mr. lawson, i inform the house that mr. lawson will vote yes on h.r. 8296. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mrs. wagner and mr. taylor, those members will vote no. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from rhode island seek recognition? mr. cicilline: as the member designated by ms. sewell and mse yes on h.r. 8296. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from tennessee recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. comer of kentucky, he will vote no on h.r. 8296. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by congress members barragan, kahele's, swalwell bass will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from alabama seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. fallon and mr. jackson, i inform the house that both mr. fall op and mr. jackson will be voting no on h.r. 8296. the speaker pro tempore: for wh

mr. lawson, they vote yes on suspensions. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. foflter and ms. -- foster and ms. houlahan, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on the suspensions en bloc. the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 365 and the nays are 57. 2/3 of those voting having responded in the affirmative, the rules are suspended, the bills are passed and, without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid on the table. without objection, the title of h.r. 1286 is amended. pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the unfinished business is the vote on the motion of the gentleman from california, mr. huffman, to suspend the rules and pass senate 144. on which the yeas and nays are ordered. the clerk will report the title. the clerk: senate 144. al an act to authorize the secretary of health and human services acting through the director of the indian health service to acquire private land to facilitate access to the

mr. lawson of florida, mr. bran of maryland, wilson of florida and mr. mfume of maryland, they vote no on en bloc 1 h.r. 9294. >> mr. gohmert of texas, i inform the house that they will vote nay on en bloc number 1. the chair: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new hampshire seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. pingree of and ms. meng, i inform the house that these members will vote no on amendments en bloc number 1. the chair: for what purpose does the gentleman from florida seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. salazar of florida, i inform the house that ms. salazar will vote yea on en bloc number 1. the chair: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from minnesota seek recognition? >> mr. chairman, as the member designated by mrs. walorski of indiana, i inform the house that mrs. walorski will vote yea on en bloc number 1. thank you. the chair: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. correa: mr. speaker, as the member designated by congress members barraga

mr. lawson, you are now recognized? mr. lawson: good afternoon to everyone. i would like to welcome all of the panel. this has been a great discussion. my question is going to be, senate for the whole town, what i heard this morning is very interesting about what we are saying. the first question, restrict the type of investors who can gain access to private invest in opportunity, including venture capitals. the requirements for a credit investor -- investor must have particular high income, a whole wealth of at least $1 million. only around 10% of the household in the u.s. to meet this threshold, how do we balance the -- four investors risking. >> thanks a lot for that question. when we think about getting everyone involved, i do strongly believe that the balance -- we need to have the right disclosures to make sure folks know what they are getting themselves to. then risk-management investments are strictly risky. making sure we have those and clear about the kind of investment and the vehicles. this will be more helpful. limit certain things like credit ch

mr. lawson, you are now recognized? mr. lawson: good afternoon to everyone. i would like to welcome all of the panel. this has been a great discussion. my question is going to be, senate for the whole town, what i heard this morning is very interesting about what we are saying. the first question, restrict the type of investors who can gain access to private invest in opportunity, including venture capitals. the requirements for a credit investor -- investor must have particular high income, a whole wealth of at least $1 million. only around 10% of the household in the u.s. to meet this threshold, how do we balance the -- four investors risking. >> thanks a lot for that question. when we think about getting everyone involved, i do strongly believe that the balance -- we need to have the right disclosures to make sure folks know what they are getting themselves to. then risk-management investments are strictly risky. making sure we have those and clear about the kind of investment and the vehicles. this will be more helpful. limit certain things like credit ch

mr. lawson, he votes yes on h.r. 8294. the chair: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. takano: mr. speaker -- mr. chairman, as the member designated by representatives -- chairwoman maxine waters and michael san nicolas, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on amendments en bloc number 7. the chair: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? mr. keller: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. smucker from pennsylvania, i inform the house that mr. smucker will vote yes on amendments en bloc number 7. the chair: for what purpose does the gentleman from florida seek recognition? >> mr. chairman, as the member designated by mr. gallego, i inform the house that mr. gallego will vote yea on amendments en bloc number 7. the chair: for what purpose does the gentleman from georgia seek recognition? mr. bishop: mr. chair, as the member designated by mr. bennie thompson of mississippi, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. thompson will v

mr. lawson, for five minutes with questions,. welcome >> mr. lawson, you are recognized. >> good afternoon everyone i like to welcome all of the panels of this event of discussions. my question is going to be, a question for the whole panel. but i've heard this morning, y'all are very interested in where we stand. first question i have is that the federal security regulations to restrict the type of investors that can gain access to private investment opportunity, including certain pension capitalists. investments. according to which, it requires requirements from accredited investor, it much staff particularly high income, hold wealth of at least 1 million dollars beyond value of your primaries events. only around 10% of the household in the u.s. meet threshold. how do we balance the need to protect the prospect of low income investors to make investments with a high bar to enter the space? this is for the whole panel. >> i have to go first, thanks for the question, congressman lawson. when we think about getting everyone involved, i do strongl

mr. lawson, mr. deutch, miss rice and mrs. maloney, i inform the house that these members will vote nay on the motion to recommit. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. rice of south carolina, mr. katko and mr. rice and katko will vote yea on the motion to recommit. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. babin of texas, i inform the house that mr. babin will vote yea on the motion to recommit. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does gentlelady oklahoma seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. gonzales of texas and mr. hern of oklahoma, i inform the house that they will vote aye on the motion to recommit. >> as the member designated by mr. wilson, i inform the house that mr. wilson will be voting yea on the motion to recommit. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from utah seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the

