we hear bryce johnson _ and so on. yes, that's right. we hear bryce johnson is _ and so on.atl and so on. yes, that's right. we i hear bryce johnson is raging at the hear brycejohnson is raging at the relatively low uptake rates of vaccinations amongst the bunks —— the youngsters. so if you compare that to the over 50s, 95% of the over 50s have it least one jab for 18 to 24—year—olds, it's a 68%, slightly higher for those in their 20s. what we are seeing in this new initiative by the government is rather than really trying to persuade youngsters to come forward by pointing out that they are going to be missing out on a whole load of fun, basically. they will see billboards and social media campaigns telling them that you on this out on the good times. we can see those billboards and snap chats, tick tax, it will be interesting to see if that has an impact. i think it will because alongside the threat of if you want to go to a nightclub, you have to have two jabs. i think that will really have an impact rather than trying to persuade people to getjabbed by offering them free

credit— minister eric, because bryce johnson credit with _ minister eric, because bryce johnson credit credit with the european union is zero, _ credit with the european union is zero. zero — credit with the european union is zero, zero points. _ credit with the european union is zero, zero points.— credit with the european union is zero, zero points. jeffrey, at some oint, zero, zero points. jeffrey, at some point. the — zero, zero points. jeffrey, at some point, the taliban _ zero, zero points. jeffrey, at some point, the taliban are _ zero, zero points. jeffrey, at some point, the taliban are going - zero, zero points. jeffrey, at some point, the taliban are going to - point, the taliban are going to insist that they are not just a de facto government, they are the legitimate government. how ready do you think the international community, not least the the white house will be to recognise them? two oints house will be to recognise them? two points here- — house will be to recognise them? two points here. let's understand this attack was not the taliban, it was isis k, as you noted,

i getting from joe biden and bryce johnson? ., . , getting from joe biden and bryce johnson?ves of threats from iss. there is a run on the banks. the united states has frozen literally all of the country's reserves. so i do think we have a limited amount of leverage that can be used to facilitate getting people back to that airport once it's functioning. getting the taliban to agree to allow foreign country is, capable foreign countries to control that airport for a while and to keep the board there is at least somewhat open. look, best case scenario that taliban government says and tries to do some of the right things for a while and you are still going to have a fanatical taliban soldier or slipping people. i recognise that. but i it is also objectively true that there will still be avenues for these good people to come out, and while i disagree with some of the decisions that the biden administration has made, i absolutely believe in the sincerity of their commitment to stay at this until thatjob is done. and of their commitment to stay at this until that job is done.— unt

probably would've been of a wasted trip had brycejohnson finally would've been of a wasted trip had bryce johnsonn giving the coca jam. we talked quite a lot about this in the last review on the front of your paper. you know, it is, again, it's a big operation, this, and there will be those who wonder how necessary it is. �* , those who wonder how necessary it is. �*, ., ,, those who wonder how necessary it is. it's obviously a question which has been causing _ is. it's obviously a question which has been causing a _ is. it's obviously a question which has been causing a lot _ is. it's obviously a question which has been causing a lot of - is. it's obviously a question which has been causing a lot of people. is. it's obviously a question which l has been causing a lot of people for a while. the two sides are on the one hand children aren't particularly at risk from covid, very, very few children have died or been seriously ill from covid. and there is obviously a tiny risk associated with getting the jab, so you are waiting up these tiny risks and some scientists will come down on one side, and s

joining me is bryce dodi, the senior portfolio manager and hue johnson from hugh johnson advisers i havehose name is hugh, so i'm biased that way, but let me start with you. you said to our producers you thought stocks, despite the record high we saw at the end of the week last week were still undervalued. how is that possible given delta and given the fed tapering on the horizon? how is it that you look at that and you say it's still undervalued. >> if you're talking about delta, there's certainly risks in the market. what we've seen this year is pretty straightforward every step of the way we've had a rise in stock prices you become a little concerned about valuation. the next thing you see along with the rise in stock prices is an increase in the consensus estimate for what earnings are going to be for this year as well as next year. so what you have this year is upward revisions to earnings this is very much, eamon, very much of an earnings driven market every time you get a move-up in stock prices you get a move-up in the consensus expectation for learnings. they're going in lock st