vice chair safai? >> member safai: aye. >> member mar: aye. >> chair ronen: aye. >> we have three ayes. >> can you send that amended item to the full board with positive recommendation. >> on that motion to forward item number 2 to the full board with a positive recommendation as amended. >> member safai: aye. >> member mar: aye. >> chair ronen: aye. >> we have three ayes. >> chair ronen: thank you. for item 3 i'd like to make a motion to amend the proposed resolution to dereduce the -- reduce the not to exceed amount. >> on that motion to amend item -- the resolution as item number 3, to reduce the not to exceed amount from $12.9 million to $12 million, vice chair safai? >> member safai: aye. >> member mar: aye. >> member ronen: aye. >> we have three ayes. >> and can i make a motion to send the amended item to full committee with positive recommendations? >> on that motion to forward item number 3 to the full board with a positive recommendation as amended, vice chair safai? >> member safai: aye. >> m

supervisor safai? >> supervisor safai: yes. thank you through the chair. how long has the friends had a management and operations agreement for the museum? >> it's ten years, but we had another agreement prior to that, but the agreement started in 2009, sorry. >> supervisor safai: you had an agreement prior to that 1234. >> i don't have that information. >> supervisor safai: but has it always been the friends of the cable car museum? >> yes, as far as i know. >> supervisor safai: has this ever gone out to bid? >> it was bid out in 2009, supervisor safai. >> supervisor safai: and it's just continuously been extended? >> yes, as far as i know, the information i have on hand. >> supervisor safai: is there a reason that it hasn't been put out to bid? >> okay. i'm going to let my manager, jason gallegos, answer that question. >> yes. there's a ten-year contract with an option to extend. this is the first five years, and there will be another one thereafter. >> supervisor safai: okay. i don't have any more questions. do you have any questions? >> chair ronen: i

vice chair safai. member mar. >> aye and add as cosponsor. >> chair ronen. >> aye. >> we have three ayes. >> thank you. this item passes. mr. clerk, please read item 8. resolution approving the exercise of the first of two one year extension options under a lease between michael c mitchell and the city and county by and through the airport commission to extend the lease for one year for a period may 1, 2023 through april 30, 2024 for a total term april 21, 2009 through april 30, 2024. increasing the rent to $146,000 for office and industrial space occupied by the san francisco international graphics department. members of the public to comment on these items or this item call the public comment number at 415-655-0001. id24978419535. pound twice. when connected press star 3. when the system indicated you are unmuted begin your comments. madam chair. >> chair ronen: we have deana here to present. >> thank you, supervisors. the airport is seeking approval to exercise the first of two one year extension op

supervisor safai? >> supervisor safai: yes. thank you through the chair. how long has the friends had a management and operations agreement for the museum? >> it's ten years, but we had another agreement prior to that, but the agreement started in 2009, sorry. >> supervisor safai: you had an agreement prior to that 1234. >> i don't have that information. >> supervisor safai: but has it always been the friends of the cable car museum? >> yes, as far as i know. >> supervisor safai: has this ever gone out to bid? >> it was bid out in 2009, supervisor safai. >> supervisor safai: and it's just continuously been extended? >> yes, as far as i know, the information i have on hand. >> supervisor safai: is there a reason that it hasn't been put out to bid? >> okay. i'm going to let my manager, jason gallegos, answer that question. >> yes. there's a ten-year contract with an option to extend. this is the first five years, and there will be another one thereafter. >> supervisor safai: okay. i don't have any more questions. do you have any questions? >> chair ronen: i

supervisor safai? >> supervisor safai: yes, i also want to thank the b.l.a. and their team for highlighting these issues. one thing that i wanted you to highlight for your team, it doesn't make sense to have a multiplier and having the multiplier be a disqualification. i know you have the ability in your contracting process, and we do in the city, to make adjustments. if they were not responsive, if they were not able to meet to the b.l.a., you had had a person that was disqualified that was a previous contractor designed one up the street that was less than $400 million, by the way, but a lot of this doesn't make sense, so i just feel this needs to be a full scale investigation on the part of the p.u.c. with clear explanations as to why we would be asked to look into that and support something that there's not a lot of justification for. >> chair ronen: 100%. thank you, supervisor safai. mr. clerk, can we please take public comment? >> clerk: thank you, madam chair. members of the public who wish to speak on this item and are joining us in person, please lin

