and this will help with the chairman of the arbitration arbitration court of moscow, the chairman of ouncil of the moscow city duma committee on legislation, alexei kravtsov, everything to you i'll see you in court. we watch to explore the world of educational programs and documentaries, we watch for free without registration. watch today a special edition of the program 60 minutes, all the latest news about the situation in ukraine and in the world. we go live right after the news. don't miss 60 minutes today at 11:30 and 17:30 on the russia channel getting to your destination doesn't mean you can relax. why booking a hotel via the internet is still a lottery one and the same pool. it is absolutely different from our chic pools with turquoise waters tease tourists with their suspicious accessibility. nikolai has not been at the computer for the first time, but so far he has not decided to make a reservation, although the internet is his letters. it complicates the offer with meso-tempting and, accordingly, low prices and, accordingly, some kind of a feeling of anxiety creeps in, othe

and this will help with chairman of the arbitration arbitration court of moscow chairman of the expertmittee on legislation alexei kravtsov. all the best. i'll see you in court. we are watching the cancellation culture triumph in the west, and with it the art of substitution. true, they are declared lies from fakes presented as facts, but we call a spade a spade every evening. do not miss the evening with vladimir solovyov today at 21:20 on the channel russia no longer goes under water with sand engineers have found a way to save the maldives from floods. if anyone is interested, they came up with a floating city that will keep the indian ocean archipelago from disappearing due to climate change, the sea level is constantly rising by about 3-4 mm per year at this rate. it will be impossible to live in the maldives in the fiftieth year, so the government turned to a company from the netherlands with dutch engineers proposed an unusual project. according to the idea, thousands of residential buildings will float on a flexible functional network across the mogu, but with an area of ​​​​20

ourselves must make an absolutely necessary decision, and you correctly said about arbitration courts and arbitrationhat's not what we saw. he, when the us clicks and immediately ran there, the baltic states, poland , something else. well listen here is the us quotes. well these are their satellites, this is an example. it's not many votes. this is one voice that works against us, they don't care about any human rights. this is well understood. by the way, you see, here are the shots of how i show all these fascists at the azov base and here is what i show, what kind of fascists they are. here is a copy of the german map of the forty-first year. here's what i'm showing. vaughn, which answer is no. russia wants to rewrite the history of the russian federation turns the holocaust upside down. well , what a reversal of everything. clear. clearly. obviously. understandably. no. we want to listen to you, we want to listen only to ourselves. well, we'll make them. well, it's understandable, the situation. and in fact, it has already worked in many ways. uh, uh, we looked at those textbooks that, for exampl

arbitration? do you require that the plaintiff shows prejudice? lots of lower courts had required that. the supreme court said, unanimously, we are not going to adopt that kind of rule that requires prejudice, a special arbitration rule. the methodology that justice kagan managed to get all the justices to sign off to was more significant. it rejects the idea that this special policy favoring arbitration that had animated so many of the courts's cases in this area, that policy is any kind of basis to allow what she calls special rules favoring arbitration. instead, arbitration agreements are supposed to be treated just like any other contract. and are enforceable to the same extent, but not more so. this decision i think is going to be deployed in lots of litigation. it represents quite a shift to say that the court, although it had adopted many special rules, is no longer going to tolerate that kind of policy-based justification. the final case i will briefly mention is a case called viking river cruises versus mariana. here, the court seems to stick to the more typical pattern from past cases. justice alito wrote an opinion concluding that california's private attorney general act was preemptive, to the extent that it had special joinder rules. that were inconsistent with the way the court understands bilateral arbitration. but, the case was quite limited and did not go as far as em

arbitration? do you require that the plaintiff shows prejudice? lots of lower courts had required that. the supreme court said, unanimously, we are not going to adopt that kind of rule that requires prejudice, a special arbitration rule. the methodology that justice kagan managed to get all the justices to sign off to was more significant. it rejects the idea that this special policy favoring arbitration that had animated so many of the courts's cases in this area, that policy is any kind of basis to allow what she calls special rules favoring arbitration. instead, arbitration agreements are supposed to be treated just like any other contract. and are enforceable to the same extent, but not more so. this decision i think is going to be deployed in lots of litigation. it represents quite a shift to say that the court, although it had adopted many special rules, is no longer going to tolerate that kind of policy-based justification. the final case i will briefly mention is a case called viking river cruises versus mariana. here, the court seems to stick to the more typical pattern from past cases. justice alito wrote an opinion concluding that california's private attorney general act was preemptive, to the extent that it had special joinder rules. that were inconsistent with the way the court understands bilateral arbitration. but, the case was quite limited and did not go as far as em

favoring arbitration, that animated so many of the courts cases in this area, that that policy is any kind of basis to allow what you call special rules favoring arbitration. instead, arbitration agreements are supposed to be treated just like any other contract. and are enforceable to the same extent, but not more so. this decision is going to be, i, think deployed in lots of litigation because that is quite -- it represents quite a shift to say that the court, although it had adopted so many special rules favoring arbitration, is no longer going to tolerate the kind of policy based justification. and then the final case, i will just briefly mention, was brooklyn refer versus mary anna, the court seemed to stick to the more typical pattern for past cases. justice alito rhoden appeared in concluding that california's private attorney general act was preempted to the extent that it had special joined our rules that were inconsistent with the way the court understands bilateral arbitration. but the case was quite limited. it didn't go as far as employers might have wanted and justice barrett wrote separately to say that the only reason this was preempted is because the public at