i the board's executive director. we will be joined by representatives from the city department that will be presenting before the board this evening.

appeals to the board of supervisors. it's not intuitive to me that public appeal is an appeal to the public by the member of supervisors. do these amendments also apply to the san francisco community college district. >> clerk: your time has elapsed. >> caller: thanks. >> chairman: are there any other members of the public for this item number one. >> clerk: i believe that was our last public commenter. >> chairman: okay. public comment is closed and i would like to formally move the aforementioned amendments and continue this item as amended one week on that two-part motion, a roll call, please. >> clerk: yes, on the motion to amend the ordinance and continue the matter to december the 6th, [roll call] the motion passes without objection. >> chairman: we are adjourned. >> san francisco is coming back for real. the weather is all right. hi everybody. i'm san francisco mayor london breed and i'm glad to be here with all of you today at city hall. i know we come and we gather for so many different things, but today is an op

marcelo fonseca. >> i'd like to thank the board for continuing this. i know that the taxi medallion issue is complex. there are two issues for a taxi medallion. when i'm not driving my cab, yellow cab will lease it to another driver, so there used to be a compensation, a monthly compensation for the medallion. k medallions get zero at the moment, but there is also, if the medallion market ever picks up again, there is the option to sell the medallion, but i don't think that medallion will have a $250,000 value ever again. i just want to give you this information that there are two values to attach to a medallion. not much more to say. i just want to thank this board, especially president honda for your kind words, understanding that this is not the right time to make such a cruel decision. i know there's a lot for you to learn about the taxi industry. we take a lot of pride in what we do for a living, and it's very appreciated that you're looking at this very carefully. thank you. >> clerk: thank you. ronald wolter, you have three minutes. >> hi. this i

mayor and the board of supervisors. i take the position very seriously and spend a significant amount of time every month reviewing documents and talking to city staff and attending hearings. i'm proud of the work i have done at the board of appeals. i want to emphasize i take compliance with all the ethics and transparency laws seriously. and pay attention to whether i need to recuse myself. and i have requested guidance from the city attorney from numerous occasions and noted several times i have done work with the party's representative and recused himself from numerous matter from the years i have received income from the party within the prior 12 months. >> supervisor peskin: not to interrupt you, i think you mean myself, not himself. >> sorry, myself, correction, thank you chair peskin. since the mission local article appeared in october, i have started going through my records and reviewing videos from 2015 and 2017 meetings to determine if i should have recused myself on the matters. i believe i acted properly in

joe, staff, the board did fully implemented. the staff has been interviewing managers to help do that. so we've been modest in the application of leverage so far and you can see that in that it's point -- it's a very small amount. >> correct. the tools are there to measure their performance. >> yes. it's a huge difference. so there's two points. the premium we're getting it therefore it's a much more accurate comparison. we've been in real estate a long time, maybe it should be higher since we are now depending on how you want to count private credit. we are almost 50% ill liquid which 60/4 is liquid. great work by staff selecting partners and general managers. obviously he is a tremendous influence on how the managers, the allocation to and the managers found and funded in china. again, hats off to the contribution. thank you. >> president: thank you very much. is there anybody else? leona, is there anything else you'd like to share? >> commissioner: no. great performance. i've gone over it in detail and i concur with allen and

the city's database of nonprofit board members currently has over 600 nonprofits with contracts and the database with affiliates and subcontractors and board members contains over 33,000 entries. so this would be an implementation nightmare to include those folks. we do still have one concern with the legislation which is that it has an extremely broad definition of interested party which includes grass roots advocates and nonprofit volunteer board members. what happened is it includes anybody who attempts to influence legislative action. so the public official may not even know that somebody is attempting to influence, for example, if they attend a rally or send a tweet to their followers or sign a petition. so by expanding this so broadly, we get lots of people who make no sense in the context of behested payments and it will again be impossible to track. so we hope we can continue some conversations about expanding the exceptions to include advocates who have no financial or personal connection to a matter when they do things like sign the petition. thank you for considering that and

