media platforms around two prongs, first of all, we promote free speech, and by that, i mean with respect to all legal speech, speech protected by the first amendment constitution, we believe that the users should be the ones to decide what they're going to see or say, etc. the second prong is around user privacy, and we, unlike other social networks, do not track you across websites, and we collect and use the minimal data possible to provide service and to also have some sort of a modernization model. host: when did parler get started and how many people use it today? guest: it started in 2018. i do not have exact user stats today. as you know, we were deplatformed unjustly by amazon and others back in january of this year. at that point, we had between 15 million and 20 million registered users, and at that point, we had to rebuild everything, and then we rebuilt the code base from the ground up, so we are in the ramp-up phase with recovery from that blow. host: why were you deplatformed? guest: allegedly because we had content on our site that contributed to the events of january 6 at

respectable. let's see if sam i how did | do? 150. is that good? | respectable.respectable. let's see if sam can beat my flying lap of— respectable. let's see if sam can beat my flying lap of one - respectable. let's see if sam can beat my flying lap of one minute | respectable. let's see if sam can i beat my flying lap of one minute and 50. well, the very best of luck sir. confident?— 50. well, the very best of luck sir. confident? not really, i don't need it. and in, — confident? not really, i don't need it. and in, he _ confident? not really, i don't need it. and in, he is _ confident? not really, i don't need it. and in, he is honest. _ so, you know, that bit about it not being a foregone conclusion? yeah, i don't stand a chance. right back at the first meeting, we knew it was going to take months, a lot of commitment from the engineers, resources and my time, and they thought it was funny after narrow said, look, i'm very interested, but not unless we can go 100 miles an hour.— 100 miles an hour. congratulations, one minute — 100 miles an hour. congratulatio

with respect, with respect... if i can finish.you quote some biased report and then when we try to explain, we never have the opportunity. because i really do believe that no ngo, no ngo knows my kids, my sons, better than i do. and i definitely stick to my right to conduct their education regarding the sexual orientation and not an ngo in the school or in the kindergarten. well, as you mention, as you mentioned your kids... crosstalk. and to be honest, i don't understand why there are attacks on that. as you mention your kids, foreign minister, i think it's only fair for me to ask you that if one of your kids — i don't know if your kids have reached teenage yet — but as and when your kids reach teenage, who knows, one of them might be gay, who knows, we don't know. but would you, if you had a gay child in school, not want them to receive an inclusive, positive, affirming set of information about homosexuality? what i know is the following. i have two sons, the age of seven and the age of ten. and i can talk to them about basicall

people particularly complain about twitter with respect to that. but there are sure other places as well. people realize it doesn't help if your goal is to improve civil discourse among people with competing view paints. it is logically irrelevant. yeah, it would be nice to have a tool to filter that oust your feed. that's what we try to provide with you. >> steven of edge water florida is next. democrat, good morning. >> caller: yes. my concern is like i can't go into walmart and do something dangerous, go into a sporting department and get a gun and ask for bullets, put bullets in and it do something dangerous. both myself and walmart would end up in a legal situation. i think the same thing should apply to social media. if a group uses parler or facebook to organize something like january 6th, i think you guys should be subject to legal responsibility. so that's why i agree with facebook's attitude on censoring or, you know, cutting off donald trump's facebook account, to prevent this kind of dangerous stuff from going on. >> miss pickoff. >> th

on matters of sub_ respect of the resolution on matters of subjudice to respect of the resolution onchallenge them northern— reference to the challenge them northern ireland protocol as it concerns — northern ireland protocol as it concerns issues of national importance. further, i'm exercising the discretion to allow limited reference to active legal proceedings and opening in relation to the _ proceedings and opening in relation to the historic troubles related deaths — to the historic troubles related deaths. however, references to these cases— deaths. however, references to these cases should be limited to the context — cases should be limited to the context and the events which led to the cases— context and the events which led to the cases but not to the detail of cases— the cases but not to the detail of cases themselves, nor the names of those _ cases themselves, nor the names of those involved in them. all honourable members should however be mindfut— honourable members should however be mindful of— honourable members should however be mindful of the matters which may be the

