i would not join the labour party or tory party — i would not join the labour party or tory party.he person i_ tory party. i am an independent. the person i went — tory party. i am an independent. the person i went to see said what can i do and _ person i went to see said what can i do and what — person i went to see said what can i do and what can't i do and what rules— do and what can't i do and what rules do— do and what can't i do and what rules do my following can you help me was— rules do my following can you help me was sue gray, funnily enough, who is the _ me was sue gray, funnily enough, who is the senior— me was sue gray, funnily enough, who is the senior civil servant who has been _ is the senior civil servant who has been doing — is the senior civil servant who has been doing the investigation on all of this _ been doing the investigation on all of this. and you put the fear of god into me _ of this. and you put the fear of god into me then so she is a formidable and excellent woman. but i think were _ and excellent woman. but i think were onto — and excellent woman. b

and this was also another mass party, even when you had a party. it was really a collection of notable's, i think i'd call it. i'm trying to remember the exact number of people who voted for the president in 1800. i think it was about 50,000. you know, there were more people than in the sub of bethesda, north of washington d.c., twice this, money than they were voting for president for both candidates in 1801. >> the electorate was tiny. even among those who could for most people didn't bother to vote in national elections. >> exactly. >> the federal government was as did the thing. >> most people can vote. you had to have property, had to be a white men, and you had to be, of course, over 21. >> so, sean lawrence, a store in your familiar with, when it comes to jefferson as a founder of party, i think you're right, it wasn't a party, but when it comes to small "small d" jeffersonian democracy, he argues that in a sense, jefferson was this founder. against condescension and determined obstructionism jefferson and his party vindicated the political

and a tory party— party led by keir starmer and a tory party ted _ party led by keir starmer and a toryy borisjohnson, who would _ party led by borisjohnson, who would they go for? 57% went for sama's— would they go for? 57% went for sama's labour, 43% went for boris johnson _ sama's labour, 43% went for boris johnson -- — sama's labour, 43% went for boris johnson —— starmer's. you might get different— johnson —— starmer's. you might get different answers depending on the question— different answers depending on the question is, but that is certainly cause _ question is, but that is certainly cause for— question is, but that is certainly cause for concern at conservative party— cause for concern at conservative party h0 — cause for concern at conservative party hq and the guy in charge, essentially, ultimately as boris johnson, — essentially, ultimately as boris johnson, but it comes to elections it is oiiver— johnson, but it comes to elections it is oliver dowden, the chairman of the party— it is oliver dowden, the chairman of the party and his clearly concerned about _ the party and h

and this was not a mass party, even when he had a party. it was a collection of notables, i think i call it. i'm trying to remember the exact number who voted in the 1800s, you know, 50,000. there's more people in the suburb of bethesda, north of washington, d.c., twice as many as there were voting for president, both candidates then. >> electorate was tiny, even those who could vote most didn't bother voting in national elections. the federal government was a distant thing. >> most didn't vote, you had to have property, be a white man and of course, over 21. >> yeah. so sean wentz, a historian, you're familiar with, when it comes to jefferson as found earp of a party, i think you're right, it wasn't a party. but when it comes to small d jeffersonian democracy he argues that in a sense jefferson was this founder against con de against condescention he rallied the mass of citizens in effect laying the ground work for the democratic reform for jackson and van buren and others, do you agree with that? >> i think that's true, there's a big exce

stop criticizing exactly and also this was not a mass party even when he had a party. it was really a collection of notables. i think i call it. i'm trying to remember the exact number of people who voted for president in 1800. there's about 50,000, you know, they're more people in the suburb of bethesda north of washington dc twice as many than the word voting for president, you know for both candidates in 18. the electorate was tiny even among those who could vote. most people didn't bother voting in national elections. exactly. the federal government was a distant. most people couldn't vote because you had to have property you have to be a white man and you of course over 21 so sean will answer historian you're familiar with when it comes to jefferson as founder of a party. i think you're right. it wasn't a party but when it comes to small d, jeffersonian democracy, he argues that in a sense jefferson was this this founder against condescension and determined obstructionism jefferson and his party vindicated the political equality of the mass of american citizens ci

