bremmer about the president's trip.ht now, jack fitzpatrick from bloomberg government, matt miller in for john filler -- jonathan ferro and lisa abramowicz. jack fitzpatrick, last evening when things happened in washington, i partisan ended. what does that mean for president biden that bipartisan ended? jack: bipartisanship is not necessarily entirely dead, but it did end and the way it was going before. president biden was negotiating with senator shelley capito. after an extended back and forth told her she would cut those that she would can't -- he would cut the conversations off because she was not offering enough money. there's a group of bipartisan senators trying to cast itself as plan b, about half dozen who are trying to negotiate a plane among themselves and will pitch it to a larger group. so there is a bipartisan plan, a senate series of negotiations. we will see if that works out. senator capital could not get something -- capito could not get something from a -- from republicans that biden thinks would be

ian bremmer, eurasia group president.e on that, it feels like that is what hsbc has been fighting over in the u.k. for the last year -- well, for a while -- but i don't yet see how that is going to play out. guy: you look at all of these businesses, look at the numbers that just came out of nike, what is happening with h&m. all of these businesses facing the same challenge. how do you deal with a consumer in china and a consumer in the united states? how do you marry the politics of those two increasingly different groups? look at what is happening with elon musk, what is happening with tesla. really difficult. i think that highlights the challenge for corporate's is going to get greater and greater. the question is, do corporate's feel that they now have the global influence that they can ride roughshod over what is happening with politics? the consumer, i think, is a different matter. alix: good point there. coming up, we will talk about other challenges here. climate challenges, digital money, and the quest for space.

dani: bremmer see cio, their own investment opportunities and liquidate risks.et's get our view on that from our guest post for this half-hour,l --sonja laud, legal and general investment. does this play into your investment strategy at all, are there any asset classes you would avoid because of this fear over liquidity? sonja: it is very clear that liquidity observations is a much more prominent feature in the investment process, not only because the regulator is focusing a lot more on how asset managers are measuring and integrating liquidity considerations into their processes, for a good reason, we know that with those changes in the availability of them as an absorption mechanism, it is reduced. we have seen during the pandemic , when it hit the most, we have seen real liquidate bottlenecks emerge, hence the potential making sure that they can help your. there is another shift on the way, with bond you so incredibly low, we clearly have seen a lot of investors looking for turnips , the average portfolio is not delivering what used to, mainly that the guilds

ian bremmer joining us this morning on the telephone.he summit site. we are waiting to see the arrival of president biden. we will take you back there when that happens. in the meanwhile, stay with us. we'll be right back. this past year has felt like a long, long norwegian winter. but eventually, with spring comes rebirth. everything begins anew. and many of us realize a fundamental human need to connect with other like-minded people. welcome back to the world. viking. exploring the world in comfort... once again. maria: welcome back. time for the word on wall street, top investors watching your money. joining me is the fitzgerald group principal, keith fitzgerald. head of u.s. rates, gregory figorelo, and tom leiden. thank you for being here. keith, kicking it off with you w you-- futures are mixed this morning. the central bank decided to provide some detail on their plans to scale back easy money policies. what are you expecting from the fed meeting? does the language begin to change today. >> well, i tell you what, that's a very tou

also the co-founder and chairman of moderna along with ian bremmer. ian, first to you.e main message >> well, first the main message is that we know that the united states is about to start losing interest on this issue it's been front and center for every headline in the united states for the last year plus. and you know that as the americans no longer feel personally endangered, suddenly they move on to the next thing we're trying to argue that that's absolutely the wrong thing to do. there is much more of the pandemic ahead of the world even though there isn't for the united states. this is going to affect us economically so we're trying to get the g-7 to focus, especially because the united states is in a unique position to actually make a real difference because we have the vaccines, because our economic response has been as robust as it has, it really is incumbent not just on the private sector players who we think has done a pretty good job so far, but also ojt government remember last year the g-7 didn't even meet in the teeth of this crisis. this year, this wee

bremmer earlier, there's some real nuances here, some nuances in the atlantic china debate.: president biden and the senate have set up an infra-structure to begin to -- and the administration have set up an infrastructure, if you will, to compete with china on scientific innovation, and europe isn't quite ready to compete with china as much, so it is an interesting dynamic. lisa: listening to that plan that was passed yesterday in the senate, how much does rearranging the deck chairs in terms of shuffling money from one pocket to another and then putting it under a headline that looks politically attract versus a meaningful initiative that could actually shore up u.s. competitiveness? wendy: you really hit the nail on the head there. obviously this is a big political success for both republicans and democrats if it passes the house which has a whole different idea for approaching this. but it does shuffle the money around a little bit and emphasizes the national science foundation as the one agency that will corral all of this innovation and technology and push the money ou

we welcome ian bremmer, founder and president of the eurasia group.phrase g0 before. i heard tony blinken say this is the most consequential g7 meeting he is ever seen. on a spectrum from zero to most consequential, where you rank this one? ian:

