dressler.r electric car cost you $10 to fill up and will continue for the future because as the cheapest form of energy through anything california and europe have highest electricity cost when they built the most renewable energy infrastructure. >> good question. you have to look at the time of when people built out there of the structure. if you look at the lazar plot i0 shows 10 years ago solar was the most expensive in today's solar so least expensive power. germany but a lot of power and that will drive up the cost could we should thank germany. they are spending a lot of money so now it's the cheapest power. that's what energy are doing, the building l solar. so it's. i know people don't like to hear that. it was a popular podcast recently and you can imagine how many people e-mail me about that. we are going through andll enery rose -- revolution. you can't have a recent debate about that. you don't know the revolution we are going through right now. >> i'm going to try to say somethingm

ten specific distortions andrew dressler engaged in. the net 0 movement is based on distortions about denying fossil fuel benefits and denying climate mastery and when you look objectively at the full context it is obvious the world needs vastly more energy, most needs to come from fossil fuels in the next several decades tension that 0, a limited and fossil fuels rapidly is a death sentence for billions of people and should be morally condemned as an evil idea based on falsehoods and that is what i tried to explain. >> as i sit at the beginning i will say again, we need power, no one doubts that. the question is what is the power source, that is the best powers was forced to use? a lot of people have done analyses and shown that we can significantly eliminate our fossil fuel use which i don't think there's any analysis alex can point to that says that. he said a lot of things that are simply not correct. a lot of facts that are just wrong. i'm happy to engage with anybody all the evidence hall the people who are experts in this suggest

so by the way you were referred to as sldessler and dressler. just to be clearyou are dessler . you said your electric car cost you $10 to fill up and will continue to do so in the future becauseof renewables are the e cheapest form of energy . why do california have such higher electricity prices when they both builtthe most renewable infrastructure ? >> you have to look at the time of when people don't count their infrastructure. if you look at that, the lazar plot it shows 10 years ago solar was the most expensive power and today solar is the least expensive power so germany built a lot of power when it was expensive so that's going to drive up the cost. we should thank germany because they're spending a lot of money on it to help drive the price down so now . it's the cheapest power. that's what texas energy producers are built doing, their building solar . 100gigawatts in the next few years it's cheap and i know people don't like to hear that . i was on probably a podcast recently and you can't imagine how many people email me about that but we're going through an energy re

before we or you start deliberating i wanted to address mister dressler's assertion that this projectis not properly before you. i didn't catch the specific law that he is citing but he's suggesting there was some modification to the plan and this project and the plans were not available to the public 72 hours in advance when in fact the project and case report and plans were all published and made available to the public one week in advance by thursday and there have been no changes to those plans today. so i'm not sure what his assertion is but having said that there we have had in practice many times where plans and projects to change at the last minute before you. i have asked the city attorney's office to look into this matter but i am of the opinion that even in that case projects are properly before you because the overwhelming project has been advertised as available to the public and lightermodifications to that do not make it improperly in front of you . so anyway. >> i think mister driver was suggesting these were amended plans and these are not amended plans that we have t

. >> my name is jonathan dressler local 713.m in support of the affordable homes now initiative andin opposition of supervisor chan's measure. thank you . >> next caller please. >> i'm in the borough of drywall 96 eight. we currently have around 460 members on the ready to work list. i stand in support of the affordable homes now initiative and in opposition to supervisor tends better. thank you. >> can we have our next caller? >> speaker: hello supervisors. i am a resident of the city of district 10. i'min support of san francisco building trades council offered for standing . trained construction workers which i am one and very proud of it. i've been given the opportunity to provide for my family. thank you. >> we have oneperson in chambers who is here for public testimony so i'll go back in chambers for a minute . >> kim money san francisco labor council. i wanted to say the current charter amendment before you is completely in line with thesan francisco housing our workers . in terms of affordability. as you all are aware we