, which were famous, but roll to the future, aol is no longer what it was.oday so we sit today where there's a realization that climate change will drive investing opportunities for perhaps decades to come. but the markets are still forming. >> if aol was kind of the darling of the late '90s, what do you think is the darling equivalent of the current stage for climate? >> clear in the public markets that tesla in some ways is garnering the attention. may not end like aol ended, but it's an early understanding of the importance of one sector of the climate change universe. >> i asked coulter if he thinks climate names are in a bubble as most believe was the case with internet companies in the '90s he doesn't see it as a bubble but notes there will be a twisting and interesting journey. the delivering alpha newsletter where this is, it's distributed every other monday deliveringalpha.com. >>> tesla has been enjoying a pretty good morning up better than 3% and leading some of the indices for most of the day. tomorrow things get started on the banks. goldman and

back of the newspaper, absolutely >>> up next, is tesla the aol, exclusive comments from the executiveirman next. sir richard branson reaching the edge of space. what it means for virgin gact sck it might surprise you. that building you're trying to buy, you should ten-x it. ten-x is the world's largest online commercial real estate exchange. and it's fast. if i could, i'd ten-x everything. like our lunch. (laughs) amazing! see it. want it. ten-x it. ♪ ♪ ♪ digital transformation has failed to take off. because it hasn't removed the endless mundane work we all hate. ♪ ♪ ♪ automation can solve that by taking on repetitive tasks for us. unleash your potential. uipath. reboot work. do you have a life insurance policy you no longer need? now you can sell your policy, even a term policy, for an immediate cash payment. we thought we had planned carefully for our retirement. but we quickly realized that we needed a way to supplement our income. if you have one hundred thousand dollars or more of life insurance you may qualify to sell your policy. don't cancel or let your policy lapse without f

the early days of the internet, there was aol who offered a little more than a portal and email and thenng came google and figured all the valuable products that can be added to the internet. we are going to do that for crypto and a whole bunch of ways you will hear about. finally, we need to enrich the financial ecosystem of which crypto exists. derivatives to market. we need to work with our markets in making sure and bitcoin etf eventually comes out because it is safer and easier for people to access than today. i expect it will be the portal for a lot of those innovations. at the end of the day, adding assets has been more useful to people. romaine: really appreciate you taking the time to speak with us. brian brooks, the ceo of binance.us. our thanks to sonali. we will keep this conversation going. we will be back in a moment. ♪ ♪ joe: we're sticking with the crypto conversation for the rest of the show. the first bitcoin specific venture capital firm. we welcome now -- thank you for joining us. we are talking crypto. you are bitcoin focused. bitcoin specifically, but people want to

. >> jimmy: aol? >> it's not an aol address. >> jimmy: interesting. >> yeah. it was a party -- it was a -- it was called -- she asked me if i wanted to come to gorby dolls makeout party. >> jimmy: what? >> a gorby dolls makeout -- >> jimmy: a writer, he would bring -- >> they don't know. [ laughter ] >> jimmy: a person, a human man. >> a human man. >> jimmy: he was a writer, he'd have these interesting parties. >> yes. >> jimmy: a makeout party? >> it was her idea to call it the makeout party. shirley mcclain. queen latifah. all of these people were there. i was obviously panicked. because neurotic. >> jimmy: did people make out? >> i did not see anyone make out but there was a hat with names in it and you were supposed to make out with whomever you pulled out of the hat. >> jimmy: really, wow. >> matthew perry pulled my name out of the hat and promptly left the room. [ laughter ] >> jimmy: wait, how do you know he pulled it out? >> because i saw him. he was like, oh, well, i got you. i was like, uh, let's kiss. he was like, no.

