yeah, that was quite the conversation geo politics unless victor gow again believes ordinary british people will be deprived of free and open communication under the proposal. i think this is again, a typical example of double standards they want to pick and choose. and then they want to a claim itself as the champion of freedom of oppressed freedom of expression on the white hands. on the other hand, they want to really eliminate those information which is against the information presented by the u. k. government of the official areas of the great britain. now this is dangerous because eventually who will suffer? it will be the people in the united kingdom because they will be deprived of sources of information. sometimes it may be different from the positions taken by the u. k. government. but whether the u. k. couple of pollution is absolutely or only tools, nothing by the true position. it's doubtful and it has always been doubtful throughout the ages. and i think the people need to have the right to get access to information. and it will be impossible to really completely brack

we spoke with china, for example, is victor gow, who believes by sending arms to tie one washington is escalating tensions and the u . s. sales. obama just serves the only purpose of feeling the tape is more. i think the u. s. strategic ambiguity is really misleading the american people. it's misleading its allies to the west. it's misleading everyone else in the world. the united states has no legal right to interfere in the taiwan affairs or to become an obstacle to the national renew vacation of china. i think the united states is doing is getting involved in a civil war. i'm finished in 1949. we want to prevent the resurrection of civil war, but whatever the united states is, 3 is adding fuel to the fire and the may really cost the resurrection of civil war will be a disaster in the cross street relations. saudi arabia doesn't have the capacity to boost its oil production beyond $13000000.00 borrows per day. that's according to the countries crown prince. the united men came after jo biden's visit this week. the u. s. president was hoping to persuade the kingdom to off it's i put c

we spoke with china, for example, is victor gow, who believes by sending arms to taiwan, the u. s. is escalating tensions and the u. s. sales of vom just serves the only purpose of fueling the pages more. i think the u. s. strategic ambiguity is really misleading the american people. it's misleading it's allies in the west. it's misleading everyone else in the world. the united states has no legal right to interfere in the taiwan affairs, all to become an obstacle to the national renew vacation of china. i think what the united states is doing is getting involved in a civil war. i'll finish the 1949. we want to prevent the resurrection of that civil war, but whatever the united states is, duty is adding fuel to the fire and may, it may really cause the resurrection of last civil war. that will be a disaster in the cross straight relations. but while the u. s is promising more weapons to taiwan, a huge flow of western arms and financial support continues to pour in to ukraine. now questions are increasingly being put forward if that's leading to weapons smuggling in europe. the ear,