. >> reporter: according to former new jersey boy scout john humphrey, that trouble started in 1972 justout master abused him. >> i was abused over a period of three years. probably well over 200 times by my scout master, who was also my assistant principal, my band leader, my soccer coach. and had unfettered access to me. so i stuffed it away in a place, and i never talked to anybody about it. >> reporter: a painful secret he says he kept to himself until 2017. >> it changes your life. when you come out. i mean, it's cost me a job, income. the difficulty to maintain employment. either because you get some domineering boss and you just want to tell them to jump in the lake, or you can't stay focused. >> reporter: now john is sharing his story in the harrowing new documentary on hulu, "leave no trace: a hidden history of the boy scouts." >> parents gave the boy scouts the most valuable thing they had, their children. >> reporter: shining a light on survivors of sexual abuse and a century-long scandal inside the boy scouts of america, the organization concealing there were pedophiles in th

other side of it, i think that the federal reserve has looked at the situation, remember john durham, pow stating humphrey hawkins testimony saying no one consulted me as to whether or not we should do these. i did it. that's a very interesting point. it leads to what i was going to say next, because short term for certain maybe be on the the financial functions appear to have bach fired dramatically for western economies, the u. s. dollar in particular. so where are those measures adequately calculated? always at rushed through, get some headlines, get, get some barking from from other allies on this. oh, i think that this was a shock and awe campaign that they made the mistake of thinking that russia is organized the same way that the us in europe is which is that the oligarchs control the governments. and so if you sanction the oligarchs and you take their money away from them, the delta and the politicians, and they stop this and you know, overthrow potent. i mean, i think the, the, the rhetoric coming out of both europe and the united states, certainly from new york on march, the conflict lindsey gra

john kennedy. same with humphrey, who was -- he lost to nixon by 400,000 popular votes.ldn't he have loved to say, i really won the election, give the presidency to me? the same thing even more with al gore in the year 2000. we are seeing something that never happened before in history. above and beyond that, have we ever seen a president try to wage a coup to overturn an election he lost? never. i hope we never see it again. the other thing you were asking was about ginni thomas being called. yes, we have not seen the -- we didn't see the spouse of earl warren called by a congressional committee. that was because she did not send a lot of texts to the executive branch, white house chief of staff and others in the middle of a coup against democracy. >> if we look at this special coverage here that we are in, michael beschloss, as a primer to the hearing we are about to see in 15 minutes on the left side of your screen, that's a live look. it's filling up. we will take you there live in a second. michael, the electoral count act is central to the legal maneuvering around

humphrey's cafÉs offices, outside -- watergate. to understand the motive of this event and this day, you need to understand the whole conundrum of what johndean caught the -- called this the white house horrors, and what he was afraid that would be revealed if watergate was investigated. one the white house chorus was some of the same guys who broke into the watergate, broke into a psychiatrist office to try to discredit an administration enemy. i need to thank you guys for having me here. i want to acknowledge one of my guest my uncle and aunt who have their anniversary today. [applause] and i told them i have just the thing. i watergate panel. [laughter] it's so romantic. and, seriously he was of certain generation he said that it sounds like a great way to spend my anniversary. i think what that speaks to is for people who came of age, watching these things unfold in watching the investigation unfold, watergate itself was a moment of high citizenship, high engagement, something that was profound and meaningful. we talk about one of the consequences of watergate, as people losing trust in institutions and government. my argument is that