was it a party where the guidelines are l a party where the guidelines are followed or was it not a partyelines followed or was it not a party? the guidelines are followed at all times — guidelines are followed at all times. ~ , ., , the times. were you satisfied? the guidelines _ times. were you satisfied? the guidelines are _ times. were you satisfied? the guidelines are followed - times. were you satisfied? the guidelines are followed at - times. were you satisfied? the guidelines are followed at all . guidelines are followed at all times — the guidelines were followed at all times. our political correspondent sean dilley is at westminster. the police beg to differ. where does this leave borisjohnson politically now with 7 ? this leaves them in a very sticky lace. ? this leaves them in a very sticky place- one — ? this leaves them in a very sticky place. one local— ? this leaves them in a very sticky place. one local politician - ? this leaves them in a very sticky place. one local politician says - place. one local politician says that they are not a happy bunch of the moment and if o

i importance, not whether the prime minister was at a party.— minister was at a party.ook at the _ minister was at a party. i think you just look at the climate _ minister was at a party. i think you just look at the climate of - minister was at a party. i think you just look at the climate of the last | just look at the climate of the last few months. when these allegations started to _ few months. when these allegations started to come out at the end of last year. — started to come out at the end of last year, they dominated the headlines for days on end. and there was also _ headlines for days on end. and there was also a _ headlines for days on end. and there was also a feeling among tory mps that they— was also a feeling among tory mps that they could decide to topple the prime _ that they could decide to topple the prime minister. if you look at the reaction — prime minister. if you look at the reaction today and look at those comments from certain tory mps who have been_ comments from certain tory mps who have been vocal critics of the prime minister. _ have been

the mood of your own party._ the mood of your own party.od of your own party. i don't think it is sensible to _ the mood of your own party. i don't think it is sensible to have - the mood of your own party. i don't think it is sensible to have endlessl think it is sensible to have endless investigation and analysis now before the met have concluded their report. look, my view is if the opposition really want to focus on this, that's all they want to talk about, that's fine, but what i want to talk about is the stuff we are doing to take forward the uk. talking about the most serious issues, whether a prime minister has lied to the house of commons, and you seem to be making up your approach to this question on an ad hoc, hour by hour basis, and that is proven by the chaos around this vote. don't voters expect a bit more? �* , ., ., , ~ more? i'm sorry, what voters i think we'll want to — more? i'm sorry, what voters i think we'll want to see _ more? i'm sorry, what voters i think we'll want to see is _ more? i'm sorry, what voters i think w

in our party, grassroots matter. — the party. in our party, grassroots matter. this— the party.ked with kevin— in her. in full disclosure, i worked with kevin mccarthy, and she not only went — with kevin mccarthy, and she not only went against house republicans, she went _ only went against house republicans, she went to work with nancy pelosi on the _ she went to work with nancy pelosi on the january the 6th commission. when _ on the january the 6th commission. when your own party in wyoming sensors _ when your own party in wyoming sensors you and says we're disappointed in how you treated your own party— disappointed in how you treated your own party by working with democrats, that's _ own party by working with democrats, that's a _ own party by working with democrats, that's a really big statement that comes— that's a really big statement that comes from the grassroots. that was supported _ comes from the grassroots. that was supported by the vast majority of local republicans. this isn't some sort ofm — local republicans. this isn't some sort of... this is how the grassroots

they followed all the parties.ns of organizations only in this regard, that is, they behaved more moderately, another issue that then arose in the late nineties. and you too well, when it was said that the property is personal to you, and 122 apartments and 227 cars bought for cash, at the same time you assured something of the party. actually, it’s true, that means, after all, that’s why such fame, er, in quotation marks, goes exactly to the liberal democratic party under others who are more scrupulous or more inventive in their actions, there is always someone around your party around you. flair, what's the matter? i explain, i’m even hooked, we’re not doing anything wrong. sometimes to hit the leader to bind the kgb and there is nothing, but you can say who will prove it here. now now, as far as property is concerned, the program is not discussed by our actions, our successes in the elections. and here is how it happened. i am looking for people who will buy us cars and apartments, there is money. i can use them

any political party-— say, you have no connection with any political party-_ i - political party.we needed to get that on the record. you are saying this on the basis of what your feelings are and what you have been through, and michael fabricant said, he didn't think he lied, but hejust fabricant said, he didn't think he lied, but he just didn't understand, what do you make of that? he either thinks that we _ what do you make of that? he either thinks that we are _ what do you make of that? he either thinks that we are falls _ what do you make of that? he either thinks that we are falls or— what do you make of that? he either thinks that we are falls or the - thinks that we are falls or the prime minister is a fool because the prime minister is a fool because the prime minister is a fool because the prime minister and his government created these rules and to say he didn't really understand them all was —— or was not aware of what was going on, it's not really good enough. going on, it's not really good enou:h. 2. going on, it's not really good enou:h. . ., 2, , , enough. thanks

