who gets a man to settle down? and you might think of these if anyone watches old movies sort of rock hudson and doris day movies being good examples. of those kinds of films so individuals were supposed to be rooting their identities in home and family this particular type of modern nuclear family in the 50s, but that family was also absolutely essential to the sense of what it meant to be an american in the 1950s because in this time in this era parenting family life your home was your civic duty in many ways. that mothers and fathers were supposed to be creating future patriotic generations that would extend the american way of life. and having a family that operated correctly would prevent people from going. ray from the various things that that americans at the time thought the nation stood for right? and we can see this connection. to american nationalism in these very famous debates that happen in 1959 called the kitchen debates. so in 1959. vice president richard nixon traveled to the soviet union for the a

who were who were invested in a kind of economic analysis of american problems, but who weren't tied to big business who weren't tied to political legacies who weren't didn't owe anybody any favors who they were looking for teachers and coaches and librarians and normal people who could they were talking about repealing like repealing and replacing congress and so ocasio-cortez had kim had canvased for the bernie sanders sanders campaign in 2016 and her brother nominated her. when random congress was looking for community leaders. to run for congress and she was like the quote is you know, okay effort like whatever she said like, okay. i'll try this again not auspicious moment. not a moment that like like resonated with you know. future potential it was just like her brother called her up on the phone and said do you want to run for congress? and she said, okay and he he nominated her and yes, so there was this i mean in retrospect you can use the word machine, but it wasn't really a machine. it was a bunch of people who worked for bernie who believed in bernie's principles who wante

i think that there are a lot of ukrainians who, well, not what they have oncology yes and who has seenth oncology who are in a serious condition and what pain these people feel, that is, i think that every ukrainian who has seen it will agree to allow anything to make life easier for these people who are forced to suffer from cancer pricks, but these drugs are lighter and also relieve pain, other alkaloids absolutely and this is not 21st century somehow at all well, for me, now i think it is strange to discuss the fact that people need some drugs but they cannot get them, this is the first the question, well, you know. imagine that tomorrow you come to the pharmacy there to buy coal, and the pharmacist tells you well, i apologize, of course, but from today it is prohibited . well, excuse me, i'm thinking of something else, well, you understand , in fact, here's to you, in fact, how will the specialist now be a question if we talk about the fact that it is necessary to help patients, that these are the interests of millions of people in the first place, then perhaps it will be more logi

well, zelensky zelensky talks about, uh, who's next who's next so, who doesn't drink?es, that's who the next one of you will be. i think that it is always necessary to clearly formulate and radicalize those things that are clear and close to every person. here is what we are experiencing now, yes, that is, we clearly understand what we need, we need it so that ukraine does not threaten us. and it is necessary that here is a regime that actually became toxic for us in the first place. for once citizens of this country. yes, that is, who is now sincerely trying to destroy us and was going to destroy was going to roll us. that is, to avoid this threat, that is, everything is very simple and clear, that is, russia also does not want to have such a toxi. an education that sold its territory abruptly, for which it sold its citizens. that is, he throws them into the furnace and pays with them for some kind of gingerbread that goes personally to zelensky personally to this elite that is there. this is all clear. that is. and who's next? yes, probably the one who will threaten

these are not people who are out in the modern sense. these are people who are private. you have employers who are now trying to figure out whether they are gay. these purges, that are from the federal government all the way that down begin in 1950 and continued to be standard practice long after mccarthy lost his public authority. so when we get to that story, mccarthy's story is brief, he leads a mass movement and then he falls from grace. this is within a few years. this is not the case with this outcome of this lavender scare. these practices last well into the 70s. because really, in this era, questions of sexuality and gender merge with loyalty in this profound way and make queer people an enemy of the state in this and many other instances in the united states in the 1950s. so, the other group i want to talk about who are violating the rules and rules of the 1950s are unwed mothers. so, besides homosexuality, non marital childbearing was treated as the most profound violation of the ideals of the era. all unwed mothers were punished in this era and in the decades

