where do cooperatives fit in? we recently announced a climate smart partnership initiative which is designed to equip and finance large-scale demonstration and pilot projects where we can learn more about what agriculture and forestry practices can create, but results can develop from the right approach to land, and farming, and forestry. and in doing so, create data to create climate smart commodities which will be a value added commodity in the marketplace, and will allow farmers of all sizes to be able to participate in these demonstration projects, and qualify for ecosystem market credits, whether a carbon credit or wildlife credit, or whatever it would be. it is an opportunity to work with you and your cooperative, to encourage farmers of color to come together on a large-scale project, to provide the technical assistance and financial resource that will enable them to take risks and chances on their land without incurring costs, and then reap the economic benefit, and learn how to create these new climate sm

is more friendly so we can cooperate, so we don't agree will just cooperate on issues where we havea shared interest, if you are doing what we're doing in taiwan and hong kong and trading everything else. that is its current position, and so we should try to change that and we should engage them in the hope of changing their minds, and it might change next year after the 20th party of congress but we also need to be ready that if they don't change their mind, that we can tackle these shared problems without their full anticipation in cooperative endeavors. i'm not saying we shouldn't try. i'm saying we should try but we also need to be ready that if the future and is what the current answer is. >> you chronicle very well in your book how u.s.-china relations under trump nosedived really significant after trump realizes this pandemic isn't a hoax, that it really is going to necessitate a a shutdown, unle down in the u.s. and, therefore, his reelection hopes are in jeopardy. at that point onwards the china hawks basically who had been argued but not always winning in the white house,

that's cooperation. that kind of free joining and leaving when we agree and disagree doesn't happen with coercion. and so consequently, if you get the right people in government who have the right idea about community standards, you must have a decent society. however, the odds of that happening are very low. what's more likely is that you'll get people in power whose ideas of community standards deviate significantly from yours and now they've got the power to use force to enforce what they perceive to be community standards. >> what do you do at duquesne university? >> i'm a professor of economics, so i teach economics. my specialty is statistical analysis, but i spend a lot of time writing op eds, we have a podcast, words and numbers, which i encourage you all to listen to, and we talk about the application of economic thought to current events. so, for example, in the book we have a chapter on the knowledge problem. the knowledge problem says, simply, look, a single person can't contain in his or her

: i'm anderson cooper.♪♪ we'd be closer to the twins. change in plans. at fidelity, a change in plans is always part of the plan. ♪ say it's all right ♪ ♪ say it's all right, it's all right ♪ ♪ have a good time 'cause it's all right ♪ ♪ now listen to the beat ♪ ♪ kinda pat your feet ♪ ♪ it's all right ♪ ♪ have a good time 'cause it's all right ♪ ♪ oh, it's all right ♪ i'm still wowed by what's next. even with higher stroke risk due to afib not caused by a heart valve problem. so if there's a better treatment than warfarin,... i want that. eliquis. eliquis reduces stroke risk better than warfarin. and has less major bleeding than warfarin. eliquis has both. don't stop taking eliquis without talking to your doctor as this may increase your risk of stroke. eliquis can cause serious and in rare cases fatal bleeding. don't take eliquis if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. while taking, you may bruise more easily... or take longer for bleeding to stop. get help right away for unexpected ble

-eu cooperation? >> i think what is important in all cooperation on the political level, it is also trying to involve the private sector. there is a big difference from the point of view from every administration and the people who are really in the business. the involvement from the private sector is really crucial for the success of the corporation. this is one thing. the other thing is i think what is also important, to create the same or similar standards or understanding of certification standards on the eu and u.s. side. from the private sector perspective, creating different kind of certification standards in eu or u.s. will be a difficulty, because sometimes you need to be certified in eu for some standard, nus for a different standard, and so on. so the same or similar standards or even creating -- on a national level will help is this to provide services across the globe. >> thank you. we need to remember, and all of you have touched on the point of maturity. the internet itself was only com