the board has put in that language. but the way that it works is that much like filing the initial appeal where there's notices of appeal form, there's also a notice for re-hearing form which is actually -- sonya correct me if i'm wrong -- i think that it's on the back of the notice of appeal form. and it cites to that standard. and then the appellant fills out the basis for the appeal. >> commissioner sommer: got it. >> when that comes before the board, the appellant basically has to make that showing, you know, there was some evidence that came to light that would have changed the outcome. and then it's -- based on that threshold showing that there's a basis to re-hear it, then the board at that point votes to allow the re-hearing and then it goes forward and then the appellant can present whatever additional evidence that the appellant believes that would have changed the outcome. >> commissioner sommer: okay, got you. thank you. awesome. that is it for my questions. i really appreciate your work on this and this is a

first of all, by the time were on the board, the reality these are complex organizations. d of barclays was a company that's been around for 360 years you take a step back and look at the historical context of these corporations, they found through wars, pandemics, good times and bad but managed to stay afloat. i think it requires open-mindedness, judgment complex issues to shift and do the job as a fiduciary the custodian of these important organizations so listening more than speaking i think is a key take away but also really appreciating by the time something appears on the board agenda, it means it's extremely difficult if it were easy, somebody else would have solved that. he knew about these issues in the broad perspective and not just ideological there's only one answer kind of way. >> it breaks down a couple of big issues. what they are and how they operate, ways for the future and the big issues playing out now. i want to first look at one thing you said, i'm going to read from your book. quote, the changing time is more indispensable than ever. how has that chang

we need to go through and match the board's actions, the mayor and board actions in the past with this reduced item of 3.25 to determine which line items within it require which threshold. >> president walton: supervisor mandelman? >> supervisor mandelman: so -- so six votes will approve part of the 3.2? and eight votes would approve all of the 3.2? is that the deal? okey-dokey. assuming the -- the vote now is on the continuance which defers the whole thing until january. and would that deferral would not change the required six or eight votes? >> president walton: to continue? >> if it continues to january, we're back to where we are now. >> president walton: but think at that point in the time the controller would figure out which is which. >> but we could vote on it tonight and figure it out between now and then. >> president walton: thank you, supervisor mandelman. >> supervisor safai: it sounded like the controller was going to say something through the president, sounded like -- supervisor mandelman captured what i was going to say, if we reject the continuance, and we vote in fa

public comment is in an opportunity for the board to hear from the community on matters within the board'sou reframe from using employee and student names. if you have a complaint about a district employee, you may submit it to the employee supervisor. board rules and california law do not allow us to respond to comments or title answer questions during the public comment time. if appropriate the superintendent will ask that staff follow up with speakers. item 2, comments from sfusd students. we will hear from sfusd students who wish to speak on any matter. students will have up to 15 minutes of the general public comment period and may also speak at any other public comment time. >> thank you, president lopez. please raise your hand if you are a student and speak on any time at this time. [speaking spanish] [speaking cantonese] >> thank you. hello, larry? >> caller: yes, can you hear me? >> are you a student? >> caller: no. i had my hand raised. >> any students who care to speak at this time? seeing no students. >> president lopez: this is a reminder students will get to comment throughou

the school board has a big responsibility. if the school board was operating as they should be, we wouldn't be here today. early on, the school district didn't listen. they didn't take the help from experts. i hope the san francisco unified school district starts to put politics aside. take advice from experts and consultants and govern better for our kids. i believe this children first initiative will help. it will move us forward helping our san francisco students be all right. to be clear, it's all about the children. thanks again for being a service for our kids. [applause] >> the hon. london breed: thank you to our parents for their compelling stories, and the reasons why we're here today, and at this time, i just really want someone who has been many, many years and who put kids first. although she's no longer on the school board, she cares about the children and is always actively engaged and providing feedback or historical information or institutional knowledge to help us move things forward in a positive direction, an