ukraine and er central ukraine those who could have accepted already accepted those who could have beenut already there are quite a lot of orphanages who left abroad who were already there three months ago, if there is no great need, there is a need to save those who remained in the occupied territories, unfortunately, we have such institutions and people quite often sit here without a salary again, the government needs to make a decision on how to compensate them for their wages, it is clear that the occupation authorities intimidate these people, there are cases when these people are transported, it is clear that we have no control there, but the situation is quite complicated the temporarily occupied territory was evacuated. yes, no, they were not evacuated, they could be taken out where they could be taken out, they had to be taken out, again, there were no green corridors, again , i don’t want to complain now, because we all know, let’s assume those regions where quite quickly uh, they were occupied, and of course it was very difficult for the authorities to organize an evacuation,

person is he, who is he?excerpts from some fellow writers at the event who wrote about zelenskyi well, they followed the traditional path and the reference point of their biography is february 24, 2022, when zelenskyi announces that the war has begun. well, there are certain excursions that follow, it is interesting in some polish publishing houses where my book was published on june 1, zelenskyi outside the scenario is also a reference to my book zelenskyi without make-up, er, because i read same p- these links and hmm, they argue and draw certain conclusions already referring to my book in poland until the end of the season of this book, five more books about zelenskyi should be published before the new year, because the poles also want to know who zelenskyi is, and this book book is simple, it can only be explained by demand, i wonder if they are or these books well, maybe you already have reviews of people who have read these books, there are a lot of readers who write and i, and i. now i continue, why di

those who know me, those who i know. my friends know those friends grid do you understand this huge brotherhoods a very big thing, so once again i am very grateful to everyone and we continue to work, connect, there is a lot of work, the war is not over . period or some let's say differences in the volume of approaches, are the solutions worked out in the 14th year now being able to be implemented now, or are there any peculiarities compared to the 14th year, the volumes have increased tenfold because well, we are seeing a full-scale invasion and people the consolidated volumes have become so large. well, compared to the fourteenth year, it is much more, because then there was no experience, no, there were no such well-established channel connections, and we now have the support of almost the whole world , so now there are, well, much more, but there is such a trend that now it has quieted down a bit again. yes, you see, the hostilities in our country have moved more to the east, to the kharkiv direction, there to the kherson region. and there are people who do not feel hostilities for them. fo

and what what who do you think is this is who do you think is the david axelrod of joe bid? oh your parents. this is honestly uncanny we were having a conversation in the car like three hours ago about like what happened to the celebrity strategist right? like the date who came out of the 2020 election the cheap 10 cent cigars. they're just gone but like who came out of 2020 as like the architect right? like the sort of bush's brain character of the biden campaign. i think some of that's about covid right? i think that like it was just not as visible the dramas and the ups and downs of the campaign. we're just not as visible. i think part of it it speaks to the like really close-knit and to be euphemistic about it a very long tenured inner circle around joe biden, right? these are mostly people who have been but i would say one thing about this there really was someone who could have claimed a lot of that. that was mike donelan who is basically a recluse. i think there are a couple people in the biden or i mean mike donelan for sure a jan o'malley dillon, right like the peop

who told you what? who leaned on you where? an audience with the president of the united states? >> why does perry know that clark is susceptible to this idea? >> exactly. again, at doj, remember, when you were a prosecutor in the department of justice, you are vetted to an extent even your credit cards are vetted. >> david, if merrick garland did pursue charges against the former president, would that make the former president more -- would that serve the former president's interests, you think? >> yeah, i think, look -- yeah, i believe so. the president would go out and say, look, i am being persecuted for my beliefs here. if you're not going to convict the president, which you're not going to end up doing, it will make him a thousand times stronger. i don't think the attorney general will bring judges. i've heard mention on this network many times they might indict lots of people around him, leave him as an un-indicted co-conspiracy. i that's probably more powerful. >> except in georgia. >> just one question on laura's point

yes, i know it's based on who's in the white house, who the leaders are.e american citizens have a responsibility to select their white leaders. and they gotta pay attention to the facts. facts are important. leadership matters. >> then, to that enlightenment you talked about, retired general, russell honorÉ, says now, he's convinced that trump directed, helped orchestrate, and motivated the attack on the capitol. is he right? >> i think he is right, not because he said it, or anybody else said it. but based on the facts. based on what the january 6th committee has already provided. the american people, and there are more hearings. so the facts speak for themselves, especially when you look at many of the witnesses, who are trump cabinet members, white house officials in the trump administration, supporters of mr. trump. i mean, that's pretty devastating, and pretty clear, from the trump people themselves, what's happened on that day. and who was responsible for maneuvering that into violence that led up to it, and who really engaged it, and manipulated mr