>> gates: i hope not. >> cooper: why do you hope not?>> gates: i am a strong believer in institutions, whether it's the intelligence community, the defense department, the state department, the justice department, the f.b.i. he disdains institutions. and, and i think he did a lot to weaken institutions. >> cooper: you called him a thin-skinned, temperamental, shoot from the hip and lip, uninformed commander-in-chief. too great a risk for america, you said. >> gates: i would not edit that at all. ( laughs ) >> cooper: what do you think the greatest threat to democracy is in this country right now? >> gates: the extreme polarization that we're seeing. the greatest threat is found within the two square miles that encompass the white house and the capitol building. >> cooper: when you watched the insurrection on the capitol, what did you think? >> gates: the attack on the capitol was the first time armed enemies of democracy had been in the capitol since the war of 1812. i mean, seeing somebody parading through the capitol carrying a confede

they don't believe that the lack of cooperation is a problem. they created this narrative for domestic consumption that there's a conspiracy against them and they have seen this opportunity that they believe the west-- i just don't think we see that she don't see as far as we can tell it's been reported dialogue, we don't see this consideration that it was a huge error or a major mistake and that in the same way you do here, so you know i would hope they would have a period of reflection on how to handle the pandemic but i think it's more likely for domestic audience that they cross this line that they handled it very well and we are over 650,000 dead now in the united states and more or about the same in europe. >> we only have a few minutes left, so let me go to a question of my own which is what your prediction is for this pandemic? by when do you think-- it sort of a two-part question, when do you think it will be basically over and become endemic and cease to be a pandemic. also, short time to answer a big question but what are the longer-t

a social club for cooperative venture, your friday night poker game is a cooperative venture. families are in large part a cooperative venture cooperation is this form of organization by which we come together voluntarily agreedto do things . as we started this book are intent was to say look, collaboration is good , coercion is bad and that'sthe story . and the book proceeded along those lines until we got to the last chapter and the last chapter just wasn't fitting. things didn't fit together and we realize this is not the story of cooperation, good coercion back. rather it's a story of faced with all sorts of problems, we have these two tools in front of us, cooperation and coercion. most problems cooperation is the appropriate tool. butthere are some problems they tend to be limited but there are some problems for which coercion is the appropriate tool. once we came to that realization that these are 2 tools and the trick is to apply the right tool to the right problem the book all came together into some nice uniform flow . but you're correct, what we end up with his gove

most of them focus on cooperation, transatlantic cooperation. how things are working? how the collaboration is working? so after we hear from sebastian about -- we will turn to those aspects, sÉbastien, if you want to close this out on how? >> first of all the private sector incentivize themselves, it's the cybersecurity it's connected to the business. it's easy, this is easy, it's really connected to the business the private sector will inject money to be cybersecurity. if not, we have to create some mandatory requirements but after that they have to be some penalty. the penalty, similar to the gdpr idea. so it has to be very high penalty for not complying with those requirements. of course, of the how other side, i see in compliance. it's not the same as the security, or cybersecurity of the company. so after the requirements and i.t. compliance, or oh t and i.t. as complaints, they have to become external. let's think government, or third parties, to verify if those requirements are met not only on the paper, but in the real situation. so a lot of companies that hav

>> i think we already have the cooperation. of course, there are some economic interests both from eu side and the u.s. side, and you know, the most controversial discussions runs to cloud computing and cloud service providers where we have discussions around the consideration for the service providers and our argument is of course, we should not forget about transatlantic with the u.s. and so the position is we should not to develop two categories of providers, like trust from the u.n. and trust in eu-- talking about eu, i would reefer to what was achieved by eu-u.s. trade and technology counsel during the first meeting, and the declaration that was signed on the 29th of september so a fresh document. 10 working groups and of course, they will cover areas like secure supply chains and very important, of course, for us. of course, investment screening and technologies security and competitiveness. so, some regulations and some, i believe, in outcomes from this working groups came to create the good foundation for close cooperat