so, please, respect the truth and the american people. thank you. guest: you are right about one thing, which is big money is coming from a lot of these huge corporations. they are the ones who buy influence in washington. let me give you an example, the pharmaceutical industry has three map -- three lobbyists for every member of congress. when they want to get something done or they want to block efforts to reduce the cost of prescription drugs, they just send lobbyists onto capitol hill , they pull the lawmakers aside and send campaign contributions and what do you know, we cannot get it done. that is why one of the big parts of this bill is to bring transparency and to put guardrails in place so the lobbyists are not calling the shots in the big money is not the one that decides what gets done on prescription drugs or what gets done on tax policy, the environment, or anyone else. big money has taken over politics. super pacs, campaign contributions and the rest of it, and that means the average person cannot compete. their voice cannot compete wi

that's what we do with respect to those tragic cases. >> mr. secretary, again, i have so many questions. i've run out of time. i hope next time you come, and you actually will stay for second and third, maybe fourth rounds of questions, because the american people deserve transparency. they deserve accountability. they need to understand this enormous tragic crisis on our border and right now because the mainstream media is not reporting and your administration isn't admitting we have a crisis on the border, the american people are basically in the dark of what's happening here. it's a tragedy, it's a travesty. >> senator the next time i testify before this committee i do hope i'll have the opportunity to provide answers to explains the laws of the united states, to explain how we're executing those laws, to explain the plan that we have. >> i would be satisfied with basic facts and numbers that we're not getting because the facts and the numbers will describe what's happening and that's probably one of the reasons why we're not being provided

to get respect, you need to gain it. we do not have any respect worldwide. our enemies no longer fear us and our friends are a little skeptical right now. we need to step up. i am afraid that president biden, i do not think he is well. if you watch any of the interviews. he is incoherent. the media has to have preapproved questions. in what world, any journalistic venue, is that acceptable host: host:? republican line -- acceptable. host: republican line, kelly. caller: i would like to ask about the 2030 agenda. i am curious -- what is the 2030 agenda about? thank you. guest: i do not know. i'm sorry. host: we will hear from -- i have a question for you on twitter. steve says, this representative state would still be in the dark of the federal government did not create the tva, but does not support the infrastructure built. guest: the dams and the projects are part of traditional infrastructure. it absolutely would support it. the tba has to accept some responsibility, too. they pay their headman over $8 million a year. i daresay, highest paid person -- he i

with all due respect, this record is an unmitigated disaster.on't want to ask you to tell us and tell the american people what you are going to do to change course. >> thank you for your question. let me respond inn a number of different ways. first of all, the number of migrants apprehended at the border begins to increase in april of last year. number two, it's important to remember that the number of apprehensions, the number of encounters does not equal the number of different individuals encountered because we are exercising the centers of disease control titles authority to dispel individuals that means that they are quickly processed for identity and expelled. they are not placed in immigration removal proceedings but before expulsion, they often returned and are expelled again. >> mr. sec., my time is very limited. i don't mean to interrupt but i want to be clear about something you said. are you saying there hasn't been a dramatic surge in the border crossings and unaccompanied children is that your position? >> that is not my position.

i respect the fact you spend time with the i.c.e. officers and the fact personally would like to see some changes but respectfully i would say it is not true they are removed. i don't think any children have yet have been removed from the last election of 2019 think there isol a 50 percent decrease of arrest that indicates a change of policy think the question i asked about how many unlawful migrants have been removed this year is the responsibly quite shocking because it would be incredibly low as actually very few. we have been asking for this information and i appreciate the fact you have committed to getting us this information thank you for your testimony today and for your service and the unprecedented i look forward to working with you on that. >> senator i thank you need to preside over the senate shortly and senator carper has agreed to defer for your questions. >> thank you senator carper that i can participate in the hearing and fulfill my duty to preside over the senate session. also thank you to secretary mayorkas for hi