you head for cubans who had bay of pigs and cia backgrounds, who had done all types of nefarious things. you had gordon lady liddy and howard hunt who never saw a fund destined, new various scheme that they wouldn't follow, no matter how, how doomed to failure it was. and then you had the trio from the white house, chuck olson, john ehrlichman, bob haldimand, who would make you the hay stand up on the back of your deck when you heard them testifying. the third reason that i think watergate was so successful was there was good staff work. -- let's give credit to sam dash. his daughters are here. let's give credit to sam. [applause] sam new, some knew how to tell a story. and that's what he did. the summer of 1973 watergate was the best sober on television. oh it was -- television, as the new york times said. one day, 60 million people heard john dean talk about a cancer growing on the presidency. the fourth reason that i think watergate was so successful, and reverse has already mentioned this, was that it was done in a way where partisanship was secondary. it was a legitimate effort to

senator roy blunt our hero who i'm going to introduce first architect of the capitol brett blanton who oversaw the restoration and oversees the capital and distinguished historian ron white. so now you know, what's going to happen. let me present to you our first speaker. senator roy blunt built on his background as a public service servant a university president and history teacher. and the people of missouri elected him the united states senator in 2010. he shares the senate republican policy committee. he's the ranking member of the senate rules committee. he's on the senate appropriations committee the ranking member of the appropriate and if that's not enough, he's also on the senate commerce committee the transportation science and transportation and the senate select committee on intelligence. so we're lucky that he's here with us for a hot minute. and we want to be thankful to the people of southwest missouri who overwhelmingly elected now our senator, but first to the house of representatives seven times. when roy blunt went to the house of representatives he was the elected m

tamara about a japanese architect who has to develop a plan for the reconstruction of irpen and irpen will become a dream city for urban planners like how to treat such changes because it's obvious it entails certain, well, certain visual let's say shifts, well, we heard literally yesterday about this proposal, in general, it would be very good if a lot of architects, not just one famous one, came to our city, but i, er, have certain caveats, it is necessary to consult with places how people see the development of their city, because people who come to us from abroad very often meet such guests, we escort them through the streets. although they are destroyed, they feel the spirit of our city, we would not like to leave this spirit uhu, and i hope that everyone will consult with the places, how they lived here and how they plan to live here in the future, uh, definitely everyone returns to irpen and everyone wants to live here, friends, and i felt great, in fact, before the large-scale invasion of oleg. smile, i see a short reflection, see, i will explain why do you need the involvemen

who said that there are ukrainians who fight for russian-speaking ukraine ? ukrainians who speak russian came, they did not fight. oh, we want to fight for, in the event of victory, it will be the russian language, the russian language for putin, how will he win, or have they all expelled the russians for a moment, the russians are followed by ukrainian-speaking ukrainians who fight for ukraine, they can have different images, the state exists for that democracy that after that in the parliamentary and presidential elections, people decided on what image of the state would be built, the majority voted for their chosen one there for the position of president, they voted for parliamentary elections, by the way, i really hope that we will follow the path of a parliamentary republic, that this is a normal democratic path from the european ones, from a parliamentary presidential republic to a republic, the president of which will be elected within the walls of the verkhovna rada . the post-war period, and it is not immediately. and after that, there is a harmony t

yes, and who are they ?they think that we do not, well, we do not say that, you know everything, when it is just official communication from the ukrainian side , for example, they do not even believe our numbers when we announce the number of dead russians in them but what was obvious from the case with this journalist was that russia doesn’t care if it’s homoconvoys or if it’s the press, they just take it and destroy it, that is, there are no decrees for them. that is, they are war criminals and this it was very often heard in connection with the death of frederik, yes, a journalist or a fm that russia is committing war crimes very easily, what should our rhetoric be, so let's not leave these crimes unpunished, or putin is under the illusion that the more he does what the more this monster does more new horrors, the more they fear him and the less he is punished, it shouldn't be like this, that's why our lawyers are super, they work with international groups, that 's how they document war crimes, send lawsu