>> supervisor safai: yes. >> chair ronen: supervisor safai. >> supervisor safai: deputy director cohen. >> good afternoon. >> supervisor safai: good afternoon, how are you? >> doing well, sir. thank you. >> supervisor safai: good. one of the questions, one of the things i saw in here the size of this grant, extension of it, i understand is three years. but it's growing exponentially from the original amount. over 234%. can you talk about that? i understand it's a number of years, and you've provided the monitoring, on-site monitoring report. can you talk about the on-site monitoring report since we did not have access to that information? >> yes. absolutely. so, the on-site monitoring report we have done in the past year as a desk audit due to the restrictions of covid, but on-site monitoring, and five keys is meeting all the expectations in terms of the services provided, guest satisfaction, and being able to keep the site in good working order. so, we are continuing to work with them to ensure that the site satisfaction, increase the rate of completion of those, as well as connecting

vice chair. >> supervisor safai: safai is . >> vice chair safai absent. >> two ayes and safai absent. >> item 7. resolution retroactively authorizing the recreation and park department to accept and expand grant for $4.8 million from the california department of parks and recreation for the buchanan mall approving the grant contract for july 1, 2021 through june 30, 2024 and to authorize the recreation and park department to enter the amendments and modifications to the grant contract and to to execute further agreements that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities of the city and are necessarily to effectuate the purposes of the projector this resolution. please call 415-655-0001. madam chair. >> chair ronan: i understand tony moran is here to present from rec and park. >> yes. good morning, supervisors. on behalf of the recreation and parks department i am here to request a recommendation to forward the resolution to accept and expend retroactively these grant funds and enter the grant agreement. the city through the recreation and park department opens and operate

i want to thank supervisor safai. i think his amendments, again, are not substantive, don't fundamentally change the shape of the legislation and i'm happy -- i was happy to add what i thought were amendments. he's added more. i'm perfectly comfortable with the committee making those amendments. with regard to supervisor melgar's amendments, some of which we incorporated or at least we attempted to respond to in my legislation, i am -- i have no objection at all to what i think is a non-substantive amendment on page 13. which addresses funding -- the opening or operation of new shelters with not allowing that with funds that may not lawfully be used for those purposes including tax revenue designated by the voters to use for permanent housing. i think that's a fine amendment. and wouldn't have any objection. the other two i would ask the committee not to make. this legislation is intended to address a particular problem which is that san francisco is dramatically undersheltered. the amendment that requires that -- req

vice chair safai? >> supervisor safai: thank you, chair ronen. is the city planning to transfer ownership at some point or to a partner provider? >> thank you, supervisor. i will ask my colleague, dan adams, to answer that. the owner will be the city, and we will contract with a service provider or manager to manage the site. >> yes, thank you. we're moving on the direct acquisition model so we can move quickly. we've been very efficacious in bringing up permanent supportive housing. first, the city would secure the property, rehab the properties, and get them up and running, and then, evaluate the provider on the community capacity side as well as the need to transfer these properties out of direct city ownership. this would be similar to how we acquire properties, and in the end, these would be city-owned properties and managed as such. >> supervisor safai: yes. basically, similar to what we did with hotel purchases in the mission. >> yes, very much. >> supervisor safai: i guess at this point, it comes in under the numbers that we've set consis

