sarah jones. i would just add that even now and during the time of the closure, there has been adjustments as activity going on around the park has restarted and increased. so we work with rec parks to create a pass through for the buses and to allow for droppoff at the museums conservatory drive west will be re-opening to get better access. so we keep making adjustments and changes as needs demanded. >> does that answer your question? >> for the most part. so there will be some changes in terms of shuttles and muni, but the plan right now as we move forward with a more permanent plan will be to maintain the current until we receive recommendations for a more permanent plan, is that correct? >> that's correct. >> correct. i want to emphasize before covid, this stretch of jfk was one of the most dangerous streets in the city and so we we feel it's necessary to keep it safe until we have analyzed alternatives that we can maximize safety and accessibility saement. in the meantime. we're working very

sarah jones. i would just add that even now and during the time of the closure, there has been adjustments as activity going on around the park has restarted and increased. so we work with rec parks to create a pass through for the buses and to allow for droppoff at the museums conservatory drive west will be re-opening to get better access. so we keep making adjustments and changes as needs demanded. >> does that answer your question? >> for the most part. so there will be some changes in terms of shuttles and muni, but the plan right now as we move forward with a more permanent plan will be to maintain the current until we receive recommendations for a more permanent plan, is that correct? >> that's correct. >> correct. i want to emphasize before covid, this stretch of jfk was one of the most dangerous streets in the city and so we we feel it's necessary to keep it safe until we have analyzed alternatives that we can maximize safety and accessibility saement. in the meantime. we're working very

a reviewer in the new york magazine, sarah jones i thought really nailed it when she says in her beautiful review of the book she says this country concluded long ago that it would trace the public good for whatever the tycoons would shed and she is of course referring to the corporations like perdue as well as regulatory failures that repeatedly recap the dea who are supposed to be watching out for consumers. you've said before quoting john oliver that the way to hide evil is to cloak it in something boring. can you talk about why you frame of the story the way you did? >> guest: it is an honor to be talking with you and the author of dope state. i'm really following in the footsteps here in this tremendous book. to talk about it was the story as well as you do is a real treat. it's interesting that john oliver line i think about that all the time that if you want to do something evil, wrap it in something boring. what you are getting at is we live in a society where there is a great deal of complexity and sometimes it is just hard to figure out what's going on with a particular story, pa

sarah jones stated earlier, she's available for questions as am i and thank you for your time. >> chairman: okay. that was short and sweet. thank you, ms. flores. ms. jones, did you have anything else to add? >> no. thank you. sarah jones planning director. am i coming through okay? >> chairman: yes. >> okay. it got a little patchy over on my end of things. i would just add that, you know, the sfmta takes the requirements of ceqa as well as all other aspects of the complicated factors that go into decision making and further action. we take it very seriously, the ceqa process is very important and we are engaging in it and want to put that time and effort in where the situation's really warranted and so that we would, you know, see this somewhat higher threshold for filing of an appeal and want to make sure we do all the things that the public and this board is looking for us to do while these processes are going through. >> chairman: thank you, ms. jones. okay. supervisor peskin. >> supervisor peskin: thank you, chair melgar. and, let me just start out with a respectful tone to the sponso

sarah jones stated earlier, she's available for questions as am i and thank you for your time. >> chairman: okay. that was short and sweet. thank you, ms. flores. ms. jones, did you have anything else to add? >> no. thank you. sarah jones planning director. am i coming through okay? >> chairman: yes. >> okay. it got a little patchy over on my end of things. i would just add that, you know, the sfmta takes the requirements of ceqa as well as all other aspects of the complicated factors that go into decision making and further action. we take it very seriously, the ceqa process is very important and we are engaging in it and want to put that time and effort in where the situation's really warranted and so that we would, you know, see this somewhat higher threshold for filing of an appeal and want to make sure we do all the things that the public and this board is looking for us to do while these processes are going through. >> chairman: thank you, ms. jones. okay. supervisor peskin. >> supervisor peskin: thank you, chair melgar. and, let me just start out with a respectful tone to the sponso

a reviewer in new york magazine, sarah jones, i thought really nailed it when she said in her beautifuleview of your book, she wrote: this country concluded long ago that it would praise the public good for whatever largess its tycoons would shed. and she's, of course, referring to the behaviors of corporations like perdue as well as regulatory failures that repeatedly kneecapped the fda and the dea who were supposed to be watching out for consumers. so i was hoping we could begin there. you've said before quoting, i think, josh al very -- john oliver is o the way to hide evil isg to cloak it in something boring. can you talk about why you framed the story the way you did? >> guest: oh. well, first of all, beth, thank you so much for doing this. it's a real honor to be talking with you. as the author of "dope sick," i feel like i'm following in your footsteps here x it's a tremendous book. i know you're working on a new one,e, so it's always fun to get to come out and talk about your book, but to talk about it with somebody who knows the story as odwell as you do is a real trea. so so t

a reviewer in new york magazine, sarah jones, i thought really nailed it, when she said in her beautiful review of your book, she wrote, this country concluded long ago that it would trade the public good for whatever largess its tycoons would shed, referring to the rent seeking behaviors of corporations like purdue as well as well laker to favors that repeatedly kneecapped the fda and the dea who were supposed to be watching out for consumers. you wrote job oliver that tea way to hide evil is cloak it in something boring. can you talk about what you framed the story the way you did. >> oh, well, first of all, beth, thank you for doing this. it's a real honor to be talking with you. as the author of dope sick, i feel as though i'm kind of following in your footsteps here and it's a tremendous back and i know you're working on a new one, and so it's always fun to get to come out and talk about your book, about to talk about it with somebody who knows the story as well as you do is a real treat. so thank you for doing this. it's interesting. that john oliver line, i think about that all th

sarah jones stated earlier, she's available for questions as am i and thank you for your time. >> chairman: okay. that was short and sweet. thank you, ms. flores. ms. jones, did you have anything else to add? >> no. thank you. sarah jones planning director. am i coming through okay? >> chairman: yes. >> okay. it got a little patchy over on my end of things. i would just add that, you know, the sfmta takes the requirements of ceqa as well as all other aspects of the complicated factors that go into decision making and further action. we take it very seriously, the ceqa process is very important and we are engaging in it and want to put that time and effort in where the situation's really warranted and so that we would, you know, see this somewhat higher threshold for filing of an appeal and want to make sure we do all the things that the public and this board is looking for us to do while these processes are going through. >> chairman: thank you, ms. jones. okay. supervisor peskin. >> supervisor peskin: thank you, chair melgar. and, let me just start out with a respectful tone to the sponso

i don't remember a thing and that the queen would take it was like a sarah not clean latina bit just sounds like a sexier grace jones villain or something from the hill so yeah so we thought and then that of course a turns out roger ebert said it sucked and then a fox because they had signed us to write taxi 2 is that hey guess what you don't have the right to actually do it but they said can you take this children's book and i did museum can you turn that into something. and we said oh yeah now that we got there you want to know the way i look at it is like roger ebert i know he stood astride a let's say a very shallow canal in my book criticism that any time you go from critic and go to critics can go watch what they watch when you start crowd book ciro your movie socks. i can't imagine how easy that is to live mad i don't want roger ebert i thought a lot of the film he's going to be going to like that it is it is pretty easy although i mean here's the bummer you read sometimes you read criticism there's 2 kinds of criticism you know there's a criticism that you read there like that's just unfound they don't get m