the people who see them who are around them. those are the people who can stop this. we can't law enforcement a million law enforcement agents agents in the united states officers and agents and chair deputies in the federal state local tribal law enforcement agencies. law enforcements the last one to know peers teachers family members friends and neighbors. that's who has to get this message. that's why i wrote the book. that's why i do the podcast because if you listen to the details of it you'll begin to hear. oh i can see that i can hear that and you recognize so the other factor that i want to tell you about this in addition to this trajectory towards violence is that somewhere between depending on how the how far we look at the research 35 to 40 percent of these shooters. have the same characteristics the same behaviors. of people who commit suicide because their intent is to commit suicide. so when you think about i should maybe talk to the police or i should call an anonymous tip line about my neighbor because i'm not really certain remember that. 35 to 40% of

who is going to be a barrier to someone who is trying to access the clinic.nd do want to do the sort of events, even if there are protesters who are protesting abortion as head of a clinic, please take it somewhere else unless the clinic invited you to come. clinics are trying as hard as possible to get as many people through safely. this is a very scary time for patients who are coming into clinics. even though abortion is illegal, we have seen in the past that in states where abortion bans have passed, this might not be in effect yet. we still think that people might. they are in fact coming to an eclectic what they think is an illegal abortion being wrong about the long. they are coming because they are desperate. they are doing whatever they can to make it easy as possible for them. >> that is great counsel. sarah, you are stepping down after 20 years of planned parenthood in the central states. what does this moment mean to you that after 20 years of fighting and advocating on behalf of women's health, that the supreme court ruled down. how are you feeli

been who's been there for five decades and who broke into baseball 75 years old. why does jackie robinson joe? why does he continue the resume? bill, i am having problems with i hope can you see me now? can you hear me now? you're right. okay, thank you. i was ready to press the panic button. jackie robinson is a man for all seasons. and i want to thank you and and peter. for being the giants which i stand to to make my my pitch for jackie robinson, i would like to point out that my introduction to the new book was largely derived from bill rodens work and peter golombach's work. so i am honored to be in their company. they are true giants and the giant in dodger uniform is jackie robinson. he is unquestionably the most transformative athlete of the 20th century. he was a four-letter man. a uniquely at ucla and ironically baseball was probably his weakest sport. football being his best. nevertheless because of the barriers racial barriers deeply embedded in american culture. jackie was unable to join major league baseball until he was a very old rookie at 27 playi

who attacked, and who attacked?ericans say , the built sent. yes, they are on the laws, and the rule is that they can be hit on the head with everyone, and you can’t answer anyone. this is the main rule, what is it for? uh, it ends now. today we probably still have some economic aspects of the law, so we decided. i see him always. today in this tv studio i am political, by the way, not like that, i am accused of wanting to build some kind of tartar. draghi said we the west would be a seven, we are already avtarki in this world and we want to become even more ovtarki. we do not want to depend on russia for the energy resource of gold, where diamonds and everything else are developing further. we need not want to take ours, but at the prices they think is right. no , well, this is one business, options. no. there are direct speeches there, that we cannot depend on russia. therefore, the democratic emirates means arab countries, russia, uh, trying to get out of this car, who supposedly is, supposedly, there it doesn't

nita mcbride and nancy keegan smith who's some of you know, who was at the national archives for many years. and the second chapter of our book we the first chapter we look at this whole notion of the evolution of the position including when the title came into play, but our second chapter is on first ladies and civil rights. and we put that at the front of the book because we wanted to once again show this arc of history through the women who were the first lady and so you start with martha washington who brought in slave servants to the homes in both, new york and philadelphia and in philadelphia, they were doing it pretty much they had to skirt the law if they had kept their enslaved servants there for more than six months. they were free. so they would send them back to mount vernon. and so there was this back and forth in order to evade this law. we had 10 families in the white house historical association because michelle obama brought that to their attention looked at slavery in the white house. so 10 different families had brought in slave servants and part of the reason some

