well, it's all the more funny and heartbreaking that the director stood up for vladislav surkov, in particular. s- we can even look. you see, this photo is wonderful , and let me remind you that vladyslav surkov is one of the well, how is he called the architect of the war in donbas, in these anti-ukrainian moments of propaganda, the word novorossia is also rumored to belong to him where is the book printed, his letters and broken mail? well, actually kirill serebrennikov himself is being published now because he was friends with surkov and even staged a play based on his work. let's listen to how kirill himself explains it, and one of the best performances and this is a performance about how power destroys a human being as it used to kill a human soul, and here is a very dark spectrum. he came out, he enjoyed great success. pay attention to the fact that he is saying this to the french , a foreign audience that very often does not understand the elementary things that we understand and see. that is why we definitely need to say the same thing to refute such savagery, because the french simply

maybe you even know that such a curator is vladislav surkov. he directly managed the pushylina. this is a very interesting story. she has it is very long, such a long period of its existence, but still what we see now is the operation, which is called a special operation, a so-called special operation in the russian federation, what they call it, and it is directly controlled by the russian federation, what took part in it and some elements from the fsb well, this is not correct at all, and what is happening now is primarily the victory of the russian federation over the fsb, but it should be noted that the russian federation is a structure that uses soviet methods, and that is why all of their projects that they implement are foreseen in this first of all , they are quite primitive, if in the future the russian federation will completely manage the direction of hostilities in ukraine , well, this is very good, what does this mean that the armed forces of ukraine will soon achieve victory, that is, to the borders of 1991. and one more thing the last question, the belarusian mili

he said so before the war, before this there was a full-scale war , there was an article by vladislav surkovharacter where he spoke about the fact that if russia does not expand, then it will fall apart. that is, it is such an export of chaos, as he called it. and this is the form in which it can exist. that is, it can only exist by seizing foreign lands, because if it does not do this, if it tolerates the fiasco in this entropy is this entropy, this mess, it will turn inside russia, that is, russian ideologues themselves openly talk about it, and because of that , of course, the defeat of russia in ukraine will mean big problems inside russia itself, russians they know how in a world where small states are very successful, for example, like switzerland and belgium, how can the ideology of expansion remain attractive, why expand if you can be successful on such a patch of land somewhere in the mountains, well , this is an old imperial tradition, the tradition of the so-called continental empires that developed from at the end of the 19th century, at the beginning of the 20th century, the ide