cooperation. >> i think what's important in all cooperation is also trying to involve the private sector because there is a big difference from the point of view of people who are really in it. the involvement of the private sector is crucial for the corporation. it's about understanding the certification standards on the eu and u.s. side. from the private sector perspective, creating these kinds of standards in the eu or u.s. will be as difficult as can be. so using the same horse similar methods or even working at the national level will help businesses to provide services. >> thank you. we need to remember, the internet itself was only commercialized. if you are going to measure the horn in the crucial part, it might not even be a decade ago. it's a very new problem. we've talked about three things that might help-y, vehicles for cooperation internationally. we've talked about incentives in the private sector and how to blend measures, and we've also highlighted the point that while everyone is doing quite well, there's still a lot of room to improve. we didn't get a chance to talk. o

cooper 360.w this. this is a red letter night. this is anderson cooper's tenth appearance on "the late show." ( cheers and applause ) >> jon: that's amazing. >> stephen: yeah. he gets a free hoagie. ( laughter ) i got to punch his card. remind me to punch his card before he leaves, else it's not valid. can't give him the sandwich if he leaves. it's the weekend. you or anybody else in the band got any gigs coming up? >> jon: global citizens fest. >> stephen: oh, yeah! this weekend! >> jon: yes. >> stephen: i remember that thing. >> jon: yes. >> stephen: who all is playing. >> jon: we all are. >> stephen: who else will you be playing with other people or are you going to do your own set. >> jon: we're going to do our set, performances with cindy lauper, leslie kara, chris martin. >> stephen: wow. >> jon: i think there's a great intro we're actually creating with people all across the world playing at the same time. >> stephen: on the great lawn. >> jon: great lawn. >> stephen: central park. >> jon:

inter-pacific region and our willingness cooperate. i would like to thank pres. biden in this respect for this decision. it is about coordination in the fight against terrorism and in particular, the presence of help with many of our european and international partners and pres. biden over the past two weeks made some fundamental decisions that benefited our armies and these are very much the embodiment of his support. we acknowledge from bilateral partnerships, the nuclear sector, the space industry, and of course the most advanced technology and we want to have some cooperation -- extended couple up -- cooperation on regulations as well. then we will continue to work together on the main international issues -- climate change, the digital sector, health, which will be on the agenda of the g20. it will also have discussions on control, which remains a key issue. this is at the heart of our work over the past two weeks but we will discuss today. these are very concrete decisions being taken to support initiatives and actions on all of

russian foreign minister sergey lavrov says nato is not interested in cooperation nato . >> nato is notnterested in equitable dialogue and joint work. if that is the case, we don't see the need to keep returning that changes in the foreseeable future are possible, because nato has already stated about the impossibility of such changes. hashem: germany's foreign minister heiko mass, says russia's move will pose further serious strain on relations. >> that makes everything even tougher, and things are already difficult. in recent years, germany has repeatedly pushed for dialogue within russia over the past years. we have often convened the nato-russia council to show that we are in dialogue. this will prolong the difficult situation we're in. this frosty period that's been going on for some time and i think that especially within nato where there are military questions and where there are security questions that is anything but helpful. this will put a further serious strain on relations. hashem: several disputes have frayed ties between nato and russia and some have led to sanctions. mos

so far, they have been fairly cooperative, i think, with congress. we do need it to work on some key components. that is why many of us have done work in the last few years on reimagining the state department. what does the state department look like for the next 10, 20 years, and so forth? to answer your question, which i hope they will work with us on, is making sure it is not just reimagining the department, but we start taking affirmative steps to rework the department. diversity is one of the issues, but doing a better job in terms of retaining people, in allowing folks who are in midcareer to also join the state department, not because we want to allow outside people to automatically leapfrog any of the well-qualified candidates at the state department, that i think you have to allow some way for folks to come in who did not start at the beginning. different ways we can reorganize the state department to make sure it is completely modernized for the time we are in. aude: thank you, and that is very important. and you have been an advocate for d

