please commissioner bito bito. >>. >> i want to thank deputy director gaspard for the added information and also , didn't give her credit for some of the deep dives that we talked about on the dvr report so thank you for that. >> thank you commissioner moss. >> no questions at this time, thankyou for all your work . >> commissioner summer. >> i had one quick question about the site plan review you mentioned the announcements , it's the choice at this point. of people can choose whether they wish to electronicor paper . >> i was curious if there's going to be any changes to the and maybe this is to in the weeds but to requirements for papers are slightly different. will there be any changes in considered for paper submittal to sort of matchup with what's required for electronic or do you have to likethat kind of stuff.i don't know if there's any alignment . for those things. >>. >> billy, do you have something in here. >> my understanding is that everything's electronic so there's norequesting anything . but i think at a certain point we finally developed something after deciding parties

. >> clerk: okay, next, commissioner bito. >> commissioner bito: i don't have any comments at this time. >> clerk: commissioner moss? >> commissioner moss: no comments. thank you. >> clerk: commissioner sommer? >> commissioner sommer: i was curious and sort of trying to follow the timeline of events and all that -- this particular appeal is regarding the initial plans that showed a basement when the staff went out to the site and there was no basement. my question was, did the original plans -- and maybe this is for d.b.i., did the original plans indicated that there was a basement existing that was being remodeled? so it was already a livable space? >> no. so this is actually a detached garage with a crawl space. and the plans they submitted originally, they were alleging that there was already a basement in some areas. which there were not a basement it was just a crawl space. >> commissioner sommer: right. but it was -- i see -- so you're just saying that it was shown as a basement. i guess was it shown as habitable? or was there renovation to be habitable? >> it was not showing as h