the republican party must be the party of freedom. republicans must rollback joe biden's assault on the bill of rights. freedom of speech, assembly and religion, the freedom to bear arms, the bl -- the ability of the states to retain their own prerogative are all essential to our society's basic fabric and prosperity. the american people are the most creative and innovative in human history. these natural gifts flourish under freedom. they wither without it. it matters who is in charge. and as a party, we as republicans will have failed if we do not make it very clear what the consequences are of having democrats in charge. look from state to state and compare the difference between republican and democrat leaders. and democrat states families are devastated financially. from mandates and closures. having lost precious time in the classroom, kids have fallen behind. economies have been crippled by regulations and restrictions. law and order has been eliminated by leaders who embrace criminals and embolden them by disrespecting law enf

the democratic party is owing to cheat again. -- the democratic party is going to cheat again. they are going to plan out how to do it. the republicans, they need to take the cover off the mechanism and get inside the clock works and clean it out. host: why focus on the can accept the election, versus the issues? caller: everybody knows the issues. i think republicans won a clean election. they gummed up the works. democrats gummed up the works and stole the election. now, it is going to happen again. unless, the republicans can get in. it starts in these big cities who have been cheating for years upon decades. chicago, new york, all these big towns. st. louis. host: ok. memphis, tennessee. democrats line. caller: this is joshua from memphis. i hear obama last week. he a year late. another thing, watch out for the young folks. they are not polling how they think they do. they live a different life than the republican party thinks they think about. we want to be divided. the young folks, they come out and vote. get the people out of control, of our government so everybody can l

a drinks party. the daily mirror has a similar story on its front page, saying borisjohnson encouraged staff to let off steam as covid rules were broken. the i describes the prime minister as facing a �*triple threat�* over the downing street parties. mps return on tuesday, he'll face prime minister's questions and a possible vote of censure too. the daily mail says ministers have rounded on the the archbishop of canterbury after he criticised the uk's plan to send asylum seekers to rwanda. meanwhile, the daily express describes the same story as mps attacking the archbishop of canterbury over his criticsim of the rwanda migrants plan. the guardian's front page highlights that women in the poorest areas of england are dying earlier than the average female in almost every comparable country in the world. so let's begin... lots to get through. we are going to start on the downing street parties as we had seen on quite a few of the front pages, hello to you both, good to see you again. we'll start with

of the black vote for the democrat party..t's what they have been doing. >> it's fascinating, the play on words, weren't you saying when -- you talk about this in your book about education, high crime, homicides and how it is heavily concentrated in these communities, do you believe there is a connectiontw between the leadership relinquished their moral obligation and leadership obligation to make sure new plantations, you keep them dependent and make them believe there's always racism so there's no need to try because you will be pushed back and discriminated against especially with other race cases you see which reinforces it and they use this to say the white men would never allow you to progress and therefore letet us go. >> it'st just an old play on the old showow. they've got them picking and they have them demoralized. when a person is demoralized, they can't get the truth. the civil union did that to their people, beat them down. the schools are terrible, they destroyed every t institution, e education system, the econ

the republican party started as the party of lincoln and it is not now, not even the party of ragan. richard nixon got one third of the black vote, started the epa, was environmentally sensitive, expanding the clean air act. george bush said, if you pass an extension of the assault weapon ban, i will sign it, but they could not get it to him because of democrat and republican votes. i offered to be the only republican to support the ban if democrats could get it over the fence and they could not. host: do you think you could be elected today? guest: no. i decided early on that it was better to speak what i believe and that meant opposing president trump then to stay in office. host: kenneth, missouri. caller: good morning. you are an old country club republican, you and this cheney. -- liz cheney. i am a vietnam veteran. i am a republican, but you are a go along, get along and have been through most of my life. you give into the democrats. you are past history. you could not win your district now because people in red states do not like country club republicans such as yourself. we t