but the exceptions to the rule obviously in terms of the sea breeze aoling. it's been out towards the tri-valley. it's only cooled down to 78 degrees after a high of 106 degrees today in livermore. tomorrow it will be probably just a little bit cooler. but we're still expecting highs near 102 around livermore tomorrow. so here is a look at the breeze. this is important. fairfield has got a southwest wind at 23 miles per hour. if you have friends and family in the sacramento area, they look for that. the delta breeze through solano county, starting to see a sign it's copping back, but it really lacks the cooling or the deep marine layer air to help bring in the cooler temperatures. notice as we head toward the morning hours, we're only cooling into the upper 60s and 70s inland. that is the story tomorrow morning. with the rung start to the warm temperatures, tomorrow's highs again for at least one more day. south of san jose seeing the temperatures in the mid- to upper 90s. down toward morgan hill, towards antioch and concord, the today. still 70s and 80s arou

his email address was hoping to 357 at aol dot com, and after soldiering on during nearly a year long battle with advanced lung cancer rush. limbaugh died on ash wednesday at his spinal state of the union address problem presented. lynne barr the presidential medal of freedom. but rush did not rest. no error bring him there for. his syndicator kept re running old clips with what quickly became an awkward weekend at bernie's effect. only recently ended. and when prince philip passed at age 99, the royal family feud paused him in several scandals. and the queen sat alone in church. a pandemic music farewell very different than princess diana's funeral. as life goes on, it is less uncertain then same time, last year. doctors you have seen here tell us that like the flu, this covert could be endemic, meaning that we get a jab every year. we hope that this pandemic we've been through has been the story of our lifetime, meaning nothing worse happens. but if we've learned anything in 15 months, it's that anything can happen. so the way we respond is how we survive. and as we wish uncle sam,

francisco in 2011 and started working for eff and at one stage growing up in the nineties was prodigy and aol to be exhilarated by the's ideas that barlow was putting out there. i associate this with a 'wired" magazine circle and the cofounder of eff publishing and wired and dyson was another eff person who was in the wired world. i definitely had a lot of the same experiences in the nineties that this is a very long wind up to the question. so why it is still useful about those ideas and what is not anymore? fairly or not barlow is considered a libertarian the libertarian politics generally were evident. wired had newt gingrich on the cover. so obviously it is fair to say from your work and the passage that you do feel a connection with that legacy butis what do you think is active today? what should we harvestd from it and what do you think has aged less well? >> it's a great question. it's interesting because i'm from the us originally living in san francisco and then germany the past seven years now. a lot of german thinkers from that time have very similar perspectives from those in the

one stage i can totally relate to what you are saying growing up in the nineties to be a prodigy on aol and getting exhilarated by these ideas that were being put out there i also associate this with the wired mic on - - magazine circle to be publisher then on - - published in wired and another that was in the wired world. i definitely have a lot of the same experiences in the nineties but it's a very long wind up to a question what it is still useful about those ideas and what's not useful anymore? fairly or not some are considered technical utopian are a libertarian those libertarian politics like tyson or 'wired" magazine are evidenced and wired had newt gingrich on its cover. so it's fair to say from your work in the passage that you read that you do feel connection with that legacy, but what do you think is still active today? what should we harvest from it and much as age less well? >> it's a great question. it is interesting. for me i've been into inferences go a few years in germany the past seven years and there are a lot of german thinkers who are very similar perspectives and

i can relate to what you are saying about going up in the nineties being on prodigy and aol and being exhilarated by the ideas that were put out there. i associate this with wired magazine. the other cofounder of eff publishing and wired. dyson was another eff person in the wired world. i had a lot of the same experiences in the nineties. but this is a very long windup cousin trying to figure how to pose it. what is still useful about those ideas and what is not useful anymore? fairly or not barlow is considered a utopian are a libertarian the libertarian politics like dyson generally were very evident. newt gingrich is on the cover. so i think it's fair to say from your work and from the passage that you read that you do feel a connection with that legacy but what do you think is still active today? what should we harvest and what has aged less well quick. >> that's a great question. it's interesting because i've been in germany the past seven years. there are a lot of german thinkers who have very similar perspective to the libertarian thinkers in the us. of course there is more cen