supervisor safai. >> supervisor safai: thank you. so with regard back to planning, we were aware that would be part of the process and so we'll be following up with planning after we make those amendments. secondarily, i think it would be important although they are discussing doing the analysis on the previous version which i'm fine with them doing that, i think it would make the most sense to analyze the current version we have here today. since it's taken this long. i don't 100% disagree with what supervisor peskin has said. it does seem strange that only two were asked to be analyzed. there's going to be a discussion and i think there's a discussion. feasibility is real and it's something that can't be built regardless of how nice the policy's discussed, it won't have any impact. i think that is an important part of the conversation. i appreciate the planning department doing that and i know it does take time to get all of the different nuances that we are amending and putting on the table analyzed, but having that information wi

vice chair. >> supervisor safai: safai is . >> vice chair safai absent. >> two ayes and safai absent. >> item 7. resolution retroactively authorizing the recreation and park department to accept and expand grant for $4.8 million from the california department of parks and recreation for the buchanan mall approving the grant contract for july 1, 2021 through june 30, 2024 and to authorize the recreation and park department to enter the amendments and modifications to the grant contract and to to execute further agreements that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities of the city and are necessarily to effectuate the purposes of the projector this resolution. please call 415-655-0001. madam chair. >> chair ronan: i understand tony moran is here to present from rec and park. >> yes. good morning, supervisors. on behalf of the recreation and parks department i am here to request a recommendation to forward the resolution to accept and expend retroactively these grant funds and enter the grant agreement. the city through the recreation and park department opens and operate

i want to thank supervisor safai.i think his amendments, again, are not substantive, don't fundamentally change the shape of the legislation and i'm happy -- i was happy to add what i thought were amendments. he's added more. i'm perfectly comfortable with the committee making those amendments. with regard to supervisor melgar's amendments, some of which we incorporated or at least we attempted to respond to in my legislation, i am -- i have no objection at all to what i think is a non-substantive amendment on page 13. which addresses funding -- the opening or operation of new shelters with not allowing that with funds that may not lawfully be used for those purposes including tax revenue designated by the voters to use for permanent housing. i think that's a fine amendment. and wouldn't have any objection. the other two i would ask the committee not to make. this legislation is intended to address a particular problem which is that san francisco is dramatically undersheltered. the amendment that requires that -- requ

supervisor safai. >> supervisor safai: a couple questions.t is the average subsidy for households? what do you usually pay. after you reduced salary and benefits and operating $36 million over the life of this. how much is usually is the average subsidy for household? >> we will increase the allowable subsidy up to $1,895 with 100% fmr, fair market rent. it was $1,800 per month and it is now $1,900 in subsidy. tenant pays 30% income. >> it could be as high as $23,000 per household at the maximum? >> yes. >> that is great. i wanted to underscore that. that is a really important point to point out that for less than $25,000 a household you are helping people remain housed. are there time limits on the subsidy? is this on -- ongoing as long as they qualify. >> correct. >> thank you very much. i would make a motion to send to the full board with positive recommendations. >> clerk: on that motion by vice chair savvy eto forward to the board. >> aye. >> mar. >> aye. >> ronen. >> aye. >> three ayes. >> chair ronan: thank you so much. can you please

i want to thank supervisor safai.i think his amendments, again, are not substantive, don't fundamentally change the shape of the legislation and i'm happy -- i was happy to add what i thought were amendments. he's added more. i'm perfectly comfortable with the committee making those amendments. with regard to supervisor melgar's amendments, some of which we incorporated or at least we attempted to respond to in my legislation, i am -- i have no objection at all to what i think is a non-substantive amendment on page 13. which addresses funding -- the opening or operation of new shelters with not allowing that with funds that may not lawfully be used for those purposes including tax revenue designated by the voters to use for permanent housing. i think that's a fine amendment. and wouldn't have any objection. the other two i would ask the committee not to make. this legislation is intended to address a particular problem which is that san francisco is dramatically undersheltered. the amendment that requires that -- requ

well, the other possibility is if supervisor safai's language is nonsubstantiative. if the committee accepts supervisor melgar's amendments and the thing gets continued two weeks, there wouldn't be any. and if it's not, then it could be added to the full board right. >> that's right. i think if you wanted to make a motion to add the vehicle triage centers where he has under the policy, he adds language that it should be further the policy of the city and vehicle nav jaegs prior to there being offered another shelter or housing option. >> supervisor mandelman: it was not. although i'm fine with that. >> i would support i'm not making a motion right now, but support us, yeah amending further amending the legislation to add supervisor safai's amendments. i think they're all helpful in just further clarifying things and then except it'd be helpful to note deputy city attorney if you can note which one there would be some confusion over. >> looking through it quickly, i do think that's the only one where there's sort of a conflict because different language is chosen is t