my party's is an independent party, _ prime minister yourself?? my party'si is an independent party, we have our own manifesto and mission. the alliance you see before you is not just between two micro—parties but amongst all of the parties in parliament and we represent separate 5% of the population of pakistan. my party —— 75% of the population. we are limited to one to see elect all of the form to restore democracy and my party would put forward its own ministerial candidate for the next election. �* ., ., ministerial candidate for the next election. �* . ., �* ., ministerial candidate for the next election.�* . ., �* ., ., ., election. bilawal bhutto zardari, thank ou election. bilawal bhutto zardari, thank you for— election. bilawal bhutto zardari, thank you forjoining _ election. bilawal bhutto zardari, thank you forjoining us - election. bilawal bhutto zardari, thank you forjoining us on - election. bilawal bhutto zardari, thank you forjoining us on bbc. thank you forjoining us on bbc news. let s get some of the day's other news. the prime

the labour party-— worked with him and he leads the labour party. your standard answer when you _ labour party. what is your standard answer when you say _ labour party. what is your standard answer when you say you _ labour party. what is your standard answer when you say you want i labour party. what is your standard answer when you say you want to i labour party. what is your standard | answer when you say you want to be labour _ answer when you say you want to be labour leader— answer when you say you want to be labour leader and _ answer when you say you want to be labour leader and primus _ answer when you say you want to be labour leader and primus of- answer when you say you want to be labour leader and primus of the i answer when you say you want to be. labour leader and primus of the day? copy and _ labour leader and primus of the day? copy and paste — labour leader and primus of the day? copy and paste. it's— labour leader and primus of the day? copy and paste-— copy and paste. it's not the pacific form of words. _ copy and paste. it's no

i parties, why are you focusing relentlessly on parties?ut the cost of _ relentlessly on parties? i want to talk about the cost of living. - relentlessly on parties? i want to talk about the cost of living. why j talk about the cost of living. why were _ talk about the cost of living. why were we — talk about the cost of living. why were we in — talk about the cost of living. why were we in parliament _ talk about the cost of living. why were we in parliament on - talk about the cost of living. whyl were we in parliament on tuesday with the _ were we in parliament on tuesday with the prime _ were we in parliament on tuesday with the prime minister? - were we in parliament on tuesday with the prime minister? becausej were we in parliament on tuesday. with the prime minister? because he -ot a with the prime minister? because he got a fine _ with the prime minister? because he got a fine i— with the prime minister? because he gota fine ido— with the prime minister? because he got a fine. i do want— with the prime minister? because he got a fin

trump has a modern-day party boss. quote, inspiring fear, hoarding cash, dueling out favors and seeking to crush rivals, mr. trump is behaving not merely as a powerbroker but as something closer to the head of a 19th century political machine. a former trump advisor describes the ex presidents exile as lawyer, quote, a developing tammany situation. referring to tammany hall, the political machine that essentially controlled the new york city for nearly 200 years. goldmacher also compressed trump to tie many holes most notorious, deeply corrupt leader, boss tweed, shown in this famous cartoon saying, as long as i count the votes, what you're gonna do about it? that certainly sounds familiar. you'll remember when donald trump asked georgia secretary of state to just find him 11,780 votes to overturn joe biden's win in that crucial state. of course, raffensperger thankfully refused, so trump has since endorsed his challenger. along with many other far-right secretary of state candidates around the country who plan on doin

china's top party state military leader. she jinping and i know you've given a great deal of time to studying him as a figure and i think you are about to get your defilt at oxford on the see if i passed my bible monday writing you will be writing. you've written a thesis on xi jinping and he of course came to power in china and 2012-2013 and followed quite a less charismatic leader jin tao, so i wanted to give you a chance to talk about she and his role in the current state of us china relations and indeed. maybe china's international role more broadly, but one point that you make in your book that i wanted to you to address because i think it will be of great interest to the audience. is that under xi jinping the chinese communist party decided that china had more in common with russia than with the united states and wanted you to help. understand why that is how does it relate to xi jinping's leadership and the impact that she has had on the direction of chinese policy and because we're focusing on us-china relations in f

greens, but your party will not work with i but your party will not work with anybody — but your party anyone to lock out susan aitken, you are in coalition- work with anyone to lock out susan aitken, you are in coalition with - aitken, you are in coalition with the snp — aitken, you are in coalition with the snp in _ aitken, you are in coalition with the snp in some _ aitken, you are in coalition with the snp in some counties, - aitken, you are in coalition with the snp in some counties, how| aitken, you are in coalition with . the snp in some counties, how can aitken, you are in coalition with - the snp in some counties, how can we trust scottish — the snp in some counties, how can we trust scottish labour— the snp in some counties, how can we trust scottish labour with _ the snp in some counties, how can we trust scottish labour with this? - trust scottish labour with this? what _ trust scottish labour with this? what you — trust scottish labour with this? what you have _ trust scottish labour with this? what you have to _ trust scottish labour with this? what you have to understand