. >> it's been phenomenal in many respects but it's important to put these things in context . in my book i talk about the first board being established or at least recorded in the 1600s. in many ways if you look back several centuries the fundamental mandate of the board hasn't changed much. i would say traditionally boards have had two responsibilities. one is providing oversight on strategy and number two is hiring and in some instances firing the ceo. but really over the last half decade, even more there's been a material shift towards the need for corporations to take on a much more social and cultural responsibility. to be good citizens if you will and that obviously was really a counterforce to milton friedman's 1970 article in which he basically planted a flag in the sand essentially suggesting that the financial privacy of shareholders were really the key sort of attributes and important role that corporations play. that can be the shareholder versus stakeholder primacy. you can't talk about it without saying how milton friedman is maybe not in the modern times. >> tha

and among these conditions, there were procedural terms and all of these conditions were respected. i've been invited the prime minister that i have dismissed and informed him, and then i call the house speaker. and i told him that i will be resorting to article 80 of the constitution after which i declared the exceptional measures and the presence of permanent danger. security forces dressed in civilian clothing have stolen your fears about them and shook his press freedom advocates of condemned the closure. and so has the un spikes person for the un secretary general were dismayed by these reports. and we hope that all reporters, including the ones that al jazeera will be able to go about their work without harassment. and we want to make sure that as we have the situation on the ground in tunisia, that press freedoms are respected. secretary of state and the blanket has urged that unity and president respect democracy and a phone call. he said to maintain dialogue with all sides. i do so castro has more from washington. those developments are under close watched by the us and tod

>> in certain respects, i think we should increase it, in other respects, i think we should reduce it and because some of it is not spent wisely to achieve the most important outcomes and i've seen that, senator, if i may, because i know you disagree with me by your physical reaction, but if i may, i know that from being in the trenches. >> of course, i have a simple question. do you think the budget should be reduced or not and you respond like a politician, what can i say? i'm a politician, too. let me take a different topic altogether in the remaining moments. the federal government is spending as much on interest right now as we have spend on the combined budgets of commerce, education, energy, department of homeland security, housing and urban development, interior, the justice department and the state department. let that sink in. that overspending is contributing to the highest level of inflation we've seen in some 12 years. would you say that trillion dollar deficits like these before the pandemic, as well as after the pandemic, that that pose, that poses a threat to our natio

,. .. . , respect,.re, it's the people - there, it's the people travelling from all the way around the world together using flights, that is a problem that is very difficult to solve i imagine. just quickly because i have to let you go, but one of the things that comes up with these events, one of them is these events, one of them is the cost, the expense, they are really really expensive to put on. is there a danger that if costs get too high, the thing that will be sacrificed will be some of these green initiatives?— some of these green initiatives? . . ., initiatives? we have factored this in from _ initiatives? we have factored this in from the _ initiatives? we have factored this in from the very - this in from the very beginning, and working very hard to maintain our objectives, to respect both our budget and our carbon budget. this is a daily task, the carbon agenda is at the heart of our management as well. we will abide by its like everyone.— will abide by its like everyone. will abide by its li

. >> it's been phenomenal in many respects but it's important to put these things in context . in my book i talk about the first board being established or at least recorded in the 1600s. in many ways if you look back several centuries the fundamental mandate of the board hasn't changed much. i would say traditionally boards have had two responsibilities. one is providing oversight on strategy and number two is hiring and in some instances firing the ceo. but really over the last half decade, even more there's been a material shift towards the need for corporations to take on a much more social and cultural responsibility. to be good citizens if you will and that obviously was really a counterforce to milton friedman's 1970 article in which he basically planted a flag in the sand essentially suggesting that the financial privacy of shareholders were really the key sort of attributes and important role that corporations play. that can be the shareholder versus stakeholder primacy. you can't talk about it without saying how milton friedman is maybe not in the modern times. >> tha

so with respect to brown -- well, i will tell you about the three similarities with respect to the creationand what undergirded the southern manifesto in brown versus board of education. there are similarities with respect to tone, there are similarities or, you know, sort of converse of thinking about audience, the audience a similar phenomenon, sort of calculation that is went into it and finally the union nimity piece as well. when thinking about the tone when chief justice warren was writing brown he said he aimed to achieve a tone that was not emotional, nonaccusatory in an effort to avoid alienating white southerners. while the men fest toe today is understood to be aggrieved and angry and nasty, that's not how it was understood at the time. indeed many people commented on the mild tone. i found comments from senators who said this is noninflammatory. you might think that they were just attempting to be polite to their fellow senators and avoiding some sort of, you know, nasty confrontation, but even more detached observers including in the new republic and the nation said that this i

