falzon? >> commissioner falzon: presiden t bleiman, i agree with you. i don't think now is the time to start messing with conditions. what i would recommend we do, i'm open to any one suggestion on a timeline, think we need to bring daniel back. i don't know if that's in 30, 60 or 90 days. i think he has to come back we do a check-in. i think that's where the gauntlet is going to fall. if he has significant improvement, great. we can applaud that and praise him and continue to support him. on the other hand, unfortunately if we're getting lip service to get through this, i like to think that's not the case. if it is, we deal with the then. if my colleagues are interested in that idea, i will defer on all of you when the appropriate time is to bring him back in. thank you. >> president bleiman: i think some people have to learn the hard way and if they don't wake up when they're almost ready to lose something, i think may be he does have a better idea of how to handle his permit. i agree with commissioner falzon about the review in 30 days or couple of m

that's my comment. >> commissioner falzon? so just to reiterate something that president bleiman said, we all know despite the best anticipated problems, bad things can happen. i think what's disappointing here is you weren't prepared, there weren't the right people in the right places, and i think the problem with us entertaining adding conditions right now because i agree with president bleiman and commissioner lee, the program in place is sound. i think most of us, in our hearts feel that if you had been in compliance, that his people would have swooped in on this pretty quick, because they would have picked up on the escalation of noise, and they would have separated the parties apart pretty queen. but there was no one inside, and i think what's really alarming is it does make my worry how long that style of management or lack of security had been going on. but again, i don't want to focus on the past because what happened, happened. it's devastating, and it most likely was avoidable. but what we need to understand is, wil

commissioner falzon? >> i agree with commission staff. i don't think that adding conditions is really the solution, especially when william, you've been out of compliance with your existing conditions, but here's what i do want to understand. the bar that i'm setting was consistent compliance. i need to understand because it's not fair to burden us with confirming that, so i'm curious with what your solutions are going to be in letting us know that you're choosing to be in compliance. have you given that any thought? >> can you repeat the question again, please? >> sure. the bar that i'm setting tonight and what was introduced earlier was constant compliance. it seems that the only way we can ensure constant compliance is to send an inspector out every night, but that's an impossible burden for the city. so i'm asking you, how are you going to demonstrate constant compliance? >> i'm open to suggestions, but at the same time, like i said, myself is going to be there seven days of the week. we're going to make this other person an assistant

that's my comment. >> commissioner falzon? so just to reiterate something that president bleiman said, we all know despite the best anticipated problems, bad things can happen. i think what's disappointing here is you weren't prepared, there weren't the right people in the right places, and i think the problem with us entertaining adding conditions right now because i agree with president bleiman and commissioner lee, the program in place is sound. i think most of us, in our hearts feel that if you had been in compliance, that his people would have swooped in on this pretty quick, because they would have picked up on the escalation of noise, and they would have separated the parties apart pretty queen. but there was no one inside, and i think what's really alarming is it does make my worry how long that style of management or lack of security had been going on. but again, i don't want to focus on the past because what happened, happened. it's devastating, and it most likely was avoidable. but what we need to understand is, wil

that's my comment. >> commissioner falzon? so just to reiterate something that president bleiman said, we all know despite the best anticipated problems, bad things can happen. i think what's disappointing here is you weren't prepared, there weren't the right people in the right places, and i think the problem with us entertaining adding conditions right now because i agree with president bleiman and commissioner lee, the program in place is sound. i think most of us, in our hearts feel that if you had been in compliance, that his people would have swooped in on this pretty quick, because they would have picked up on the escalation of noise, and they would have separated the parties apart pretty queen. but there was no one inside, and i think what's really alarming is it does make my worry how long that style of management or lack of security had been going on. but again, i don't want to focus on the past because what happened, happened. it's devastating, and it most likely was avoidable. but what we need to understand is, wil