(music) who said you have to starve yourself to lose weight? who said you can't do dinner? said only this is good? and this is bad? i'm doing it my way. meet plenity. an fda -cleared clinically proven weight management aid for adults with a bmi of 25-40 when combined with diet and exercise. plenity is not a drug - it's made from naturally derived building blocks and helps you feel fuller and eat less. it is a prescription only treatment and is not for pregnant women or people allergic to its ingredients. talk to your doctor or visit myplenity.com to learn more. to help prevent bleeding gums, try saying hello gumwash with parodontax active gum health. it kills 99% of plaque bacteria and forms an antibacterial shield. try parodontax active gum health mouthwash. so... i know you and george were struggling with the possibility of having to move. how's that going? we found a way to make bathing safer with a kohler walk-in bath. a kohler walk-in bath provides a secure, spa-like bathing experience in the comfort of your own home. a kohler walk-in bath has one of the lowest step-in

or changing who gets to actually choose who the electors are.ers that are making decisions about how to actually mess up the count. that's the danger. the coup is not going to be a physical coup. it's going to be done, quietly, in the boardroom's, and in the county rooms. that's what we have to be afraid of. >> do you think these hearings can set the table for preventing that? >> it's -- we can't. no matter what, and as cynical as we all may be in this country, i think we do have a common vein that we love democracy. >> yes. >> we understand that we are all united in that blood that runs through all of us. that we may not agree. i was not happy when republicans won in the past. but you know what, legitimately time to move on. i hope republicans -- and i think most of them -- and actually i think still a lot of republicans still believe that. we have to get back to that period. by exposing what happened, by exposing all the people involved, from the smallest person to the highest person, you understand that there is a danger here. also, more impo

that's the end of story. >> who's the person who delivered it to your office?>> and i also just asked him moments ago whether or not he would try to find out the identity of the person behind this. he indicated no interest in doing that. i also asked him, jake, just moments ago about why not -- why exactly offer something to the vice president without vetting this information. he went on to say, we got handed an envelope that was supposed to go to the vice president. i didn't know -- i didn't know about it, so we just called up the vice president and offered it. he claimed it came from a house office initially, but he also said he didn't know who, which house office provided it. so a lot more questions than answers after my interaction multiple times with ron johnson tonight. also, jake, andy biggs, the conservative congressman from arizona, it was revealed today that he tried to pressure the state house speaker, rusty bowers, to decertify the electoral results from arizona. he declined to comment when asked multiple times on capitol hill, but one person did de

but it is important to also remember that these republicans who are testifying at this hearing -- whois going to testify but republican members of the trump administration who pushed back against this? quite frankly, i have stripped away whatever political affiliations people might have, not thinking about democrats or republicans. i'm thinking about americans who are coming forward, testifying under oath, before the american people about what happened in the days leading up to january 6th and on january 6th. and in the last few days, we have seen people who, behind the scenes, unbeknownst to us but now we are getting the details -- who were holding the line. people can criticize them for not coming forward in realtime. but to hear the stories in detail, from the people who were involved, using their own language about what happened in those rooms is, like, the little bit of solace i get in just understanding how close we came to losing everything and how it was individual americans who stood in the breach and said no to a president of the united states. and i think that the other hea

coco cagauff who between us -- who beat selena williams.ropped the first set, before winning in three. laura: the man with the best assignment there, reporting from wimbledon. you can find much more on all of the day's news at our website, just to see what we are working on at any time. check us out on twitter. i am laura evelyan. thank you for watching "bbc world news america." ♪ narrator: funding for this presentation of this program is provided by... narrator: financial services firm, raymond james. narrator: funding was also provided by, the freeman foundation. by judy and peter blum kovler foundation; pursuing solutions for america's neglected needs. and by contributions to this pbs station from viewers like you. thank you. ♪ ♪ narrator: you're watching pbs. ♪ da-da-da-duh-da-da-da♪ ♪ da-da-da-da-da-da ♪♪ judy: good evening. i'm judy woodruff. on the "newshour" tonight -- >> it was un-american. we were watching the capitol building get defaced over a lie. judy: a key witness, a top aide to former president trump's chief of staff testif

i think hearing from people who are kind of government function nares who are not in washington, who are not in glamorous jobs, who are just doing their duty, trying to do their part, do their jobs, if there is hope for the committee that there are people who are persuadable, who are not set in their defense of the former president, i think maybe that will be where they find it. >> you know, we're talking about this from the federal level. but there is a state case going on in georgia right now as we speak. a grand jury is looking at some of this evidence as well. how might this play? it's going to be spilled out into the public sphere now. >> yeah. there's parallel proceedings here. we know that as the committee's having its hearings, the fulton county has a grand jury going. and brad raffensperger, who we'll hear tomorrow, has testified. and gabriel sterling, the second witness, has testified. and that hall olivia talked about is so key. i listened to it. we've all heard that snippet, i need you to find -- it's 62 minutes long. olivia's right. when you listen to it, it is alarming.