and respect very much indeed.t i think in this occasion_ newspaper but i think in this occasion a bit too kind to the prime minister _ occasion a bit too kind to the prime minister. , , ., , ., ., minister. yes he did promise to to revolutionise _ minister. yes he did promise to to revolutionise the _ minister. yes he did promise to to revolutionise the devolution, - minister. yes he did promise to to revolutionise the devolution, if. revolutionise the devolution, if that's the right phrase was up give more power to the counties than just the big cities and encourage people to do more for themselves. generally speaking i think most people agree that this speech was pretty thin. he described on the cross examination as the skeleton of his plans. won’t as the skeleton of his plans. won't be any bone _ as the skeleton of his plans. won't be any bone on — as the skeleton of his plans. won't be any bone on the _ as the skeleton of his plans. won't be any bone on the skeleton - as the skeleton of his plans. won't be any

you and i have to respect that. he creates a newspaper empire of affiliated newspapers that support his way ofthinking about the world . he's in that respect he creates fox news network. he understands the democratic newspaper culture of america. he's always saying don't write adsagainst hamilton. rip him to shreds . he's too good a newspaper granular. you've got to go after him. so there's a reason the guy is on mount rushmore. i criticize him because it's something that's really important any in the slavery issue, he gets worse over time. he found a political party that's basically as a southern base, here's the relevance of this today. today party, and both parties have this but i'm talking about therepublican party . liz cheney, i think in the end you have to protect your soul of your party. so i respect her for that but i see the whole on the other side that we're going to lose votes, we're going to lose our base if you're lindsey graham or kevin mccarthy. a similar thing concerns madison and jefferson. they kn

and all of these conditions were respected. i've been invited the prime minister that i have dismissed and informed him that i call the house speaker. and i told him that i will be resorting to article 80 of the constitution after which i declared the exceptional measures and the presence of permanent danger. and you said, my son is 78, but there was no constitutional court to decide whether the move was legal under article 18 on the street tennis in the cooling for change. many fed up with the political cellmates and economy in crisis. high unemployment rates, and the mishandling the pandemic, the in the party, which holds most seats. and parliament has recently pulled the brunt of their anger . we have this political crisis match, the was conscious that we have ever had international have 100 people dying every day from growing numbers. and then we have also a huge crisis. so at this point, you could kind of just because, you know, are exhausted, they are scared, and nobody knows exactly where we are heading. need political t

director for the human rights watch, a highly respected n.g.o. dedicated to promoting human rights and civil liberties. director for the human rights watch, a highly respected n.g.o. dedicated to promoting human rights and civil liberties. he joined the obama administration as the assistant secretary of state until the end of the administration in 2016. since his election to kong, tom has served on the house foreign affairs committee including service for the middle east north africa and global terrorism. tom was named as the vice chair in the 117th kong. to kick off our kong today, tom will deliver brief remarks. following that, i will moderate the conversation and will try to introduce as many of your questions as comments as i can. for those of you joining on zoom, you can pose your questions using the chat function and by those joining by phone, please submit your questions using theer events at mei address. also for anyone experiencing tech any nickal difficulties contact our staff -- technical difficulties, contact our staff. let me turn th

i've not heard anything with respect to that. i don't have a regular contact with the united states. so i'm hoping to now that we have a president that at least on paper is more open to i guess, recognizing some form of palestinian rights. what we'll see down the line, i hope to be able to be in touch with the americans of the next time i'm in geneva and in new york, you think bennett will allow joe biden to but a u. s. consulate in east jerusalem for the ballast indians. i'm sure is that a beach that's going on within the israeli government and the end of the day? i can't see how the how these read the government can refuse. the old opening a reopening of the u. s. council. that's been there since before. 948 is my understanding as simply restoration to the status quo. job whiteness done some on attacks. some of the issues that were, that had been on done by the foreign president such as the restore aid to unwrap the palestinian refugee agency run by the united nations. he's attempting to try to reopen as constantly as restore f

they fought very hard to stay in that framework for all of the respect and stature it conveys.so i was really surprised it was not in vocationalt languag. >> i wonder what year that wasn't when that was i'm really curious. >> may be semi- good but that in the chat. that's interesting. it sounds like a sort of related question here about maybe the marketing aspect of home economics, lorna says why you think the name family and consumer science hasn't stuck? >> that is a great question. they have done a lot of marketing over the years. i guess a couple of things i think it's clunking they never figure out the acronym which doesn't help. i understand why they did it. it was also never all that popular even within the field. it got likee a majority but there is never a term, there's an enormous amount of focus grouping and so on with various organization did over the name change. it was a good enough enough people loved it. i think that for all of the first frustrations home economist had in trying to get respect for that name, i think the name home economics, it has a real power.

