government wants and not have to navigate through the interagency to find out who is responsible for what. having the structures in place i think will help with better, actionable information sharing operations across the private sector and the government in a way that has not occurred so smoothly in the past. suzanne: to put it mildly. you're being gentle. tim, we have another question from our audience related to the growth trajectory for cisa and the co

again, george walker of newberger bermen. >> thank you, becky. >> we're going to get straight over togs this morning. coca-cola obviously on the list. we're going to be getting j&j later this week. verizon. what are you looking at? >> look, i think coca-cola was better, you often find that companies that are on prem, where you go to buy coke at mcdonald's or chipotle, they should be, where james quincy pulled it off and has done a good job and one of the exciting products i'm excited about is a hard seltzer, 20% share in texas in two weeks that would be remarkable if that can keep up. introducing new products a pure play in africa. not going to trade here. generally making a lot of money with what i thought it was going to be a perilous time, andrew. >> i got to tell you, i am a bubbly guy which is a pepsico product but i have also become an ah-ha guy, if you have known about ah-ha, a bubbly drink. my ah-ha question for you though, is do you buy the bitcoin dip? >> no? >> or is it a dip or is it something else >> no, i think the bitcoin base peak has deeply affected things and let it

official over there, the deputy national security advisor for cyber and emerging technologies, ann newbergerpatches today that are critical. we urge all owners and operators of microsoft exchange servers to apply these latest patches immediately. the u.s. government will lead by example. we are requiring all agencies to immediately patch their exchange servers as well. should these vulnerabilities evolve into a major incident, we'll manage the incident in partnership with the private sector so the white house warning people who run microsoft exchange to patch their systems. this follow and separate from a breach back in march that was reportedly done by the chinese government this now a warning from the u.s. government the white house telling me a few minutes ago it comes from the national security agency which initially found these vulnerabilities in the systems now the white house wants to get this message out to the private sector to patch these systems and fast because they are vulnerable. >> microsoft exchange servers. is this anyone with microsoft exchange or anyone running a server >>