who is the one manned, who found most respect, and feared as leader of the united energies of this free nation? i think the people of america know the answer, and a bewildered and divide people sought linking one century ago, we now seek eisenhower. from every heart and horizon, from women and youth from farms and factories, even from democrats, who placed the principle of our authority to all of the people of america, it's under grows a century that is part of the new threat of slavery. that's a challenge for statesman, soldiers, mr. america, [inaudible]

is now and pollenke bondarenko who is the first year who is not meeting me because he i also sing for our ukraine quietly i love you, a friend of the deer, she is big, cheerful, i want you to behave small, new, small , you people are looking for what to do, what i have, galya is looking for water, oh , and our concert is coming to an end, and if i missed the dedication, who -anybody my love convey to us that my love always lives only when i can share it and i want to thank you for the heroism that no matter what and more you are not hell even if you show the world an example thank you to everyone who fights for my life to show me where should i stand in what country thank you very much sincerely thank you sincerely sincerely thank you life teaches me there is us there will be i sincerely who is the accordion thank you let's buy spires work wait aunty you are falling like a man in fact it is hard to believe that we live well me and me i want you are my distant mount vera, thank you for me, rejoice in heaven, collect novels, chew people, also lightnings, oh lety , take care, thank you f

and, part of that includes supporting folks who are re-entering society who want a second chance. i can't even list the number of people that i grew up with who paid their debt to society and some others that paid somebody else's debt to society and they would come home looking for help. and maybe their mom or their grandma was displaced from the place they grew up in. and they were rejected time and time again for employment opportunities to make a decent living to be able to have money to pay rent. and so, what happens is -- what happens when everyone is slamming the door in your face. what happens when everyone is telling you no. what happens is when you're trying to figure out where you're going to sleep. that's why this is so important. it's important for people to have dignity. the for people to have a foundation. for people to truly get the second chance that they deserve in life and to have stable housing at the center of all that. but also what steve has created is more than just housing and abstinence based programs. who uplift 1 another and in turn, all of the folks who

that's who gave us this extremist supreme court, who overturned roe v. wade today. but i have news for them, lawrence, come november, we have leaders up and down on the ballot on the democratic ticket, that are willing to stand up for the freedoms of all georgians. and i'm excited to have someone like stacey abrams, and raphael warnock on the ballot to vote for, to stand up for our rights and our freedoms as georgians. >> the senate race is crucial, because if senator warnock's not reelected, that then republicans could have the majority in the senate, and they could use that majority to pass a complete national abortion ban. >> lawrence, this is the same body, the same republican u. s. senate members who won't even affirm our right to vote in this country but they're willing to do an all out, federal ban on abortion. that's what we are up against. so, if you are sitting here wondering, if this impacted you, if this affects you, it does. if you care about environmental rights, if you care about reproductive freedom, reproductive rights, then you need to join us in t

let's also remember, to those who want to criticize the committee, to those who want to criticize the media, who say that there was -- the election was stolen, all these people have to be wrong. all these judges who threw out, you know, all this purported evidence of fraud, they have to be in on the conspiracy and so do these trump loyalists who said, no, we're not doing that, because there is no evidence of what you're suggesting. it is simply without merit. listen to them. put all the other politics aside. listen to them. i think that's the power in what we heard yesterday. >> that's what liz cheney underscored, the end of the hearing. she said to trump voters, right, i would make a distinction between trump voters and hard core trump supporters, trump voters deceived by him, misled and, if you look at the way, you know, let's step aside from the legal ramifications here, one audience is the department of justice, but another -- the audience for liz cheney is the american people, specifically republicans, and we learned in the 2020 election there were many of them who pulled the lev

to have friends who are diverse have friends who are black or of different ethnicity or who don't look and think like them who are who, you know, aren't in the same social circles as they are. i find that happens a lot more so in white communities. community so it's not symmetrical. no, right and i just want to add to that i think even today because you talked about your experience in the 60s and 70s. when black people tend to surround themselves with black people. often for self-protection when white people choose to surround themselves, but it's often for status right to protect status or just because it's time difference. it's just because of comfort and it's a certain degree. it's that way for black people. but also when i was growing up in the sixties and seventies, i write about it in the book. this was a wb du bois society that lived in in my neighborhood park vista. we moved from a black neighborhood. that wasn't you know the upper middle class to a neighborhood. that was the upper middle class and this neighborhood called park vista where all of the my neighbors were southern