>> present. >> president safai? >> safai, present. >> and commissioner thomas? >> present. >> thank you, we have a quorum. >> great. madam secretary, please call the next item. >> item no. 12, discussion item, san francisco deferred compensation plan, quarterly report. q1 '22. >> great. >> thank you. can you hear me okay? >> yes. >> excellent. thank you so much. well, good afternoon, commissioners, thank you so much for your time today. i will be providing a quarterly report that covers the four pillars of the plan which are investment, marketing, operations and the record keeper. quarterly report include both the look back at the prior quarter as well as what's next for the deferred compensation plan. up first is investments. as reported last month, stable value crediting rate increased to 1.70%. and guaranteed for the quarter. this crediting rate is correlate with interest rates and as you have been following, the set has been increasing rates to offset inflation. recently, the set raise benchmark by half a percentage point which is the highest increase it has

. >> supervisor safai: present. stefani not present. >> president walton: present. >> you have a quorum. >> president walton: thank you, madame clerk. the san francisco board of supervisors acknowledges that we are on the unceded ancestral homeland of the ramaytush ohlone who are the original inhabitants of the san francisco peninsula. as the indigenous stewards of this land, and in accordance with their traditions, the ramaytush ohlone have never ceded, lost, nor forgotten their responsibilities as the caretakers of this place, as well as for all peoples who reside in their traditional territory. as guests, we recognize that we benefit from living and working on their traditional homeland. we wish to pay our respects by acknowledging the ancestors, elders and relatives of the ramaytush ohlone community and by affirming their sovereign rights as first peoples. colleagues, please stand with me to recite the pledge of allegiance. i pledge allegiance to the flag of the united states of america, and to the republic, for

supervisor safai. >> supervisor safai: yeah. i just saw one item on the list in my district that i had a question about. should we talk offline with the department or should i talk specifically? i don't know if they'll be able to answer the question. >> i probably don't have the information currently available, but we can talk in the hall and have somebody pull it up on the tablet. >> president walton: work for you? >> supervisor safai: yes. supervisor mar. >> supervisor mar: thank you. you know, i just had a question about the lists, the reportive cost lists. it looks like there's different versions with different dates, but the most recent list is sort of what's been kind of whittled down the properties that are subject. >> yes. the most recent list we submitted around 2:00 p.m. and that was updated with all the invoices that had been paid as of yesterday in the early part of today. >> supervisor mar: great. because i had a question about the original list. it looks like it's dated april 25th, 2022. it looks like there's kind

supervisor safai. >> supervisor safai: yeah. i just saw one item on the list in my district that i had a question about. should we talk offline with the department or should i talk specifically? i don't know if they'll be able to answer the question. >> i probably don't have the information currently available, but we can talk in the hall and have somebody pull it up on the tablet. >> president walton: work for you? >> supervisor safai: yes. supervisor mar. >> supervisor mar: thank you. you know, i just had a question about the lists, the reportive cost lists. it looks like there's different versions with different dates, but the most recent list is sort of what's been kind of whittled down the properties that are subject. >> yes. the most recent list we submitted around 2:00 p.m. and that was updated with all the invoices that had been paid as of yesterday in the early part of today. >> supervisor mar: great. because i had a question about the original list. it looks like it's dated april 25th, 2022. it looks like there's kind