party are in trouble because boris — party are in trouble because borisjohnson _ party are in troublety are in trouble because boris johnson has led the i party are in trouble because . borisjohnson has led the ship into the — borisjohnson has led the ship into the rocks _ borisjohnson has led the ship into the rocks that _ borisjohnson has led the ship into the rocks that therefore l into the rocks that therefore voters — into the rocks that therefore voters just _ into the rocks that therefore voters just say, _ into the rocks that therefore voters just say, well, - into the rocks that therefore votersjust say, well, this i into the rocks that therefore | votersjust say, well, this lot are terrible, _ votersjust say, well, this lot are terrible, we _ votersjust say, well, this lot are terrible, we have - votersjust say, well, this lot are terrible, we have to - votersjust say, well, this lot are terrible, we have to vote j are terrible, we have to vote for the — are terrible, we have to vote for the other— are terrible, we have to vote for the other lot. _ are terrible, we have to v

you remember they rebranded it as the union party rather than the republican party. he believed he was the right man to nominate for the presidency. and even for me, that's a little hard. how can you be a loyal subordinate if you're also scheming to get the nomination. it all blows up. >> we'll get to had that. let me go back to the wigwam here in chicago in 1860 where lincoln was nominated because this letter is one from march 5th. and in may it was when the convention was and i could read the -- not all of it, but he says doubtful writing your judgment as to the possible action of the convention. so as far as i'm concerned, i leave the whole matter unreserve bliss to its decision. well, is that the case, he did not try? >> no, he was -- that very letter that you're holding is part of his effort. one of his consistent themes, in 1860 and again in 1864 and again in 1868, that i'm really not ambitious. you shouldn't be afraid of me. i'm leaving this to the people, but if the people want to nominate me, i will be the candidate. so but the fact that there are hundreds o

i would say opposition party but of course, it's not a party, it is an alliance of parties which looks if this is a concession speech by the party candidate to be prime minister, the alliance's candidate to be prime minister, but the position at the moment, with 70% of the votes cast, with the protection of only having 57 seats in a 190 member parliament, is that his brave attempt at dislodging the prime minister viktor 0rban by burying their own differences, this attempt has failed, it would appear to be the case. let me just check one more thing for you. yes, this is in fact the leader of the alliance, the 49—year—old leader of, there would—be prime minister who is taking on, peter marki—zay there, addressing the opposition alliance, and one assumes, they won cannot be certain, i'm afraid i don't speak hungarian, one assumes, not least by his facial expression and the lack of response from the crowd, that that was probably something close to a concession speech, or at least, an acknowledgement that the alliance of parties in hungary has not done as well, anything like as well, as the

it is also a region where marine le pen's party has been scoring high. the mayor was reelected in 2020 with 74% of the vote. he is one of her oldest allies. he claims he is the one who predicted her local success in the north, an area scarred by the economic crisis. when he came into power, he says he inherited debts and an increase in crime rate. [speaking foreign language] anchor: in recent years, the party was derided for its extremist views and has worked hard to have a more reasonable tone. the party changed its name and image, hiring younger faces to try to broaden its appeal. back here, people gathered supporters from the muslim community and granted a building permit for a new mosque. [speaking foreign language] anchor: in this part of france, the national rally has turned down its most blatant islamophobia. [speaking foreign language] [speaking foreign language] anchor: marine le pen has seen an advantage in softening her party's image. but he has gone in the opposite direction. [speaking foreign language] anchor: he has popularized the great re

it is only those parties.he so-called members of the pakistan -- who were not considering their policies in the correct way, it is a democratic process. prime minister shehbaz sharif has said we are not going to go against any vendetta, so if imran khan and his party continues -- considers they should come out on the street, it is their democratic right. if it is under the law of the land, they must gather and raise their voice. if they are able to muster that support and destabilize the government and push them to the new elections, so be it. for the moment we must all except the democratic process and the law of the land. folly: maria, let's talk about the first big challenge for this new prime minister and his new government. that is the economy, the imf program has been suspended. the country is facing enormous deficit on the fiscal side. how will he steer the country, prime minister sharif? well the economy take a different direction from under imran khan? maria: that is what i wanted to reply. my colleag