we need to go through and match the board's actions, the mayor and board actions in the past with this reduced item of 3.25 to determine which line items within it require which threshold. >> president walton: supervisor mandelman? >> supervisor mandelman: so -- so six votes will approve part of the 3.2? and eight votes would approve all of the 3.2? is that the deal? okey-dokey. assuming the -- the vote now is on the continuance which defers the whole thing until january. and would that deferral would not change the required six or eight votes? >> president walton: to continue? >> if it continues to january, we're back to where we are now. >> president walton: but think at that point in the time the controller would figure out which is which. >> but we could vote on it tonight and figure it out between now and then. >> president walton: thank you, supervisor mandelman. >> supervisor safai: it sounded like the controller was going to say something through the president, sounded like -- supervisor mandelman captured what i was going to say, if we reject the continuance, and we vote in fa

to address the board dial one, zero. make sure you are in a quiet location and mute any computers or tvs streaming the meeting. you will have two minutes to provide public comment and i will announce a 30 second warning and when time is up. introduction of new or unfinished business by board members. >> board members, are there items under new unfinished business? i see director lai has raised her hand. >> i want to acknowledge and thank staff for hyper linking the agenda now. that will help the public out in navigating the planning department. hiring status, director tumlin, i don't know if you have an update on the briefing about that? >> i don't. the hr division is overwhelmed dealing with return to work and vaccination requirements. i will need to check in with them once things are settled down and they are able to catch up on hiring recording. certainly by january. if january is okay, i know that would be doable. >> that would be great. thank you. thank you chair. >> any other items under -- yes, director yekutiel. >

public comment is in an opportunity for the board to hear from the community on matters within the board's jurisdiction. we ask that you reframe from using employee and student names. if you have a complaint about a district employee, you may submit it to the employee supervisor. board rules and california law do not allow us to respond to comments or title answer questions during the public comment time. if appropriate the superintendent will ask that staff follow up with speakers. item 2, comments from sfusd students. we will hear from sfusd students who wish to speak on any matter. students will have up to 15 minutes of the general public comment period and may also speak at any other public comment time. >> thank you, president lopez. please raise your hand if you are a student and speak on any time at this time. [speaking spanish] [speaking cantonese] >> thank you. hello, larry? >> caller: yes, can you hear me? >> are you a student? >> caller: no. i had my hand raised. >> any students who care to speak at this time? seeing no students. >> president lopez: this is a reminder students w

i'll entertain feedback from the board members. een two months since we've had to sit this long but are members willing to continue for the next presentation as well? >> yes. i would put the condition after the next presentation we entertain a hygiene break. >> that's okay. we'll call for agenda item number 11. >> thank you. this is agenda item number 11. an education and s.f. hsf update and discussion item and presented by s.f. hsf health plan. >> thank you. let me pull up the slide. good afternoon, commissioners. i'm a senior health planner and i'll be giving an update on population health strategy. it looks at social determinesate -- determinates of health. and for our agenda today i'll start by giving background and context to the population health and switch over and go to our approach and strategy and look at the work to date. and finally close the presentation and look ahead. the aims of this presentation are to serve as continued education and update to the board and to encourage discussion questions on the topic of populati

some of whom are now on the board of supervisors. i'm very proud to see. grown tremendously as a person in my work with lyric. i'm appreciative to the youth who have been part of lyric for the life experiences and future dreams they shared with me. in closing, i want to express my deepest gratitude to catherine, my wife of 30 years. for all communities, rest assured, you haven't seen the last of us. thank you. >> president walton: thank you so much, jody. [applause] congratulations, again, and thank you, supervisor mandelman for honoring such a worthy human being and our 2:30 special order is now closed. madame clerk, would you please go to item number 14. >> item 14 is ordinance to appropriate approximately $6.9 million from the general verve and approximately $5 million from other revenue for a total amount of approximately $12 million to the department of elections to support additional costs from unforeseen elections in fiscal year 2021-2022. mr. president, this item pursuant to charter section 9.113, this matter requires eight votes of all members of t

