sarah jacobs is joining us next. sarah jacobs is joining us next. bipolar depression.like i was trapped in a fog. this is art inspired by real stories of people living with bipolar depression. i just couldn't find my way out of it. the lows of bipolar depression can take you to a dark place... ...and be hard to manage. latuda could make a real difference in your symptoms. latuda was proven to significantly reduce bipolar depression symptoms and in clinical studies, had no substantial impact on weight. this is where i want to be. latuda is not for everyone. call your doctor about unusual mood changes, behaviors, or suicidal thoughts. antidepressants can increase these in children, teens, and young adults. elderly dementia patients on latuda have an increased risk of death or stroke. call your doctor about fever, stiff muscles, and confusion, as these may be life threatening... ...or uncontrollable muscle movements, as these may be permanent. these are not all the serious side effects. now i'm back where i belong. ask your doctor about latuda and pay as little as $0 for

. >>> with me the democratic congresswoman sarah jacobs of california. so good to see you. so earlier in the evening last night you were a holdout for voting yes on the bill. what changed your mind? >> you know, i have long said that we should do both bills together and that they go together as a single package that is the president's full agenda. as it became clear that we had the agreement to be able to pass the second bill, just not yesterday, i took the president at his word and his masterful leadership in getting us to where we were and i had conversations with my colleagues from across the caucus, from every end of the idealogical spectrum, and i was confident that if we got the bipartisan infrastructure bill passed last night, that we would have the votes in place to pass the build back better act next week when we're back from recess. >> i'm curious to know what was in those conversations, because while you're a member of the progressive caucus which vowed for weeks to not vote for the infrastructure bill unless the president's infrastructure -- spend spending bill

finally, congresswoman, -- congresswoman sarah jacobs. let's get it done, is what she tweet.otta put these on to see what's on the screen. ohio independent line. tim, thanks for holding. what's the new stork -- news story of the week for you? caller: desert storm and two days ago, congressman release and tim ryan of ohio -- congressman ruiz and tim ryan of ohio, that bill is to provide presumptive benefits for veterans who suffer for exposure. i happen to be one of those veterans. for decades, we have been trying to get the v.a. to provide us with health care, but the v.a. keeps telling us there is no scientific proof that these that should that this is what is making us sick and there are literally thousands of veterans sick and dying today from this exposure. every time we seem to get close to getting legislation passed even though it is bipartisan, republicans keep voting it down stating that it will cost too much to provide veterans with the health care not only that they erred, but that they deserved. host: thank you for calling and with that issue. we want to show you t

eric: that's california congresswoman sarah jacobs, a democrat, stressing the bipartisan nature of therastructure bill vote. six members of the progressive democratic so-called squad, they voted against it and only 13 republican house members backed it. our next guest was not one of them. he says it will cost american taxpayers just too much. congressman jay openopi, serves on the house budget committee. you're on the budget committee, that means you know budgets and the cost of things. we all have to do a household budget. what do you object so strongly about this bill? >> well, i think households across america are already suffering the effects of inflation. everything from the cost of commodities like bread and meat to the cost of gasoline, my constituents are paying over $20 more to fill the gas tank in their car to go to work than they were a year ago of everyone across america is feeling these effects. any economist will tell you that deficit spending is dangerously inflationary. that's why we're sew wary about enacting what will be the largest spending package in the history of

joining me now, california congresswoman sarah jacobs, a member of the house democratic steering and see you back on the broadcast. thank you for joining me. let's talk about the six of your progressive colleagues who voted against the bipartisan infrastructure bill. you voted for it, we should remind viewers. i want to start first with why you voted the way you did. >> well, thank you for having me back. for me, i had conversations with colleagues across our caucus, and i feel confident that when we bring the build back better act up for a vote, we will have the votes to get it passed, and i felt like getting the bipartisan infrastructure bill passed last night and giving the president that win was the best thing we could do to make sure that the build back better act actually ends up getting passed in two weeks when we get the final cbo score. >> and that makes sense your vote, but the democrats who voted no, do you understand why they did not, and do you support their actions? was there a message being sent? because six a lot different than one or two. >> look, i think each of us h

at some point targeting the presiding chair of the house sarah jacobs of california, a democrat who isaging the house floor right now. also a california congresswoman. so this has been really interesting to watch, but yes, he did beat house speaker nancy pelosi's record of 8 hours just a few minutes ago. >>> now, the plan is right now that the house will reconvene at 8:00. house democratic leaders say that they have the votes to pass the build back better act when they reconvene, which is major because now that means it will go to the senate, which is, of course, where all of the drama is expected to play out these next couple weeks as they try to get senator joe manchin of west virginia to sign on. he is the one senator that still has not offered his assurances for this bill, and democratic leaders need all democratic senators to support this bill so they can pass it using a process using budget reconciliation. take a listen to what senator joe manchin said as recently as yesterday. still voicing concerns for what this bill could do to inflation in this country. >> you haven't made a

i recognize representative sarah jacobs of california. sg you answered in last question that we should have left in afghanistan indefinitely. i wanted to ask you a quick question if you could answer yes or no so we could get to more because time is short. first is, do you believe the terror threat imnating from yemen is greater than in afghanistan at any point over the last 20 years? >> i have no way of measuring that. i think it's significant in both countries. >> okay. how about syria or somalia? >> again, like wise. i have no basis of knowledge in those countries. it's theoretical in those countries. >> my analysis is that the threats imnating are much more real than anything we have seen come out of afghanistan for the last 15 years recognizing that 20 years ago there was a horrific attack. i hope no one is suggesting a military intervention and nation building exercise. the reason i'm asking is i'm trying to understand why you believe that an indefinite continuation of this war is in the u.s.'s national interest. september 11th happe

jacob blake 7 times. my understanding that the rest of the joke is because they ran out of plus, sarah that jokes out therewith all of this. this is one of them. but i think this the rest of this show as it were suggests a. some sort of. racial bias number 7. is no longer on the chart. i just missed him. >> later in the day a witness testified that one of the shooting victims had tried to take rittenhouse's rifle away and lunged at the teen just before he was shot. rittenhouse's lawyers argued that he acted in self-defense if convicted, he could face life in prison. opening statements could begin tomorrow in the case against 3 white men accused of chasing and killing ahmaud arbery in georgia but controversy is already surrounding the proceeding said after 2 and a half weeks of difficult jury selection. the jury seated yesterday is made up of 11 white jurors and only one black juror. the jury pool comes from glynn county where more than a quarter of the population is black arbery an avid jogger was gunned down when the defendant's claim they thought he was a robbery suspect. >> time for another look at the

sarah, including from, if you could hear me, from high-profile renowned attorney ben crump for george floyd. >> he was also involved here in kenosha and on the ground for the family of jacob blake who was shot by a police officer and injured shot in the back several times. he has just made a statement on this case. and here is what he had to say. and i'm going to -- excuse me while i read this because it is -- i want to make sure it is accurate. he said that if you needed yet another example of the two justice systems at work in america, look no further than the delayed arrest and spectacle of a trial and acquittal of kyle rittenhouse. rittenhouse a self-declared white nationalist which is not true crossed state lines and unlawfully possessed an ar-15 and those details in court said he did not bring that across state lines. that ar-15 style weapon was inside of a home here in kenosha that his bought that ar-15 for kyle rittenhouse because he was too young to purchase a weapon because he was 17 at the time. but that was being held here in kenosha. now when he left after the shootings, he then got into -- there was some trouble there. but the truth of the matter is this is