well, talking to me earlier here on our team, political analyst chris bambrick says the face of the choice between france and britain, the united states will always take the brits. this new trillion is very clearly. i know what you build up in the pacific nuclear submarines which banks what somebody's going to be on with cool aim to try it out. and i think france and germany got cold feet over this face or rather obscene from the face organization concerned with protecting western europe in the north. the one thing i did was in the co post 945 cold war dorothy long gone. britain is over a little bit more frustrated over that with the, with more special. i don't exaggerate the special relationship based for the choice to friends in britain. i think it is because those are the brits taliban has appointed an african delegate to the united nations, even though the new and still have one in place from the previous administration. the movement says that it's alerted the body secretary general at the change, but i guess the report next from cobble the united nations now faces an incredibly diffic

but as i miss christ, bambrick says that face of the choice between france and britain, the us would always take the breadth this new trillion time is very clearly. i know what you build up in the pacific nuclear submarines is big. what the submarines are going to be on way? clearly a china and i think france and germany got cold feet over this phase or has rather change in the organization concern with protecting western europe in the north. that one thing i did was in the cold post 945 cold war dorothy long gone. britain is over a little bit more prostate, all with the, with the, with more special. i don't exaggerate the special relationship based with a choice in france and britain. i think it is always the brits, the thought about as appointed and have gotten delegate to the united nations even though the un still has one in place from previous administration. the movement says, alerted the body secretary general, all the change. more garcia, report from global the united nations now faces an incredibly difficult decision because any choice that they make is fraught with politica

in favor of good relations with russia, i would like to speak now live to political unless chris bambrick appreciate you joining me this evening. chris. so the way you approach is to me the seems a little bit call before the horse, the vote decided that what they're going to do, if there is an offense, normally it still the way around how you interpret while they're doing degree that you normally do when we wait on reports, international observers, you observe and saw and you go and one or 2 they went action, they would come back report. and if there was any wrong doing or anything that was on toward then they might of those might take action. in this case tuesday, and they've taken the action worse for being cast and anyone knows how the actions are going to run. so as you rightly say, this is putting the cart before the horse so the question then is why do this? what's the motivation? because many people in russia could interpret that as being quite an aggressive move. i think they could see it as an aggressive move. i think that is because more and more the european union is falling be