last but not least supervisor safai. >> thank you. today i was going to honor leah and andre honors of excelsior coffee. andre is a teacher in which at jim jordan. they are phenomenal couple. i met them when i was first running for supervisor five years ago. they opened a business that is truly community serving and wonderful, wonderful coffee place. >> thank you. mr. president. no other name ons the roster that concludes the introduction of new business. >> thank you, madam clerk and colleagues. now at public comment. >> the board of supervisors welcomes general public comment. first insight anyone in the room to offer their comment to the board of supervisors. we do have interpreters standing by. i will provide the phone number. 415-655-0001. when you hear the prompt enter 24953898001. pound twice and you will have joined the meeting. you will hear discussion. your line will be muted. you will be in the listening queue. when you provide comment you should press star 3 to be in the line to provide comment. we have someone standing at

vice chair safai . [roll call vote] >> we have 3aye's . >> mister clerk, thanks to all the vw staff. i hopeyou get well soon . mister clerk can you please read item number two. >> -twois a hearingon departmental hiring patterns with regard to racial equity . it's the goal of equitable diversity in the city. members of the public who wish to provide public comments should call 415-655-0001, meeting id is 2497 841 9535 and press pound twice. the system prompts will indicate you have raised your hand. wait until the system indicate you have beenunmuted and you may begin . >> chair: as i announced earlier , director ice and isn't able to make the meeting and would like to be here and we love to hear from her directly so if i could continue this item to the call of the chair. after public comments, can we please open this item for public comment ? >> members who wish to speak and are joining us in person should line up now. for those listening remotely please call415-655-0001 . the meeting id is 2497 841 953

>> present. >> president safai? >> safai, present. >> and commissioner thomas? >> present. >> thank you, we have a quorum. >> great. madam secretary, please call the next item. >> item no. 12, discussion item, san francisco deferred compensation plan, quarterly report. q1 '22. >> great. >> thank you. can you hear me okay? >> yes. >> excellent. thank you so much. well, good afternoon, commissioners, thank you so much for your time today. i will be providing a quarterly report that covers the four pillars of the plan which are investment, marketing, operations and the record keeper. quarterly report include both the look back at the prior quarter as well as what's next for the deferred compensation plan. up first is investments. as reported last month, stable value crediting rate increased to 1.70%. and guaranteed for the quarter. this crediting rate is correlate with interest rates and as you have been following, the set has been increasing rates to offset inflation. recently, the set raise benchmark by half a percentage point which is the highest increase it has

>> supervisor safai: yes. >> chair ronen: supervisor safai. >> supervisor safai: deputy director cohen. >> good afternoon. >> supervisor safai: good afternoon, how are you? >> doing well, sir. thank you. >> supervisor safai: good. one of the questions, one of the things i saw in here the size of this grant, extension of it, i understand is three years. but it's growing exponentially from the original amount. over 234%. can you talk about that? i understand it's a number of years, and you've provided the monitoring, on-site monitoring report. can you talk about the on-site monitoring report since we did not have access to that information? >> yes. absolutely. so, the on-site monitoring report we have done in the past year as a desk audit due to the restrictions of covid, but on-site monitoring, and five keys is meeting all the expectations in terms of the services provided, guest satisfaction, and being able to keep the site in good working order. so, we are continuing to work with them to ensure that the site satisfaction, increase the rate of completion of those, as well as connecting

>> supervisor safai: yes. >> chair ronen: supervisor safai. >> supervisor safai: deputy director cohen. >> good afternoon. >> supervisor safai: good afternoon, how are you? >> doing well, sir. thank you. >> supervisor safai: good. one of the questions, one of the things i saw in here the size of this grant, extension of it, i understand is three years. but it's growing exponentially from the original amount. over 234%. can you talk about that? i understand it's a number of years, and you've provided the monitoring, on-site monitoring report. can you talk about the on-site monitoring report since we did not have access to that information? >> yes. absolutely. so, the on-site monitoring report we have done in the past year as a desk audit due to the restrictions of covid, but on-site monitoring, and five keys is meeting all the expectations in terms of the services provided, guest satisfaction, and being able to keep the site in good working order. so, we are continuing to work with them to ensure that the site satisfaction, increase the rate of completion of those, as well as connecting

