t. u. s. senate plans have come as the state department has launched a new program to analyze evidence of a war crimes and ukraine. the state department has said that the program will initially cost $6000000.00 and will examine satellite imagery as well as information shared on social media. russia denies targeting civilians and has alleged that some suppose the scenes of war crimes in ukraine have been staged from on this. we can cross live to international law. professor francis boyle, thank you very much for being with us here in our international thank you. best all my friends in rti appreciate that. so is the us justified to expand its jurisdiction over international cases, particularly concerning russian involvement in the ukraine conflict or is this it overage? is america overreaching its balance? well, when i read the proposed legislation, i had to smile that there was so much hypocrisy involved behind it. we have large numbers of war, criminals and gender siders already running around the streets of the united states of america that the united states government knows all about beca

t. v. u. s. senate hands have come. as the state department has launched a new program to analyze evidence of alleged war crimes in ukraine. the state department has said the program will initially cost $6000000.00 and will examine satellite imagery as well as information shared on social media. russia denies targeting civilians and has said that some suppose it seems of war crimes in ukraine appear to have been staged. we asked international law professor francis boil on why the us wants to expand its authority on a global level. so public relations, so exercise are part of what we are. law professor is called law fair using the law as a tool for her. i'm not denying of war crimes might have been committed there by ukrainian forces and russian forces. this happens all the time in war, but this is not a good faith investigation by the united states. no, this is, this is law affair using law as a tool of warfare against the russian federation. certainly, that's the way i interpreted. of course, there's nothing objective

we should expect many punches to land in the coming weeks. caleb martin, r t new york author and x u. s. senate a target we do believe it's hypocritical. when you do liberals criticize must, while censoring non mainstream news, human mosque is a, is a, is a character that is now kind of being guam don and attacked by the left. because he basically just said he didn't believe that conservative accounts should be, you know, dismissed or, or banned from the platform. and that was enough to ignite a bunch of pieces about him becoming the owner of twitter. meanwhile, they're not saying anything about basis or, you know, the fact that gates is bought up swath of american farm land, things like that, that other american eleger. so doing, once you start banning and censoring, you're moving further and further away from ideal of freedom of speech, freedom of press, you know, meanwhile we're, we're, you know, the last a shouting about freedom of speech. but here you have doing a song still in bellmarks prison for publishing and being a journalist and doing his job, basically because he embarrassed you kn

stalls t works, which catacombs still shell, to the bleeding out remainder of the mar you pull neo nazi garrison left at the very end of the rope. makers, dawn of reporting from our usual c a u. s. senate has found 2 adult 10 asked a rated bell on earlier assistance to ukraine, despite financial support for the cd adoption of the last. and it's around paul, oppose the decision. according to the senate, i would be a big mistake by the u. s. to save ukraine by dooming the u. s. economy is comes as the country faces. it's was inflation rate in 40 years as cost life now it's well corresponded rachel blevins for more on this. rachel, good to see you. i was seems an alley agreement on the bill has stoled. why did this happen and what's next? well, the united states congress is planned to pass an additional $40000000000.00 of funding for ukraine was stalled, after it did not receive unanimous support in the senate. thanks to the objection of a single member. now republican senator ran paul so that he could not support the bill because it didn't include legislation that would allow the inspector general to oversee how the money was actually spent in ukraine. similar to what the united states h

senator warner's question, which is that we are at, u.s. t, are very aware of the dynamics, the debate around this particular provision in u. s. law. and we will continue to follow it closely as we conduct our trade conversations. >> very, very good. obviously, we will work with you. but my interest over here is very much connected to trade space. and that is that 230 is all about the innovators. it is all about the risk takers. the big guys, they never have to worry. they can monetize any claims, and it's always about the people with the big, new ideas, what is striking is a lot of these platforms, when they were small, my goodness, they thought that 230 was the greatest thing since night baseball was invented. but as they got big and powerful, they pulled out the most to try to hold down the little guys, the innovators. we'll have that conversation in the future. thank you, senator barrasso? >> thank you so much, chairman, ambassador, nice to see you again. thank you for your service and taking time to meet with us today. >> when we last met to discuss president biden's trade agenda, i raised concerns about a number of issues. it