. >> chad, thanks aol lot. >> \m \m >> in tonight's whatever happened to segment...s was supposed to change the way you live your life. claudia takes a look.es >> when they launched google glass 10 years ago out of a blimp, the gadget was hailed as a game changer. wearers could use the internet and check email and record videos with a move of their head or voice commands. >> the idea was to get rid of computers and have a device that could do everything and wear it on your face. >> it gave us a taste of the future. >> google beta tester wore google glass for a year even in the shower. deciding the reality was fun but -- e >> it was an elitist product because it was $1,500 and it did not do much. >> googles device never really caught on. glass was doomed by its tiny built-in camera that unleashed big privacy concerns. >> you could take somebody's picture without doing anything other than a gesture is creepy to a lot of people. a term was coined glass hole to refer to people wearing google glasses.. >> by 2017 google scrapped glass and markets it for industrial use in

probably about 20 million on aol. 1996. now what do we have? facebook, twitter, we have billions worldwide. so times have changed, the internet is flourishing. but first amendment still must be protected. no one could envision what was about to happen with the internet in our country now, with billions of users worldwide. that is why this is so important. and when you have mark zuckerberg and others being called in front of congress and being coerced and questioned by all of these congressmen, you also have mark zuckerberg emailing dr. fauci about covid, and in fact, a lot of their emails we received have been redacted. not just because of phone numbers, but they were trading trade secrets. things -- a private company is communicating with the federal government, and parts of that were redacted. so that makes them -- they are not immune anymore. it was coercion, collusion, working together, and they cannot hide from the first amendment. that is why this is so very important. even facebook's oversight board that mark zuckerberg created, the over

started working for bff and at one stage i can totally relatete growing up in the 90s and prodigy and aolgetting exhilarated by these ideas that folks like barlow were putting out there. ... i had a lot of the same experiences in the nineties. but this is a very long windup cousin trying to figure how to pose what is still useful about those ideas and what is not useful anymore because they think fairly or not someones like barlow is considered a techno-utopian now and certainly a techno-libertarian. the lear bird terry and politics of somert like dyson who is generally evident and he had ingrid jonas cover. so obviously it's fair to say from your work and from the passage that you read that you do feel a connection with that legacy but what is it do you think is still active today? what should we harvest from it and what do you think is aged less well? >> absolutely. it's a great question. it's interesting because you know i've been in germany for almost seven years now and there a lot of german speakers from on that time who had similar perspectives to libertarian thinkers in the u.s..

i'm thinking about aol, time warner, the successes and lack of successes, disney and abc.apping, the high are in full flow. the telecoms and execs feel like they are back. the question is will anything significant happened that changes how the district looks? i've not seen mr. bezos yet but i am sure he is someone everyone is keen to speak to. tom: he has a gorgeous view of a bike trail behind him. are you going one mile or five miles on the bike? ed: as you know, i mckeon by quest. i'm busy -- i am 18 bike list. i did's -- i am a keen bicyclist. i did see someone at 5:00 a.m. this morning. tom: in our world 5:00 a.m. is midday. ed ludlow with further reporting from sun valley. i think it is what it is. guess what. this year is different. it could be really interesting. romaine: absolutely. you talk about the competition we have seen pickup for streaming because of the pandemic, even prior to the pandemic. interesting to see if they can facilitate some sort of consolidation because there is too many streaming channels. tom: don't you think so? your house is like my house,

he truly believes that the 21st century will be determined by aol l democracy has to stand up an demonstrate that you can get something done. >> what do you make of the point that he was making there? i mean china in particular has proven that at times particularly with the pandemic control can have a difference and a positive impact. >> that is exactly right. and this is a theme that president biden has struck many times in the first six months of his presidency. and frankly, it has been a bit of a surprise because it is not the way he talked when he was vice president. it is not the way he talked when he was chairman of the senate foreign relations committee. in instead he has described what is essentially the makings of a new cold war, one in which he is pitting the united states against [ inaudible ] and that is a very big difference. he is making the case that we have to prove the democracies can deliver and that all the chaos around the vaccine, around the election conspiracy theories, make it hard to convince people that democracy can deliver. i think that he believes this very much i