vice chair safai.e. >> mar. >> aye. >> chan. >> aye. >> walton excused. chair ronen. >> aye. >> four ayes. we will hear on the port's budget. >> thank you, chair. our recommendations for the port of san francisco are on page 16 of our report. reductions for the proposed budget $393,836 in fiscal year 22-23. $43,836 are ongoing savings. $350,000 are one-time savings. that would allow increase over $100 million for the budget. our recommended reductions to the proposed budget $44,144 in 23-24. all of those recommended reductions are ongoing savings. my understanding is that the department agrees with the recommendations. we are available for any questions. >> chair ronan: thank you. any questions? making sure the port agrees with these recommendations. >> yes, we are in agreement and appreciate the willingness of the budget legislative analyst to negotiate with us. >> chair ronan: thank you so much. to the controller, please note it is this committee's intention to accept the port budget with the bla rec

i want to thank supervisor safai. i think his amendments, again, are not substantive, don't fundamentally change the shape of the legislation and i'm happy -- i was happy to add what i thought were amendments. he's added more. i'm perfectly comfortable with the committee making those amendments. with regard to supervisor melgar's amendments, some of which we incorporated or at least we attempted to respond to in my legislation, i am -- i have no objection at all to what i think is a non-substantive amendment on page 13. which addresses funding -- the opening or operation of new shelters with not allowing that with funds that may not lawfully be used for those purposes including tax revenue designated by the voters to use for permanent housing. i think that's a fine amendment. and wouldn't have any objection. the other two i would ask the committee not to make. this legislation is intended to address a particular problem which is that san francisco is dramatically undersheltered. the amendment that requires that -- req

and just to note we are joined by supervisor safai. supervisor melgar you referred to some amendments you have been working on and youtouched on one or two . i think it would be helpful for the public if you could go over your full list of amendments and then i know supervisor safai you had someproposed amendments . we kind of just summarize what those are for the public. >> thank you chair. there's really three main things in my amendment and instead of having to gothrough every line item . the main thing is that i would propose that we include shelter and permanent supportive housing in this legislation together. what i just heard ms.cohen say is exactly that . that she cannot give us a number or an exact amount without looking at the totality that they are all interrelated. the number of permanent supportive housing units that we have i would even go furthe . the number of affordable housing units and permanent supportive housing units we have is intricately related to the number ofshelter beds we need because it is a spectrum. peop

. >> supervisor safai: present. stefani not present. >> president walton: present. >> you have a quorum. >> president walton: thank you, madame clerk. the san francisco board of supervisors acknowledges that we are on the unceded ancestral homeland of the ramaytush ohlone who are the original inhabitants of the san francisco peninsula. as the indigenous stewards of this land, and in accordance with their traditions, the ramaytush ohlone have never ceded, lost, nor forgotten their responsibilities as the caretakers of this place, as well as for all peoples who reside in their traditional territory. as guests, we recognize that we benefit from living and working on their traditional homeland. we wish to pay our respects by acknowledging the ancestors, elders and relatives of the ramaytush ohlone community and by affirming their sovereign rights as first peoples. colleagues, please stand with me to recite the pledge of allegiance. i pledge allegiance to the flag of the united states of america, and to the republic, for

with that we have questions starting with supervisor safai . >> iq.going back to slide seven, just want to get a little more clarity on your creating a director of sanitation and streets and keeping the direct deputy director ofoperations . can you explain what you're doing that? it seems to me you would have thedeputy director position become the director of streets and sanitation . i'm not exactly clear why that decision is made seems like a duplication of roles . >> carly short, interim directorfor public works . we have to a, appoint a director that meets all the criteria outlinedin the ordinance . so there will be a process to recruit for that position and then there will be a selection process whereby the commissioners will make a recommendation of at least three candidates ibelieve to the mayor for selection . so that process is actually outlined in the ordinance. >> on the charter, i remember that. >> i think it's important to recognize that any department will notice publicworks has three deputy directors under the director . there are differ