it is a really good drug and i recommend my friends who are of an advanced age figured me mr. lawson can i just quick eyes quickly ask you. there's a risk of severe illness, depend on which variance the president has, which of course hasn't been confirmed yet. no problem, you know, we don't know the answer to that i'm, but the answer is probably not. you know, clearly he has one of the sub variance, obama crohn. and we know that those are the variance are highly infectious, much more infectious than the original one virus, and even more infectious than the on a chron variant, the original one. but we don't know if it's, you know, how serious a disease it causes. we think that it's probably either approximately the same kind of a disease or perhaps even milder, but we don't actually have the answer to that. well, thank you very much for explaining a little bit lower lawrence cost. do appreciate taking the time to join us here on the news out from georgetown university. i appreciate it. thanks. we want to go to developments and shoreline canal security forces of re did the main anti go

mr. lawson, i inform the house that mr. lawson will vote no on the motion to recommit.he speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from alabama seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. jackson of texas and mr. fallon of texas, they will both will be voting no on the motion to recommit. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from nebraska seek recognition? >> as the member designated by p mr. stauber and mrs. hartzler, both will vote yes on the motion to recommit. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the -- for what purpose does the gentleman from alabama seek recognition? >> madam speaker, let me try that again. as the member designated by mr. fallon and mr. jackson of texas, i inform the house that mr. jackson and mr. fallon will be voting yes on the motion to recommit. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from oklahoma seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. learn of oklahoma, i inform the house that mr. hern will vote aye on the motion to recomm

mr. lawson, mr. deutch, miss rice and mrs. maloney, i inform the house that these members will vote nay on the motion to recommit. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. rice of south carolina,

johnny lawson law is john mr. santos, who was covered. former president ordered a doctors war on drugs, grammar worker. we have a situation sure where you have authorities who essentially falsified evidence to potentially hide guilt. can't people realistically expect justice when it's so qualities themselves who are involved parish right now. i think that justice is going to be very difficult and we talk about justice, you know, in the sense of accountability and bringing those people responsible to a card that can be really difficult. right now. number one, we have president marcos junior and deter does daughter sarah dirt as vice president. they're seen very much as continuous t candidates and continue to legislators. so we see them as continuing the policies of the deterred administration, including the war on drugs. second to that, there have been pronouncements by the philippine national police and also the law enforcement authorities saying that they are very happy with how the war on drugs was carried out under the deterred administration. and they have asked president marcos ju

mr. lawson of florida, mr. brown of maryland, ms. wilson of florida, and mr. mfume of maryland, i inform the house that they will vote yes on house resolution 1232. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania rise? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. smucker of pennsylvania, i inform the house that mr. smucker will vote no on h.res. 1232. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california rise? mr. correa: madam speaker, as the member designated by congress members barragan, kahele, leger fernandez, and castro, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on h.res. 1232. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from florida rise? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by ms. salazar of florida, i inform the house that ms. salazar will vote nay on the rule. the speaker pro tempore: thank you. for what purpose does the gentlewoman from ohio rise? mrs. beatty: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. troy, i inform the house that the member will vote ye

mr. lawson is recognized for five minutes. >> thank you, madam chair, i would like to welcome everyone to the committee. one of the things that i was thinking about here, back in, i think it was 1972, when i was trying to get a house for the very first time, i -- so, i went to fha i. but i noticed today that have ha is disproportionately, the way that people of color sometimes gone borrow money for housing, haven't had a competitive disadvantage in the housing market. the afferent changers mortgages, i have found now to about 18%, it looks like basically in 2020 and to 2021, continued the downward trend toward a lower level, i would say, up until about 2012. if the trend of home purchases continues like we projected, how would sellers be encouraged to conduct business when the cash values can, incentives sizing offers above the asking price? this is to the whole panel. >> this is pope, thank you so much for that question. you, know sellers, you're right, they can take offers firm cash buyers, we can't steer them. as really state practitioners, we can educate your homeowners, your sellers

mr. speaker, the following members, i've been designated by the following members that will vote yes on h.r. 1130. lawson of florida, bowman of new york, brown of maryland, rush of illinois, cherfilus-mccormick of florida and wilson of florida. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. smucker of pennsylvania, and mr. jacobs of new york, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on h.res. 1130. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from illinois seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. veasey of texas and mrs. demings of florida, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on h.res. 1130. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from minnesota seek recognition? >> thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated by mrs. walorski from indiana, i inform the house that mrs. walorski will vote yea on h.r. 1130. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? >> as the member designated b

lawson i inform the house that these members will vote yes on h.r. 8373. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia seek riggs in -- recognition? mrbeyer: as the member designated by m ms. barragan, m. newman, ms. moore, mr. evans of pennsylvania, mr. boyle of pennsylvania, and mr. keeght of massachusetts fowtion that these six members will vote yes on h.r. 8373. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from colorado seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by miss cherks -- ms. porter , mr. bowman, i inform the house that these four members will vote yes on h.r. 8373. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from minnesota seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. bergman i inform the house that mr. bergman from the great state of michigan will vote no. the speaker pro tempore: on this vote, the yeas are -- the speaker pro tempore: on this vote, the yeas are 228, the nays are 195 and two are answering present. the bill is passed and without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid on the table. the speaker pro tempore: the chair lays before t