>> he's been cooperative. i'm not sure about his present whereabouts. [ inaudible question ] >> i won't talk about the specifics of that. that's still being investigated. >> just for clarity, was there multiple rounds in that weapon? >> cando you have more informat about when charges will be filed? >> i'll stay away from a timeline. there are several individuals who need to be interviewed, and from those interviews comes new information that can be used, so i don't want to put a timeline on it. we're working diligently, our investigative team is, to wrap this up thoroughly and completely, so there is no timeline. we want to get all the facts, get all the statements and present that to the district attorney's office for review. >> can you confirm you've interviewed hanna gutierrez reed and the assistant director dave halls? >> we have. >> do you expect to bring in either of those two? >> as questions come up, other information comes to light, there may be follow-up interviews, so i would suspect that we would w

security cooperation. one that will see us working as equal partners in defining and tackling share priorities. one that seeks to address the root causes of the security challenges that we face, including an equity corruption. impunity, and one that does that. not only by modernizing law enforcement, but also strengthening public health, rule of law and broader based economic opportunity. there are 3 pillars to this framework, which i just want to very briefly describe. the 1st is protecting the health and safety of the people of our nations. often in the past, we've tried to do this by relying too much on security forces into little and other tools in our kit. of course, law enforcement has a critical role to play in reducing homicides and other serious crimes. but it's efforts have to be mentioned by investments in going you can on the opportunity, particularly for underserved communities in regions. that happens to be a central focus of the high level of economic dialogue that we launched a few weeks ag

so we are happy with the cooperation. on the other hand, while i see that the western european countries make much bigger deals with china than we do. so whenever western europe leaders meet the chinese leadership, they're always contracts to an extent of tens of billions of euros or dollars being signed. so please do not portray us as if we were the only ones who wants to build a good cooperation, be china, oil rock and i'm most of the local countries do it, especially the big western european ones now and on the statement. you know, i think europe in union should not make itself ridiculous, but you make yourself ridiculous when you pass resolutions on the same issue in a very unsuccessful manner. so we have baz 8th 8 resolutions on china in the recent one or 2 years. always with the same result which was 0. so my question was that isn't really the foreign policy of european union that novel issue, the 9 statement on the same issue without any kind of, without any kind of outcome. so i said let's, let's me more some digi

and then the areas we can cooperate in. i feel like we are getting closer but i still don'tar feel like we are fully there. >> do youha think that in some cases the united states might have to modulate its rhetoric in some ways or is this an issue where standing up on human rights where we do have such strong differences is an absolute and any other way would be a disappointment and fall short of our values to the country? i think we have to lead with our values. this freedom, democracy and protecting human rights, so we shouldn't waiver. we negotiate and have conversations with them then obviously we try to do what it takes to get them to move in a humane direction but in terms of the public posture and standing up for our values to the world, we need to do that. >> the right way to frame the relationship is strategic competition. do you think that is the right framework and if it is, what do you think that winning looks like? >> that is a great question. let me just dig through it. dealing with the world's largest economi

and so far they've been fairly cooperative, i think with congress. but we do need to work on some key components. that is why many of us have done work in the last few years on reimagining the state department. what is the state department look like forne the next ten -- 20 years and so forth? so to answer your question what i would hope they would work with us on is making sure it's not just reimagining the department but we start taking affirmative steps to rework the department. diversity is one of the issues. doing a better job in terms of retaining people and allowing folks in midcareer to join the state department. not because they want to have outside people leapfrog of the qualified candidates of the state department but i think you have to allow some way for folks to can men who did not n necessarily start there at the beginning. so different ways we can reorganize the state department to make sure it is completely modernized for the times we are in. lex thank you i found that very important. so how would we go about doing that? are there an