there's a chance for every party. however, when you zoom in on the situation of hungary on the hungarian media situation as well, if you look at the budget that the hungarian government had and has it to you to booster campaign compared to the fraction that the opposition parties have in that regard. observers say that already the lead up to this election wasn't really very just something that primary civic to albany was asked about. after casting his bellow this morning, he says, no, that's not the case. it's a very fair election. so that's one way of looking at just really healthy out is that even before people come to make a decision here, how well they could actually be informed on the various arguments that are here on display, both from the government and from the opposition parties. but once again, if you look at those poles and people here who want to believe that your position parties do have a chance to win today, the alliance does have a chance to win today did do not really want to consider those balls. be

a drinks party. the daily mirror has a similar story on its front page — saying borisjohnson encouraged staff to "let off steam" as covid rules were broken. the i describes the prime minister as facing a "triple threat" over the downing street parties. mps return on tuesday, he'll face prime minister's questions and a possible vote of censure too. the guardian's front page highlights that women in the poorest areas of england are dying earlier than the average female in almost every comparable country in the world. the daily mail says ministers have rounded on the the archbishop of canterbury after he criticised the uk's plan to send asylum seekers to rwanda. meanwhile the yorkshire post says a second senior church leader — the archbishop of york — has condemned the asylum plan. and the financial times warns that slowing growth, high inflation and the war in ukraine are all threatening the world's economic recovery. so let's begin... let's get cracking. hello to you both. lovely to see you both. kate

there is a party of common sense, but uh, this is a party in this party consists of individuals, andlic figures are individual cultural figures, uh, politicians who are not now. uh, at least in the national governments, maybe in the governments of the lands, uh, in the regional some parliaments in different states are industrialists, many are members of this party. well, apparently. more ordinary people will join this party as the crisis hits according to their pockets, but the political sphere is controlled not by the party of common sense, but by the party of uh, hysteria and not capable of independent politics. united states launched. e. here is a definite line. and poland great britain well and partially lithuania act. how can such local operators of this policy continue, but, and the rest of europe is simply rolling in this trailer and is not able, uh, to make an independent decision, we will continue to talk about russian european relations and which parties exist in europe after a short advertisement? our task is to hold until the last section, which the command has determined

i'll put it right down to the democrat party the upper escalon to the democratic party. not the ranking five people that vote for the democrat not a whole lot of the people. that i elected by democratic party because you know why a lot of these people are in districts where the democratic party has so much control that in order for them to win. they have to run as a democrat. so before they can do some good and they have told me and they told you man, i support a lot of what you talking about, but right i can't run as republican conservative in my district. help me change it. i've had so many of them sickness help me change if you can get my people support school choice. i'll vote for it. but right now. have my money comes from the teachers unions. if i go out to school choice, i'm done. they're just gonna bring somebody else in. at least i'm doing a little bit of good right now. so who controls the democrat party planned parenthood? the atheist from george soros on down the the people that want to open borders the people that love the drug trade the people i love the se

that is the conservative party for you. dodge, deflect, - party for you.ok overthere— over there. but those were conservatives _ over there. but those were conservatives who - over there. but those were conservatives who are - over there. but those were i conservatives who are calling over there. but those were - conservatives who are calling for him to resign. so what has changed? they say a lot has changed. there is a war in europe... the they say a lot has changed. there is a war in europe. . ._ a war in europe... the has been the beacon of — a war in europe... the has been the beacon of a — a war in europe... the has been the beacon of a leader _ a war in europe... the has been the beacon of a leader he _ a war in europe... the has been the beacon of a leader he always - a war in europe... the has been the beacon of a leader he always has i beacon of a leader he always has dreamt of being! he beacon of a leader he always has dreamt of being!— beacon of a leader he always has dreamt of being! he hasn't made any... ukrainians _ dreamt of being! he hasn't

between the macron party, kind of| between the macron party, kind of become _ between the macron party something of a common party in order to have — become something of a common party in order to have consistent _ in order to have consistent candidates _ in order to have consistent candidates all— in order to have consistent candidates all across- in order to have consistentl candidates all across france in order to have consistent - candidates all across france because they need _ candidates all across france because they need to — candidates all across france because they need to have _ candidates all across france because they need to have candidates - candidates all across france because they need to have candidates in- candidates all across france because they need to have candidates in all. they need to have candidates in all constituencies. _ they need to have candidates in all constituencies. tan _ they need to have candidates in all constituencies.— constituencies. can you see that happening. _ constituencies. can you see that happening. an — constituencies. can you see that