were obliged to defend that country from irregular groups that added the human rights needed to be respected. and that the events at the border would be investigated. the news the soon as he is president, thanks the defense and justice ministers to dismissing the prime minister pro and anti government demonstrators of clashed outside parliament and security forces storm out. is there a bureau in tunis or real stuff out of the building? ah, how many watching i was they were like my headquarters here in the hall also coming up levels that not, gee, but mac countries, the kills of majority to become prime minister designate, offering hope to a country struggling and economic crisis. also the human cost of the african conflict, the un says a record number of women and children are dying and fighting. ah, welcome to the program to 0 is facing its biggest political crisis since the 2011 revolution that introduced democracy on sunday night president chi saeed froze parliament. and as did the prime minister with the help of the army. here were the latest developments on monday, the president announc

how can you expect the general public to respect the capitol when the leader herself has no respect for the office? guest: first of all, i believe that all of us respect the office of the presidency. speaker pelosi has on many occasions expressed her frustration with president trump in the four years he was there. there was not a lot of agreement on many things. there are so many missed opportunities for president trump to bring the country together, do some big bipartisan things. i was certainly disappointed that there were not more opportunities. president trump could have been an infrastructure president, but he could not get it done. he was more about dividing than uniting the country. i share speaker pelosi's frustrations with the former president. i am glad president biden is in the white house. he is a uniter. the bipartisan infrastructure package we negotiated, president biden knows what negotiation is all about. he knows what bringing people together in a bipartisan way is all about. a $1 trillion package, i am hoping that survives and makes it through the senate with a biparti

so olc is very powerful in that respect. the other thing i wanted to raise and don't have to discuss this but it came up in steve's answer is the extraordinary episode involving the dismissal of u.s. attorneys and congressional response in the bush administration. because that is a facet of how people have thought about the department of justice, norms, where the authority over those matters are located, that is a very significant and i would say it is forgotten, but it left a mark that the democrats and the congress launched an investigation into the grounds for the dismissal of u.s. attorneys and then there were a number of assumptions that started to build about what level of accountability congress -- the president had publicly and to congress for deciding that a u.s. attorney ought to be dismissed and an acting u.s. attorney a permanently replacement ought to be considered. it flashed into my head, in the whole subject of the history witten about modern days of doj and dependence and white house noninterference, the u.s

it always gave me respect for the military.u want to be an american you have to respect would created america. this ultimate american bible includes the king james version of the founding documents of america, a readable version of the u.s. constitution, the built of rights, the pledge of allegiance and my handwritten course to god bless the usa. i suggest smeef read the constitution. it might help her attitude. judge jeanine: nancy gray says she thinks the american flag is too white. did you hear that one? >> i didn't. look, our flag represents the greatest country as i said that ever existed. i don't understand why if somebody wants to be a great athlete and represent our country they should love our country. if they don't love our country, why would you want to represent us. it doesn't make any sense to me. if we are so bad, why you would want to be part of it. we are beautiful. our country is beautiful. most of the people in america get it. they are great americans. the gooders in of america takes care of the greatness of a

i think they do have respect for each other, and i think there were a lot of emotions and yesterday'shamilton to be celebrating whilst he was in a hospital bed. i don't even really know if limit —— lewis hamilton knew that he was in hospital, certainly we didn't know as journalists and media and we have been asking all afternoon since the crash. so i think this season is a classic. we will be looking back at this for years and saying that 2021 season was the best we have had in decades. i season was the best we have had in decades. ., , season was the best we have had in decades. . , u, ., ., decades. i am sure we welcome and of course, this — decades. i am sure we welcome and of course, this incident _ decades. i am sure we welcome and of course, this incident slightly _ course, this incident slightly overshadowed the new sprint race style that was try out this weekend on saturday. but you were there, what was the general feeling about that? ., ~ ., ., ., that? you know what, the whole weekend was — that? you know what, the whole weekend was amazing. - that? you know what, the whole

