thank you. >> mr. starrn these hybrid hearings, but she can't see you. >> do you wants me to look at you. [laughter] >> if you face forward, you are speaking to her remotely. yes. [laughter] >> commissioner fung? >> i have a couple of questions and a couple of comments. if we do this with anticipation and allow enough flexibility for adaptation in the future, then i would raise the following question. the fleet operations are electricity-intensive in use. there is nothing in the ordinance here that talks about their use of renewable energy. is that going to come from one of the other agencies? >> thank you for the question. this legislation doesn't lay out a specific requirement for the use of renewable electricity. however, in san francisco, our clean power s.f. is on track to get to 100% renewable electricity by 2025 and the state also has renewable electricity goals that align with that transition to electric vehicles so certainly statewide and in san francisco, the vision and the goal is that, as we tran

if there are no questions, mr. starr, there is a report from the board of appeals. they met last evening and heard an appeal of the cannabis retail establishment at 2000 oakdale avenue. you heard this matter as a d.r. on december 9 of 2021, and the d.r. requester basically cited concerns about odor impacts. after hearing, the commission voted unanimously not to take discretionary review and approve the project. a ceqa review was heard on march 1. the appellant cited the same environmental impacts and lack of public review. after hearing, the board of supervisors unanimously voted 10-0 to deny the appeal and uphold the ceqa exemption. last night at the hearing, the appellant voiced his concerns about odor impacts, and the board voted 4-0 on the basis that the department properly reviewed the permit. if there are no questions, commissioners, we can move onto general public comment. at this time, members of the public may address the commission on items of interest to the public that are within the substance matter jurisdiction of the commission except agenda items. wi

if there are no questions, mr. starr, there is a report from the board of appeals.met last evening and heard an appeal of the cannabis retail establishment at 2000 oakdale avenue. you heard this matter as a d.r. on december 9 of 2021, and the d.r. requester basically cited concerns about odor impacts. after hearing, the commission voted unanimously not to take discretionary review and approve the project. a ceqa review was heard on march 1. the appellant cited the same environmental impacts and lack of public review. after hearing, the board of supervisors unanimously voted 10-0 to deny the appeal and uphold the ceqa exemption. last night at the hearing, the appellant voiced his concerns about odor impacts, and the board voted 4-0 on the basis that the department properly reviewed the permit. if there are no questions, commissioners, we can move onto general public comment. at this time, members of the public may address the commission on items of interest to the public that are within the substance matter jurisdiction of the commission except agenda items. with res