party.politics became part of the church and it never should have been. the black preachers job and any preachers job c.s. c lewis saids to live for eternity in the presence of jesus . that's their job. we have politicians and we s hae lawyers but when you are talking about in jesus i tell people i cannot be oppressed and i can believe in systemic racism. i'm the son of. i've never met anybody -- he teaches us a the whale have gifts and we are supposed elevate each other's gifts and when we elevate each other's gifts jealousy and income inequality you go to a better school than i do? no, think about you. elevate your gift help your neighbor allocate his gift and guess what i happens? the doctor helps everybody in a great mechanic helps everybody a great cook a great teacher helps everybody. instead they. america down by saying you have some type of superiority over me and therefore i want you to give up your privilege. i was born with privilege. i had two great parents a great family. i was

more important than parties, i think you are trying to - parties, i think you are trying to say, _ partiesortant than party—gate? l am just— say, more important than party—gate? lamiust going — say, more important than party—gate? lamiust going to— say, more important than party—gate? l am just going to say— say, more important than party—gate? i am just going to say to _ say, more important than party—gate? i am just going to say to you _ say, more important than party—gate? i am just going to say to you humbly. i am just going to say to you humbly that i think that is what people want me to be focusing on right now but for my friends in westminster, they must get on with their votes. that's fine. borisjohnson, there. now it's time for a look at the weather with carol kirkwood. good morning, everyone. this morning, there's been a fine start to the day for most of us, with sunny spells. we will carry on with that through the day. but we have a cool easterly breeze coming across a cool easterly breeze coming across a cool north sea. this area of low pressure is sinking away and you can see

for attending a party.e of i the longer term implications because it's very easy to get caught up in it all. but the ft leader also talks about a british government that has squandered its legitimacy, and it raises questions about the government acting people to make big changes to their lives, in particularly approaching a period where we see the biggest squeeze on our incomes in a generation. there point is that they say

i am sure that the party will no doubt not just stay afloat.n one of the iconic components of russian politics and will remain a parliamentary party. and everything else is all personnel matters. let's wait 40 days after the death of the great man vladimir volfovich zhirinovsky, and then we solved some personnel issues. we will discuss and accept decisions are good, but uh, you know one well-known american political scientist once said that a party becomes a real party when it outlives its founding father, but there is a firm belief that the liberal democratic party will outlive its founding father, there is a firm belief of course, all this depends on us. you have to stay away from people. we need to carry out the tasks of this line that remained to us after vladimir volfovich, there is no doubt that this will be exactly the case and, of course, now is not the time for any kind of invigorating statements, but there is no doubt that we, of course, we will keep people in line. the political line of the liberal democratic party and, again, we wil

as, er, the party of regions of the russian federation are not political parties, the sharia party, there is a whole list of these anti-ukrainian forces and they have nothing to do with the competitiveness of the political process in ukraine, in the end, since the communist party, which is ultimately banned, is the center of ukrainian power, which should be banned, those convicted of their activities should be recognized this is the kind that harms our country, and people who were related to these parties do not have the right to hold positions in the state. after all, this is not a new practice. it is a practice that was used by many countries of our neighbors. returning to the uh-uh uh-uh situation that we discussed. uh, you know about the turning point in the war. well, it seems to me that the key turning point was in general, the first day of a large-scale tuesday when the whole world saw that ukraine and ukrainians would fight, that our army uh- this is the army that can protect ours state because, well, time goes by very quickly. we forget about how uh, european countries, in

the -- party.es that have dominated french political life for the last many years are in tatters. macron is in the middle. what you are going to see on the right is a recomposition -- the hard right, le pen, the people who backed her, plus -- voters. and the hard right party on the right which could gather a percentage of the voters. and this is similar to the british tory party. very nationalist and protectionist and at the same time, against foreigners. it is [indiscernible] host: funny you should say that. we need to get into the parliamentary elections. i'm sorry to interrupt. a president without a majority has no power and we have parliamentary elections coming up in the summer. traditionally, the winning president gets the parliament. do you think this will be a different ballgame? >> yes, certainly if marine le pen wins. ever since they changed the timing of the parliamentary elections putting them after the presidential election, there is a momentum going in. however, i don't see marine le

what are their chances in any action, there's a chance for every party. however, when you zoom in on the situation of hungary and the hungarian media situation as well, if you look at the budget to that, the hungarian government had and has it to you to booster campaign compared to the fraction that the opposition party sat in that regard observer say that already the lead up to this election wasn't really very just something that prime is civic to albany was asked about after casting his ballad this morning. he says, no, that's not the case. it's a very fair election. so that's one way of looking at it just really healthy or is it even before people come to make a decision here how. * well, they could actually be informed on the various arguments that are here on display, both from the government and from the opposition parties. but once again, if you look at those poles and people here who want to believe that your position parties do have a chance to win today, the alliance does have a chance to win today did do not really want to consider those balls.