stage i can totally relate to what you are saying about growing up in the 90s and being on prodigy and aoland getting kind of exhilarated by these ideas that folks like barlow were putting out there. i also associate this with wired magazine . there was an overlap with the other cofounder of eff publishing in wired andbeing involved with those folks . i think dyson was another eff for kind of was in the wired world . so i definitely have a lot of the same i think experiences in the 90s but i think i wonder, if this is a long line up to a question because i'm trying to figure out how to compose it which is what still is useful about those ideas and what's not useful anymore. because i think fairly or not someone like barlow is considered a techno-utopian now. certainly a no libertarian. i think that's the libertarian politics of someone with dyson wired magazine are evident. famously wired newtgingrich on its cover . so obviously i think it's fair to say from your work and from the passage that you read that you do yfeel a connection with that legacy . but what is that you think is still ac

or aol. they just didn't cross the chasm and make it to that next group of customers so i think this group of customers in their 20s and 30s, they're just starting and probably getting started ten years before all of us did, who are watching on the show or maybe 20 or 30 years before some of us did. and so that really is the upside this is a company that has always operated with a sense of urgency, and by building absolutely stunning gorgeous experiences for users, which reminds me of airbnb and google and facebook and uber the quality of the product is paramount in this industry because it is so competitive and you have to constantly be offering new things he talked about maybe there is more products to come and when he pitched it to me in the early days before the product was launched, he did have a very, very big vision for the company. >> jason, yeah, i mean, is there a brand message mismatch here to some degree? like, what gamification, robinhood got popular selling pizza, but saying the

by the period probably that this decision aol -- the building actually will come down, it will be stille i said. and at that point, it will probably be in the recovery state, not in the rescue position. >> the crestview towers in north miami beach was also ordered to evacuate after it was deemed structurally and electrically unsafe. is the city taking steps to make sure that buildings are up to code and that any other buildings in the area are possibly a concern? >> these -- these buildings are in a jurisdiction of different cities. and in this particular case, north miami beach has requested people to evacuate due to i'll say an unsafe structure that they determined after their inspection. this is going on around -- on every city, every city is doing their inspections or reviews of their 40-year inspections. as we are in the county, county mayor ordered an audit of our buildings also that are recently just been done with the 40-year inspection. and that's in the unincorporated area. this is something that is being done across our county by the different -- and my colleagues and i are g

and evidence that you and aol individuals funding the audit have sought to advance the big lie of debunked voter fraud allegations about the 2020 presidential election. americans' right to vote is protected by the constitution. it is the cornerstone of our democratic system of government. the committee seeks to determine whether the privately funded audit conducted by your company in arizona protects the right to vote or is instead an effort to promote baseless conspiracy theories, undermine confidence in america's elections and reverse the results of a free and fair election for partisan gain." what do you really mean? the so-called audit in arizona in which the republicans in the state legislature hired this group cyber ninjas, which appears to be just this guy doug, to do some kind of operation on the ballots and voting machines from the largest county in arizona, it's lived for months now at this intersection of clown show ridiculousness and actual consequential threat to american democracy because the whole thing is aimed at essentially undoing the presidential election result in a u.

. >> all right good stuff bryn >> yeah, hey, carl, so for every apple there are far more ge and aol andwould be a buy a basket of great growth companies with that i would do the qqqs and ark. naturally changing over time >> the arkk, okay. going out on the risk curve a bit. they're young they have a long time to go so that's very interesting amy? >> congratulations, carl i think the next decade is going to be one of molecular medicine. i'm going to give you a value stock regeneron, a growth stock, illumina more speculative with great patent protection in intellectual property. intelia. a leader in crispr i think you will do well >> some ark play there is too. i noticed that pete >> yeah, you know, it's interesting, scott, i did with this with my children back in 2009 when they were young. they had to present to me what they were looking for and present to me why they should be able to own churchill downs and apple and some of the other flames he already has apple i like pepsi and coke. i like both they both work pepsi is more diverse than you're looking at coke but i think these are com