under that section, any change with respect to voting in a covered jurisdiction could not be enforced unless the jurisdiction first proved to the justice department or to the united states district court for the district of columbia that the proposed change did not deny or abridge the right to vote on account of race, color, or membership in a language minority group. using that tool, it -- from being implemented across georgia because they failed the statutory test. if georgia had still been covered by section 5, it is likely that s.b. 202 would never have taken effect. we urge congress to restore this invaluable tool. i will now turn the podium over to kristen clarke, who will tell you more about our filing in the united states vs. georgia. ms. clarke: thank you, attorney general garland. two weeks ago, you made clear that the department will spare no effort to protect voting rights in this country. as you and i have discussed on many occasions, the civil rights division stands on the front lines of this work. while it is the honor of a lifetime to lead the division charged with uph

we want to respect what cops do, we want to respect the hacked -- respect the fact that they have bravery, but when you have some thing like this, you don't flinch because the badge does not insulate you. joshua: one of the things that came up repeatedly, particularly in the prosecution, listening to jerry blackwell, listening to steve slusher, in a number of their statements, the opening and closing, they tried to build the case on the facts and not about making a point. it was not a black lives matter prosecution. it was, these are the facts, we should find him guilty. you had to feel the pressure at some point -- not the pressure, the desire from the public to throw the book at derek chauvin. i think there are a lot of people who said, 22.5 years is more than the minimum, it is not what you asked for, but it is reprehensible for police. throw the book at him. how do you reflect on the sentence? are you satisfied? >> satisfied does not capture what is going on with me. i will tell you this. until we end excessive force by state actors against a discrete and insular group of people who a

and respect very much indeed. ., ., minister. yes he did promise to to revolutionise _ minister. yes he did promise to to revolutionise the _ minister. yes he did promise to to revolutionise the devolution, - minister. yes he did promise to to revolutionise the devolution, if. revolutionise the devolution, if that's the right phrase was up give more power to the counties than just the big cities and encourage

follow u- we should be respectful. go again. follow up their _ we should be respectful. go again.s. ~ , , ., follow up their equipment no worries. g , ., ., , ., worries. my question now is for harry kane- _ worries. my question now is for harry kane. your _ worries. my question now is for harry kane. your feelings i worries. my question now is for harry kane. your feelings for i worries. my question now is for. harry kane. your feelings for the game against... riff harry kane. your feelings for the game against. . ._ harry kane. your feelings for the game against... of course. they are two amazing — game against... of course. they are two amazing defenders. _ game against... of course. they are two amazing defenders. they - game against... of course. they are two amazing defenders. they have i game against... of course. they are i two amazing defenders. they have had -reat two amazing defenders. they have had great experience over their careers in big _ great experience over their careers in big matches. obviously i have been _ in big matches. obviously i have been worth it enoug

i respect him. i respect his service. he was early on the truth of see covid for what it is.he basis of it. he made motions to push the fda for a faster approval process. all right. so, don't lump everybody in together. all right? doctor, thank you for being back on the show. >> hey, chris. you know i ask myself the same question, why am i back on your show. but, look it's important to get the message out there. this is a disease that has evolved significantly. it is a bad disease, the delta variant is real. and it is hurting people. the good news is if you've had even moderna or the pfizer vaccine, maybe the j&j plus a booster shot, you are well protected against serious illness and death from the delta variant. and i think that's the message that people need to hear tonight. the choice is yours to be sure. i'm not a fan of mandates. i think mandates drive oppositional behavior. we certainly saw that in texas when the governor mandated the hpv vaccine and had a lot of resistance to it. and to this day i don't think there's been the uptick there should have been. but, look, e

it is really a lookahead, in many respects.a remarkable achievement for a authoritarian leninist party like itself, but in many ways this is the chance for xi jinping to underscore his message to china and the world that china is entering a new error under his leadership, and that we should come to expect them to remain in power, and his demands for respect and even approbation that he wants all of us to try and secure for him and the party. the party, as china itself has changed quite dramatically since its founding years ago. you have been watching it throughout your entire career. what would you say are the ideologies and principles that still remain from when it was founded? 0f founded? of those that still remain, i guess the single most important one is that the party has always been a leninist style party, that is to say central control of a self appointed elite, which claims to have some sort of special vision or understanding about the historical tides, understanding about the historicaltides, overwhich understanding ab