on missing persons and also appeal to the european court of human rights at the same time oleksandra matviychuktates that such complaints will be accepted there only until september 16, as long as the court has jurisdiction about the russian federation more and in a wider context about crimes against civilians committed in the occupied territories , we talk with human rights defender olena lunyova olena first of all, in the legal field, how do you qualify similar cases of kidnapping and illegal deprivation of liberty of civilians during the war? greetings, first of all, we are talking about war crimes, because according to the rome statute of the international criminal court, they are such, and about enforced disappearances and forced deportations, this is exactly what we are talking about about war crimes, that is why there is a very clear qualification of what is happening in the occupied territories, what the russian army is doing to ukrainian civilians, what is known to your center from of human rights, about similar cases of abduction and illegal kidnapping of civilians in the occupied ter

well, oleksandr matviychuk the human rights defender is getting back in touch with us, so mrs. oleksandrainue, but according to the question that was raised, the parliament justified the removal of mr. ludmila demisova with the efficiency of her work, unfortunately , the parliament completely forgot what is wrong, not as important as the issue of efficiency, the independence of the work of the commissioner and that is why the appointment of an authorized person and the dismissal of an authorized person are protected by the procedure, it simply does not happen even during a war, even if someone has justified and unfounded claims to it efficiency of work, because it is not about the candidacy, not about specific personnel. and with the institute, and that is why human rights organizations say that this is a false decision that confirms the independence of the institute of the commissioner. well, i would like us to talk about more important news, in particular, besides what we have e-e was suspended the e-e commissioner for human rights issues, we still have a new commissioner for issues of

pavlichenko, good evening, good evening, well, the head of the center for civil liberties , oleksandra matviychukn ukraine, it says that since the dismissal of p. denisova, this institute has ceased to be independent, because now any boatswain can be dismissed due to lack of confidence can you explain what are the risks associated with this? this is an absolutely correct statement and it actually indicates that to date there is no institute of the authorized representative of the verkhovna rada. in fact , he is appointed by the bank or appointed by the verkhovna rada. well, let's say this. e-e representative of the verkhovna rada who will be a watcher or something , why e-e it will be exclusively e-representative dependent on the authorities because he has e-e risk and e-e in fact a constant threat of being removed due to any of his activities inaction or expression eh, which will contradict the position of those who appointed him and you appointed him, and accordingly, the main characteristic of the office of the commissioner and the authority of the institute for the protection of human rights