i ukraine and journalists asking them about parties?— about parties?s main message is that he's johnson�*s main message is that he�*s going to be in power in six months�* time. this is a bold statement that he made whichjust time. this is a bold statement that he made which just at once was a message to the country at large, but also to members of his own party might seek to replace him. as i forget that the front runner to replace borisjohnson rishi sunak has the on a banana peel due to his wife�*s tax affairs and has become a liability rather than an asset and borisjohnson is in this sense that you might want to get rid of me but who would you put in place of me? that is a question that the tory parties is really struggling to answer. there�*s no doubt he slipped in popularity he is now 7.7 points behind keir starmer and he was a 1.14% behind the labour leader in those days. and so, i think there�*s a sense that he is suffering a setback as a dip in his popularity, but there�*s a very strong confidence and message from borisjohnson that he will be ab

own party's split. thing has to be said. if you asked the pti government to treat anything i would say no. it has had phased out economic problems. it has gone to the imf. all of that is true. but it has no vision at all. just like the other political parties in the country. and all the promises of modernizing pakistan, changing it, amounted to nothing. at the same time, corruption continued, including from imran's family. his latest wife with a circle of friends around her, made lots of money by pointing in embassy as chief minister -- so all of these things began to weigh up. the question imran khan sang the americans got rid of me, they may have. we don't know. either way, there's never been evidence from the united states -- [indiscernible] wikileaks releases it. so it is not impossible that the united states expressed displeasure because imran described the 20 or occupation of afghanistan as an american mess. on the crane, he took a position similar to that of india and china. that did not please u

i and now they have joined hands, been the opposition parties, namely pml and box on people's party. so it, it is only both parties be the so called members of the box that you can solve who are not considering their policies in the correct way. they have not voted in this in this vote of no confidence such a democratic process. and mr. chavez has said that we are going to go against any, any been debt order or are making against a greek against anybody. so if you can shop and his body considers that they should come out on the street, it is their democratic, right? if there's, if it is within the right of the political domains under the law of the land, they must together, they must raise their weiss and if they are able to muster that support and the stabilize the government and then push them into the new elections. so be it, but for the moment we must all accept the demo that the process and the last the last night. so we must accept the democratic process. you say, maria, let's talk about the 1st big challenge for this new prime minister and this new government. and that is the

do you think a third party could displace the republicans and eventually become a major party? is this my dad it could be i think the sounds like a question that he would ask and i think he tried to ask if the other night moderator was like, nope. we're not talking the ringer. yes. i did recognize the last name. maybe you want to answer this one once it's wrong. well, it's i mean, right because the the wigs went. into oblivion and i think that there's an argument to be made that unless the never trump people find a way to work with the democrats. that they're just going to be shouting into the void, right? um, there's a guy who's running in utah. he wants to run for senate. um, he's a and he ran. evan mcmullen and he ran for president last time in 2016, but his whole thing now is how to figure out a way to get the democrats to trust him to nominate him because most democratic primaries of those voters are not going to want to nominate somebody who's just switched his registration from republicans. so yeah, there's the unless they figure that out. you know, the i don't know that

so the democratic party. what you have, in the past we had four parties. we really have gone from four parties to two. that is where you have to fight. i will say, that if this goes on for a while, and i see there is no redemption for the republican party, i am not wedded to be republican. i'm not a democrat. i do not believe in nine members and the democratic policies. it is just not who i am. without change there will be a point at which i will no longer consider myself republican. but i think the party is worth fighting for this moment, when it is being taken over by authoritarians. >> congressman thank you so much for being here and thanks for all that you do. that is a perfect segue into my question. i am jack, freshman, and i'm from pittsburgh. my question is, as he talked about tribalism, i think about some of the other democracies in the world, like germany, new zealand, that are sometimes considered some of the healthiest democracies in the world. they have 4-5 parties. my question is after you talked about how we staff somewhat more of a four par