thank you to the tida board and directors. yeah, it's been a [indiscernible] doing things virtually as our fundamental lifeline. let me share something with you. it'll be myself and jamie brewster, our newest addition to the team, copresenting here. can you guys see this powerpoint? >> i do. >> all right. great. so definitely excited to talk about the new partnerships that we've been establishing for workforce development training and employment, but there'll be three parts to this presentation. i'm going to go start with an overview of what we're doing, our recent successes, and then jamie will take over around the 22 slide to talk about the future delivery of the program. this picture here, i hope you can see my [indiscernible] up here, you can see part of the employers and the union reps. you have to take a physical test for entrance into the union. they want to make sure you are physically fit to participate in the work and do it on an eight-hour day, so we usually do this, we subjugate one of the providers on the island do

we need to go through and match the board's actions, the mayor and board actions in the past with this reduced item of 3.25 to determine which line items within it require which threshold. >> president walton: supervisor mandelman? >> supervisor mandelman: so -- so six votes will approve part of the 3.2? and eight votes would approve all of the 3.2? is that the deal? okey-dokey. assuming the -- the vote now is on the continuance which defers the whole thing until january. and would that deferral would not change the required six or eight votes? >> president walton: to continue? >> if it continues to january, we're back to where we are now. >> president walton: but think at that point in the time the controller would figure out which is which. >> but we could vote on it tonight and figure it out between now and then. >> president walton: thank you, supervisor mandelman. >> supervisor safai: it sounded like the controller was going to say something through the president, sounded like -- supervisor mandelman captured what i was going to say, if we reject the continuance, and we vote in fa

i'm not aware of communications from the board besides chair gee. i will continue to the next item. directors, item 4 is board of directors new and old business. i'm not aware of any. i will continue to next item. item 5 is executive director's report. >> we're all thrilled that the congress approved and >> president breed: signed the long awaited $1.2 trillion infrastructure investment and jobs act. which provides a historic level of funding for infrastructure including transportation. with many of them available on annual basis for the next five years. these include capital investment grants, under the u.s. department of transportation. our federal advocates will join us in december to provide an update to funding opportunities that will be available to us. passage of this couldn't come at a better time. the package provides $23 billion for new start. which is double the amount provided in the program. lots of great stuff coming ahead. with funding split between federal and local shares of $10 million will be requesting the grant will advance certain design and programmatic managem

the board will accept any comment on any topic by using the address at the san francisco board of supervisors, 1 carlton b. goodlett place, room 204, san francisco, california, 94102 or by using the e-mail address sfbos@sf.org. interpreters will be available to assist the public beginning with the 3:00 p.m. special order. we will have two interpreters today, for chinese and spanish. and so finally to the public, if you are experiencing any trouble connecting to this meeting remotely, please call. we have a live person standing by in the clerk's office. that's 415-554-5184. that concludes my announcement. >> president walton: thank you. and just a reminder, colleagues, to please mute your microphone if you are not speaking. we'll go to the approval of minutes, and that's approval of the october 26, 2021 and november 2, 2021 meetings. i'll entertain a motion and a second. made by supervisor peskin, seconded by supervisor chan. >> clerk: on the motion to approve the minutes -- [roll call] >> clerk: there are ten ayes. >> president walton: thank you. without objection, the minutes will be approve

to address the board, dial 1, 0. make sure you're in a quiet location that you mute any tvs or computer streaming the meeting. it will reduce any echoes. you'll have two minutes to provide public comment otherwise noted by the chair. i will announce a 30 second warning and when the time is up. this places you on item number 6. introduction of new or unfinished business by board members. >> chair borden: i see several hands. i will go around the screen. director yekutiel. >> director yekutiel: director lai and i spent some time on the routes we'll be talking about today. where we received feedback from the public and see how they are going and what -- get our firsthand experience about these routes. i wanted to bring up for new business is, i imagine director tumlin will bring this up in his report. there's been a lot of news reports and also i received lot of frantic e-mails from small businesses with regards to their shared spaces and coming in compliance. i know we brought this up before. it might be time to have a

