peter mccullough is here next. so what's going on? i'm a talking dog. the other issue. oh... scratching like crazy. you've got some allergic itch with skin inflammation. apoquel can work on that itch in as little as 4 hours, whether it's a new or chronic problem. and apoquel's treated over 10 million dogs. nice. and...the talking dog thing? is it bothering you? no... itching like a dog is bothering me. until dogs can speak for themselves, you have to. when allergic itch is a problem, ask for apoquel. apoquel is for the control of itch associated with allergic dermatitis and the control of atopic dermatitis in dogs. do not use apoquel in dogs less than 12 months old or those with serious infections. apoquel may increase the chances of developing serious infections and may cause existing parasitic infestations or pre-existing cancers to worsen. new neoplasias were observed in clinical studies and post-approval. most common side effects are vomiting and diarrhea. feeling better? i'm speechless. thanks for the apoquel. ahh, that's what friends are for. ask your veterinarian for a

joining me is doctor peter mccullough kindness, cardiologist, epidemiologist and harvey rish, epidemiologist, the rejection of clear science early on in this pandemic was so obvious to me as a non-medical professional because i have people like you guys and other smart people who are not political advising the angle. where are we now in all of this given what we know in true and untrue about what they said. >> we are following and ever building stories that natural immunity, robust, complete and durable and a september 17th issue of the british medical journal summarized in wonderful report that cdc estimates, 120 million americans have had covid 19. whether vaccinated or not they've had the real infection attempt durable immunity, that represents 44% of those ages 18 to 49. that large block has a negligible risk of covid 19, they can release their fear of getting the infection again. it doesn't happen in any significant risk, there's excess harm. that is a clear message americans to take home that natural immunity is the backstop of us getting out of the pandemic. >> what is being said in r

peter mccullough, yale school of medicine at the epidemiologist. dr. mccullough, the rejection of clear science early on in this pandemic, that was so obvious to me as a nonmedical professional because i have people like you guys and other really smart people who are not political advising the angle. where are we now in all of this given what we know is true and untrue about what they said? >> we are following in every building story that natural immunity is robust, complete and durable. in a september 17th issue of the british met medicine journal walk summarized in a wonderful report that using census in cdc asked, estimates, 120 million americans have know how to covid-19 and whether they are vaccinated or not they had at the infection, and they represents 44% of those ages 14 through 49. that large block has a negligible risk of covid-19 that they can basically release their fear of getting the infection again and it doesn't happen in any significant risk whatsoever and there are six studies now showing that if they are needlessly failed comic vacc

doctor peter mccullough here next. ♪ ♪ >> the regulatory process is regulatory process is underway toer 19 vaccines available for children age 5 to 11. i to take a moment to put this in perspective. there have been 745 deaths in children less than 18. >> as health officials rush to vaccinate kids and shame those who do not want to do so what about the actual numbers of child deaths. statistician emma wouldhouse looked at under the the cdc data and noticed something fishy. while the cdc claims there have been 750 deaths among the 0 to 17 cohorts the national center for health statistics shows just 558. while every single one of these fatalities is tragic, inflating the stats by 37%, why are they doing that? could have major policy consequences. the president's ability to unleash prosperity and doctor mccall a, why is the risk to kids being inflated? what point does this serve? >> two things. one, it keeps the fear narrative and control from the government a little bit longer but what is much more important at this point it justifies the bad decisions politicians and public health offic