do you mean by the citizens of russia, and who do you mean

monarchies who were deposed.'s proving very supportive in thailand of the militaryjunta there that seized powerfrom a democracy. i mean, just an observation from you, perhaps on the uses and abuses of monarchy internationally. having a monarch is no guarantee of either the good or the evil of a monarch, the monarchy. you do have thailand, where they're in support of a military dictatorship. 0n the other hand, although he was an embarrassment a few years ago, the king in spain, juan carlos, actually helped transition that country to democracy from fascism, and so there have been examples of good kings and queens and bad kings and queens. and sometimes it's the same person. correct! but as sometimes it's the same person. but they are not elected and there is no way to get rid of them unless it is a bloody revolution or some other kind of mechanism that few countries have managed to actually successfully do in a bloodless way. so you cannot get rid of these kings and queens very easily, and i think that's what we're

who paid for them to come to washington? who paid for their signs? are they getting some kind of stipend for being there? they show up at all of these things, on buses, they fly into washington, who is paying for all of that? is it george -- , is other left-wingers of a type who support these district attorneys around the country that offer lower no bail, they let criminals out of prison and never sudden there in the first place? there's a lot of questions that need to be ask. this is when i met earlier. i get back to the idea of the other side, where people cross examine some of thes

so as someone who has experienced that, someone who knows, someone who has been this, had my own issuesn it comes to a domestic abuser. we can't stop fighting. one way is to keep talking about it. we put in it people's face and make sure people know this disparity exists and this is about saving lives. >> cori bush, i appreciate your time. thank you. >>> coming up, the protests continue around the country including new york city which you see there. the supreme court ruled on another case yesterday having to do with new york state and the right to carry a concealed gun. it too is expected to ripple across the country. next we will discuss this and the overturning of roe v. wade. ♪ it's a lovely day today ♪ ♪ so whatever you've got to do ♪ ♪ you've got a lovely day to do it in, that's true ♪ [ chuckling ] ♪ and i hope whatever you've got to do ♪ ♪ is something that... ♪ [ music stops ] [ beeping ] cars built with safety in mind, even for those guys. the volkswagen atlas with standard front assist. ♪ ♪ a monster was attacking but the team remained calm. because with miro, they could probl

for you to say to those people who lost their homes and who were forced to go nowhere, to those mothers who had to get into overcrowded cars and leave for the unknown. someone can say that with all his heart, first of all, i want to say that i am very sorry that such a terrible story happened to you in the upper life, but perhaps i should say that there is nothing scarier when you are not alive in the soul of a person . poroshenko lives, who is still a stranger to other people, if only they had something like that, a material house, there is nothing better than this, they don’t have a house, there is nothing around it, but the death of another person stings, and i have legs, we are friends, i know for sure that this is terrible the war is a challenge to their personal life, and i know for sure that i can. you are now one of my friends who, er, how much power we can have, er, that we will fight. we are now with you and we will do everything so that none of these people who meet us and - and fate will enlighten us and that we we will never leave these people as long as you can, how many o

the men who aid and abet and not responsible -- it was seven men who decided roe v. wade. roe v. for the sexual recklessness of men. it allows them not to be held responsible in the same way we require child support. i think we should have a requirement for when they impregnant a woman. if you look at the reasons why women get abortions, many of them say because they feel abandoned by their men. i think this is an important cultural moment where we're going to reset the conversation, where we're going to say, men, you need to be part of this. we're not going to allow seven men in robes to dictate something that is a lower case d democrat process. and that's the beauty of what's happening with this ruling, it was an honest conversation about life and whether abortion is legal, safe, and rare in this country. right now, it's not. >> the fire bombing and things have happened on both sides of this argument. we know abortion clinics have also been attacked over the years. i do want to bring something up that you said. you said that this is not rare. but the numbers have gone down acco