the school board has a big responsibility. school board was operating as they should be, we wouldn't be here today. early on, the school district didn't listen. they didn't take the help from experts. i hope the san francisco unified school district starts to put politics aside. take advice from experts and consultants and govern better for our kids. i believe this children first initiative will help. it will move us forward helping our san francisco students be all right. to be clear, it's all about the children. thanks again for being a service for our kids. [applause] >> the hon. london breed: thank you to our parents for their compelling stories, and the reasons why we're here today, and at this time, i just really want someone who has been many, many years and who put kids first. although she's no longer on the school board, she cares about the children and is always actively engaged and providing feedback or historical information or institutional knowledge to help us move things forward in a positive direction, and some

in other words on the board of the library, and you have somebody who's on the board of an oust that contracts with the fire department, you'd have to disclose because you shared a position with that person who serves on several different groups. i'm making a complete hack of this, but do you know what i'm talking about? >> i do. those are recent developments, and i just checked on the website, and that example is not on the website yet. right now, the form 803 only asks for basic information about the official who made the payment, who the payment went to, how much it was, a brief description. it does not yet represent the kind of information that you're talking about, but i know the fppc has been taking some disclosure actions for their payments with some of the things that you're describing. they also completed some new rules about donor advice funds, so i think they may update that form, and i will keep a close watch on that and let you know what happens. >> if we take this up in january, could you provide a brief memo on the state or federal requirements that impact how our peopl

the board of supervisors welcomes the public to remotely attend these board meetings on sfgov tv, on channel 26 or by viewing the live stream online. the most efficient way to participate and provide public comment is to listen from your touch phone which should be connected to the remote call-in system. throughout the meeting, the number is streaming on your screen. it is 1-415-655-0001. and when you hear the prompt, enter the meeting i.d. which is 2497 279 5481. press # twice and you will join as listener. you will hear the discussion and your line will be muted. once you're ready to get into the queue, press # and then beginning your comments. during item 1, that is the committee of the whole, where the board will consider whether or not to concur in the proclaiming of a local emergency. once the hearing is declared open, this will be your only opportunity to speak to the urgency of the drug overdose in the tenderloin. once that item is closed, the board will consider whether or not to concur. shortly thereafter, the president will open general public comment, which is item 3, wher

i want to make a motion to move item 12 to the full board with a positive recommendation. can i have a roll call vote, please. >> clerk: on the motion to move item 12 to the full board -- [roll call] -- . >> clerk: i think member mar is frozen again. >> supervisor mar: i'm here. can you hear me? [roll call] >> clerk: we have two ayes with vice chair safai absent. >> chair haney: great. this will go to the full board with a positive recommendation. mr. clerk, are there any further items before us today? >> clerk: mr. chair, that concludes our business. >> chair haney: great. meeting's adjourned. [♪♪♪] [♪♪♪] >> so i grew up in cambridge, massachusetts and i was very fortunate to meet my future wife, now my wife while we were both attending graduate school at m.i.t., studying urban planning. so this is her hometown. so, we fell in love and moved to her city. [♪♪♪] [♪♪♪] >> i was introduced to this part of town while working on a campaign for gavin, who is running for mayor. i was one of the organizers out here and i met the people and i fell in love with them in the neighborho

