but under it was under clinton, clinton head clinton too, had given assurances. so had 3 other part to other presidents, bush, one and bush to and including the and clinton. and yet all those agreements and understandings were ignored. michael maloof, former senior pentagon security analyst joining us live during this breaking news on our end to national really appreciate it. thanks for your time. thanks for having me. and thanks for joining us. 019 international for our breaking news story is big news coming out of east ukraine, and of course moscow today are the, the area for trego. joining us here in the studio, elliot, bring us up to speed with the latest, you know, pretty shocking development so far in the past 2 hours for a hello there. well, 1st of all, i just want to go through some of the things that we heard from the russian president vladimir putin. some of us expected his speech to be quite short. we were expecting the announcement on the decision by moscow to recognize the independence of the dawn and can no guns republics. but. 3 a lot of people did

clinton's campaign had closey relationship with tech heads accused of infiltrating trump computers. a very powerful special counsel who says there is evidence that hillary clinton's campaign spied on trump before and during the time he was president. well, where are the reporters and the op-ed writers? i'm guessing they don't like this narrative. sources tell fox that john durham's investigation into the origins of the russia probe is accelerating. more people are cooperating and coming before the grand jury than were previously reported after the bombshell court filing alleging the clintonpaign paid a tech company to infiltrate computer servers at the trump tower in new york and later when trump was president in the white house. today's "new york post" dropping the hammer with this headline. hillary the spy. and the "wall street journal" editorial board saying trump really was spied on. former deputy national security advisor k.t. mcfarland asks some important questions in a new op-ed. you have to read it. pay attention. we've highlighted the good parts. did the intelligence community know the clinton campaign was hacking into trump's campaign, presidential -- and offices? if so, did they look the other way or did they actually participate in the effort to spy on donald trump? if the intelligence community knew nothing about it, why not? i told you they were good. joe concha, fox news contributor and media and politics columnist for the hill. those are important questions. >> that's the thing. questions. we should be asking questions here because we don't have a lot of

clinton and exonerated hillary clinton. then turned around and started the investigation of president trump. in order to get the mueller investigation going. the head director of the fbi james comey leaked information about his boss, the president of the united states to get a special counsel appointed and to get the department of justice refused. the very department of justice that exonerated hillary clinton and so when fear they can't look at president trump read what were your thoughts when you heard about the leak of information the market was concerning. all we were hearing during that time going back and forth. when that happened and comey was fired and you get the e-mails, let's don't waste this opportunity. when they had the opportunity to say this is been, let's go ahead and appoint a special counsel and mueller was the one that came up read jeff sessions signed up because he recused himself three people forget that. he is taking his hands off. in essence fbi was operating under jim comey as an entity to itself. in this investigation was allowed to continue. for me it was a concern because at the time trey gaudi and interment were looking into this and beginning to build out. i don't know if you remember this. as soon as mueller was named as a special prosecutor. in the back of my mind i said you could tell this is what they want. in a democrat latched onto it. he became, you cann

clinton took it head on yesterday. >> it is interesting. this is the kind of hillary clinton message we haven't seen in a couple of years. we haven't seen her out in this openly aggressive political way since she lost the presidency. what is significant to me is not only that she has chose chb to speck out in this political and public forum but there was a reception for her. there were a lot of democrats angry for her for losing in 2016, for not being a better candidate against donald trump. now i think there's an openness to hear what hillary clintonre of a role this time around than perhaps she did in 2020. reverend sharpton, what could be her path? i don't think any of us expect to see her name on the ballot ever, but you don't ever say never. how can she galvanize them and be an effective messenger? some democracy said it was a good attack. what could she do for them going forward? >> i thought she was good yesterday. she could be the spokesperson that brings the fire back in a lot of democrats because many of the democrats see her as a victim in '16. let's not forget she won the popular vote. she was maligned. she was dragged through the mud in a way that mr. trump has not. and she just stepping on stage reminds them of that and i think she will be well received. let's not forget hillary clinton has a substantial following, and as this party has moved more toward the moderates like eric adams and others, nobody symbol ices that moderation more than a hillary clinton or joe biden. >> no doubt about it. >>> let's move on to this