who was it who took a bunch of

who's the baby roe? and we still continue to see what impacts and long term social economic circumstances that you know kind of lead people to get abortions from those perspectives. i think one thing that was really striking. i was talking to joshua before we came up here is that you know, these women aren't alone. we can also see how the social constraints. and the abortion debate shapes and impacts negatively often individuals lives such as curtis boyd milford faye johnson, you know, i found these stories revealing as much as norma's and how we cannot just always assume or frame this debate about the termination of pregnancy itself. it does have other impacts. in addition, you know no matter what side of the abortion debate you land on this book provides you a perspective on the personal lives social constraints and historical events without making any moral judgments, and i think that's critical. joshua's writing allows us to empathize with all the cast of the players that are involved with this issue

people who were parents, who left behind children printed people who should be alive today. reports from the scene detailed shooter carrying two guns. an ar style semi automatic rifle bought just yesterday. carrying those two guns through the medical building before the shootings began. hospital personnel were unable to do anything through the open carry law before the shooter began his rampage. while we don't know the details, the republicans in their never-ending pursuit to increase the number of guns on our streets and in our schools past was in oklahoma so that no permit is needed to purchase a firearm from a private individual. no waiting time is needed and no firearm registration is required in the state. in oklahoma, anyone over the age of anyone can openly carry a firearm including an ar 15 without a license or registration. weapons that can cause mass devastation are subject to less commonsense safety measures than cars or motorcycles. the children of uvalde our all of our children. the parents in buffalo and oklahoma are all of our parents. this is our responsibili

and so, clearly, r so manpeople, there are people who are alive today who were raised by, who knew, who were in community with, who loved people who were born into intergenerational chattel bondage. and so this history that we tell ourselves was a long time ago wasn't in fact that long ago at all. and part of what so many activists and grassroots public histoans and organizers ross this country recognize is that if we don't fully understand and account for this history, that actually wasn't that long ago, that in the scope of human history was only just yesterday, then we won't fully understand our contemporary landscape of inequality today. we won't understand how slavery shaped the political, economic and social infrastructure of this country. and when you have a more acute understandg of how slavery shaped the infrastructure of this country, then you're able to more effectively look around yo and see how the reason one community looks one way and another community lookanother way is not because of the people in those communities, but is because of what has been done to those communit

navarro, who didn't provide evidence to the congressional committee.ny people are clamoring for, which is to actually bring some sort of action against higher ups at the white house, where the very least they stood by and did nothing for 181 minutes. at the most, they probably did more. that may be the justice department waiting for these congressional hearings to take place. there's multiple different explanations of what could be coming out. but they are two different -- as you say. >> neal katyal, think you very much for joining our discussion tonight. >> thank you. >> thank you. up next, trump election lawyers are running for secretary of state in 17 states. michigan secretary of state, jocelyn benson is running for reelection against one of those trump election lawyers. never in history has more been at stake in what were the previously low visibility state campaigns for secretary of state. michigan secretary of state, jocelyn benson, will join us next. next or... his nose. if you have copd, ask your doctor about breztri. breztri gives me better b

in great britain and i contrast that with nathan hale who's who was hung as a spy? and he said i only regret that but one life to give to my country, but william lloyd's words are not recorded. so what they said before they hung him as they said that's very funny. it's a great argument, but you availed yourself of the protection of the crown all of your life and you owe responsibilities and they hung them. so if if we don't have responsibilities, it's very difficult for us to understand what our rights are. right because if we say i can do whatever the heck i want. oh, but you can't. right. what? what is my right? what's my responsibility? in my responsibility to pull the kid out of a burning building. the maybe yeah right with every should come or responsibility. sure. yeah. but but when you teach when you give you here's what i think is going to turn the tide to the extent that i hope that they don't do something really interesting in october is that the people are going to say gas prices? yeah, but more than that. you cannot have my kids. you can't have my grandc

who's 200th birthday? we celebrate this evening, but first general i want to say just what an honor it is be part of this birthday celebration and how privileged i feel to share the stage with ron white and in general portrays, and i have to tell you general much as i admire you this is as grand his life does not in my my move to a hip-hop beat. in any event is hamilton moment will be without having to play. i think you know to go back to what frank's guturo was saying that i wrote this book because i wanted to explain to a new generation readers. why the ulysses s. grant monument was the largest muslim in north america why it was actually the single greatest tourist attraction in new york city for a long time and why the people of that era of venerated grant regard it was born wonder he was considered to be part of this holy trinity of american greats that included george washington and abraham lincoln and i think that at this moment of racial reckoning that going through i think they were actually in a p