. >> clerk: welcome to the december 8, 2021 meeting of the san francisco board of appeals. president honda will be the presiding officer tonight. vice president rick swig is absent. also present is deputy city attorney brad russi who will provide the board with any legal advice this evening. we will also be joined by representatives from city departments that will be presenting this evening. corey teague, zoning administrator, and tina tam, deputy zoning administrator, and matthew green, senior building inspector with d.b.i. also present is chris buck, urban forester with san francisco department of urban forestry. the board requests that you silence or turnoff all phones or electronic proceedings so they will be interrupt the proceedings. appellants and respondents will be given seven minutes to present their cases. public comment will be limited to two minutes. for rehearing requests, the parties are listen three minutes each with no rebuttal. four votes are required to grant an appeal or to modify a determination or to grant a rehearing request. public comment is very imp

susan arnold will take over as chairman of the board of disney. we know that bob chapek will be officially reported to her. caroline: 14 years on the disney board herself, she's been at procter & gamble. here is a woman who knows the business world in particular. romaine: we will have to check the stats, but this is one of the few female chairmen of a s&p 500 company. with twitter and the rise of a lot of the indian-american, indian immigrant, and hopefully starting to see more gender diversity over at walgreens. caroline: on the list of 50, one of the key voices on the bloomberg 50 list is the new ceo of cvs, one of the most powerful female executives in the united states now. taylor: it is interesting with these changes we have seen. romaine: we are talking about walgreens, just to be clear. taylor: we talked about some of the big changes we have seen. we were talking about twitter. even the name changes with facebook into meta. some of the changes, founders and the longtime leaders pivoting to a new generation. romaine: this is a broader questio

i think it's rare when a legislative aide leaves that the entire board of supervisors feels it as strongly as the supervisor herself who is losing her chief of staff. it was so funny the other day, at the personnel committee, t.a., tilley said that losing amy is going to be one of the hardest things that happens to her this year. and i jokingly said, this is going to be hard for you? and then supervisor mandelman and peskin chimed in and said it's going to be hard for us, too. and i think that's a testament to how extraordinary amy is as a person, as a professional, as a brilliant life long housing rights activist, affordable housing developer, just person extraordinaire. when i hired amy over four years ago and i first called her up on the phone and asked her if she would ever consider working for me as a legislative aide, she immediately responded thank you so much, but no. and it wasn't until i put on the hard sell and really told her how much of a difference she could make at the local level around housing policy and land use, that she accepted and i think that was the best hire -- bei

mail send it to the san francisco board of supervisors number 1 carlton b. good place city hall room 244 in san francisco, california, 91402 or using the e-mail address bos at sfgov.org and interpretation will be invited to assist speakers with their language needs and we'll have the interpreters introduce themselves and the services they will provide to the public. this afternoon we have agnes li assisting in chinese and arturo casanza if your having trouble with the meeting call the clerk's office. we have a live person standing by to assist you to access this meeting. thank you, mr. president. that concludes my communication. >> supervisor: thank you, madame clerk. before we get started a friendly reminder, colleagues, please mute your microphones when you're not speaking. madame clerk let's go to our approval of the meeting minutes from the october 19, 2021 regular board meeting. i don't see anyone wishing to make changes so we'll entertain a motion to approve the minutes made by supervisor stefani seconded by supervisor preston. >> clerk: on the minutes

we will provide the board with any immediate legal advice today . i'm julie rosenberg for the secretary. we will be joined by representatives from the planning department, the zonin administrator and commissioner janet deputies zoning administrator . board guidelines are as follows. silence all phonesand other electronic devices so they will not disturb the proceedings . the rules of the presentation are as follows. parties are given three minutes each in remodel and members of the public not affiliated with the parties of up to three minutes to address the board and no remodel. mister longley will give you a verbal warning 30 seconds before your time is up and four votes are required to plan a rehearing request. if youhave questions about the board rules or hearing schedules please email board staff .public access and for dissipation are of paramount importance to the board and every effort has been made to replicate in person process. to enable public participation sfgov tv is streaming this life and we will have the ability t receive public commen