tried to impose other obligations on these providers and fec stepped in and said no, we generally have aolicy of appointment and that has preemptive effects and say yes, you're right, the decision not to regulate preemptive minnesota state law. the other case i put in that bucket of strong recognition and recent case new york, where new requirementmposed a that required offering $15 a month low income services in the district court there decided new york state law based on this concept of both conflict and field preemption and third the case in that bucket would be our own decision in 2017 where we move internet providers from title to regulation title one and said that decision regulate from title to the title i carries preamp to force and therefore by state law to the contrary. that portion of our 2017 decision was not upheld by the d.c. circuit and that leads me into the second category which is a less-expensive review of the regulatory or preemptive force of deregulation. one would be 2019 d.c. circuit case that no fec, your decision to move title i to title to, we don't think thate is

markets hadn't quite set up for how they were going to deal with that >> he says tesla is akin to the aolwill be a twisting and interesting journey. guys >> okay, leslie, thank you very much sun light financial will benefit from the rising interest making its trading debut today following the completion of its spac merger with apollo backed spartan acquisition corp shares finishing higher by nearly 5%. sunlight ceo joins us. welcome, your employees are here and everybody is happy it's a big day for you >> a really exciting day >> why spac? >> first, we had a very healthy cash flow, a strong balance sheet and we're a profitable business we met the team at apollo and they were incredible partners. we're happy with the result. >> what do you make of the fact it's trading below $10, a demarcation line for spac listings >> we have a long view here. this is a high-growth market up 10x over the last decade and has incredible room to run we're looking at it over the long term. we've heard great feedback about the strength of the company and we're bullish about the future we're thrilled and excite

that's if they are late, can be aol fairly expensive propositio.directs the department of agriculture to invest additional resources that would be the provided under this bill. at the end of the day the service adds a delicate l is compromise between producers and workers. they worked larded -- long and this and it deserves our vote of confidence allowing to be able to see if it works and what works well and what doesn't work and as you all know no bill is ever perfect of confidence to allow it to see what works well, what doesn't work. note no bill is ever perfect. i think the fact that this is a compromise between people who historically have had a difficult time finding common ground, we should be encouraging that kind of activity i would think. so time will tell. it's certainly improved where it is today. >> thank you. that's very helpful. >> senator conyn? >> mr. secretary, thank you for being here today and for your testimony. i particularly appreciate your reaching out to me and other members to see what's possible in this space as a practic

i mean some of us were still getting those little aol discs in the mail and wondered what to do withm all. we just didn't know. host: not laughing at you, laughing at your reference. i get it. as far as legislative efforts themselves, do you trust the legislators themselves to make the updates to reflect the current time is and the nature of the law considering where we are with the internet should mark caller: well, i would hope so, but the problem is that this has become so politicized. that's why i think this is ultimately going to have to wind up in the hands of the supreme court. for them to moderate this whole thing. no matter who is in power, the republicans, the democrats, they are each going to have their own perspective on how this thing should be handled. but basically, big tech has gotten too big for their britches. they are just sort of begging for a sherman antitrust action to be taken against them all and have them all broken up. i hope that doesn't happen. host: ok, that is mark sharing his thoughts on 230, potential changes in what he sees as a possible need for chan

. >> this is not aol particularly difficult problem to solve. it only takes will. canan create a framework th will protect privacy and fill this t gap. >>nk okay. well thank you. and i yield to mr. biggs. >> i thank the gentlelady for yielding when i w ran out of ti, professor tur turley just anne answered my question i'll remind you and give you the context. i was asking about the stick that might be necessary to help whatat we typically think of asn independent court. so you all seem to be in agreement with guidelines, et cetera and statutory guidelines. howen do you make those are goi to be tough enough? >> ifes i may. >> yes, mr. burton down the line ms. burten. >> d if i may i think the conce ofof extending the fourth amendment to data stored in the cloud is pa reasonable framework to consider here. because that would take all existing sticks as you put it that would apply when government overreachesgh and violates four amendment t rights, exclusion o evidence and so forth. and applicable here as well. thee irony here is that fourth amendment jurisprudence iso