lisa abramowicz, ian bremmer making clear we could not have a vice president more understanding of thish. lisa: the question is how much weight that will carry based on the actions of the united states , based on president trump administration, and frankly, that began several presidents before that, that the u.s. started to depart from the rest of the allies and the rest of the european continent. there's a question of what president biden can do to restore those alliances at this point without some sort of material legislative action. tom: image is everything, as they come off of air force one wearing marine blues. he looks like romaine bostick, casual on the weekend. [laughter] with the aviator glasses going. lisa: but it is important, this is his sort of common man look in the common man appeal. how much that is going to read in europe at a time when the u.s. is trying to restore its relationship is going to be important to see. tom: he seems fired up. we will try to listen in here and maybe hear something from president biden. pres. biden: strengthening the alliance. making it clear

this hour, the gentleman from modernity there, a huge success, speaking with ian bremmer's group on healthter this pandemic. a number of currents there right now. with this huge news flow, we address that with jennifer hopkins. i need you to come to the rescue of the gentleman from holy cross. dr. fauci is having a difficult week, and he says follow the science. that has been the huge message of the last 24 hours from a beleaguered crouching. frame for us right now what that means. to the critics of people like you, the critics of all the guests we have had on science and obviously we are very pro-science, what does that phrase mean to you, follow the science? jennifer: for me, driving our decisions on the policies we are moment. it does not mean we have unwavering faith in decisions made, but we have to look at the data, examine the data, and what the data tell us where to go. it is really interesting this week, because what we are seeing in the u.s. is a lot of states are really scaling back their data. they are producing the frequency their publishing covid-related data. i know everyone

. >> ian bremmer. and we have a quick but important programming note. kirsten just sat down of his meeting and you can see a preview of that interview on nbc "nightly news" with lester holt. >>> a setback for police reform. we'll go live to capitol hill after a very short break. don't go anywhere. customers are engaged. near real time data for fast decision making. this is business at the speed of 5g. because the more businesses do with 5g, the more your network matters. it's us pushing us. it's verizon vs verizon. this past year has felt like a long, long norwegian winter. but eventually, with spring comes rebirth. everything begins anew. and many of us realize a fundamental human need to connect with other like-minded people. welcome back to the world. viking. exploring the world in comfort... once again. new projects means new project managers. you need to hire. i need indeed. indeed you do. the moment you sponsor a job on indeed you get a short list of quality candidates from our resume database. claim your seventy five dollar credit, when you post

karol i did not know to read this book that arthur bremmer who shot george wallace actually wanted to kill richard nixon first. and was thwarted. >> that is actually good story for the secret service. he rode in his journal that he was trying to get nixon. but it was too tricky. it was too tricky to get. he was struggling because the secret service men made it too hard for him to get a close enough shot. so good for them. kennedy's assassination really made them rebuild that agency from the ground up with rigorous training, majoring security. it's been sleeping for the past couple decades. >> is not aware to something you referred to in this book the exceptional case study project. this is where an analysis was done of 83 people who attacked or came close to attacking prominent figures between 1949 and 1996. they are not all presidents. but that that awful lot of instances of attempts, many more than i knew then we probably remember. the point made among others in this study is that many of them are about wedding faith. this is not political ideologies right? something without about t

anne thompson and stephanie gosk, anne bremmer, thanks for starting us off this hour. joining me now on the phone is a former special prosecutor in the cosby case and msnbc legal analyst. it's good to have you with us. first of all, how much of a blow is this, not just to the alleged victims of bill cosby but to the broader movement to hold sexual abusers accountable? this case, as i mentioned earlier, was certainly a watershed moment in the me, too movement. >> yeah. it's a huge blow, amman. it's a huge blow, i can't dispute that, and what it shows and i want to say that i respect the judge's decision. i don't agree with it obviously, but what it shows is that, you know, it highlights how agreements, whether it's a non-prosecutorial agreement or a non-disclosure agreement can really impair an individual's route or journey towards justice. this is as travesty of justice if a prosecutor is able to make those types of agreements. i don't necessarily agree with the way that the people have interpreted the decision, but holding that to the side i think -- i think that one

ian bremmer, he's going to be on and senator cassidy, he's talking about a bipartisan infrastructureust going to stay at. >> brian: we are going to watch her show at 11:00. >> and it meant that we are going to party down. >> brian: we are going to watch shannon bream! >> evil shannon bream. >> brian: she's one of the nicest people. according to reports, tucker carlson is next. when tucker is ready is when the snare drum starts. thank you. speak it is this the happy chatter you do? ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ >> tucker: good evening and welcome to "tucker carlson tonight." last night, we opened the show with new information about what happened at the capital on january 6th. no day, it's fair to say, in recent american history has received more media attention or been used for greater political effect bipartisan actors. because of january 6th, our attorney general told us this week, we have got to change our country forever. and yet, given all the talking, the endles

. >> martha: okay, let's bring in ian bremmer, great to see you today. thank you for joining us.led the statement fact list multilateralism. what do you call it and how do you think of it? >> they probably didn't talk to the folks who were attending the actual g-7 summit for biden. china got about 50% of what they wanted to. they invited in a special guest, the australians come at the, and the indians. the idea was specifically to build a stronger and larger multilateral coordination. it is not just about the statement on the uighurs are at the south china sea, but more importantly, build back better world agreement that has been in track and started under the trump administration with australia and japan. and it was meant to counter specifically the digital where the chinese are making large technology and environment like claimant infrastructure investment around the world, of course, with no regard to nature of equality, the programs are indications of the debt. and this is broadening that idea out to most of america's key allies around the world. apparently, there is already