that's the scenario where there is cooperation. i think there are lots of areas where there's competition or where there's disagreement. semiconductors is another ttc working group. u.s. is now investing i think the chips act money is not appropriated yet, but if it is, i think the u.s. is going to invest around 50 billion in domestic manufacturing in semiconductor r&d. europe has now said, we want in on that, so we also want to invest tens of billions. those companies find the same market so there's competitive element there for sure as the u.s., or the eu doesn't want to be dependent on the u.s. for its semiconductor manufacturers supply chains. that's an area of competition, talent is an area of competition, too. we have canada advertising with big billboards in silicon valley saint if you have h-1b problems, visa problems, come to canada. we are very open, we have low taxes. that campaign has been running for many years and having a lot of success. the u.s. says we want to cooperate on talent with other countries but that often

cooper, i inform the house that mr. cooper will vote yes on h.r. 2379.peaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by congress member napolitano, i inform the house that congress member napolitano will vote yes on h.r. 239. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from indiana seek recognition? mrs.walorski: as the member designated by mr. baird of indiana, i inform the house that mr. baird will vote yes on h.r. 2379. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from florida seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. wasserman schultz, i inform the house that ms. wasserman schultz will vote yes on h.r. 2379. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. crenshaw of texas, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. crenshaw will vote yes on h.r. 2379. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> as th

it is very beneficial for us to have good cooperation with china. we could increase our trade, our export by 50 percent during the 1st half of the year last year, china brought the most investments to hungary representing high technological standards on the high rate of added value. so we are happy with the co operation. on the other hand, while i see that the western european countries make much bigger deals with china than we do. so whenever western european leaders meet the chinese leadership, there are always contracts to an extent of pencils, billions of euros are dollars being signed. so please do not portray us as if we were the only ones who wants to be of the good cooperation, be china, oil rock, and most of the ro can countries do it, especially the big western european ones. now on, on the statement, you know, i think europe in union should not make itself ridiculous, but you make yourself ridiculous when you pass resolutions on the same issue in a very unsuccessful manner. so we have baz 8th 8 resolutions on china in the recent one or 2

now, each one of these four individuals is either not cooperating or cooperating on different levels. so it's important that we need to look at each one on its own merits. but right now, the committee's made it clear, they are not going to wait around to move to criminal contempt if they feel it's necessary. anderson. >> ryan nobles, appreciate it. thanks for more now on what happens if and when the committee tries to impose consequences for noncompliance, we are joined by cnn contributor, garrett graft. also, elie honig. so, elie, i want to ask you about those subpoenas in a minute. but just regarding the news from kaitlan collins that the white house formally rejected the request to assert executive privilege. absent an intervening court order. do you think this will end -- ultimately, end up with a -- a -- a -- you know, a legal fight? >> i do think it will, anderson. this move by the biden administration puts donald trump in a very tough spot. now, trump has two options. one, he can do nothing and let it be which means 30 days from now, those documents go over to the committee. or

today, we're taking the historic step to deepen and formalize cooperation among all 3 of our nations, the u. k. australia and the us will be joined even more closely together, reflecting the measure of trust between us 2 junior nom de cpu. it's a huge disappointment, especially since 5 years of hard work went into that to ensure the proper implementation and smith running of this major contract. the contract was to fulfill a trailer request for 12 conventional attack submarines to read the rate that it was they request. so as trailer has gone back on his word and changed his needs to know, you know, an alliance means transparency. it means predictability. it means clarification. it means talking to each other, not hiding, especially on a central issues. so all this has not been forthcoming, and we will have to talk about it. why wasn't it forthcoming? it was quite the day for both presidents before this, meeting up the french embassy in the vatican for a manual mccolan. this the news coming out of france concerning a disgraced right wing politician who's accused of having being behind

