epstein, maxwell, no rico there. i wonder why? >> tucker: yeah. it's kind of weird. they grab some of alex text, that he's the real criminal, not jeffrey epstein, right? the second they got his text, you know everything, every embarrassing thing he ever said will be in the "new york times," but they're affirmative protecting jeffrey epstein, not even alive anymore. it's one of the weirdest things i've ever seen. >> it's been going on since the "vanity fair" article back in 2002, the puff piece on jeffrey epstein back then. maria farmer outed this guy in 1995, 1996, nobody followed up on it, pursued him the way they should have, and it was happening under the nose of the fdny, who loves to get on their ivory tower and preach down to the rest of us on a regular basis how bad we live our lives. meanwhile, he was running around in their district, for four presidencies, hanging out at the white house, and nobody cares what's going on until the survivors themselves decide to take the case to the people, and we see what's happened since then. there's been an avalanche effect. they've had to react