i the board's executive director. we will be joined by representatives from the city department that will be presenting before the board this evening. they are representing the planning department. the board meeting guidelines are as follows. we request you turn off or silence all phones and electronic devices so they won't disturb the proceedings. people are given seven minutes to present their case and three minutes for rebuttal. people affiliated with these parties must include their comments within the seven or three minute period. members of the public weren't affiliated have three minutes each to address the board and no rebuttal. time maybe limited to two minutes if the agenda is long or if there are large numbers of speakers. hourly legal assistant will give us a warning when time is almost up. if you have any questions about requesting a rehearing, please e-mail board staff. public access and participation are paramount importance to the board. every effort has been made to replicate the in-person hearing proc

appeals to the board of supervisors. it's not intuitive to me that public appeal is an appeal to the public by the member of supervisors. do these amendments also apply to the san francisco community college district. >> clerk: your time has elapsed. >> caller: thanks. >> chairman: are there any other members of the public for this item number one. >> clerk: i believe that was our last public commenter. >> chairman: okay. public comment is closed and i would like to formally move the aforementioned amendments and continue this item as amended one week on that two-part motion, a roll call, please. >> clerk: yes, on the motion to amend the ordinance and continue the matter to december the 6th, [roll call] the motion passes without objection. >> chairman: we are adjourned. . >> 21 meeting of the san franciscoboard of appeals. president honda will hopefully be joining us shortly.also present is vice president swig, commissioner lazarus and commissioner lopez . commissionerchang is absent. we will provide the board with any im

even when i was a member of the board of supervisors, we've been talking about reforming this system and i want to take this opportunity to really thank all of you because especially darilyn and miguel who helped to lead the efforts on getting us to this point where we were able to get legislation finished, passed, and now signed today. and i want to thank our city administrator carmen chiu. and i said, carmen, we've been talking about this for too long. we have to build some consensus. we have to raise the threshold, we have to get to a better place and she got it done. this is like a major accomplishment for our city and i want to also thank the board of supervisors president shamman walton. he helped to provide these opportunities for all of us to be here to do to sign this legislation, so i appreciate his leadership and the other board of supervisors members who are involved in our l.b.e. program. thank you supervisor safai and supervisor melgar for being with us here today. and once i sign this legislation, i'm sending all my friends and family from the neighborhood to each and e

these are now before the board for final approval. staff is not planning to present but is available for questions. >> thank you. is there a motion to approve the consent agenda? moved by peskin. a second? >> preston second. >> madam clerk please call the roll. >> (roll call) approve we have 11 ayes. >> please call item 9. >> item 9, san francisco severe injury traffic trend. from 2011 to 2020. this is an information item. >> thank you madam clerk. i think we have seth pardo and devan morris here. >> hello supervisors. i'm seth pardo and the new director for centers of data science at the department of public health. we're here to present a slide deck on the vision zero strategy and severe injuries. while this report is -- we have included e-scooters. devan morris primarily works data systems integration between the police department, department of public health and mta, including our trans based data set and helping with our linking while we search for a new vision zero epidemiologist. i thank him for being here with us today. >> i'm

the board will accept any comment on any topic by using the address at the san francisco board of supervisors, 1 carlton b. goodlett place, room 204, san francisco, california, 94102 or by using the e-mail address sfbos@sf.org. interpreters will be available to assist the public beginning with the 3:00 p.m. special order. we will have two interpreters today, for chinese and spanish. and so finally to the public, if you are experiencing any trouble connecting to this meeting remotely, please call. we have a live person standing by in the clerk's office. that's 415-554-5184. that concludes my announcement. >> president walton: thank you. and just a reminder, colleagues, to please mute your microphone if you are not speaking. we'll go to the approval of minutes, and that's approval of the october 26, 2021 and november 2, 2021 meetings. i'll entertain a motion and a second. made by supervisor peskin, seconded by supervisor chan. >> clerk: on the motion to approve the minutes -- [roll call] >> clerk: there are ten ayes. >> president walton: thank you. without objection, the minutes will be approve