we're here with anderson cooper.guys didn't have a copy of the book so i actually stopped at barnes and noble down the block as i was coming here [ laughter ] ran in, bought a copy and then came here. >> seth: that's so embarrassing. you bought your own book >> yes, i did. yes. [ laughter ] i -- i got a text on the way, like, " do you have a copy of the book with you because they don't have one?" i'm like, "what? like, i walk around with my book like a schmuck." [ laughter ] >> seth: did you -- did you find it right away? or do you have - >> i just happen to walk around the city like, "hey, anderson cooper's got a new book." >> seth: the worst would be if you walked around like this. [ laughter ] just, like, to make sure people saw it was you [ laughter ] this is your mom's side of the family >> yes >> seth: the vanderbilts >> yes >> seth: for those who don't know the history >> yeah, they -- this guy, commodore cornelius vanderbilt, made a ton of money in the late 1800s. he started with nothing and built a steamship

but as of yet rucker's has remained silent on what consequences if any, doctor cooper will face? so to have this saturday morning, any tax signed deal for wealthy in the us is called the richest man in the world under the collar. what have a look at what he's been saying to soft? ah ah join me every 1st bit on the alex simon. sure. well, i'll be speaking the guess will the world politics sport? business, i'm sure business. i'll see you then. ah ah, welcome back. now an american companies feeling the effects of pushing for diversity because a former employee has been awarded $10000000.00 in compensation after he was fired and replaced by 2 women as part of the company's diversity and inclusion program. they tried to say a trial that they fired him because 2 years before he had gotten sick during his speech and had to sit down and was embarrassing to the ceo. and he and he never recovered from it instead. and standing in that he was not adequately engaged in his work. all the, all the documentation showed that he was more than engaged and that he was delegating it parents as before

their cooperation.an to get cooperation out of these witnesses and that includes criminal contempt if it should come to that. the statement reads, quote, we will not allow any witness to defy a lawful subpoena or attempt to run out the clock and we will swiftly consider advancing a criminal contempt of congress referral. and the running out the clock part is a very important part of this equation. because to evans point, there isn't a lot of legal precedent for the arguments in a court of law and it is to benefit of the former president donald trump and his associates to throw as many legal barriers in the way even if their ultimately going to be unsuccessful because the select committee doesn't have enough time to adjudicate all of these matters and come to a swift conclusion ahead of the midterm elections next year. so their time frame is short. so the trump team could run out the clock as long as possible. and one other note i'll make, in the statement from the select committee there is one name that

but i think what it still shocked people about dr. cooper's words are the intense animosity she carries toward white people in the world. obsessed with c, r t and dismantling white privilege. it seems that on american campuses, at least, it has become acceptable to display outright racial prejudice against white people and blatant racism aside. what makes this whole situation even more shocking is the fact that rucker's is a public institution, meaning that dr. britney cooper salary of around $114000.00 per year is essentially paid for in part by tax payers. what american taxpayers, especially occasion, taxpayers really be happy to know that their money is going to fund a professor who is outright teaching her students to be prejudiced against them. this professor and all the woke alike of the problem. this generation not responsible for the behavior of their ancestor teaching history to point previous generation full to mass compensation from current generation. that is ridiculous. rutgers she should not be teaching this kind of hate to students do better. rutgers, this is the kind of

cooper has said about black people. white people showed up being raggedy and violent and terrible and trying to take everything from everybody that professor would be fired immediately and with good reason. but as of yet rucker's has remained silent on what consequences if any doctor cooper will face. meanwhile, for some diversity does come with a half price tag, because a man gets a $10000000.00 reverse discrimination pie from the hospital. he works full often. he was replaced by 2 women. we hear from his lawyer to stop to this oh, is your media a reflection of reality? ah, in the world transformed what will make you feel safer? hi, solution for community. are you going the right way or are you being led to somewhere? which direction? what is true? what is great? in the world corrupted, you need to descend, ah, so join us in the depths or remain in the shallows. so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have. it's crazy confrontation, let it be an arms race is on offense. very dramatic development. only p

and cooperate closely with him.- cooperate closely with him.e make one thing quite clear- cooperate closely with him. let me make one thing quite clear from i cooperate closely with him. let me | make one thing quite clear from the beginning. i would of course work very closely with sebastian kurtz, the head of the new people's party, the head of the new people's party, the largest party in parliament — parliament. anything else would be absurd in terms of democratic politics. moreover, i considerthe accusations to be false and i am convinced that at the end of the day they will turn out to be baseless. he was one of the eu's youngest leaders. he vowed to fight accusations against him and remains the leader of his party. mr�*s opposition fairies he will continue to call the shots. political observers say he has not gone far. sebastian is not gone. i think you could say this is a real resignation, it'sjust a halfway solution and his plan is to return as soon as possible. that solution and his plan is to return as soon as possible.— solution and

noting the difference between engagement and full cooperation. you know, the committee is hoping and the committee has not said that there is going to be any contempt charges just yet. and they have held off and they have given mark meadows and kash patel some more time to cooperate. and to come into be deposed. so, you know, they say that this is the most extreme case with steve bannon. and when the cooperation or the engagement starts and say that they are going to be willing to move in the same direction with mark meadows and kash patel, but they haven't reached that point yet. so they are hoping for potentially full cooperation from them. i don't know if they will get it though. >> and susan page, we both covered bill clinton in the white house and since. and we understand off of the white house gaggle with the reporters on air force one that president biden plans to call bill clinton later in the day. not surprising that he would be calling someone he knew so well, a fellow democrat in the hospital. but that is at least the word. but here yo

mister cooper?'m asking for clarification. >> my intention was it go until april 4 which is the last date of the term within our legal period. >> chair: so you all know the suggestion of april 15 is tax day. you're not ready tomeet on tax day i know . member pierce, i was under the impression itwas wednesdays . it's mondays . >> that was member lee. i can't do the third monday. i need clarification on what my next steps are because this effectively gives me. >> chair: i need help. >> there has been a motion now to set this regular meeting schedule on the first and third mondays at 6 pmwhich prevailed by 6 to 1 . if there was a motion to rescind that vote and seconded we would take a roll call vote on that and you would have reversed that action. >> chair: members, what's your pleasure? i don't feel comfortable votin anyone out of the meeting ? we need to get my, my suggestion is we get creative here . >> some members of the task force haveentered their names into the roster . member cooper. >> i apo

cooper will face. lauren check the wrap. it up this bulletin, so not sure what we're talking about. you'll find so much more l t o. com, but no reporting for moscow. it's kevin, are in for me, a great team on judy with me this saturday afternoon without the h q. thanks for watching. we'll hope you have a great rest of the weekend to ah, join me every thursday on the alex simon, sure. and i'll be speaking to guess in the world of politics, spoke business, i'm show business. i'll see you then. mm hm. we're allowing ourselves to be more efficient or quicker with our transactions . we can make mobile payments from are on the truth is that every device is a potential entry point for security attack. making sure, i think you got a meeting, but only eventually there's malware on thousands, maybe sometimes millions each day. they use the cyber, they use the technology. it's an extension of traditional crime. artificial intelligence has not many main threat. this is due to the 3 laws of robotics. one of the things that the mini cyber implants right now, i'd be where is it really worried abou

cooper had said about black people. white people showed up being raggedy and violet and terrible and trying to take everything for everybody that professor would be fired immediately and with good reason. but as of yet rucker's has remained silent on what consequences if any, doctor cooper will face for a while for some diversity does come with the asking price tag, because a man has received a $10000000.00 reverse discrimination pie from the hospital. he used to work full off to he was replaced by 2 women. one of the details on that on here from is roy to just off to the bright. ah ah, is your media a reflection of reality? ah in the world transformed what will make you feel safer? tice elation whole community. are you going the right way? where are you being live with? what is true? what is great? in the world corrupted, you need to descend. ah, so join us in the depths or remain in the shallows. ah, join me every thursday on the alex saline. sure. but i'll be speaking to guess in the world of politics, sport, busines